Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0820109-183958 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0820109-183958
論文名稱
Title
資訊部門主管賦權與組織績效之研究
Empowerment of IT Manager and Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
131
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-07-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-08-20
關鍵字
Keywords
轉換型領導風格、資訊部門績效、賦權、人格特質、內控型人格特質、資訊部門主管、組織結構、組織文化
the Big Five Personality Factor, Transformational Leadership Style, IT Department Performance, IT manager, Empowerment, Locus of Control, Organizational Culture, Organizational Structure
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5681 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5681 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
電腦科技與通訊的使用已經改變公司結構,隨著科技日新月異、資訊系統科技的快速發展,企業面臨與日遽增的競爭。資訊在公司扮演的角色日趨重要,資訊部門主管在面對國際化的競爭必須具備足夠的管理與領導能力以解決所面臨的挑戰,提升企業的競爭力。本研究探討資訊部門主管的人格特質、領導風格與主管賦權對資訊部門績效影響之研究,並以組織文化及組織結構作為資訊部門主管特性與資訊部門績效研究之調節因子。
經問卷調查與資料分析的結果,本論文主要的發現如下:
1.高賦權的部門主管確能提高資訊部門的績效。
2.轉換型領導風格的資訊部門主管可以明顯提高資訊部門績效。
3.內控型人格特質的資訊部門主管比外控型資訊部門主管能創造較高的部門績效。
4.組織文化與組織結構在資訊部門主管賦權對資訊部門績效之影響沒有明顯的調節作用。
本研究的發現一方面在理論上支持主管賦權能夠提昇資訊部門的績效,在實務上也能提供企業界在資訊部門用人與管理上的參考。
Abstract
Today, computers and communications have changed the relationship among firms, the structure of some existing companies, the advancement of information technology (IT), and increased competition among enterprises. IT plays an important role in enterprise. IT Managers face global competition, and therefore, must be prepared to respond to abrupt changes. They need to ensure their capabilities and resources are sufficient to cope with the environmental challenges that arise. Therefore, this research will concentrate on investigating the relationships among empowerment, leadership style, personality of IT manager and IT department performance. The moderating effects of organizational culture and organizational structure on the relationship between IT manager characteristics and IT department performance are also considered in the study.
The result shows four major findings. First, empowerment of IT manager has a significant positive effect on IT department performance. Second, the presence of a transformational leadership style of IT manager has positive effects on IT department performance. Third, IT managers classified as Internal LOC have significantly higher departmental performance than IT managers classified as External LOC. Finally, organizational culture and organizational structure were shown to have no moderating effect between empowerment of IT manager and IT department performance.
The findings of this research can serve as a reference for organizations to improve selection of managers with potential for improving department performance.
目次 Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE 1
INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objective 4
1.3 Research Process 5
1.4 Structure of the Research 5
CHAPTER TWO 7
LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Empowerment 7
2.2 Leadership style 12
2.3 Personality Traits 16
2.4 IT Department Performance 18
2.5 Organizational Culture 22
2.6 Organizational Structure 26
CHAPTER THREE 30
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 30
3.1 The Conceptual Model 30
3.2 Construct Measurement 30
3.2.1 Empowerment 31
3.2.2 Leadership Style 32
3.2.3 Personality Traits 33
3.2.4 IT Department Performance 36
3.2.5 Organizational Culture 37
3.2.6 Organizational Structure 38
3.3 Hypotheses 39
3.3.1 Empowerment and IT department Performance 39
3.3.2 Leadership Style and IT department Performance 40
3.3.3 Personality traits and IT department Performance 41
3.3.4 Organizational Culture and IT department Performance 42
3.3.5 Organizational Structure and IT department Performance 44
3.4 Questionnaire Design and Sample 47
3.5 Data Analysis Procedure 48
3.5.1 Descriptive Analysis 48
3.5.2 Purification and Reliability of the Measurement Variables 49
3.5.3 Relationships between Research Variables 49
CHAPTER FOUR 52
DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS AND RELIABILITY TESTS 52
4.1 Descriptive Analysis 52
4.1.1 Response Rates 52
4.1.2 Demographics 53
4.2 Instrument Reliability and Validity Tests 56
