本論文從文化建構主義社會化途徑分析視角，對國際人權規範、自決理論以及香港民主權利變遷的相互建構進行研究，並輔以調查訪問的結果，以1997年香港主權回歸中國作為香港政治權利評價劃分的時間點，分析香港民眾在各項民主參與權利上的態度認知，進而推論香港民主權利的未來發展。研究結果發現，國際人權規範力量對於中國與民主國家社群建構人權意識具有正面的促進作用，香港反對派以及國際力量二項因素主要影響香港民主權利社會化建構作用的幅度。另一方面，香港反對派不同的次文化，弱化香港民主運動者進行民主權利建制改革的能力。此外，儘管自決的有關規範理論正朝向引入民主治理概念的內部自決權利發展趨勢，然而，對於以內部自決權利來促進民主參與權利實踐的看法，在國際人權體系中仍呈現為一種「和平民主」的國際主流論述。國際社會、中國以及香港社會三者對於民主參與權利的論述建構相互適容，共同促進香港特殊民主權利自治體制的存續能力。結論認為，作為促進保障民主參與權利的內部自決權利有關規範理論是否能獲得全球人權體系的認受與內化，將影響包括香港在內的其它地區的民主參與權利未來發展。

This dissertation takes a cultural-constructivism socialization approach in analyzing the mutual construction of international human rights norms, theories of self-determination, and changes of Hong Kong’s democratic rights. With survey data on Hong Kong’s political rights before and after 1997, it also investigates the attitudes of the people of Hong Kong toward democratic rights and their impact on the development of Hong Hong’s democratic rights. The results signal that the power of international human rights norms have positive effects on constructing a consciousness of human rights both in China and the world’s community of democracies. Hong Kong’s democratic opposition and international forces are two major agents driving the direction and strength of the socialization of democratic rights in Hong Kong. This dissertation further finds that the different sub-cultures within Hong Kong’s democratic opposition weaken the ability of the democratic movement to reform the institutions of democratic rights in Hong Kong. The results reflect a clear trend that while norms and theories of self-determination are evolving towards adopting the right to internal self-determination as part of the right to democratic governance, the discourse of “peaceful democracy” has been the mainstream for improving democratic rights through the recognition of the right to internal self-determination. This dissertation indicates that the respective discourses on rights to democratic participation within the international community, China, and Hong Kong are adaptive to one another, which contributes to the survival of the unique, autonomous regime of democratic rights in Hong Kong. It concludes that whether or not norms and theories of the right to internal self-determination are legitimized and internalized by the global human rights system will have effects on the further development of the right to democratic participation in Hong Kong and other regions.

第一章 緒論………………………………………………...…1
第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………2
第二節 研究問題與目的…………………………………………5
第三節 文獻回顧與檢視…………………………………………7
第四節 研究途徑與方法………………………………………...18

第二章 國際人權規範、自決與民主權利：理論與實際…….35
第一節 自決與民主權利理論發展…...…………………………36
第二節 自決與民主權利國際規範建制…...……………………45
第三節 自決與民主權利國際實踐…...…………………………52

第三章 香港民主權利的建制內涵檢視…………………….61
第一節 香港問題與自決主張歷史緣由...………………………61
第二節 北京政府的自決觀點與香港主權回歸問題...…………68
第三節 北京政府的「一國兩制」政策與香港民主權利建制……….74

第四章 國際行為者對香港民主權利的政策與行為回應.....85
第一節 中國對香港民主參與權利和自決主張回應.………..…85
第二節 英國對香港民主參與權利和自決主張回應.……..……88
第三節 美國對香港民主參與權利和自決主張回應.………..…96
第四節 其他人權體系對香港民主參與權利和自決主張回應……..102

第五章 香港民主權利變遷的文化建構分析.……………..107
第一節 中國對國際民主權利規範的社會化建構論述.………107
第二節 中國對香港民主權利的國際規範社會化建構型態……....119
第三節 自決規範理論與香港社會的民主權利文化建構……….…137

第六章 結論.………………………………………………..153

“一國兩制專題，”華夏經緯網，http://www.huaxia.com/zt/2003-54/pl/00140231.html，2007年4月23日。
“中英聯合聲明，”維基百科網站，http://zh.wikipedia.org/，2006年3月22日。
“中國提出開創國際人權事業新局面五項主張，”新華網，http://news3,xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2006-06/21/content_4723919.htm，2006年6月21日
“全國人民代表大會常務委員會關於香港特別行政區2007年行政長官和2008年立法會產生辦法有關問題的決定，”
中華人民共和國全國人民代表大會常務委員會公報，第4期（2004年）。
中國人大網，http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/rdgb_qg/index.jsp?lmid=1139，2006年8月10日。
“西方國家的外交是在什麼背景下產生的，”人民日報（北京），2006年4月5日，版9，新華網，
http://news3,xinhuanet.com/politics/2006-11/16/content_5339873.htm，2006年11月16日。
“青年毛澤東的劃時代的政論：毛澤東論‘湘人治湘’，”七十年代月刊（香港），2月號（1984年）：頁18-19。
“香港問題上的美國影子”，文匯報（香港），2004年4月30日，http://www.wenweipo.com/，2006年6月21日。
“香港基本法第二十三條，”維基百科網站，http://zh.wikipedia.org，2007年6月1日。
“深入實施香港特別行政區基本法，把「一國兩制」偉大實踐推向前進－吳邦國在基本法實施十周年座談會講話全文，”
國務院港澳事務辦事處，2007年6月9日，http://www.hmo.gov.cn/public/xghgszn/gjldrjh.htm，2007年6月24日。
“第I部份：香港特別行政區概況，” http://www.women.gov.hk/big5/document/govern/cedaw/cedaw_pti_c.pdf (accessed June 11, 2007).
