Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0821112-231506 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0821112-231506
論文名稱
Title
青少年道德脫離、同理心、對暴力電玩之熱愛與霸凌行為之相關研究
The study of adolescent’moral disengagement, empathy, passion toward violent online game and bullying behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
142
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-07-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-08-21
關鍵字
Keywords
熱愛、同理心、道德脫離
moral disengagement, empathy, passion
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5729 次,被下載 1411
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5729 times, has been downloaded 1411 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討台南及高雄地區青少年道德脫離各面向、同理心各面向及
喜好暴力電玩之不同經驗與校園霸凌行為之相關研究。本研究採用問卷調查
法,以台南及高雄地區之小五~高中職生為對象,並以「道德脫離量表」、「同
理心量表」、「熱愛量表」及「霸凌行為量表」為研究工具。問卷實際發放751
份,回收751 份,有效問卷700 份,有效回收率93%,並以描述性統計、卡方
考驗、t 檢定、單因子變異數分析、Pearsonru 積差相關、多元迴歸分析等進行
資料分析。本研究獲得結論如下:
一、台南及高雄地區青少年之校園霸凌現況:在受凌方面,網路受凌約
二成,傳統受凌約一成七;在霸凌方面,網路霸凌約一成一,傳統霸凌
約一成。而霸凌類型在網路上以「性騷擾」、「網路論戰」和「排擠」為
主;在傳統霸凌上仍以「言語霸凌」、和「關係霸凌」及「肢體霸凌」
為前三名。
二、台南及高雄地區之青少年遇霸凌事件,約有三成九之旁觀者會出手搭救
受凌者。
三、男生比起女生在霸凌事件中,不管是受害者或是加害者,其比率均比女生
來的高;大抵來說在學習階段方面,不管是受害或是加害者角色皆以高中
職階段比率最高;有電玩經驗者通常亦是霸凌事件之受害者及加害者之高
危險群,且高資歷者玩家比其他類玩家,更易來霸凌他人。
四、道德脫離各層面與受凌/霸凌等行為有正相關;同理心與受凌/霸玲等行為
有負相關。
五、旁觀者態度越傾向於協助受凌者其道德脫離程度越低。
六、有電玩經驗者與對電玩熱愛不管是越偏偏執式或和諧式及喜好暴力電玩經
驗越高、程度越強與頻率越頻繁,有較高的霸凌與受凌行為。
七、對暴力電玩之偏執式熱愛、和諧式熱愛、優勢比較及對暴力電玩經驗確實
為有效的的預測網路受凌之因素,對暴力電玩之偏執式熱愛及對暴力電
玩經驗確實為有效的的預測傳統受凌之因素;對暴力電玩之偏執式熱愛、
對暴力電玩經驗與道德脫離之婉轉標示,確實為有效的的預測網路霸凌
之因素,對暴力電玩之偏執式熱愛、道德脫離之優勢比較、婉轉標示及責
難歸因與認知同理,確實為有效的的預測傳統霸凌之因素。
Abstract
The study amied to realized the relationship among the adolescents’ moral
disengagement–oriented ,empathy –oriented, and preference of violent video games
experience with bullying behavior. The data was collected by means of questionnaires
and participants were grades fifth-grades to twelfth in Tainan and Kaohsiung area.A
questionanare including basic data, scale of moral disengagement, scale of empathy,
scale of passion, and scale of bullying behavior,and 700 effecitve participants were
obtained. Data analysis methods included descriptive statistics, Chi-square test,
The study amied to realized the relationship among the adolescents’ moral disengagement–oriented ,empathy –oriented, and preference of violent video games experience with bullying behavior. The data was collected by means of questionnaires and participants were grades fifth-grades to twelfth in Tainan and Kaohsiung area. A questionnaire including basic data, scale of moral disengagement, scale of empathy, scale of passion, and scale of bullying behavior, and 700 effective participants were obtained. Data analysis methods included descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Independent t-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and Regression Analysis. The results of this study were as follows:
1. In Tainan and Kaohsiung, about 20% of adolescent had suffered cyberbullying, 17% of adolescent had suffered traditional bullying; 11% of adolescent had been bullied in network, and 11% of adolescent had been bullied in campus. Commonly occurred types of traditional bullying are verbal bullying, relational bullying and physical bullying.
