論文名稱：西方意識型態的瓦解：黃哲倫《蝴蝶君》中多重聲音的出現
頁數：一百零五頁
校所組別：國立中山大學外國語文研究所
畢業名稱及提要別：九十二學年度第二學期碩士學位論文提要
研究生：蘇文祥 指導教授：陳福仁 教授
論文提要

本論文旨在以巴赫汀的時間和空間(chronotope)、嘉年華(carnivalesque)和多意(heteroglossia)來探討黃哲倫的《蝴蝶君》。多數的評論家大都針對加利瑪(Gallimard)和宋莉玲(Song Liling)之間的關係做討論，使得同志議題已成為研究這齣劇的重要指標；但本論文則從巴赫汀的研究方法來討論黃哲倫如何去分析布契尼的《蝴蝶夫人》中帝國主義的意識型態及其對東方的影響。
首章概述《蝴蝶君》的摘要和巴赫汀的三種研究方法，並解解釋巴赫汀的理論與《蝴蝶君》的關連性。第二章重於時間和空間對加利瑪的影響，時間和空間反映出「觀念」的變動性，從加利瑪的牢房到宋莉玲的公寓，每一段的時間和空間都展現出對意識型態的修正。第三章主要探討宋莉玲的變裝和巴赫汀的嘉年華之間的關係，宋莉玲的變裝意在推翻西方政權的唯一性，並且反映出種族平等的概念。第四章則著重在論述一個多元結構的社會，巴赫汀的多意解構西方殖民主義所產生的唯一性和獨特性，此研究方法顯示了社會的多元文化以及保護被壓迫的族群。末章則重申《蝴蝶君》與巴赫汀理論的關聯性，並且探討劇中兩位主角的關係，以及所造成的影響。

ABSTRACT
This thesis focuses on Bakhtinian’s three approaches, chronotope, carnivalesque and heteroglossia in David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly. Since it is released, most critics mainly emphasize on the relationship between Gallimard and Song Liling. Gay issue becomes an underlying theme when readers study this play. Therefore, my thesis, based on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory, will analyze the parodic functions produced by Hwang to oppose to the empirical ideology in Madame Butterfly.
The introduction, Chapter one, begins with a short summary of M. Butterfly and an overview of the theoretical frame of Bakhtin’s theory as well as an explanation of the connection between Bakhtinian approach and M. Butterfly. In Chapter two, I discuss how chronotope, time and space, affects Gallimard. Chronotope represents changing concepts that appear in different situations. From Gallimard’s prison to Song Liling’s apartment, each event is considered a crucial form-shaping ideology. Chapter three chiefly deals with Song Liling’s transvestism and Bakhtin’s carnivalesque. Song Liling, like a carnival clown, turns over the western authority by masquerading her/himself and brings forth the concept of equality of all races. Chapter four aims to manifest a multiple constructed society. Bakhtin’s heteroglossia designates to destroy the unification and centralization that colonialists use to dominate the non-white. Heteroglossia helps reveal the centrifugal discourses saturated in the society to secure the oppressed voice in this play. In the concluding chapter, I reiterate the analysis of M. Butterfly and Bakhtin’s three approaches as well as describe the consequence of western ideology.

Table of Contents




Chapter One:
Introduction……………………………………………………………………..1




Chapter Two:
The Influence of Time and Space On Gallimard………………………………..8




Chapter Three:
Song Liling’s Transvestism and Bakhtin’s Vision of the Carnivalesque……….24