“資料：波多黎各憲法簡述，”七十年代月刊（香港），1月號（1984年）：頁19-20。
“請看彭定康如何打國際牌，”文匯報（香港），1993年5月21日，版2。
Andersen, Svein S. and Kjell A. Eliassen主編，陳寅章譯，歐洲政策制定（Making Policy in Europe）。北京：國家行政學院出版社，2003年。
Mirsky, Jonathan著，吳靄儀譯，“英國人看英國對香港的道義責任，” http://www.fastio.com，2007年3月5日。
人民網，http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/33831/33836/34144/34195/2546656.html，2007年3月12日。
千謙譯，“彭定康談香港改革和東西文化，”北京之春，12月號（總第19期）（1994年），頁19-18，http://bjzc.org/bjs/bc/19/16，2005年3月22日。
中國人權網站，http://www.humanrights.cn/china/rqlt/T120011119141042.htm，2007年5月3日。
中國中央人民政府駐香港特別行政區聯絡辦公室網站，http://locpg.gov.vh，2007年5月3日。
中華人民共和國外交部網站，http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn/wjdt/zyjh/default.htm，2006年8月14日。
公民黨，“公民黨參選二○○七年行政長官選舉的聲明，”公民黨網站，2006年10月3日， http://www.civicparty.hk/cp/pages/posts/E585ACE6B091E9BBA8E58F83E981B8E4BA8CE2978BE2978BE4
B883E5B9B4E8A18CE694BFE995B7E5AE98E981B8E88889E79A84E881B2E6988E664.php，2007年6月21日。
王昭麟，“「香港政策法案」對美國、中共關係之影響，”美國月刊（台北），第8卷，第1期（1993年1月）：頁48-59。
王風波，“民族‘自決’和國際社會的反應，”當代中國研究網，第2期（總第57期）（1997年），
http://www.chinayj.net/StubArticle.asp?issue=970208&total=87，2005年3月22日。
正源，柯林頓訪華言論錄。北京：中國社會科學出版社，1998年。
民主黨，“推動2012年雙普選，”民主黨網站，2007年6月10日， http://www.dphk.org/2003/news/index.asp?iCommentID=3167，2007年6月21日。
民間人權陣線網站，http://www.civilhrfront.org/，2006年10月2日。
白桂梅，“論內部與外部自決，”法學研究（北京），第19卷，第3期（總第110期）（1997年）：頁105-116。
任東來，“自決原則再歷史上的實踐及其含義的演變，”太平洋學報，第3期（1997年）：頁51-56。
全民投票研究組，全民投票的環球經驗及其對香港的啟示研究報告書（香港：香港大學民意研究計劃，2005年2月）。
全民投票實踐計畫網站，http://www.civilreferendum.org/faq.html，2007年3月5日。
成報（香港），2004年10月23日，http://wisesearch.wisers.net/，2005年8月11日。
江靜玲，“回歸十周年前夕，柴契爾談港：一國兩制針對台灣，治港不合宜，”中國時報（台北），2007年6月11日，版A13。
何立，“福克蘭群島風波與香港，” http://www.fastio.com，2007年3月5日。
何俊仁等，邁向全面普選：2012年政治改革諮詢公眾方案。香港：21名民主派立法會議員，2007年3月。民主黨網站，http://www.dphk.org/2003/images/thumbphoto/2012_chi.pdf，2007年6月21日。
李文志，“感謝南朝鮮政府，”國策期刊（台北），第42期：頁10-12。
李怡，“面對九七的幾個矛盾問題，”七十年代月刊（香港），12月號（1983年）：頁12。
亞洲時報（香港），2003年6月20日，http://www.atchinese.com/，2007年3月4日。
季衛東，“自決權與憲政理論，”法律思想網，http://www.world-china.org/06/0603032101.htm，2005年1月26日。
林正義，“美國對香港的政策：人權及經濟利益因素的探討，”裘兆琳編，中美關係專題研究，1992-1994（台北：中央研究院歐美研究所，1995年），
頁207-234。
林寶慶，“莫里森移民法案，美眾院投票通過，”聯合報（台北），1990年10月5日，版11。
社會民主連線，社會民主連線政改方案建議書（香港：社會民主連線，2007年1月15日），社會民主連線網站，
http://www.lsd.org.hk/new/index.php?page=620，2007年6月21日。
前綫，“前綫政制發展意見書，”政制發展前瞻：跨越零七零八研討會，香港，2004年11月6日。
，前綫對行政長官和立法會普選模式的意見。香港：前綫，2007年5月19日。前綫網站，
http://www.frontier.org.hk/download.php?file=200705211805577.doc，2007年6月21日。
，前綫對政制發展小組第四號報告書的意見（香港：前綫，2004年12月22日），前綫網站，
http://www.frontier.org.hk/download.php?file=200504130129583.pdf，2007年6月21日。
政治事務局，“策略發展委員會、管治及政治發展委員會對「普選概念」的一般理解，”香港政治事務局文件，2006年1月20日，編號：CSD/GC/3/2006。
香港大學，“市民對2007年普選特首的支持程度，”香港大學民意網站，http://hkupop.hku/chinese/popexpress/public_ele/cel/chart/poll1.gif，
2007年6月21日。
，“市民對2008年普選立法會的支持程度，”香港大學民意網站，http://hkupop.hku/chinese/popexpress/public_ele/cel/chart/poll1.gif，
2007年6月21日。
香港民主民生協會，香港民主民生協進會就行政長官普選模式提交建議。香港：香港民主民生協會，2006年7月19日。
香港立法會秘書處，“《基本法》第二十三條的報道摘要，”香港立法會網站，http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr02-03/chinese/sec/library/0203in01c.pdf。2006年10月20日。