4.2.1 Empowerment 56
4.2.2 Leadership style 58
4.2.3 Personality traits – The Big Five 60
4.2.4 Personality traits – Locus of Control 61
4.2.5 IT Department Performance 62
4.2.6 Organizational Culture 65
4.2.7 Organizational Structure 67
4.3 Measurement Results for Relevant Research Variables 69
CHAPTER FIVE 72
RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 72
5.1 The correlation between variables 72
5.1.1 Person Correlation Analysis between Empowerment and IT Department Performance 72
5.1.2 Person Correlation Analysis between Leadership style of IT manager and IT Department Performance 74
5.1.3 Person Correlation Analysis between the Big Five personality of IT manager and IT Department Performance 75
5.1.4 Person Correlation Analysis between LOC of IT manager and IT Department Performance 76
5.1.5 T-test Analysis between LOC personality of IT manager and IT Department Performance 76
5.2 Hypotheses tests 77
5.2.1 Multiple regressions Analysis between leader characteristics and IT Department Performance 77
5.2.2 The Moderating Effect of Organizational Culture on the relationship between Empowerment of IT manager and IT Department Performance 79
5.2.3 The Moderating Effect of Organizational Structure on the relationship between Empowerment of IT manager and IT Department Performance 81
CHAPTER SIX 84
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 84
6.1 Research Conclusions 84
6.2 Research Suggestions and Implications 88
6.3 Research Limitations and Future Research Suggestions 89
REFERENCES 91
APPENDIX 106
參考文獻 References
1. Agaral, Naresh C.1979. On the interchangeability of size measures. Academy of Management Journal, 22:404-409.
2. Allaire Yvan and Firsirotu Mihaela E.. 1984. Theories of Organizational Culture. Organization Studies. 5/3:193-226.
3. Aryee, S. & Chen, Z. X. 2006. Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business research, 59:793-801.
4. Arogyaswamy Bernard and Byles Charles M.. 1987. Organizational culture: Internal and external fits. Journal of Management. 13:647-659.
5. Ashforth, B. E. 1989. The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43:207-242.
6. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. 2004. Transformational leadership and moderating commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:951-968.
7. Bartunek, J.M. and Spreitzer, G.M. 2006. The Interdisciplinary Career of a Popular Construct Used in Management: Empowerment in the Late 20th Century. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15:3 255-273.
8. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M K., 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Pres. Psychology. 44:1-26.
9. Barrick M. R. and Mount,M. K. 1993. “Autonomy as a Moderator of the Relationships between the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology. 111-118.
10. Bass, B. M. 1990. From Transactional to Transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics. 18(3):19-31.
11. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and development. 4:231-272. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Beckman. T., 1999. The current state of knowledge management. In J. Leibowitz (ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 1(1):1-22.
13. Berger, Chris J., and Cummings Larry L.. 1979. Organizational structure, attitudes and behavior. In Barry M. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior. 1:169-208. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Blackburn Richard S.. 1982. Dimensions of Structure: A review and reappraisal. Academy of Management Review. 7(1):59-66.
15. Blau, J. R., & & Alba, R.D. 1982. Empowerment nets Science of participation. Administrative Quarterly, 27:363-379.
16. Block, J. 1995. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117:187-215.
17. Brockner, J., Spreitzer, G., Mishra, A., Pepper, L., and Hochwater, W. 2004. Perceived Control as an Antidote to the Negative Effects of Layoffs on Survivors’ Organizational Commitment and Job Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49:76-100.
18. Brown Andrew D. and Starkey Ken. 1994. The effect of organizational culture on communication and information. Journal of Management Studies. 31(6):807-828.