2 .39% of adolescents in Tainan and Kaohsiung will choose action to rescue the
victim when they encounter the event of bullying.
3. Compared with the female, the male more likely to become the
bully/victim; compared with lower grades, higher grades more likely to become the bully/victim; compared with higher qualifications of players more likely to become the bully.
4.The was a significantly positive correlation between the behavior of
bully/victim and moral disengagement-oriented; the was a significantly negative correlation between the behavior of bully/victim and empathy-oriented.
5.Bystander attitude is more likely to assistant, the lower degree of moral disengagement.
6.Bystander’s attitude is more inclined to help victims, the lower degree of moral disengagement.
7.Obsessive passion of violent online game, harmonious passion of violent online game, advantages comparison and experience of violent online game are the most significant predictor to predict become the victim of cyberbulling; obsessive passion of violent online game and experience of violent online game are the most significant predictor to predict become the victim of traditional bullying; obsessive passion of violent online game, experience of violent online game and euphemistic labeling are the most significant predictor to precict become the bully of cyberbullying; obsessive passion of violent online game, euphemistic labeling attribution of blame and perspective-taking are the most significant predictor to precict become the bully of traditional bullying.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論----------------------------------------------------01
第一節 研究背景與動機--------------------------------------01
第二節 研究目的--------------------------------------------06
第三節 重要名詞釋義----------------------------------------06
第四節 研究範圍與限制--------------------------------------10
第二章 文獻探討-----------------------------------------------11
第一節 校園霸凌--------------------------------------------11
第二節 道德脫離--------------------------------------------21
第三節 同理心----------------------------------------------29
第四節 熱愛------------------------------------------------32
第三章 研究方法-----------------------------------------------37
第一節 研究架構--------------------------------------------37
第二節 研究假設--------------------------------------------38
第三節 研究對象--------------------------------------------40
第四節 研究工具--------------------------------------------41
第五節 資料處理與分析--------------------------------------61
第四章 研究結果與分析----------------------------------64
第一節 背景變項、道德解離、同理心、霸凌現況之分析----------------64
第二節 背景在有無線上電玩相關經驗之差異情形-------------------------74
第三節 背景在霸凌行為的類型及角色上之差異----------------------------78
第四節 不同背景變項之青少年在道德脫離與同理心之差異-------------90
第五節 道德解離 同理心及不同背景的電玩經驗與霸凌之相關、回
歸分析----------------------------------------------------------------------97
第六節 典型相關------------------------------------------------------------------106
第五章 研究結論與建議----------------------------------109
第一節 研究發現------------------------------------------------------------------109
第二節 研究結論------------------------------------------------------------------112
第三節 建議------------------------------------------------------------------------116
第四節 未來研究之建議---------------------------------------------------------119

參考文獻-----------------------------------------------------------------121
中文部分----------------------------------------------121
西文部分----------------------------------------------126
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文部分
方鳳琪 (2002)。台灣青少年的媒體使用與其道德判斷之相關性-以電視綜藝節目與網路連線遊戲為例。國立政治大學傳播所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吉同凱、王哲偉(2009年11月)。拒作顫慄羔羊:從線上遊戲談國中生校園霸凌行為。2009臺灣資訊社會研究學會年會暨學術研討會,國立交通大學。