香港特別行政區政府律政司網站，http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_export.nsf/chome.htm，2006年8月14日。
香港特別行政區政府統計處網站，http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/statistics_by_subject/index_tc.jsp?subjectID=1&charsetID=2&displayMode=T，2006年10月30日。
倪學偉，“試論「一國兩制」下之中國國際法主體資格，”法律圖書館網站，http://ww.law-lib.com/lw/lw_view.asp?no=2533，2005年5月9日。
翁松燃，“香港前途－「波多黎各模式」，”七十年代月刊（香港），12月號（1983年）：頁9-10。
國務院新聞辦公室，中國的人權狀況。北京：國務院辦公室，1991年11月1日。
張保民，“民族自決與香港、台灣問題，”明報月刊（香港），11月號（1994年）：頁53-56。
許家屯，許家屯香港回憶錄（上）（下）。台北：聯合報，1993年。
郭立青，“中共智囊建立合法性新論述背後，”觀察，第1期（總第32期）（2007年3月5日）：頁5-8。
陳向明，社會科學質的研究。台北：五南，2002年。
陳婉瑩，“影響港人的美國移民配額，”七十年代月刊（香港），12月號（1983年）：頁24-26。
陶文釗，中美關係史（下卷）（1972-2000）（上海：上海人民出版社，2004年），中國社會科學院美國研究所網站，http://ias.cass.cn/show/show_project_ls.asp?id=765，2005年4月8日。
喻舲居，“香港回歸與直布羅陀自決－一斷回憶和幾段歷史，”開放雜誌（香港），7月號（1997年）：頁79-80。
曾仁全，“聯合國人權委員會第11次表決背後的「天機」，”人民報網站，2004年4月17日，http://renminbao.com/rmb/articles/2004/4/17/30778b.html。2007年6月15日。
黃秋龍，“全球治理與新安全機制－以歐盟計畫對中共解除武器禁令為分析個案，”展望與探索，第5卷，第3期（2007年3月）：頁51-68。
楊森、林子健，“超過六成市民支持2012年雙普選，”民主黨網站，2007年2月12日， http://www.dphk.org/2003/images/thumbphoto/20070212PRESS.pdf，2007年6月21日。
梁耀忠、劉慧卿，“拒絕提名梁家傑公開信，”前綫網站，2007年1月31日，http://www.frontier.org.hk/download.php?file=200702011021203.pdf，2007年6月21日。
廖光生，香港政制改革與中（共）英談判的經驗。台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1994年3月。
熊玠，“民主的直覺與反直覺：試由驗證理論評析民主，”中國評論，2月號（總第110期）（2007年）：頁23-26。
熊玠，“民主與經濟發展及國際和平的關係，”中國評論，4月號（總第112期）（2007年）：頁22-25。
趙國材，“一九九二年「美國－香港政策法案」之一般分析，”亞洲研究（香港），第5期（1993年3月）：頁21-47。
劉慧卿，“爭取普選，決不妥協，”前綫網站，2007年3月13日，http://www.frontier.org.hk/download.php?file=200703131035485.doc，2007年6月21日。
，“國際對香港民主的支持－或奧地利人權獎後感，”爭鳴，3月號（1998年）：頁77-78。
鄧小平，鄧小平文選，第3卷。北京：人民出版社，1993年。
嶺南大學公共管治研究部網站，http://www.ln.edu.hk/pgp/level2/pgp-sur-f.htm，2007年6月21日。
聯合晚報（台北），1996年7月19日，版6。
薛瓦．法蘭克福－納區密爾斯（Chava Frankfort-Nachmias）、大衛．納區密爾斯（David Nachmias）著，潘明宏、陳志偉譯，最新社會科學研究方法（Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 5th ed.）。台北：韋伯文化國際，2003年。
邁過（美），“西藏要自治，不要獨立－記達賴喇嘛柏克萊大學訪談會，”動向，7月號（1997年）：頁62-63。
羅玉中、萬其岡、劉松山，人權與法制。北京：北京大學出版社，2001年。
“H.Con.Res. 79: In Support of Human Rights and Democracy in Hong Kong,” The Library of Congress-THOMAS Website), http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c101:H.CON.RES.79: (accessed March 15, 2007).
“HK Democracy Must Forge Own Path, Not Emulate Others,” South China Morning Post, June 26, 2006, p. 6.
“Hong Kong Democracy: Why the U.S. Cares,” Speeches and Articles by former Consul General James R. Keith, Hong Kong & MACAU, Consulate General of The United Sates, http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/cg_ik2004030901.html (accessed March 4, 2007).
“Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, President Bush Signs Hong Kong Policy Act into law,” U.S. Department of State, http://usinfo.state.gov/eap/east_asia_pacific/china/china_hong_kong/hong_kong_policy_act.html (accessed March 15, 2007).
“Remarks by U.S. Consul General Richard A. Boucher to the American Chamber of Commerce, Hong Kong,” June 23, 1999, Bulletin (June 24, 1999):5.