19. Borman, W. C. Rosse, R. L., Abrahams, N. M., 1980. An empirical construct validity approach to studying predictor-job performance links. J. Appl. Psychol. 65:662-671.
20. Boudarias, J. S., Gaudreau, P. Laschinger, H. K. S. 2004. Testing the structure of psychological empowerment: Does genders make a difference? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5):861-877.
21. Bowen, D., & Lawler, E. 1992. The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when? Sloan Management Review, 33:31-39.
22. Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. E. 1995. Empowering service employees. Sloan Management Review, 36(4): 73-85.
23. Buss AH. 1989. Personality as traits. American Psychology. 12:277-294.
24. Buss DM. 1991. Evolutionary personality psychology. In Rosenzweig MR, Porter LW (Eds.) Annual Review of Psychology. 42:459-492. Palo Alto, CA:Annual Reviews Inc.
25. Bycio Peter, Hackeet,Rick D. Allen Joyce S., 1995. Further Assessments of Bass’s (1985) Conceptualization of Transactional and Transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80(4):468-478.
26. Caligiuri Paula M.. 2000. The Big Five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-rated performance. Personnel Psychology. 53:67-88.
27. Carless, S. A. 2004. Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4):405-425.
28. Carumna, A. : Morris, M. H. : and Vella. A. J. 1998. The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management. 36(1):16-29.
29. Chatman Jennifer A. and Eunyoung Sandra Cha, 2003. Leading by leveraging culture, California management review. 45(4):20-34.
30. Child. J. 1972. Organizational structure and strategies of control: A replication of the Aston study. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17:163-176.
31. Child. J. 1974. Comments on Reimann and Mansfield’s “bureaucracy”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 19:247-250.
32. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. 1988. The empowerment process : Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13:471-482.
33. Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae R.R., 1992. An introduction of the Five-Factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality. 60(2):175-215
34. Dalton. D. R., Todor, W. D., Spendolini, M. J, Fielding, G. J. & Poter L. W. 1980. Organizational structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review. 5:49-64.
35. Damanpour. F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants an moderators. Academy of Management Journal. 34(3):555-590.
36. Day, D. A. Silverman, S. R. 1989. Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Pres. Psychol. 42:25-36.
37. Deanne. N, Den Hartog, Jaap J. Van Muijen and Koopman Paul L., 1997. Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of MLQ. Journal of Occupational Organizational Psychology. 70:19-34.
38. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. 1989. Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 580-590.
39. Demarest. M. 1997. Understanding knowledge management Long Range Planning. 30(3):374-384.
40. Denison Daniel R. and Mishra Aneil K.. 1995. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science. 6(2):204-223.
41. Deshpande Rohit and Webster Frederich E. Jr. 1989. Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the research Agenda. The Journal of Marketing. 53(1):3-15.
42. Detert James R., Schroeder Roger G., and Mauriel.John J. 2000. A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of management review. 25(4):850-863.
43. Digman J. M., 1990. “Personality Structure: Emergence of the five-factor model ”, Annual Review of Psychology. 41:417-440
44. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., Salas. E., 1987. Personality and group performance. Rev. Personal. Social Psychol. 9:91-113.
45. Duncan W. Jack. 1989. Organizational culture: getting a ‘Fix’ on an Elusive concept. Academy of Management Executive. 3:229-236.
46. Dvir Taly, Dov Eden, Avolio Bruce J. & Bass Shamir. 2002. Impact of Transformational Leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal. 45(4):735-744.
47. Eagly A.H. and Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C. 2001. The Leadership styles of Woman and Men. Journal of Social Issues. 57(4):781-797.
48. Ein-Dor. P., and Segev, E. 1982. Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly. 6(3):55-68.
49. Ergeneli, A., Sag, G., Ari, I., & Metin, S. 2007. Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers, Journal of Business Research, 60(1):41-56.
