論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
女性軍官領導行為與權力基礎之實證研究-以服役於艦艇之女軍官為例 A Practical Study on Commanding Behavior and Power Bases of Female Naval Officers-Samples taken from female officers serving on warships of the R.O.C Navy |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
92 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2001-06-29 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2001-08-15 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
權力基礎、女性軍官、交易型領導、轉化型領導 Female officers, transformational leaderhsip, transactional leadership, power bases |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5667 次,被下載 7120 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5667 times, has been downloaded 7120 times. |
中文摘要 |
女性軍官領導行為與權力基礎之實證研究 ―以服役於艦艇之女軍官為例― 論文摘要 近幾年來由於教育的普及和傳統觀念逐漸式微,女性受教育的程度日漸提升,連帶使得婦女就業的機會大增。國防部門為社會中的一環,志願役軍官均來自民間,過去以男性為主要成員的軍事院校,近年來招募面臨了相當大的壓力。民國八十三年陸軍官校、海軍官校、國防管理學院、中正理工學院首度招收正期女生,女性已成為國軍幹部的重要來源之一。 有鑑於政治、社會與科技問題日趨多元且日益複雜,領導的藝術實有繼續研究的必要。細究領導的本質是源於影響力,亦即廣義的「權力」。本研究以Bass在1985年所提出交易型與轉換型領導理論,及French & Raven在1959年對權力基礎所作的分類,來探討服役於艦艇之女性兵科軍官的領導行為與權力基礎。期望能透過理論的脈絡與驗証,使女性軍官對自身的領導統御與權力的運用有所了解,進而形成獨特的風格。 本研究採縱斷性設計,在女性兵科軍官擔任幹部的第一年及第二年即作實證調查,其重要發現如下:(1)在轉化型與交易型領導之各構面上,女性軍官與男性軍官無顯著差異,其領導型態是橫跨兩種型式,較偏向轉化型領導。(2)在權力基礎的運用上,女性軍官與男性軍官雖無顯著差異,但女性軍官偏向使用參照權與專家權。(3)女性軍官的領導行為與使用的權力基礎呈正相關。 關鍵字:轉化型領導、交易型領導、權力基礎、女性軍官 |
Abstract |
A Practical Study on Commanding Behavior and Power Bases of Female Naval Officers—Samples taken from female officers serving on warships of the R.O.C. Navy Abstract In recent years, due to the popularity of education and the variation of traditional concepts, employment opportunities are wide open to women. In other words, it has become the main stream to welcome “woman power” into all walks of life. There is no exception for the Ministry of National Defense (MND). In the past, professional officers were all males. Military academies admitted only male students. A few years ago, the MND, adjusting to the world trend, made major academies open to female students in order to cultivate female officers who would be serving in the military. In 1994, for the first time, the following academies admitted female students: the Military Academy, the Naval Academy, the National Management College and the Chung-cheng College of Science & Engineering. Now, female officers have been an important part of the military personnel. Since modern politics, society and technology have become more and more complicated, how to successfully lead is a branch of art and science. The commanding modes of female military officers have formed a newly-rising research field and need to be studied continuously. The essence of leadership is derived from influence, which means “power” in the broad sense. This study is based on two theories. One is the theory of transformational leadership and transactional leadership advocated by Bass in 1985. The other is the power bases advocated by French & Raven in 1959. This study is focusing on the commanding behavior and power bases of female naval officers serving on warships. Through the study with logical analyses and practical experiments, it is hoped that female Naval officers can clearly understand how they practise their leadership and power. Furthermore, the study can help them establish their own successful and unique commanding styles. Questionnaires and interviews were done with female officers who had been serving in the Navy for one or two years. There are three important points found as follows: (1) Regarding the factors of the transformational leadership and transactional leadership, no significant difference is shown between male and female Naval officers. Officers of both sexes use both types of leadership although female officers have a slight preference for transformational leadership. (2) In practising power bases, officers of both sexes are almost the same although female officers have a little tendency to use reference power and expert power. (3) The relation between commanding behavior and power bases of female naval officers is significantly positive. Key words: transformational leaderhsip & transactional leadership, power bases, Female officers |