Chapter Four:
Embracing Others: the Heteroglossic Power of Discourses……………………53




Chapter Five:
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………80




Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………101

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Fort Worth: Hardcourt Brace College P, 1993.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poietics. Ed Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
---. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélèn Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.
---. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.
Baudrillard, Jean. “The Ecstasy of Communication.” The Anti-Aethetic. Ed. Hal Foster. Port Townsand: Bay P, 1983.
Bell, Michael Mayerfeld and Michael Gardiner, eds. Bakhtin and The Human Science: No Last Words. London: SAGE P, 1998.
Bernard-Donals, Michael F. Mikhail Bakhtin: Between Phenomenology and Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994.
Brandist, Craig. “Deconstructing the Rationality of Terror: William Blake and Daniil Kharms.” Comparative Literature 49.1 (1997): 59-75.
Bretz, Mary Lee. “Voices of Authority and Linguistic Autonomy in Niebla.” Studies in Twentieth Century Literature 11.2 (1987): 229-38.
Chang, Hsiao Hung. “Cultural/Sexual/Theatrical Ambivalence in M. Butterfly.” Tamkang Review: A Quarterly of Comparative Studies between Chinese and Foreign Literature 23.1-4(1992-3): 735-55.
Cody, Gabrielle. “David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly: Perpetuating the Misogynist Myth.” Theater 20.2 (1989): 24-27.
Davis, Rocio G. “‘Just a Man’: Subverting Stereotypes in David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly.” Critical Mass 6.2 (2000): 59-74.
Deeney, John J. “Of Monkeys and Butterflies: Transformation in M. H. Kingston’s Tripmaster Monkey and D. H. Hwang’s M. Butterfly.” Melus 18.4 (1993): 21-39.
Dentith, Simon. Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Digaetani, John Louis. “M. Butterfly: An Interview with David Henry Hwang.” TDR: The Drama Review: A Journal of Performance Studies 33.3 (1989): 141-53.
Emerson, Caryl. The First hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1997.
Emerson, Caryl, and Michael Holquist, eds. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays: M. M. Bakhtin. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Austin: U of Texas P, 1986.
Eng, David L. “Heterosexuality in the Face of Whiteness: Divided Belief in M. Butterfly.” Racial Castration. London: Duke UP, 2001. 137-165.
---. “In the Shadows of a Diva: Committing Homosexuality in David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly.” Amerasia 20.1 (1994): 93-116.
Garber, Marjorie. “The Occidental Tourist: M. Butterfly and the Scandal of Transvestism” Nationalism and Sexualities. Ed. Andrew Parker, Mary Russo, Doris Sommer, and Patricia Yaeger. New York: Routledge, 1992. 121-46.
Gardiner, Michael. The Dialogics of Critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Goldstein, Philip. The Politics of Literary Theory: An Introduction to Marxist Criticism. Florida: Florida State UP, 1990. 32.
Guzlowski, John. “Isaac Bashevis Singer’s Satan in Goray and Bakhtin’s Vision of the Carnivalesque.” Critique 39.2 (1998): 167-75.
Haedicke, Janet V. “David Henry Hwang’s M.Butterfly: The Eye on the Wing.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Critics 7.1 (1992): 27-44.
Hayman, David. “Toward a Mechanics of Mode: Beyond Bakhtin.” Novel 16.2 (1983): 101-20.
Hirsckop, Ken. “Heteroglossia and Civil Society: Bakhtin’s Public Square and the Politics of Modernity.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 23.1 (1990): 65-75.
Hirschkop, Ken, and David Shepherd, eds. Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1989.
Holland-Toll, Linda J. “Bakhtin’s Carnival Reversed: King’s The Shining as Dark Carnival.” Journal of Popular Culture 33.2 (1999): 131-46.
Holquist, Michale. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Hwang, David Henry. M. Butterfly. New York: Penguin, 1988.
Levecq, Christine. “‘Mighty StrangerThreads in Her Room’: Laughter and Subversive Heteroglossia in Zora Neale Hurston’s Moses, Man of the Mountain.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 36.4 (1994): 436-61.
Lodge, David. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Magistrale, Tony, and Mary Jane Dickerson. “The Language of Time in The Great Gatsby.” College Literature 16.2 (1989): 117-28.
March, Cristie. “ Crsmson Skills and New Potatoes: The Heteroglossic Power of the Object Atwood’s Alias Grace.” Studies in Canadian Literature 22.2 (1997): 66-82.
McCracken, Ellen. “Subculture, Parody, and the Carnivalesque: A Bakhtinian Reading of Mary Helen Ponce’s The Wedding.” Melus 23.1 (1998): 117-39.
Morson, Gary Saul, ed. Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work. Chicago: the U of Chicago P, 1981.
Morson, Gary Saul, and Carly Emerson. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990.
---, eds. Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1989.
Moy, James S. “David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly and Philip Kan Gotanda’s Yankee Dawg You Die: Repositioning Chinese American Marginality on the American Stage.” Theater Journal 42.1 (1990): 48-56.
Pao, Angela. “M. Butterfly by David Henry Hwang” A Resource Guide to Asian American Literature. Ed. Sau-ling Cynthia Wong and Stephen H. Sumida. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2001. 200-08.
---. “The Critic and the Butterfly: Sociocultural Contexts and the Reception of David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly.” Amerasia 18.3 (1992): 1-16.
Pittman, Barbara L. “Cross-Cultural Reading and Generic Transformations: The Chronotope of the Road in Erdrich’s Love Medicine.” American Literature 67.4 (1995): 777-92.
Porter, Laurin. “Bakhtin’s Chronotope: time and Space in A Touch of the Poet and More Stately Mansions.” Modern Drama 34.4 (1991): 369-82.
Remen, Kathryn. “The Theater of Punishment: David Henry Hwang’s M. Butterfly and Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish.” Modern Drama 37.3 (1994): 391-400.
Roth, John K. ed. “David Henry Hwang” American Diversity, American Identity. New York: A Henry Holt Reference Book, 1869. 599-602.
Shimakawa, Karen. “‘Who’s to Say?’: Or, Making Space for Gender and Ethnicity in M. Butterfly.” Theater Journal 45.3 (1993): 349-61.
Shumway, Suzanne Rosenthal. “The Chronotope of the Asylum: Jane Eyre, Feminism, and Bakhtinian theory.” A Dialogue of Voices: Feminist Literary Theory and Bakhtin. Ed. Karen Hohne and Helen Wussow. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. 152-70.
Sims, Robert L. “From Fiction to Factual Narrative: Contemporary Critical Heteroglossia, Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s Journalism and Bigeneric Writing.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 25.1 (1992): 21-60.
Skloot, Robert. “Breaking the Butterfly: The Politics of David Henry Hwang.” Modern Drama 33.1 (1990): 59-66.
Sloboda, Nicholas. “Heteroglossia and Collage: Donal Barthelme’s Snow White.” Mosaic 30.4 (1997): 109-23.
Smith M. W. “Embracing ‘Other’: Dialogism and the Carnivalesque in Nadine Gordimer’s A Sport of Nature.” Critique 39.1 (1997): 41-47.
Stirling, Grant. “Ortonesque/Carnivalesque: The Grotesque Realism of Joe Orton.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 11.2 (1997): 41-63.
Todorove, Tzvetan. Mikhail Bakhtin: the Dialogical Principle. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
William, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977. 101.
Wilson, Robert R. “Play, Transgression and Carnival: Bakhtin and Derrida on Scriptor Ludens.” Mosaic 19.1 (1986): 73-89.