50. Eylon, D. & Bamberger, P. 2000. Empowerment cognitions and empowerment acts: Recognizing the importance of gender. Group and Organization Management, 25:354-372.
51. Ford, J. D., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. 1977. Size, technology, environment and the structure of organizations. Academy of Management Review. 2:561-575.
52. Ford Robert C. and Fottler Myron D.. 1995. Empowerment: A Matter of Degree. Academy of Management Executive. 9:21-31.
53. George, J. M., 1992. The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. J. Manage. 18(2):185-213.
54. Gerard Saucier and Goldberg LR. 1998. What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality 66(4):495-524.
55. Gist, M. 1987. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3):472-485.
56. Graham, A. B., and Pizzo. V. G. 1996. A question of balance: Case studies in strategic knowledge management. European Management Journal. 14(4):338-346.
57. Goldberg LR. 1992. The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 4:26-42.
58. Goldberg LR. 1992. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist. 48:26-34
59. Gosling Samuel D., Rentfrow Peter J., and Swann Jr William B.. 2003. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 37:504-528.
60. Hall, Richard H., Haas J. Eugene. And Norman J. Johnson. 1967. Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32:905-912.
61. Hatch Mary Jo and Schultz,Majken 1997. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing. 31(5/6):356-365
62. Hater, J. J. & Bass, B. M. (1998). Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73:695-702.
63. Hechanova, M., Alampay, R., & Franco, E. 2006. Psychological empowerment, job satisfaction, and performance among Filipino service workers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9:78-92.
64. Heller, F. & Yukl, G. A. 1969. Participation, Managerial decision making and situational variables, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 4:227-241.
65. Herrenkohl Roy C, G. Judson Thomas, and Heffner Judith A.. 1999. Defining and Measuring Employee Empowerment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 35(3):373-389.
66. Holdaway, E. A., Newberry, J. F., Hickson, D. J., & Heron, R. P. 1975. Dimensions of organizations in complex societies: The educational sector. Administrative Science Quarterly. 20:37-58.
67. Holdsworth, L. & Cartwrigth, S 2003. Empowerment, stress, and satisfaction: An exploratory study of a call center. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 24(3):131-140.
68. Hollander Edwin P. and Offerman Lynn R. . 1990. Power and Leadership in Organizations. American Psychology 45: 179-189.
69. Holsapple. C. W., and Joshi, K. D. 2001. Organizational knowledge resources. Decision Support System. 31(1):39-54.
70. James, Lawrence R., and Allan P. Jones. 1976. Organizational structure: A review of structural dimensions and their conceptual relationships with individual attitudes and behavior. Organizational behavior and Human Performance. 16:74-113.
71. Judge Timothy A and Bono Joyce E., 2001. Relationship of Core-Evaluations Traits--Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability—With Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(1):80-92.
72. Jung D.I., Chow C. and Wu A. 2003. The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypothesis and Some Preliminary Findings. The Leadership Quality. 14(4-5):525-544.
73. Kaplan R., Norton D., 1992. The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 70(1):71-79.
74. Kaplan R., Norton D., 1993. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review. 71(5):134-142.
75. Kaplan R., Norton D., 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business review. 74(1):75-85.
76. Kaplan R., Norton D., 1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
77. Keen, P. 1991. Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press
78. Kichuk Susan L. and Wiesner.Willi H. 1997. The Big Five Personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 14:195-221.
79. Kimberly, John R. 1976. Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly. 21:571-597.
80. Kirkam, B. L. & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: The antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal. 42(1):58-74.
81. Kohn, Melvin L., and Schooler Carmi. 1973. Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review. 38:97-118.
82. Korman, A. K. 1966. Consideration, initiating structure, and organizational criteria-A review. Personnel Psychology. 19:349-362.
83. Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., & Liden, R. C. 1999. Psychological empowerment as a multidimensional construct: A test of construct validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59:127-142.