目次 Table of Contents |
目 錄 頁次 第一章 緒 論......................1 第一節 研究動機....................1 第二節 研究流程....................3 第二章 文獻探討.....................4 第一節 領導理論之回顧與相關研究............4 第二節 權力基礎的意義及相關研究............19 第三章 研究方法.....................29 第一節 研究架構....................29 第二節 研究對象與操作性定義..............30 第三節 分析工具與研究假設...............33 第四節 研究限制....................38 第四章 分析結果.....................39 第一節 因素分析....................39 第二節 描述性統計、差異分析..............45 第五章 結論與建議....................54 第一節 結論......................54 第二節 建議......................57 第三節 對後續研究的建議................59 第六章 參考文獻.....................60 附錄一 問卷.......................72 附錄二 訪談原始資料 |
參考文獻 References |
陸、參考文獻 中文部份 王保進,視窗版 SPSS與行為科學研究,民89,台北:心理出版社。 朴英培,工作價值觀、領導型態、工作滿足與組織承諾關係之研究 -以韓國電子業為例,民77,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 余民寧:心理與教育統計學,民84,台北,三民書局。 林清山:心理與教育統計學,民82,台北,東華書局。 林宴夙、徐荷譯,Sally Helgeson原著,柔性優勢―女人的領導風 格,民84,台北:允晨。 林麗冠譯,Judith C. Tingley原著,兩性大和解―與異性成功溝 通秘訣,民85,台北:時報文化。 林維林,轉換型、交易型領導行為與領導效能關係之研究:以台灣 省政府建設廳為個案分析,民86,。私立東海大學公共行政管理 研究所。 姜占魁,行政學,民69,五南圖書出版社。 洪春吉,資訊業、鋼鐵業、紡織業之領導型態與企業文化之比較, 民86,管理學報,14(3),pp.331-358. 洪春吉,台灣地區中、美、日資企業主管之領導行為與權力基礎、 影響策略之實證比較,民88,中山管理評論,第七卷第四期,pp. 1115~1146. 徐凱,老闆是女人,影響他一生?,民84,工商時報周日版二十版。 陳膺宇,如何擴大預備軍官學制之研究,民83,軍事院校教育法 制與行政之研究,台北,國防部。 陳譓森,轉換型領導對警政服務品質之影響研究,民85,國立政 治大學公共行政研究所論文。 陳山譯,Larry R. Donnithorne 原著,西點軍校領導魂。民83, 台北:智庫文化股份有限公司。 夏崇舜譯,美國海軍中的女性官兵,「海軍軍官雙月刊」,民88,第 18卷,第四期。 戚樹誠、黃敏萍,國內大型企業魅力領導與公司規範之關聯性研 究,民84,台大管理論叢,6:2 pp.109-134. 黃麗蓉,組織中的女性領導,民85,人事管理月刊,33:6=388 pp. 19-25. 黃德春譯,Richard K.Beus原著,奇襲戰,民84。台北:國防部史 政編譯局。 黃俊英,企業研究方法,民84,台北:東華書局。 曾柔鶯,企業領導者行為屬性之比較研究,民81,台大管理論叢, 3:1, pp.149-172. 彭懷真,少林向峨嵋拜師―學習女性特質創造成功事業,民84, 管理雜誌第二五0期,頁133~135。 張潤書, “行政學”, 民72,台北:三民書局,頁502。 張美蘭,男女主管性別角色、領導型態與部屬組織承諾、組織公民 行為之相關研究,民84,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 廖國峰,國軍女性軍官工作特性、工作滿足與離職傾向關係之研究 ,民89,國防管理學院學報,第21卷,第一期。 廖思先,轉換型領導、組織承諾與組織公民行為之相關研究:以台 灣公立美術館為例,民88,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。 潘慧玲,梁文蓁,陳宜宣,台灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析: 女性主義的觀點,民89。 蔡申章譯,Capra,F.原著,轉捩點-科學、社會與新興文化,民75, 台北:牛頓。 瞿立鶴,論教育行政的權力,民75,教育資料文摘第18卷第3期, 4-18 英文部份 Alice H.Eagly and Blair T.Johnson,“Gender and Leadership Style: A meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin,September 1990. pp. 233-56 Alice H.Eagly, Steven J, Karau,1991. “ Gender and the Emergence To Leaders: A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, May, pp.685-710. Alice H.Eagly, Steven J, Karau, and Blair T.Johnson, “Gender and Leadership Style among school Principals: A Meta-Analysis, “Educational Administration quarterly: February 1992, pp. 76-102 Amanda Bennett, TheDeath of the Organiz ation Man (New York: William Morrow, 1990), pp.205 Anderson, L. R. 1990, “ Toward a Two-Tack Model of Leadership training:suggestions from Self-Monitoring Theory”, Small Group Research, pp.147-167. Bass, B. M. 1985, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations.New York : Free Press. Bass, B. M. & B.J. Avolio 1994, Improving Organizational Effectiveness . Through Transformaitonal Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications. Bass, Bernard M. 1990, Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership .Research, and Managerial Applications.