紙本教材對學習者來說是一項很重要的學習工具，同時也是學生獲得知識的主要來源。然而，紙本教材在呈現複雜的知識或概念上有所限制。近年來，智慧型手機蓬勃發展，其不但可作為通訊設備，更可作為連接網際網路的設備，擷取豐富的數位資訊。由於行動設備與人們慣用的紙本教材同樣具有很好的行動性(mobility) 及可攜性 (portability)，若能將智慧型手機適當的與紙本學習活動相互整合，便可以藉由行動科技將網際網路上非常具有豐富性及便利性的數位學習內容來擴增原有的紙本學習環境。
本研究提出一個以智慧型手機整合紙本與數位教材的英文閱讀學習環境，藉以提升學習者的閱讀成效。在此環境中，本研究設計兩種輔助閱讀活動的機制來輔助閱\讀學習，一是利用QR code作為自動化連結機制，將紙本教材的內容與數位教材相互連結，提供學習者相關的解說或背景知識；另外則是以提問式鷹架引導學習者在閱讀過程中掌握文章重點，促進文意的理解。本研究設計並建置一個整合紙本與數位教材的閱讀學習系統，並以準實驗研究法評估學習者使用此學習系統的閱讀成效。結果顯示，提問式鷹架可以顯著提升閱\讀成效，而自動化連結及其與提問式鷹架二者間的交互作用並無顯著提升學習者閱讀成效。問卷的分析結果顯示，多數學習者同意使用此一學習系統有助於英文閱讀理解。本研究進一步討論資料分析結果，並給予實務教學與未來研究方向之建議。

Reading from paper-based materials has been a major way for people to acquire knowledge. However, paper-based materials are constricted in presenting abstract and complex knowledge or concepts. Recent development of smartphone makes it a device not only for interpersonal communication, but also for accessing rich digital resources over the Internet. Because both paper-based materials and smartphone are mobile and portable, we can make use of the networking capability of smartphone to access digital materials from the Internet to enrich conventional paper-based reading activities such that students’ reading comprehension can be enhanced.
The present study came up with an innovative paper-based reading system integrated with digital materials delivered from the smartphone. QR codes were employed to automatically link the content of the print material with relevant digital resources. Also, questions were given to students along the reading process to scaffold the reading activity in order to help students comprehend the essence of the reading pieces.
A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the learning system in improving students’ reading comprehension. The results suggested that whether or not using QR code to automate linking digital and print materials does not significantly influence student reading comprehension; however, using questions to scaffold the reading process significantly improves students’ reading comprehension. The survey conducted in the experiment suggested that most of the students agreed that the integrated learning system benefits English reading comprehension. The implication of the results and suggestions to system design and future studies were then addressed.

致謝 II
摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
目錄 VI
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 X
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 3
第三節、研究目的 4
第四節、研究問題 4
第二章、文獻探討 6
第一節、紙本結合智慧型手機的閱讀學習環境 6
第二節、閱讀理解 8
第三節、提問式鷹架 8
第三章、 研究方法 12
第一節、研究架構與假說 12
第二節、系統設計 15
第三節、研究工具 25
第四節、研究對象 32
第五節、實驗設計 32
第六節、資料分析方法 36
第四章、結果與討論 37
第一節、資料收集情形 37
第二節、前後測試題分析 38
第三節、相關性分析 39
第四節、後測閱讀成效分析 40
第五節、系統使用問卷分析 46
第六節、討論 49
第五章、結論 54
第一節、研究結果 54
第二節、研究貢獻 55
第三節、研究限制 56
第四節、未來研究 56
參考文獻 58
附錄1、專家訪談表 65
附錄2、前測 68
附錄3、後測 76
附錄4、教材 83
附錄5、問卷 90
附錄6、問卷結果 97

Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B. L., O'Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1998). A diary study of work-related reading: Design implications for digital reading devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '98), 241-248.
Alison, K. (1994). Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osbom, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read (3rd ed.). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
Back, M., J. Cohen, et al. (2001). Listen reader: an electronically augmented paper-based book. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Seattle, Washington, United States, ACM: 23-29.
Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Brandl, P., M. Haller, et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between real printouts and digital whiteboard. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. Napoli, Italy, ACM: 31-38.
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational researcher, 10(2), 14-21.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. M., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Chao, P. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2009). Augmenting paper-based learning with mobile phones. Interacting with Computers, 21(3), 173-185.
Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, Wei, C. W., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Designing a self-contained group area network for ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 16-26.
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students' comprehension of text. ProQuest Education 58(6), 570-580.
Cobb, T. (1997). Cognitive efficiency: toward a revised theory of media. Educational technology research and development, 45(4), 21-35.
Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompasss new literacies. The reading teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading research quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.
Cook, D. A. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Medical teacher, 31(2), 158-162.
Cook, D. A., & McDonald, F. S. (2008). E-learning: is there anything special about the "e"? Perspectives in biology and medicine, 51(1), 5-21.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Graf, S., Liu, T.-C., Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., & Yang, S. J. H. (2009). Learning styles and cognitive traits - Their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1280-1289.
Graves, M. F., & Graves, B. B. (2003). Scaffolding reading experiences: Designs for student success. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Harris, T., & Hodges, R. (Eds.). (1995). The literacy dictionary. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
IRA, & NCTE. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE: International Reading Association and the National Council of Teachers of English.
Koike, H., Sato, Y., & Kobayashi, Y. (2001). Integrating paper and digital information on EnhancedDesk: a method for realtime finger tracking on an augmented desk system. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 8(4), 307-322.
Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2009). Let us read together: Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading system. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1188-1198.
Langer, J. A. (1986). Computer technology and reading instruction: Perspectives and directions. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 91-106.
Longhurst, J. (2003). World History on the World Wide Web: A student satisfaction survey and a blinding flash of the obvious. The history teacher, 36(3), 343-356.
Mackay, W. E., G. Pothier, et al. (2002). The missing link: augmenting biology laboratory notebooks. Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Paris, France, ACM: 41-50.
Mark, M. A., & Greer, J. E. (1995). The VCR tutor: Effective instruction for device operation. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(2), 209-246.
Mathes, P.G., Torgesen, J.K., & Allor, J.H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal. 38, 371-410.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mitnik, R., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A. (2008). An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Autonomous robots, 25(4), 367-382.
Moreno, R., & Valdes, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational technology research and development, 53(3), 35-45.
Morris, M. R., Brush, A. J. B., & Meyers, B. R. (2007). Reading revisited: Evaluating the usability of digital display surfaces for active reading tasks. Proceedings of the second annual IEEE international workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '07), 79-86.
O'Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and online documents. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '97), 335-342.
Paris, S. G., Wixson, K. K., & Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Instructional approaches to reading comprehension. Review of research in education, 13, 91-128.
Pearson, P. D., Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. Handbook of reading research, 11, 815-860.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The future of children, 10(2), 76-101.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of educational research, 56(4), 411-436.
Smith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tanimoto, S. L., Hubbard, S., & Winn, W. D. (2005). Automatic textual feedback for guided inquiry learning. Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, 662-669.
Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press.
Wang, T.-Y., Huang, H.-C., & Huang, H.-S. (2006). Design and implementation of cancellation tasks for visual search strategies and visual attention in school children. Computers & Education, 47(1), 1-16.
Want, R., K. P. Fishkin, et al. (1999). Bridging physical and virtual worlds with electronic tags. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, ACM: 370-377.
Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Literacy Instruction in Nine First-Grade Classrooms: Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 101-128.
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative process of comprehension. Educational psychologist, 24(4), 345-376.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.