84. Kuhnert Karl W. and Lewis Philip. 1987. Transactional and Transformational leadership : A Constructive/Developmental Analysis. Academy of Management Review. 12(4):648-657.
85. Laschinger, H. K., Finegan S., Shamian J. E. & Wilk, P. 2004. A longitudinal analysis of the impact of workplace empowerment on work satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behaviors, 24:527-545.
86. Lawler, E. E. 1988. “Strategies for involvement”, Academy of Management Executive, 2, 197-204.”
87. Lee, Heeseok & Choi, Byounggu, 2003. Knowledge Management Enablers, Process and Organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems. 20(1):179-228.
88. Longenecker, C. O., & Fink L. S. 2001. Improving management performance in rapidly changing organizations. Journal of Management Development, 20:7-18.
89. Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., Sivasubramaniam, N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7:385-425.
90. Mainiero, L. A. 1986. “Coping with powerlessness: The relationship of gender and job dependency to empowerment-strategy usage”, Administration Science Quarterly, 31, 633-653.
91. Martinsons Maris, Davison Robert and Tse Dennis. 1999. The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decision Support Systems. 25:71-88.
92. McCrae RR and Costa PT. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52:81-90.
93. McCrae RR and Costa PT. 1989. More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. American Psychologist. 44:451-452.
94. McCrae RR and John OP. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality. 60:175-216.
95. McCrae RR and Costa PT. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist. 52:509-516.
96. MeDonald Paul and Gandz.Jeffrey 1992. Getting value from shared values. Organizational Dynamics. 21(3):64-76.
97. Meek V. Lynne. 1988. Organizational culture: origins and weaknesses. Organization Studies 9:453-473.
98. Meindl, J. R. 1990. On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. 12:159-203.
99. Menon. A., and Varadarajan. R. 1992. A model of marketing knowledge use within firms. Journal of Marketing. 56(4):53-71.
100. Mills, P. K., & Ungson, G. R. 2003. Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. Academy of Management Review, 28:143-153.
101. Mishra, A. K., and Spreitzer, G. M., 1998. Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice, and work redesign. Academy of Management Review, 23(3):567-588.
102. O’Dell. C, and Grayson, J. 1999. Knowledge transfer: discover your value proposition. Strategy & Leadership. 27(2):10-15.
103. Oldham, Greg R, and Daniel J. Brass. 1979. Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24:267-284.
104. Oldham Greg R. and Hackman J. Richard, 1981. Relationships between organizational Structure and employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative frameworks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1):66-83
105. Payne Roy. L. and Mansfield Roger. 1973. Relationships of Perceptions of organizational climate to organizational structure, context, and Hierarchical position. Administrative Science Quarterly. 18(4):515-526.
106. Peppard J. Ward, J., 1996. Reconciling the IT/business relationship: a troubled marriage in need of guidance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 5:37-65.
107. Pfeffer, J., Cialdini, R. B., Hanna, B., & Knopoff, K. 1998. Faith in Supervision and Self-Enhancement Bias: Two Psychological Reasons Why Managers Don’t Empower Workers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20:313-321.
108. Poter, Lyman W., and Lawler Edward E.. 1965. Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 64:23-51.
109. Prasad, A. 2001. Understanding workplace empowerments as inclusion: A historical investigation of the discourse of difference in the United States. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(1):51-59.
110. Prasad, A. & Eylon, D. 2001. Narrative past traditions of participation and inclusion: Historic perspectives on workplace empowerment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(1):5-14.
111. Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, and C. Yurner. 1968. Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly. 13:65-105.
112. Quinn, R. E., and Spreitzer, G. M. 1997. The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader consider. Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, 26(2):37-51.
113. Quinn, R. E., Spreitzer, G.M, and Brown, M. 2000. Changing others through changing ourselves: The transformation of human systems. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2): 147-164.
114. Rapert, M., and Wren. B. 1998. Reconsidering organizational structure: A dual perspective of frameworks and processes. Journal of Managerial Issues. 10(3):287-302.