(Third Ed.), New York; The Free Press. Bass & Avolio, B. J. 1993, Improving organizational Effectiveness through transformational leadership . CA: Sage. Bass, B. M. & Yammarino, F. J. 1988, Leadership: Dispositional and situational . Binghamton: State University of NY, Center for Leadership studies. Bell, D.V.J. 1975, Power, Influence and Authority: an Essay in Political Linguistics New York; Oxford University Press. Bennis, W.G.1959, Leadership theory and administrative behavior: The problem of authority, Administrative Science Quarterly ,4,pp.259-260. Bennis, W.G.and Nanus,B., Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge, Harper & Row, New York,NY,1985. Bierstedt, R. Power and Progress: Essays on Socialogical Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Blanchard, K., & Johnson, S. 1982, The one minute manager. NY: William Morrow. Burns J.M. 1978, Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Chung, K.E. & Meggison, L.C. 1981, Organizational Behavior: Developing Manageriall Skills New York: Harper & Row Publisherrs Inc. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. 1988, Behavioral dimensions of charismatic leadership. In J. A. Conger, R. N. Kanungo and Associates, Charismatic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. David C. McClelland, “The Dynamics of Power and Affiliation Motivation.” In David A. Kolb, Irwin M. Rubin & James M. McIntyre(Eds.) Organizational Psychology : A Book of Readings ,(Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice—Hall , 1971), p.148. “Debate: Ways Men and Women Lead,” Harvard Business Review ,January-February 1991, pp. 150-60. D.Cartwright, “A Field Theoretical Conception of Power. “In D.Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in Social Power, (Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan, Research Center for group Dynamics,Institute for Social Research, 1959a), p.183. D.Cartwright,“Power : A Neglected Variable in Social Psychology.” in D. Cartwright (Ed.) DeMatte, Lori A. 1994, “From Hieratchy to Vnity between Men and Women Managers—Toward an androgynnous Style of Management” , Women in Management Review.Vol.9, No.7,pp.21-28. DiMaggio,Paul J,and Walter W. Powell 1983, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review,48, pp.147-60. Etzioni, A., A Comparative analysis of Complex Organizations ,The Free Press, New York,NY,1975. Fiedler, F.E. 1967, A theory of Leadership effectiveness, New York : Mcgraw-Hill. F. Fiedler, “Personality and Situational Determinants of Leadership Effectiveness.” In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. (New York : Harper & Row, 1968, pp.362. French.W.L., Kast.F.E. & Rosenzweig, J.E. Understanding Human Behavior in Organization. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers,1985. Fromm, E. 1941, Escape from freedom. NY: Farrar & Rinehart. Gibson,J.L.,Ivancevich,J.W.& Donnelly, I.H., Jr(1976) Organiza -tion: Behavior, Structure, Process Texas: Business Publications, Inc. Graham, J. W. 1987, The essence of leadership: fostering follower autonomy, not automatic followership. In J. G. Hunt (eds.),Emerging leadership vistas. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Graen, G. B. Liden, R.C. & Hoel, W. 1982, Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868-872. Gregory H. Dobbins, William S. Long Esther J. dedrick, and Tanya Cheer Clemons, “ The Role of self-Monitoring and gender on Leader Emergence: A Laboratory and Field Study,” Journal of Management, September 1990, pp.609-18. Griffin R. W. & G. Moorhead, Organizational Behavior.( Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986), p.382. Hater, J. J. Bass, B. M. 1988, Supervisors evaluations and subordinates perceptions of transformational and transaction leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695—702. Herlihy. B. & D. Herlihy, “ Improving Principal-Teacher Relationships by Understanding the Concepts of Power.” NASSP Bulletin,69,485(1985):95-102. House R. J. 1977, A theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G.Hunt & L. L. Larson (eds), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Hollander, E. P. 1978, Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. NY: Free Press. Hollander, E. P. 1964, Leadership Groups and Influencd, Oxford University Press, New York, NY,1964. Huntinton, Samuel P. 1956, “Civil Control of the Military: A Theoreticalstatement.” In Heinz, Eulau, J. saumuel and Morris Janowitz . Glencoe, eds. Jane M. Howell and Peter J.Frost, “ A Laboratiory study of Charismatic Leadership,” in Organizational Behavior and Human Dcision Processes,43(1989), pp.243-269. Jacobson,W. D. Power and Interpersonal Relations. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1972), p.6. Political Portrait. NY: The Free Press. Janda,K.F. “Towards the explication of the concept of Leadership In terms of the concept of power.” Human relations,1960, 13,345-363. Janowitz, Morris,1960, “ The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. NY: The Free Press. J. C. Rost, “The Politics of Leadership.” Paper Preesented at 35th Annual Meeting of Educational Administration. (San Marcos,TX: August 1982), p.22. J.Grant,”Woman as Managers; What they Can Offer to Organizations ,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1988. pp.56-63 J.R.P.French,Jr.,and B. Raven, “ The Bases of Social Power,” in D.Cartwright(ed.), Studies in Social Power(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research,1959) pp.150-67. Judith B.Rosener, “Ways Women Lead,” Harvard Business Review: November-December 1990, pp.119-25. pp.120-24. John W. Gardner, “ Leadership and Power. “ NASSP Bulletin, 72(Dcember 1988) : 47. Kahn R. & E. Boulding, Power and Conflict in Organizations. (New York : Basic, 1964), p.4. Kast & R.L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organization. (New York: Wiley & Sons,1966), pp.22. K. N. Wexley & G. A. Yukl, Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology. (Homewood, IL : Irwin, 1984). p.159. Korabilk, Karen, 1990, “Androgyny and Leadership Style.” Journal of Business Ethics, pp.283-292. Kornburg A. & S. D. Perry, “Conceptual Models of Power and Their Applicability to Empirical Research in Politics.” Political Research in Politics.” Political Science. XV, 1966. K.W. Thomas and B.A.Velthouse, “Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An ‘Interpretive’ Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation,” Academy of Management Review, October 1990. pp.666-81. Kuper, Adam & Jessica Kuper ed 1985, The Social Science Encyclopedia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul。pp.54-55. L. L. Cunningham, “Leader and Leadership : 1985 and Beyond.” Phi Delta Kappan 67 (September 1985): 17. McClelland, D. C. “ The dynamics of Power and Affiliation Motivation”. In D.A. Kolb; I. M. Rubin; & J.M. McIntyre (Eds.) Oraznizational Psychology: A Book of Readings, pp.141-161. Englewook Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.,1971. M. Weber, Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1954), p.323. Melamed,T.and Bozionelos, N. 1992, “Gender Differences in the Personality Features of British Managers.” Psychological Rcports, December, pp.979-86. Norusis/Spss Inc.1993. Spss for Windows: Professional Statistics Release 6.0. Chicago,II: Spss Inc. Paul Hersey & Kemeth H. blanchard, Management of Organiza- tional Behavior.