“Resolution Warns That Hong Kong's Basic Freedoms Are in Danger,” Hong Kong & MACAU, Consulate General of The United Sates, http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/ushk_article23_2003062702.html (accessed March 15, 2007).
“U.S. Secretary of State Schultz’s Statement on Sino-Brith Joint Declaration,” Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 84, no. 2092 (November 1984):56.
“U.S.-Hong Kong Policy Act Report,” April, 1, 2006, Hong Kong & MACAU, Consulate General of The United Sates, http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/ushk/pi/2006/040101.htm#III (accessed March 4, 2007).
A., Henderson Errol. Democracy and War: The End of An Illusion. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002.
Åkermark, Athanasia Spiliopoulou. “The Procedural Position of Autonomous Regions before International Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Organs,” Autonomy: Applications and Implications, ed., by Markku Suki, 139-150. The Hague/London/Boston:Kluwer Law International, 1998.
Alfredsson, Gudmundur. “Autonomy and Human Rights,” in Constitutional and Economic Space of the Small Nordic Jurisdictions, ed., by Lise Lyck, 34-47. Stockholm: NordREFO, 1997.
. “The Right of self-Determination and Indigenous Peoples,” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 41-54. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
Alliance for Reform and Democracy in Asia, A Report on the Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections 200. Singapore: Alliance for Reform and Democracy in Asia.
Amberg, E. M.“Self-Determination in Hong Kong: A New Challenge to an Old Doctrine,” San Diego Law Review, vol. 22, no. 4 (1985):839, http://www.sandiego.edu/usdlaw/about/publications/journals/lawreview/issues/index.php?vol=22&issue=3 (accessed June 11, 2007).
Amendment No. 2752, The Library of Congress-THOMAS Website, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r104:1:./temp/~r104XeTISq:e622452: (accessed March 15, 2007).
Annan, Kofi A. “Address to the Commission on Human Rights,” Geneva, 7 April 2005, http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/docs/61chr/sgchr.doc (accessed October 16, 2006).
. In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. New York: United Nations, 2005.
Archibugi, Daniele. “A Critical Analysis of the Self-Determination of Peoples: A Cosmopolitan Perspective,” Constellations, vol. 10, no. 4 (2003):488-505.
Ash, Robert, Peter Ferdinand, Brian Hook, and Robin Porter (eds.). Hong Kong in Transition: One Country, Two Systems. London; New York: Routledge, 2003.
Baehr, Peter R. Human Rights: Universality in Practices. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.
. The Role of Human Rights in Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.
Beran, H. “A Liberal Theory of Secession,” Political Studies, vol. 32, no. 1 (1984):21-31
. “More Theory of Secession: A Response to Birch,” Political Studies, vol. 36, no. 2 (1988):316-323.
Birch, A. H. “Another Liberal Theory of Secession,” Political Studies, vol. 32, no. 4 (1984):596-602.
Black, Jan Knippers. “What Kind of Democracy Does the ‘Democratic Entitlement’ Entail?” in Democratic Governance and International Law, eds., by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 517-531. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bollen, K. A. and Jackman R. W. “Economic and Noneconomic Determinants of Political Democracy in the 1960s,” in Research in Political Sociology, ed., by Richard G. Baumgart, 28-43. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc, 1985).
Brams, Steven J. “To Mobilize or Not to Mobilize: Catch-22s in International Crises,” International Studies Quarterly (December 1999), Vol.43, No.4: 621-640.
Bridges, Brian. “Europe, Hong Kong and the 1997 Transition,” in Hong Kong SAR: In Pursuit of Domestic and International Order, eds., by Beatrice Leung and Joseph Cheng, 259-270. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1997.
Brzezinsli, Zbigniew and Samuel P. Huntington. Political Power: USA/USSR. New York: Viking Press, 1964.
Buchanan, Allen. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundation for International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Butler, David and Austin Ranney (eds.). Referendums around the World. Basingstoke: Macmillan,1994.
Byrnes, Andrew. “Hong Kong and the Continuation of International Obligations Relations Relating to Human Rights after 1997,” in Hong Kong SAR: In Pursuit of Domestic and International Order, eds., by Beatrice Leung and Joseph Cheng, 135-158. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1997.
Cassese, Antonio. “Political Self-Determination-Old Concept and New Developments,” in UN Law/Fundamental Rights: Two Topics in International Law, ed., by Antonio Cassese, 137-166. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979.
. Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Chan, Johannes. “State Successuon to Human Rights Treaties: Continued Application of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to Hong Kong after 1997,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4 (October 1996):928-946.
Chan, Johannes M. M., H L Fu, and Yash Ghai (eds.). Hong Kong’s Constitutional Debate: Conflict over Interpretation. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2000.
Chan, Ming K. “Hong Kong in Sino-British Conflict: Mass Mobilization and the Crisis of Legitimacy, 1912-1926,” in Precarious Balance: Hong Kong between China and Britain, 1842-1992, ed., by Ming K. Chan, 27-57. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1994.
Chang, David Wen-wei and Richard Y. Chuang. The Politics of Hong Kong’s Reversion to China. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2 (1998):324-348.
Cheng, Arthur K.C. “Bill of Rights - The Hotbed of Challenge,” in The Other Hong Kong Report: 1997, ed., by Joseph Cheng, 123-135. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1997.
Cheung, Chor-yung, “Legitimacy, Legitimacy Crisis, and Transitional Politics in Hong Kong, ” in Hong Kong SAR: In Pursuit of Domestic and International Order, eds., by Beatrice Leung and Joseph Cheng, 1-24. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1997.