115. Reimann, B. S. 1973. On the dimensions of bureaucratic structure. Administrative Science Quarterly. 18:462-476.
116. Reimann, B. S. 1974. Dimensions of structure in effective organizations: Some empirical evidence. Academy of Management Journal. 17:694-708.
117. Rosenthal Jeff and Masarech Mary Ann, 2003. High-performance cultures: How values can Drive Business results. Journal of organizational excellence. 3-18.
118. Schein, E. H. 1990. Organizational Culture. American Psychologist. 45(2):109-119.
119. Schmit Mark J., Kihm Jenifer A.. 2000. Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology. 153-193.
120. Sciulli, Lisa M. 1998. How organizational structure influences success in various types of innovations. Journal of Retail Banking Services. 1(20):13-18.
121. Smircich Linda. 1983. Concepts of Culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28:339-358.
122. Spector, P. E. 1982. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin. 91:482-497.
123. Spreitzer, G. M. 1992. When organizations dare : The dynamics of psychological empowerment in the workplace. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Michigan.
124. Spreitzer, G. M. 1995. Individual empowerment in the workplace : Dimensions, Measurement, validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
125. Spreitzer, G. M. 1996. Social structural levers for workplace empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504
126. Spreitzer, Gretchen M., Kizilos, Mark, and Nason, Stephen. 1997. A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5): 679-704.
127. Spreitzer, G. M., Janasz, S.C., and Quinn, R. T, 1999. Empowered to lead : the role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 511-526.
128. Stoker J. I., Looise J.C., Fisscher O. A. M. and De Jong R. D. 2001. Leadership and Innovations between Leadership, Individual Characteristics and the Functioning of R&D Teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(1):1141-1151.
129. Tett. R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., 1991. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Pres. Psychol. 44:703-741.
130. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. 1990. “Cognitive elements of empowerment, : An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation”. Academy of Management Review, 15:666-681.
131. Weiss, H., & Sherman, J. 1973. Internal-external control as a predictor of task effort and satisfaction subsequent to failure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57:132-136.
132. Wiener Yoash, 1988. Forms of Value systems: A Focus on organizational effectiveness and culture change and maintenance. Academy of management review 13:534-545.
133. Wiggins J. S. and Pincus A. L., 1992. ”Personality: Structure and Assessment” Annual Review of Psychology. 43:473-504.
134. Willcoxson Lesley and Chatham Robina, 2006. Testing the accuracy of the IT sterotypr : Profiling IT managers’ personality and behavioural characteristics. Information & Management. 43:697-705.
135. Wu Jen-Her, Chen Yi-Cheng and Chang Jack. 2007. Critical IS professional activities and skills/knowledge: A perspective of IS managers. Computers in Human Behavior 23:2945-2965.
BOOKS AND WEBSIDES:
1. Bales R.F. 1950. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small
Groups. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesly
2. Bass, B. M. 1990a. Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory,
Rerearch and Managerial Applications, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
3. Bass, B. M. 1990b. Editorial: Toward a meeting of minds. Leadership Quarterly,1.
4. Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York:
Free Press.
5. Bass, B. M., Waldman, D. A. & Avolio, B. J. 1986. Transformational leadership
and the falling dominoes effect (Tech. Rep. No. 86-99). Binghamton: State
University of New York, School of Management.
6. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. 1989. Manual for the Multifactor Leadership
Questionnaire, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
7. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J., 1990. Transformational leadership development:
Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologists Press.
8. Bell, N. E., Staw, B. M. 1989. People as sculptors versus sculpture. In M. B.
Arthur, D. T. Hall, and B. S. Lawrence (eds.) Handbook of Carrer Theory. New
York : Cambridge University Press.
9. Black Ken, 2006. Business Statistics for contemporary decision making. Wiley.
Fourth Edition.
10. Bowen D. E. and Lawler E. E. 1995. Empowering Service Employees, Sloan
Management Review. Pp. 73-84.