朱奕修 (2007)。線上遊戲玩家的熱愛、成癮與攻擊行為。台北大學資訊管理研
究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
朱美瑰(2008)。看不見的拳頭:高雄市國中生網路霸凌經驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
朱美瑰(2008)。網路犯罪新型態∼看不見的拳頭:青少年網路霸凌現象初探。諮商與輔導,268,6-10。
吳明隆、簡妙如 (2009)。青少年網路霸凌型行為探究。中等教育。60(3),90-109。
李炯煌 (2004)。特質目標取向和知覺動機氣候對能力知覺的預測力及交互作用。體育學報,37,133-147。
李志偉 (2011)。青少年霸凌類型與其影響因素調查研究。國立東華大學課程設計與潛能開發學系碩士論文,未出版,台東。
李奕宏 (2009)。保齡球參與者運動熱情態度、熱情效應之關聯性分析。台北市立體育學院休閒與運動管理碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李蕙秀 (2010)。工作熱情來源與組織承諾之關係研究-以研發人員為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
兒童福利聯盟網站(2007)。兒童校園「霸凌者」現況調查報告。台北市:兒童福利聯盟。
林育賢 (2001)。電玩暴力對學童之暴力攻擊行為之效果研究。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市
林珈瀅 (2011)。青少年霸凌行為與情緒管理、親子關係之相關研究。國立中山大學教育所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林苡彤 (2008)。 國中生關係攻擊角色與規範信念、同理心、人際衝突因應策略
之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士論文,
台北市。
林瑞英 (2011)。國小學生知覺教師管教方式與校園霸凌行為關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教學視導碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
林萬億 (2010,七月)。我們可以從「校園霸凌」學到什麼?發表於財團法人人本教育文教基金會、國立台北教育大學文教法律研究所、台灣大學法律系聯合舉辦之「以霸制霸 伊於胡底?」校園霸凌國際研討會,台北市。
邱絨軒 (2003)。沉迷網路遊戲高中生心理經驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
邱靖惠、蕭慧琳(2009)。台灣校園霸凌現象與危機因素之解析。2010年8月10日,取自。http://www.children.org.tw/database_report.php?id=287&typeid=4&offset=0
寇彧(2002)。青少年道德判斷、價值取向發展及其與首選觀念影響源之關係。運用心理研究,14,151-187。
柯采伶(2009)。真的只是囝仔的打鬧嗎?國中霸凌者校園霸凌行為之研究。 國立
高雄師範大學教育所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
胡婉玲(2009)。雙元熱情對競技啦啦隊之影響。台灣體育運動管理學報,8,
55-74。
教育電子報(2008)。2008年1月10日,http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=897
教育電子報(2010)。2010年8月19日,http://epaper.edu.tw/foreword.aspx?period_num=423
洪福源 (2003)。校園欺凌行為的本質及其防治策略。教育研究月刊,110 ,
88-98。
許建民 (2006)。青少年休閒參與動機模式之建立與驗證。國立體育學院研究所
博士論文,未出版,台北。
許文宗(2010)國中學生虛擬霸凌與傳統霸凌之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,未出版,彰化。
郭惠玲(2009)。國小學童人格特質、親子關係與霸凌行為之研究。國立東華大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
臺北駐日經濟文化代表處文化組 (2008)。2006年日本學校霸凌問題急增為12萬件。日本朝日新聞,290。2008年1月10日,取自http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=897
陳如瑾 (2011)。高雄市國小教師班級經營策略與校園霸凌行為相關之研究。屏
東教育大學社會發展學碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
陳怡安 (2002)。線上遊戲的魅力-以重度玩家為例。南華大學社會教育研究所碩
士論文,未出版,嘉義。
陳郁瑾 (2010)。台北市高中職學生校園霸凌行為與學校獎懲、導師領導、父母
管教關係之研究。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
陸洛 (1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研
究彙刊,8 (1),115-137。
曾琬鈴 (2010)。青少年網路霸凌行為形成原因之探討。玄焋大學應用心理學碩
士論文,未出版,新竹。
賀欣音 (2010)。學生知覺學校支持與學生霸凌型為關係之研究~以臺南市國中
為例。台南大學教育學系課程與教育碩士論文,未出版,台南。
馮嘉玉 (2002)。國中學生電玩遊戲使用經驗、成癮傾向及其自覺健康狀況之研
究。台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃羽淳 (2008)。大專院校啦啦隊員運動熱情與涉入關連性研究。台北市立體育學院休閒運動與管理碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃天佑、黃士珍 (2010)。國中生網路霸凌行為相關影響因素之研究。資訊科學應用期刊,6 (2),1-15。
黃妙玟(2008)。父母管教方式、收看暴力電視節目與校園霸凌之相關研究:以臺北縣國小高年級學童為例。私立銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
黃凱琳 (2010)。高雄地區國中生參與線上遊戲經驗與自我概念、生活適應、幸福感之研究。國立中山大學教育所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
黃瓊慧 (2000)。從心流(flow)理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。交通大
學傳播研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
黃德祥、李介至(2003)。電玩沉迷對青少年敵意、社會關係與學業成就之影
響,中等教育學報,第10期,頁39-頁69。
黃莉君 (2007)。以正向心理學建構青少年線上角色扮演遊戲行為模式。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
趙梅如、鐘思嘉(2004)。觀點取替故事同理心量表的發展。中華輔導學報,15,39-50
萬礎榮 (2009)。活動熱情對青少年社會支持及主觀幸福感之影響。國立台灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
雷新俊。校園欺凌行為的本質及其防治策略。國教之友,60 (4),33-41。
蔡淑莉 (2008)。健身運動者的運動熱情與運動幸福感及幸福感之相關研究。國立台北教育大學體育學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
賴示維 (2010)。建中橄欖球隊的認同與熱情:幾位黑衫軍的故事。國立體育大學體育推廣學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