Chiu, Hungdah. “Introduction,” in The Future of Hong Kong: Toward 1997 and Beyond, eds., by Hungdah Chiu, Y.C. Jao, and Yuan-li Wu, 1-21. New York: Quorum Books, 1987.
. “The Hong Kong Agreement and U.S. Foreign Policy,” in Hong Kon: A Chinese and International Concern, eds., Jürgen Domes and Yu-min Shaw, 183-195. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1988.
(ed.). The Draft Basic Law of Hong Kong: Analysis and Documents. Baltimore, Md.: School of Law, University of Maryland, 1988.
Christopher Cox, “Rep. Cox Speaks on H. Res. 667, Supporting Hong Kong Democracy,” September 13, 2004, http://cox.house.gov/html/speeches.cfm?id=765 (accessed June 15, 2005).
Chung, Carol. “Mock Ballot Attracts more than 8,000,” The Standard, March 26, 2007, http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=4&art_id=40936&sid=12831328&con_type=1&d_str=20070326 (accessed June 11, 2007)
Cingranelli, David Louis (ed.). Human Rights Theory and Measurement. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988.
Claude, Richard P. “The Classical Model of Human Rights Development,” in Comparative Human Rights, ed., by Richard P. Claude, 6-50. Baltimore: Jones Hopkins University Press, 1976.
Cobban, Alfred. National Self-Determination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.
Cohen, Jerome Alan and Hungdah Chiu. People’s China and International Law: A Documentary Study, vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.
Concluding Observation of the Committee on Economic, Social and Culture Rights, UN Document E/C.12/1994/19.
, UN Document E/C.12/1996/Add.10.
Concluding Observation of the Human Rights Committee, UN Document CCPR/C/79/Add.69 (1996).
Cottrell, Robert. The End ofHong Kong: The Secret Diplomacy of Imperial Interest. London: John Murray, 1993.
Crawford, James. “Democracy and the Body of International Law,” in Democratic Governance and International Law, eds., by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 91-120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Davies, Stephen and Elfred Roberts. Political Dictionary for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Macmillan Publishers.
Davis, Michael C. “Chinese Perspectives on Human Rights,” in Human Rights and Chinese Values: Legal, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, ed., by Michael C. Davis, 1-24. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Dawson, Richard E. and Kenneth Prewitt. Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1969.
Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Election Observers, http://www.un.org/Depts/dpa/declar-principles-05.pdf (accessed October 14, 2006).
Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.
Donnelly, Jack. “International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis,” International Organization, vol. 40, no. 3 (1986):599-642.
. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Economy, Elizabeth and Michel Oksenberg. “Introduction,” in China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects, eds., by Elizabeth Economy and Michel Oksenberg, 1-41. New York: Council in Foreign Relations Press, 1999.
Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder. “Democratization and War,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 3:79-89.
Engbarth, Dennis. “Hong Kong Vote Seen as Step to Openness,” Taiwan News Online, March 24, 2007, p. 3, http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:zfYP_TmnYzAJ:www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php%3Fid%3D415207+Hong+Kong+Vote+Seen+as+Step+to+Openness&hl=zh-TW&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=tw (accessed June 11, 2007)
European Commission, “Toward A New Asia Strategy,” July 1994, Brussels: European Commission.
Expressing the Sense of Congress that the People of Hong Kong should be Accorded the Right to Self-determination [H.CON.RES.68.IH], The Library of Congress-THOMAS Website, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c102:2:./temp/~c102tIOU6q:: (accessed March 21, 2007).
Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998):887-917.
Finnemore, Martha. National Interest in International Society. Ithata: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Fox, Gregory H. “Book Review: Self-Determination in the Post-Cold War Era: A New Internal Focus?” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 16 (Spring 1995):733-734.
. “The Right to Political Participation in International Law,” in Democratic Governance and International Law, eds., by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 48-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Franck, Thomas M. “Legitimacy and the Democratic Entitlement,” in Democratic Governance and International Law, eds., by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 25-47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
. “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance,” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 86, no. 1 (January 1992):46-91.
. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Freedom House, Freedom in the World Country Ratings. Washington, DC: Freedom House, 2001-2006, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=1 (accessed June 8, 2006).
Freeman, Michael. Human Rights. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publisher Inc., 2002.
Fukuyama, Francis. “The Primacy of Culture,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, no. 1 (January 1995):7-14
Genest, Marc. A. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1996.
Grotius, Hugo. On the Law of War and Peace, trans., by A. C. Campbell (London, 1814), http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm (accessed October 2, 2006).
Gurr, Ted Robert. “The Political Origins of State Violence and Terror: A Theoretical Analysis,” in Government Violence and Repression: An Agenda for Research, eds., by Michael Stohl and George A. Lopez, 45-71. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986.
Halperin, Morton H. and David J. Scheffer with Patricia L. Small. Self-Determination in the New World Order. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1992.
Hannikainen, Lauri. “Self-Determination and Autonomy in International Law,” in Autonomy: Applications and Implications, ed., by Markku Suki, 79-95. London: Kluwer Law International, 1998.
Hannum, Hurst and Richard B. Lillic. “The Concept of Autonomy in International Law,” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 74 (1980):858-889.
Harding, Harry. “Breaking the Impasse over Human Rights,” in Living with China: U.S./China Relations in the Twenty-First Century, ed., by Ezra F. Vogel, 65-185. New York: W.W. Norton, 1997.