11. Brief, A. P., Nord, W. R. 1990. Meanings of occupational work. Lexington, MA:
Lexington Books.
12. Bryman, A. 1992. Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. London: Sage.
13. Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York : Harper & Row.
14. Cameron Kim S.. 1985. Cultural Congruence, strength, and type: relationship to
effectiveness. The University of Michigan, Working paper No. 401b. 1-41
15. Carlyle.R. 1990. The out of touch CIO. Datamation. pp.30-34.
16. Carte, T.C., and Rusell, C. J. 2003. In Pursuit of Moderation : Nine Common
Errors and Their Solutions. MIS Quarterly. 27:3. Pp.475-501
17. Champion. D. J. 1975. The sociology of organizations. New York:McGraw-Hill.
18. Collins James C. and Porras Jerry I.. 1994. Built to Last: Successful Habits of
Vicionary Companies. New York: HarperBusiness.
19. Collins, James C. 1995. Change is good-but first know what should never change.Fortune. 29, p.141.
20. Costa, P. T., Jr. McCrae, R.R., 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory and
New Five Factor Inventory: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment
Resources, Odessa, FL.
21. Daft Richard L. 2007. The leadership experience. 4th Edition. Thomson.
South-Western. pp. 420-451.
22. Deal T.E. and Kennedy A. A.. 1999. The new corporate cultures: revitalizing the
workforce after Downsizing, mergers, and reengineering. Perseus Books.
23. Fiedler, F. E. 1967. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
24. Great Expectations? Fast Company. 1999. Pp. 212-224.
25. Hackerman. J, and Morris C. 1978. Group tasks, group interaction process, and
group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L.
Berkowitz (ed.). Group Process. New York: Academic Press. 1-15.
26. Hackman, J. R. and Oldman, G. R. 1980. Work Redesign, Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
27. House, R. J., Woycke, J. & Fodor, E. M. (1988). Charismatic and noncharismatic
leaders: Differences in behavior and effectiveness. In J. A. Conger & R. N.
Kanungo (Eds), Charismatic leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational
effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy : History,
measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. R. Pervin, & O. P. John(Eds.),
Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford
Press.
29. Joseph C. Rost. 2000. Leadership for the twenty-first century (Westport, CT :
Praeger, 1993), p. 102; and Joseph C. Rost and Richard A. Barker, “Leadership
Education in Colleges : Toward a 21st centry Paradigm,” The Journal of leadership
Studies 7, no. 1:3-12.
30. Jung C. G, 1923. Psychological types, London: Routedge and Kegan Paul
31. Jung C. G. 1971. Psychological types (translated by R. F. C. Hall). Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
32. Kahn Jeremy, 1998. What makes a company Great? Fortune. 26, pp. 218.
33. Kotter John P. and Heskett James L., 1992. Coporate culture and performance.
New York: The Free Press. p.6
34. Kirkman, Bradley L and Rosen Benson. 2000. Powering Up Teams,
organizational Dynamics. Pp. 48-66
35. Laudon, K. C.,& Laudon, J. P. 2002. Management information systems:
Managing the detail firm (7th ed.). NJ:Prentice Hall.
36. Lucas Henry C., Barondi Jr. Jack. 1993. The Role of Information Technology in
Organization Design. Leonard N. Stern School of Business. New York University
37. Lawler, E. E.1996. From the Group Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic
Corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Benson, G.. 2001. Organizing for high
performance: Employee Involvement, TQM, Reengineering, and knowledge
Management in the Fortune 1000. San Franciso:Jossey-Bass.
39. Leavitt, Harold J. 1964. Applied organization change in industry: Structural,
technical, and Human Approaches. In New Perspectives in organization research.
W. W. Cooper, H. J. Leavitt, and M. W. Shelly,Π, eds. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
40. Leonard-Barton. D. 1995. Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the
sources of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
41. Liden, R. C., & Arad, 1996. A power perspective of empowerment and work
groups: Implication for HRM research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in
personnel and HRM, vol. 14:205-252. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
42. Long, D. D. 1997. Building the knowledge management-based organizations: how
culture drives knowledge behaviors, Working paper of the center for business
innovation. Ernest & Young LLP, Cambridge. MA.
43. Martinsons M. G., 1992. Strategic thinking about information management,
Keynote address to the 11th annual conference of the International Association of
Management Consultants, Toronto.
44. Malone, T. M. and J. F. Rockart, 1991 "Computers, networks and the
corporation," Scientific American.
45. McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., and Wetherbe, J.C. 1994. The Relationship
between User Participation and User Satisfaction:An Investigation of Four
Contingency Factors, MIS Quarterly 18:4. Pp.427-451.
46. Mitroff, I. I. 1983. Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
47. Mitroff, I. I. and Kilmann, R. H. 1975. Stories managers tell: A new tool for
organizational problem solving. Management Review. 18-28.
48. Mitroff, I. I. and Kilmann, R. H. 1976. On organizational stories : An approach to
the design and analysis of organization through myths and stories. In R. Kilmann,
L. R. Pondy, and D. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design, New
York: Elsevier North Holland.
49. Montanari, J. R. 1978. Operationalizing strategic choice. In J. H. Jackson & C. P.
Morgan. 1978. Organization theory: A macro perspective for management.
Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 286-298.
50. Neilsen, E. H. 1986. Empowerment strategies: Balancing authority and
responsibility. In S. Srivastva & Associates (Eds.) Executive power: 78-110. San
Francisco : Jessey-Bass.
51. O’Toole, J.& Lawler, E.E. 2006. The new American workplace. New York :
Palgrave-Macmillan.
52. Pearlson Keri E. and Saunders Carol S., 2006. Managing and Using information
Systems-A Strategic Approach.
53. Quinn, R. E. 1988. Beyond Rational Management. London: Jossey-Bass.
54. Rochart, J. and J. Short, 1991. "The Networked organization and the management
of interdependence," in M. Scott Morton(ed.), The corporation of the 1990s,
London, Oxford University Press.
55. Sherwood, John J. 1988. Creating work cultures with competitive advantage.
Organizational Dynamics. 5-27.
56. Spreitzer, G. M., and Doneson, D. 2005. Musings on the Past and Future of
Employee Empowerment. Forthcoming in the Handbook of Organizational
Development, Tom Cummings ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
57. Spreitzer, G.M. 2006. Empowerment. In S. Rogelberg (ed.) Encyclopedia of
Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, p. 202-206.
58. Spreitzer, G. M. 2007. Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of
research on empowerment at work. In The Handbook of Organizational Behavior,
C. Cooper and J. Barling eds. Sage Publications
59. Strassmann P.. 1997. The squandered computer, information economics press.
New Canaan. CT.
60. Strassmann P.. 1997. Facts and fantasies about productivity,
(www.strassmann.com/pubs/faf/factsnfantasy.html), excerpt from a forthcoming
book, Information Productivity, Information Economics Press, New Canaan. CT
61. Tichy, N. M. & Devanna, M. A. 1990. The transformational leader, rew. Ed. (1st
ed., 1986). New York: Wiley.
62. Weber, M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization (A. N.
Henderson & T. Parsons, eds & trans).Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
63. Weber, M. 1947. Theory of social and economic organization. London: Oxford
University Press.
64. Yammarino, F. J. & Bass, B. M. 1990. Long-term forecasting of transformational
leadership and its effects among naval officers: Some preliminary findings. In K.
E. Clark(Eds), Measures of Leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of
America.
65. Zimmer Carl, 2005. “Looking for personality in Animals of all people”. The New York Times. P. F1
66. Http://www.cio.com/forums/executive/gartner_description.html
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.149.230.44
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.149.230.44
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code