顏士弦 (2010)。不同背景之籃球員心理韌性與熱情之相關研究。國立體育大學教練研究所碩士論文,桃園。
蘇船利(2003)。 學童暴力電子遊戲經驗與死亡概念、死亡態度相關性之研究。臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。















英文部分
Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010a). Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (4), 192–201.
Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010b). Development of a scale to investigate cybervictimization among online social utility members. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 46-59.
Almeida, A., Correia, I., & Marinho, S. (2010). Moral disengagement, normative beliefs of peer group, and attitudes regarding roles in bullying. Journal of School Violence, 9, 23–36. doi:10.1080.715388220903185639.
Anderson, Craig A.,Shibuya, Akiko, Inori, Nobuko, Swing , Edward L., Bushman Bard J, Sakamota Akira, Rothstein , Hannsh R, Saleem , Muniba.(2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin.136(2).151-173/
Aquino K, Reed A, Thau S, Freeman D.(2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How
moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagementinfluence cognitive and emotional reactions to war.J Exp Soc Psychol 43:385–392.
Baldry, A. C. and D. P. Farrington. (2000). “Bullies and delinquents: Personal
characteristics and parental styles.” Journal of Community and Applied Social
Psychology, 10: 17-31.
Bandura, A., Unerwood, B., & Fromson, M. F.(1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of research in personality. 9(4),253-269.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personal and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. dio:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119.doi:10.1080/0305724022014322
Bandura, A., Barbarnelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbarnelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory me chanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125–135.
Batson, C.D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G.(1997).Perspective taking:Iaagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personlity and Social Psycholgy Bulletin, 23(7).751-758.
Batson C.D., Thompson ER, Chen H.( 2002). Moral hypocrisy:Addressing some
alternatives. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:330–339.
Batson, C.D. , Ahmad,N.,& Lishner, D.A. (2002). Empathy and altruism.In Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp.417-426).New York, American:Oxford University Press.
Bar-Tal D. 2000. Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social PsychologicalAnalysis.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baumeister RF, Vohs KD.( 2004). Four roots of evil. In: Miller AG (ed.). The Social
Psychology of Good and Evil. New York: Guilford Press, pp 85–101.
Bernie Froese-Germain (2008).Bullying gets digita shot-in-the-arn.Education Canada.48(4).20-23.
Benack , S..(1984). Postformal epistemologies and the growth of empathy . In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations :Late adolescent and adult cognitive development ,(pp.340-356). NY:Praeger.
Bernie, FG. (2008). Bullying gets digital shot-in-the-arn, Education Canada, 48(4),20-23.
Boulton, M. J., Bucci, E., & Hawker, D. D. S. (1999). Swedish and English secondary
school pupils’ attitudes toward,and conceptions of, bullying: Concurrent links with bully/victim involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,40,277–284.
Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise?. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 68-76.
Carey, C.T., Fox, E., & Spraggins, E.F,(1988).Replication of structure findings regardin the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development ,21,102-106.
Čermák, Ivo,& Blatný, Marek.(1995). Personality indicators of aggression and moral disengagement. Studia Psychologica.,37(3),199-201.
Cimbora, D. M. & Mclntosh, D.M. (2003). Emotional responses to antisocial acts in adolescent males with conduct disorder :a link to affective morality.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psycholgy.32(2).296-301.
Cohen, P.(1996).Childhood risks for young adult symptoms of personality disorder :Method and substance . Mulivariate Behav Res 31:121-148.
Correia , Issable & Dalbert, Claudia.(2008). School bullying: belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders.European Psychology,13(4),248-254.
Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in
the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2, 41–60.
Craig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the
playground and in the classroom school.Psychology International, 21, 22–36.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, n113-126..
Dorothy L. Espelage. (2000). Using Research to Inform Bystander Intervention
Approaches to Prevent School-based Bullying. Educational Psychology.2-37.
Dorothy, S., & Jerry, Y. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Journal article by Dorothy, 38.
Duan, Changming, & Hill, Clara E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Jounal of counseling psychology.43(3).261-274.
Endresen, Lnger. M., Olweus, Dan, Bohart, Arthur C., & Sticpek, Deborah J.(2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, & society., (pp. 147-165). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, x, 420 pp. doi: 10.1037/10433-007
Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109-125.
Espelage, D. L., K. Bosworth, and T. R. Simon. (2000). ‘‘Examining the Social Context of Bullying Behaviors in Early Adolescence.’’ Journal of Counseling and Development 78,326-333.
Farrington, D.P., Jollifffe, D. & Stouthamer-Loeber, F. M., (2001). The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys' delinquency. Journal of Adolesence.24(5),579-596.
Funk,J. B., & Buchman, D.(1996). Playing Violent Video and Computer Games and Adolescent Self-Concept.Journal of Communication,46(2),19-32.
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggr Behav
32:528–539.
Grandinger, P. & Strohmeier, D. & Spiel, C.(2010). Motives for bullying others in cyberspace:A study on bullies and bully-victims in Austria.
Grussendorf J, McAlister A, Sandstro‥m P, Udd L, Morrison TC.(2002). Resisting
moral disengagement in support for war: Use ofthe ‘‘Peace Test’’ scale among student groups in 21 nations.J Peace Psychol 8:73–83.
Grüsser, S.M., Thalemann, R.,& Griffiths,M.D. (2007). Excessive Computer
Game Playing: Evidence for Addiction and Aggression? CyberPsychology & Behavior.Vol,12(2),290-292.
Haslam, N.( 2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev
10:252–264.
Hindmju, S. S., & Pacthin, J. W.(2008). Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156.
Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Toward a comprehensive empathy-based theory of prosocial moral development. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 61-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hymel,S.(2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176.
Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1–11.
Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cbyerspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505.
Kelman, H. C.,& Hamilton,V. L.(1989).Crimes of obedience :Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Kestenbaum, G. I. & Weinstein, L. (1985). Personality, Psychopathology, and Developmental Issues in Male Adolescent Video Game Use. Journal of the American of Child Psychiatry.24(3),329-333.
Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 22-30.
Kumpulainen, K., Rasanen, E.& Puura,K. (2001). Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying. Aggressive Behavior .27(162),102-110.
Li, Q. (2007a). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1777-1791.
Li, Q. (2007b). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber-victimisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 435-454.
Li, Q. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents’ experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50, 223–234.
Mayeux, L. & Antonius H.N.Cillessen.(2008). It's not just being popular, it's knowing it, too: The role of self-perceptions of status in the associations between peer status and aggression. Social Development,17(4),871-888.

Marsh P.E, & Collet P.,(1987). Driving passion:the psychology of the car. Psychological aspects:psychology.424-446.
Menesini E, Modiano (2002) A Multi-faceted Reality: A Report from Italy. In: Smith
PK, editor. Violence in schools: the response in Europe. Routledge Falmer
Editor. p 153–168.
Milgram S.( 1974). Obedience to Authority. An Experimental View.New York: Harper
Row.
Miller, P.A., & Eisenberg, N.(1988).The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing / antisocial behavior.Psychological Bulletin , 103, 324-344.
Molcho, M. Craig, W, Due, P ,Pickett, W, Harel-Fisch, Y, Overpeck, M.D,HSBSC Bullying Writing Group.(2009). Cross-national time trends in bullying behaviour 1994–2006: Findings from Europe and North America. International Journal of Public Health,54,225-234.
Monroe K.R. 2008. Cracking the code of genocide: The moral psychology of rescuers,
bystanders, and Nazis during the holocaust. Polit Psychol 29:699–736.
Nelson, E., Laidler, D., Mccallum, B. , Meltzer, A. , Schwartz , A., Svensson, L. (2003). The future of monetary aggregates in monetary policy analysis (2003). Journal of Monetary Economics.28(1).
Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239-257
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights
and challenges for intervention. H9Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.
Paciello M, Fida R, Tramontano C, Lupinetti C, Caprara GV. (2008). Stability and
change of moral disengagement and its impacts on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Dev79:1288–1309.
Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the school yard: A preliminary look at cyber bullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169.
Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2008).Cyberbullying :an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant behavior,29(2),129-156.
Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The Moral Disengagement Scale: Extension with an Amrican minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 26, 31–39. doi:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007454.34707.a5.
Pepler, D.J., Craig, W.M.F. (2001).Naturalistic Observations of Peer Intervations in Bullying. Social Development.10(4),513-527.
Perry D.C., Williard, J. C., Perry, L.C.(1990). Peers perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Cilid Dev 61:1310-1325.
Pornari, C., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81-94.
Salmivalli,C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten,M.(2010). Anti-bullying
intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Esurational.Psychology.75(3),465-487.
Sigfusdottir, I. D, Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (2010). Bullying and delinquency: The mediating role of anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 391-396.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M. & Tippett, N.(2006). An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying. A Report to the Anti-Bullying Alliance. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RBX03-06.pdf adresinden 09.02.2009 tarihinde erişilmiştir
Steffgen, G. & König, A. (2009). Cyber bullying: The role of traditional bullying and empathy. B. Sapeo, L. Haddon, E. Mante-Meijer, L. Fortunati, T. Turk & E. Loos (Eds.), The good, the bad and the challenging. Conference Proceedings (Vol. II; pp. 1041-1047). Brussels: Cost office.
Swearer, S. M. and B. Doll.( 2001). “Bullying in schools: An ecological framework.”
Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2: 7-23.
Szabo RM, Gelberman RH, Williamson RV, Dellon AL, Yaru NC, Dimick MP.(1084). Vibratory sensory testing in acute peripheral nerve compression.Nationa Institutes of Health,9A(1),104-9.
Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). The revised cyber bullying inventory (RCBI): Validity and reliability studies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 660-664.
Valdesolo P, DeSteno D.( 2007). Moral hypocrisy. Social groups andthe flexibility of
virtue. Psychol Sci 18:689–690.
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C. F., Léonard, M., Gagné, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l ’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756-767.
Warden, D ,& Mackinno, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social. problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmetn Psychology,23(3),367-385.
Wiens, B. A.,& Dempsey, A. (2009). Bystander involvement in peer victimization:the value of looking beyond aggressor and victims. Journal of School Violence, 8(3),206-215.
Willard, N. (2004). An educator’s guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats, new.csriu.org/cyberbully/docs/cbcteducator.pdf viewed November , 2010.
Willard, N. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Retrieved November 1, 2010, from http://new.csriu.org/cyberbully/cbbook.php.
Zebel, S., Zimmermann, A., Viki G., & Doosje, B.( 2008) Dehumanization and guilt as
distinct but related predictors of support for reparation polices. Polit Psychol 29:193–219.
Zimbardo PG.( 2004) A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil. In: Miller A(ed.). The Social Psychology of Good and Evil. New York: The Guilford Press, pp 51–84.
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M.,& Leaf, P. J..(2007). Examing the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying : implications for school intervention .Journal of Adolescent Healthy.41(6),42-50.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code