Harhoff, Frederik. “Palestinian Self-Determination Viewed from A Distance: An International Legal Comparison between Palestinian Self-Government and Greenland’s Home Rule,” The Palestine Yearbook of International Law, vol. 8:55-77.
Hatch, Eivin. Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.
Hawkins, Darren. “The Domestic Impact of International Human Rights Norms,” the 42nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA, February 20-24, 2001, http://www.isanet.org/archive/hawkins.html (accessed November 8, 2004).
Heintze, Hans-Joachim. “On the Legal Understanding of Autonomy,” in Autonomy: Applications and Implications, ed., by Markku Suki, 7-32. London: Kluwer Law International, 1998.
Herskovits, M. J. Cultural Relativism: Perspectives in Cultural Pluralism, ed., by F. Herskovits, introd., by D.T. Campbell, 14. New York: Random House.
Higgins, R. “International Law and the Avoidance, Containment and Resolution of Disputes: General Course on Public International Law,” Rec. des cours, vol. 230 (1991-V):9-341.
. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995.
Hughes, Richard. Borrowed Place, Borrowed Time, 2nd Edition.London: Andre Deutsch, 1976.
Huntington Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968.
. “After Twenty Years: The Future of Third Wave,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 8, no. 4 (October 1997):3-11.
International Commission of Jurists, Countdown to 1997: Report of A Mission to Hong Kong. Geneva, Switzerland: International Commission of Jurists, 1992.
Jayawickrama, Nihal. “‘One Country, Two Systems’ and the Law: Illusion or Reality,” in One Culture, Many Systems: Politics in the Reunification of China, eds., by Donald H. McMillen and Michael E. DeGolyer, 43-62. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1993.
. “Hong Kong: The Gathering Storm,” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 22, no. 2 (1991):157-174.
Johnson, Harold S. Self-Determination within the Community of Nations. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff Publishers, 1967.
Johnson, M. Glen. “Human Rights in Divergent Conceptual Settings: How Do Ideas Influence Policy Choices?” in Human Rights Theory and Measurement, ed., by David Louis Cingranelli, 41-59. (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988.
Jones, David R. “Soviet Strategic Culture,” in Strategic Power: USA/USSR, ed., by Carl G. Jacobsen, 35-49. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.
Katsumata, Hiro. “Reconstruction of Diplomatic Norms in Southeast Asia: The Case for Strict Adherence to the ‘ASEAN Way’,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 25, no. 1 (April 2003):104-121.
Katzenstein, Peter J. “Conclusion: National Security in a Changing World,” in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed., by Peter J. Katzenstein, 498-537. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.
(ed.). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. New York: World Bank, 2003.
Kent, Ann. China, the United States, and Human Rights: the Limits of Compliance. Philadelphis, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Kesen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1951.
Kim, Byung-Kook. “Korea’s Crisis of Success,” in Democracy in East Asia, eds., by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, 113-132. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Kimminich, Otto. “A ‘Federal’ Right of Self-Determination?” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 83-100. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
King, Ambrose Yeo-chi. “Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Level,” in Social Life and Development in Hong Kong, eds., by Ambrose Y. V. King and Rance P. L. Lee, 127-149. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1981.
Kiss, A. “The Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination,” Human Rights Law Journal, vol. 7, no. 2-4 (1986):165-176.
Krasner, Stephen D. “Power Politics, Institutions, and Transnational Relations,” in Bring Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, ed., by T. Risse-Kappen, 257-279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
. Minority Rights and the Westphalian Model. Stanford: Department of Political Science, 1995.
Kuan, Hsin-chi, Wai-man Lam, and Siu-kai Lau. East Asia Barometer: A Comparative Survey of Democratization and Value Changes. Country Report: Hong Kong Report. Taipei: Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, 2004.
Kwok, Rowena and Elaine Chan, “Political Culture and Prospects of Democratization in Hong Kong,” in Institutional Change and Political Transition in Hong Kong, ed., by Ian Scott, 64-84. Basingstole, Hampshire: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin’s, 1998.
Lam, Jermain T. M. “The Political Culture of Voters: Reflection on the Legitimacy of the Hong Kong Government,” in 25 Years of Social and Economic Development in Hong Kong, eds., by B. Leung and T. Wong, 236-251. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1994.
Lapidoth, Ruth. Autonomy. Flexible Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. Washington:, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Lau, Siu-kai. Decolonization without Independence: The Unfinished Political Reforms of the Hong Kong Government. Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong: Center for Hong Kong Studies, Institute of Social Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1987.
. Society and Politics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1984.
Lee, Ta-ling. “Hong Kong: The Human Rights Dimension,” in The Future of Hong Kong: Toward 1997 and Beyond, eds., by Hungdah Chiu, Y.C. Jao, and Yuan-li Wu, 115-137. New York: Quorum Books, 1987.
Legro, Jeffrey W. “Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism,” International Organization, vol. 51, no. 1 (Winter 1997):33-57.
Linz, Juan J. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
Locke, John. Two Treaties of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1689], 1970.
Loh, Christine. “Civil Society and Democratic Development in Hong Kong,” in Building Democracy: Creating Good Government for Hong Kong, eds., by Christine Loh & Civic Exchange, 127-135. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2003.
Loukacheva, Natalia. “On Autonomy and Law,” Globalization and Autonomy Online Compendium, http://www.globalautonomy.ca/global1/servlet/Xml2pdf?fn=RA_Loukacheva_AutonomyLaw (accessed January 11, 2007).
MacCamant, John F. “ Social Science and Human Rights,” International Organization, vol. 35, no. 3 (Summer 1981):531-552.
Margalit, A. and J. Raz, “National Self-Determination,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, no. 9 (1990):439-461.
Marie, J. B. “Relations between Peoples; Rights and Human Rights: Semantic and Methodological Distinctions,” Human Rights Law Journal, vol. 7 (1986):195-204
Marks, Susan “International Law, Democracy and the End of History,” in Democratic Governance and International Law, eds., by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 532-566. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
McGoldrick, Dominic. The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
McMillen, Donald Hugh. “The Political Development of Hong Kong: 1991－The Last Year of Choice?” in One Culture, Many Systems: Politics in the Reunification of China, eds., by Donald H. McMillen and Michael E. DeGolyer, 3-42. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1993.
Mearsheimer, John J. “The False Promise of International Institution,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95):5-49.
Miller, D. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Miller, Russell A. “Self-Determination in International Law and the Demise of Democracy,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 41 (2002-2003):611-647.
Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nations. New York: McGraw Hill, 1993.
Murswiek, Dietrich. “The Issue of a Right of Secession-Reconsidered,” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 21-39. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
Nanda, Ved P. “Self-Determination Under International Law: Validity of Claims to Secede,” Case Western Reserved Journal of International Law, vol. 13 (1981):257-280.
Nathan, Andrew J. “China and the International Human Rights Regime,” in China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects, eds., by Elizabeth Economy and Michel Oksenberg, 136-160. New York: Council in Foreign Relations Press, 1999.
. “Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Policy,” The China Quarterly, vol. 139 (Stember 1994):622-643.
Ngok, MA. “Democratic Development and Business Interest,” in Building Democracy: Creating Good Government for Hong Kong, eds., by Christine Loh & Civic Exchange, 95-126. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2003.
Nowak, Manfred. U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary. Kehl am Rhein: N.P. Engel, 1993.
O’Connell, David P. International Law, vol. 1. London: Stevens & Sons, 1970.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, Human Rights and Elections: A Handbook on the Legal, Technical and Human Rights Aspects of Elections. New York; Geneva: United Nations, 1994.
Patten, Chris. East and West: The Last Governor of Hong Kong on Power, Freedom and the Future. London: Macmillan, 1998.
Paust, Jordan J. “Self-Determination: A Definitional Focus,” in Self-Determination: National, Regional, and Global Dimensions, eds., by Yonah Alexander and Robert A. Friedlander, 3-20. Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1980.
Pomerance, Michla. “The United States and Self-Determination: Perspectives on the Wilsonian Conception,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 70 (1976):1-27.
. Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United Nations .Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982.
Pritchard, Kathleen. “Political Science and the Teaching of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3 (1985):459-475.
Przeworski, Adam et al.. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Przeworski, Adam. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Pye, Lucian W. Asia Power and Politics: The Culture Dimensions of Authority (Cambridge: Harvard University, 1985).
Quane, Helen. “The United Nations and the Evolving Right to Sef-Determination,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 47 (July 1998):537-572.
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Reisman, W. Michael “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law,” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 84 (1990):866-876.
Report of the Secretary-General, Support by the United Nations System of Efforts of Governments to Promote and Consolidate New or Restored Democracies, UN Doc. A/52/513, 1997.
Ress, George. “The Hong Kong Agreement and Its Impact on International Law,” in Hong Kong, A Chinese and International Concern, eds., Jürgen Domes and Yu-min Shaw, 129-166. Boulder: Westview Press, 1988.
Risse, Thomas and Kathryn Sikkink. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction,” in The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, eds., by Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, 1-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Risse, Thomas and Stephen C. Ropp. “International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change: Conclusions,” in The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, eds., by Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, 234-278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.).The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Roberti, Mark. The Fall of Hong Kong: China’s Triumph and Britain’s Betrayal. New York: John Wiley, 1994.
Ronen, Dov. The Quest for Self-Determination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.
Rosas, Allan. “Internal Self-Determination,” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 225-252. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Of the Social Contract or Principles of Political Rights, intro., by Charles M. Sherover. New York: Harper & Row, 1763/1976.
. The Social Contract. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, [1762], 1968.
S. Janes Anaya, “A Contemporary Definition of the International Norm of Self-Determination,” Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, vol. 3 (1993):131-164.
Salmon, Jean. “Internal Aspects of the Right to Self-Determination: toward a Democratic Legitimacy Principle?” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 253-282. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
Schmitter, Philippe “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, eds., by P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch, 7-52. London: Sage, 1979.
Scott, Ian. “Political Transformation in Hong Kong: From Colony to Colony,” in Hong Kong – Guangdong Link: Partnership in Flux, eds., by Alvin Y. So and Reginald Kwok Yin-wang, 189-223. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1995.
. Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Segal, Gerald. The Fate of Hong Kong. London: Simon and Schuster, 1993..
Setälä, Maija. Referendum and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions. London; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.
Seymoue, James D. “Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Relations,” in China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium, ed., by Samuel S. Kim, 217-238. Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1998.
Shehadi, K. S. Ethnic Self-Determination and the Break-Up of States. London: Brassey’s, 1993.
Sing, Ming. Hong Kong’s Tortuous Democratization: A Comparative Analysis. London; New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.
So, Alvin Y. Hong Kong’s Embattled Democracy: A Societal Analysis. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1999.
Sohn, Louis B. “The Concept of Autonomy in International Law and the Practice of the United Nations,” Isral Law Review, vol. 15, no. 2 (1980):180-190.
Steiner, H. “Political Participation as a Human Right,” Harvard Human Rights Yearbook, vol. 1 (1988):77-134.
Strange, Susan. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982):479-496.
Strouse, James C. and Richard P. Claude. “Empirical Comparative Rights Research: Some Preliminary Tests of Development Hypotheses,” in Comparative Human Rights, ed., by Richard P. Claude, 51-67. Baltimore: Jones Hopkins University Press, 1976.
Summers, James. “The Idea of the People: The Right of Self-Determination, Nationalism and the Legitimacy of International Law,” Doctoral Dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2004.
Tam, Henry. Communitarianism: A New Agenda for Politics and Citizenship. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
Tamir, Y. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,1993.
The Library of Congress-THOMAS Website, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c101:7:./temp/~c101fKffTB:: (accessed December 2, 2005).
Thomas, Nicholas. Democracy Denied: Identity, Civil Society and Illiberal Democracy in Hong Kong. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 1999.
Thornberry, Patrick. “Self-Determination and Indigenous Peoples: Objections and Responses,” in Operationalizing the Right of Indigenous Peoples to Self-Determination, eds., by Pekka Aikio and Martin Scheinin, 39-64. Turku/Åbo: Åbo Akademi University, 2000.
. “The Democratic or Internal Aspect of Self-Determination,” in Modern Law of Self-Determination, ed., by Christian Tomuscht, 101-138. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
Tsang, Steve. “Maximum Flexibility, Rigid Framework: China’s Policy towards Hong Kong and Its Implication,” Journal of International Affairs, vol. 49, no. 2 (Winter 1996):413-433.
Tucker, Nancy Bernkopf. “Hong Kong as a Problem in Chinese-American Relations,” in Hong Kong Under Chinese Rule, eds., by Warren I. Cohen and Li Zhao, 213-229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
U.S. Department of State, United Sates-Hong Kong Policy Act Report (April, 1, 1999), http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/ushk/pi/990401.htm#vii.e (accessed March 4, 2007).
U.S. Department of State Website, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/c10790.htm (accessed October 14, 2006).
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2004 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. June 2004, http://www.uscc.gov/annual_report/2004/04annual_report.pdf (accessed March 21, 2007).
United Nations Commission on Human Rights Website, http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/index.htm (accessed October 16, 2006).
United Nations Databases Website, http://www.un.org/databases/index.html (accessed October 14, 2006).
United Nations Document Center Website, http://www.un.org/documents/ (accessed October 14, 2006).
United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report (New York and Oxford University: Oxford University, 2006), http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/pdfs/report/HDR06-complete.pdf (accessed June 8, 2006).
United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1991 [H.R.3522.IH], The Library of Congress-THOMAS Website, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c102:1:./temp/~c102eDLVKx:: (accessed March 21, 2007).
Unite State Information Agency, “Presidents Clinton, Jiang Debate Rights, Tiananmen, June 27, 1998,” USIA Website, http://www.usia.gov/gov/regional/ea/uschian/0627press.htm (accessed June 14, 2007).
Wai, Ting. “China’s Post-June Fourth World View in the Context of Changing East-West Relations: Implications for Hong Kong,” in One Culture, Many Systems: Politics in the Reunification of China, eds., by Donald H. McMillen and Michael E. DeGolyer, 249-270. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1993.
Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Wan, Ming. Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Relations: Defining and Defending National Interests. Philadelphis, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.
Watts, Sir Arthur. “The Liechtenstein Draft Convention on Self-Determination Through Self-Administration: A Commentary,” in The Self-Determination of Peoples: Community, Nation, and State in an Interdependent World, ed., by Wolfgang Danspeckgruber, 365-392. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002.
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, vol. 20, no. 1 (1995):71-81.
. “The Structure-Agent Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3 (Summer 1987):335-370.
. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1999.
Wikipedia-The Free Encyclopedia Website, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page (accessed October 30, 2006).
Wong, S. L. “Modernization and Chinese Culture in Hong Kong,” The China Quarterly, vol. 106 (1986):306-325.
World Bank, World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980-2006, http://www.worldbank.org/ (accessed June 8, 2006).
Wright, Jane. “Minority Groups, Autonomy, and Self-Determination,” Oxford Journal of Legal Students, vol. 19, no.4 (Winter 1999):605-629.
Wu, An-chia. “Can the Hong Kong Settlement Serve as a Model for Taiwan?” in The Future of Hong Kong: Toward 1997 and Beyond, eds., by Hungdah Chiu, Y.C. Jao, and Yuan-li Wu, 155-177. New York: Quorum Books, 1987.
Wu, Naiteh. “Observation Report of the Project Civil Referendum,” IRI-Asia Website, http://www.iri-asia.net/?mod=News&node_id=16&id=403 (accessed June 11, 2007).
Yahuda, Michael B. Hong Kong: China’s Challenge. London; New York: Routledge, 1996.
Yee, Herbert S. and Lo Shiu-hing. “Macau in Transition: The Politics of Decolonization,” in One Culture, Many Systems: Politics in the Reunification of China, eds., by Donald H. McMillen and Michael E. DeGolyer, 175-194. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1993.
Young, John D. “The Building Tears: Maintaining a China-Hong Kong-Britain Equilibrium, 1950-71,” in Precarious Balance: Hong Kong between China and Britain, 1842-1992, ed., by Ming K. Chan, 131-147. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1994.
Young, Simon. “The Meaning of the Right to Vote,” McGill Law Journal, vol. 42 (1997):649-730.