(5th ed)(Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice— Hall,1988), pp.202. Peabody, R.L. 1964, Organizational Authority New York: atherton Press: A Division of Prentice-Hall. Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: Fieldbook Strategies And Tools for Building A Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday, 1994), pp.6,78,82,297-347,427,437,448. Popper, M., Landau,O.,and Gluskinos,U., “The Israeli defense Forces”. An example of transformational leadership,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol.13,No.1, 1992, pp.3-8. Popper, M., and Liphshitz, R., “Ask not what your country can do for you . The normative basis of organizational commitment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.41,1992, pp.1-12. Popper, M., “ Comparison of leadership in the IDF and in Business organizations,” in Shenhar, A., and Yarkoni, A.(Eds) ,Management Culture in Israel, in press, 1994. Powell, Gary N. 1988, Women & Men in Managenent. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Powell, Gary N. 1993, Women & Men in Managenent.2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. R.A.Dahl, “ The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science,1957. R.H.Hall, Orgaznizations: structure and Process. (Englewood Cliffs.NJ: Prentice-Hall,1982 Robbins, S. P. 1996, Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall International , Inc. Shamir,B, “ The charismatic relationship: Alternative Explanations and directions,” Leadership Quarterly, Vol.2, 1991, pp.81-104. Salancik, G.R. Calder, B.J. Rowland, K. M. 1975, Leblebici, H. and Conway, M. “Leadership as an Outcome of Social Structure and Process: A Multi-dimensional Analysis” in J.C. Hunt and L. L. Lars(Eds.), Leadership Frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, pp. 81-101. Sally Helgesen, The female Advantage: Women’s ways of Leadership, New York: Doubleday, 1990. Shepherk, L.J.1993, Lifting the veil—The Feminine Face of Science. Boston: Shambhala Publications. Schriesheim, C. A., Hinkin, T.R., & Podsakoff, P. M. 1991, “ Can Ipsative and Single-Item Measures Produce Erroneous Results in Field Studies of French and Raven’s(1950) Five Bases of power ? An Empirical investigation.” Journal of Applied Psychology, February, pp.106-114. Stogdill,R.M.1974,Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature, New York: Free Press. Virginia P. Richmond. Leonard M. Davis, Kitty Saylor, & James C.Mcrossky, “Power Strategies” in Organizations: Communication Techniques and Messages.” Human Communication Research (fall 1984) : 85. V. H.Vroom, and A. G. Jago.1988, The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations(Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall). V. H.Vroom, Work and Motivation(New York: John wiley,1964) Yariv, D., “Integration of senior IDF officers(retired) in The civilian economy and the compatibility of military and Civilian careers,” MA thesis(Hebrew), Tel Aviv University, 1980. Yukl G. 1981, Leadership in Organizations.(Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice—Hall, 1981), p.21. Yukl G. 1994, Leadership in Organizations. 3rd ed, Prentice- Hall International, Inc. Yukl, G. A. 1998, Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River,NJ: Prentice—Hall, Zaleznik, A. 1977, Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 67—80. Zaleznik,A., “The Leadership Gap,” Academy of Management Executive,February 1990,pp.7-22.A critical assessment of the Mystique,subscribed to in business and taught in business Schools,that places a premium on the team over the individual. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |