Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0831105-010711 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0831105-010711
論文名稱
Title
心理契約違反與工作績效關係之研究–以永豐餘造紙股份有限公司為例
The Relationship of Psychological Contract Violation and Work Performance –For the Case Study by Yueng Foong Yu Paper MFG. CO., LTD.
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
97
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-07-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-08-31
關鍵字
Keywords
心理契約、領導風格、永豐餘、公平、職權、人格特質、主管與部屬關係、工作績效、組織承諾、可雇用性
leading style, the relationship between employers and employees, authority, work performanc, equity, personal characteristics, Yueng Foong Yu., organizational commitment, employability, psychological contract
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5677 次,被下載 5385
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5677 times, has been downloaded 5385 times.
中文摘要
契約是僱傭關係中不可或缺的關鍵因素,勞動契約規範了勞雇雙方的權利與義務,而心理契約則是另外一種特殊的契約模式,是員工與組織對彼此相互義務的一種期望,它是維持員工與組織和諧關係的必要條件之一。近年來許多的企業為了提昇競爭力而推行「企業再造」及「組織精減」等策略,但這些策略卻與企業推動重視員工或是展現員工是企業一份子的活動相互矛盾,忽略了員工在成功組織中的價值。此時,員工與企業彼此間的忠誠與信賴就顯得特別重要,而心理契約則是維持彼此關係的重要因素之一。
心理契約的違反會影響到員工的行為表現,當心理契約被違反時,員工對組織的信任感、忠誠度、工作滿意度及組織公民行為、工作績效等會產生負面的影響,甚至離職。但是心理契約的違反是一種主觀的認知,會受到員工個人的差異及外部環境的影響。
心理契約包括了員工個體與組織兩個層面,國內有關心理契約違反的研究有人以醫師、銀行員工或高科技產業為研究主體,但沒有以製造業為研究對象的,並且大多只限於個體的觀點。因此,本研究以永豐餘造紙股份有限公司為研究對象,並加入組織的觀點來看個體的貢獻,實證當員工心理契約違反時,是否對工作績效有負面的影響?並且實證員工的可雇用性、組織承諾、人格特質及主管的領導風格、與部屬的關係、職權及公平等因素,是否對心理契約的違反與工作績效產生影響?
實證的結果發現:
1.在不同的事業部中,總管理處員工的脈絡績效比紙與紙板事業部員工佳。
2.在性別差異上,女性員工的任務績效比男性員工佳。
3.在工作年資上,11~15年工作年資員工的脈絡績效比年資超過25年的員工佳。
4.心理契約的違反與工作績效並無顯著的差異。
5.組織承諾對於心理契約違反與工作績效的影響方面,員工組織承諾愈高者,對公司實現組織津貼期望愈滿意時,其主管卻認為其任務績效表現愈差。
6.可雇用性、人格特質對於工作績效有顯著的差異。
7.主管與部屬的關係、公平對脈絡績效有顯著的差異
Abstract
The contract is essential for the employment, the labor contracts standardize the right and duty for the employment, but the psychological contract is another type of contract. A psychological contract is an employee's belief about the mutual obligations, and it balances the relationship between the employee and his/her organization. In order to promote the corporation's competition, the corporation carries out the restructuring and downsizing strategies, but these strategies are contrary to the critical role that people play in successful organization. Under this condition, the employee's belief and loyalty become more important to maintain the balance of relationship between employee and his organization.
When the psychological contract was violated, it may lead to reduce the employee's belief, loyalty, job satisfaction and performance, citizenship behavior, even the employees will turn- over. However, the react may be affected by the individual's discrepancy and external circumstances.
The case study is based on the employees in Yueng Foong Yu Paper MFG. CO., LTD. so as to prove if the psychologial contract violation will reduce the employee's performance, and some factors deal with how to affect the violation of psychological contract and work performance.
The result is shown as the following:
1. In different SEU(Strategic Entrepreneurial Units), the performance of the employees in the
general management office is better than the Fine Paper and Board SEU.
2. In the sexual difference, the task performance of the female employees is better than that of the
male ones.
3. In the workage, the employees whose contextual performance are from 11 to 15 years are better
than the ones whose workage are over 25 years.
4. The difference between psychological contract violation and work performance is insignificant.
5. When the employees whose orgnizational commitment is higher feel more satified with the
organizational benefits, his/her task performance becomes worse.
6. The difference between employability, personal characteristics and work performance is
significant.
7.The differecne between relationship of employers and employees and contextual performance is
significant.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的3
第三節 研究流程4
第二章 文獻探討7
第一節 心理契約7
第二節 工作績效19
第三節 影響心理契約與工作績效的干擾因素26
第三章 研究方法37
第一節 研究架構37
第二節 研究假設37
第三節 問卷設計與測量38
第四節 個案公司介紹與資料收集方法44
第四章 實證分析50
第一節 各研究變項的特性分析50
第二節 心理契約違反與工作績效之關係57
第三節 干擾變項對心理契約違反與工作績效之影響58
第五章 結論與建議 70
第一節 結論70
第二節 建議71
參考文獻74
附錄
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
刑袓援,1975。現代考核評估的發展方向。研考通訊,第五卷第一期,3頁。
江錦樺,2001。人格特質與組織文化之適配性對工作績效之影響–以高科技F公司為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
余德成,1996。品質管理人性面系統因素對工作績效之影響。國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
吳子輝,1975,內外控取向與自由選擇對閱讀測驗成績的影響,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳秉恩,1986。組織行為學。台北:華泰書局。
吳秉恩,1991。策略性人力資源管理:理念、運作與實務。中國經濟企業研究所。
吳瓊恩、李允傑、陳銘薰,2001。公共管理。智勝文化事業有限公司。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬,2001。組織行為學。台北:華泰書局。
房冠寶,2000。人格特質與工作績效的關聯性研究:以證券業後勤行政人員為例。台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
林安弘,1987。行為管理學。台北:三民書局。
陳麗琇,2002。高科技產業教育訓練功能委外之研究–以新竹科學園區為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
康譽瓊,2001。內部行銷作為、行為評估、工作滿足和顧客導向之研究–以證卷營業員為例。國立中山大學企業管理研究論文。
萬榮水,2002。公務人員期望「跨組織發展」生涯之勞雇心理契約意涵。研習論壇,第十九期,頁29-34。
黃英忠,2001。現代管理學 ,第四版。台北:華泰書局。
黃家齊, 2000。高效能人力資源管理活動、雇用關係與員工反應之關聯性研究–心理契約的觀點。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
黃錦淑,2001。研發人員的工作設計與工作績效關係之研究:兩種工作特性模式之應用,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
劉家駒,1996。由組織及均衡觀點探討職位結構、組織承諾與承諾管理關係之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
蕭育芬,2002。企業之內部行銷作為、績效評估方式、授權、公司顧客導向策略與員工顧客導向關係之研究—以不動產經紀業為例。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
謝東榮,1998。組織中親信關係之形成及其對組織效能之關聯性研究-以銀行服務業為實證對象。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文 。
蘇義祥,1999。中華電信專戶服務部門領導型態與工作績效關係之研究:服務人員特質及成熟度的調節作用。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份
Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L.(Ed.), Advances In Experimental Social Psychology( p.267-299). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, E., & Oliver, R. L. 1987. Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based contrao system. Journal Of Marketing, Vol.51, 4, p.76-88.
Argyris, C. P. 1960. Understanding organization behavior. Homewood, Dorsey.
Barnard, C. 1938. The Functions Of The Executive. Cambridge, MA: President And Fellows Of Harvard University.
Blau, P. 1967. The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Jonranal Of Sociology ,68, p.453-467.
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. 1982. Yhe missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performace. Academy Of Mangagement Review, 7, p.560-569.
Bolles, R. C. 1979. Learning theory, New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt, N., Borman, W. C., & Associates. Personnel Selection in Organization(p.71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, D. E., & Schneider, B. 1988. Service Marketing and management: Implications for organizational behavior. Research In Organizational Behavior, JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. 1996. An interactive framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, p.189-208.
Burger, J. M. 1997. Personality, 4th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Campell, J. P. 1970. Managerial Behavior Performance And Effectiveness. New York: Mcgraw Hill.
Cascio, W. F. 1998. Learning from outcomes: Financial experiences of 311 firms that have downsized. In The New Organizational Reality: Downsiziing, Restructuring, And Revitalization. Eds. Gowing, M. K., Kraft, J. D., & Quick, J. C. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, p.55-70.
Caxcio, W. F. 1991. Applied Psychology In Personal Management, 4th ed. Nes Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chandler, T. A., Wolf, R. M., Cook, B., & Dugovices, D. A. 1980. Parental correlates of locus of control in fifth graders: An attempt at experimentation in the home. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, p.183-195.
Conway, N., & Briner, R. 2002. A daily diary study of affective responses to psychologcial contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 23, p.287-302.
Costa, P. T., & Mccrae, R. R. 1992. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality And Individual Differences,13, p.653-665.
Cravens, D. W., Ingram, T. N., Laforge, R. W., & Young, C. E. 1993. Behavior-based and outcome-based salesforce comtrol systems. Journal Of Marketing, Vol.57(October), p.47-59.
De Mesuse, K. P., Bergmann, T. J., & Lester, S. W. 2001. An investingation of the relational comonent of the psychological contract acrosee time, generation, and employment status. Journal Of Managerial Issues, Spring 2001 , p.102-118.
De Meuse, K. P., & Tornow, W. W. 1990. The tie that binds has become very, very frayed!. Human Resource Planning, 13, p.203-213.
De Meuse, K. P., Bergmann, T. J., & Vanderheiden, P.A. 1997. Corporate downsizing: separating myth from fact. Journal Of Management Inquity, 6, p.168-176.
De Meuse, K.P., Bergmann, T.J., & Lester, S.W. 2001. An investigation of the relational component of the psychological contract across time, generation, and employment status. Journal Of Managerial Issues, Spring 2001, p.102-118.
Denise M. Rousseau, 1995. Psychological Contracts In Organizations, p.33.
Dixon, N., & Vollmann. 1990. The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations For World-Class Comperition. IRWIN Illinois, Homewood.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, No.3, pp.500-507.
Follett, M. O. 1942. Dynamic Administration. New York, Harper.(10).
Gatewood, R. D., & Field, H. S. 1998. Human Resource Selection. Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press/Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
George, W. R.1990. International marketing and organizational behavior: A partnership in developing customer-conscious employees at every level. Journal Of Business Research, Vol.20, p.63-70.
Gronroos, C. 1983. Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report NO.83-104. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elorn, E. 1994. Expatriate managers and psychological contract. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No.4, p.617-626
Hallage, J., & Pollard, E. 1998. Employability: Developing a framnework for policy analysis. Department For Education And Employment (DfEE) Research Report on RR85. London, Deff.
Harvey, L. 2001. Defining and measuring employability. Quality In Higher Education, Vol.7, 2, 2001.
Harvey, L. 2001. Defining and measuring employability. Quality In Higher Education, Vol.7, No.2.
Harvey, L., & Green., D. 1995. Employer Satisfaction Survey. University Of Central England.
Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kidd, J. M., 1997. The content of the psychological contract. British Journal Of Management, 8, p.151-162.
Huseman, R., Hatfield, J., & Miles, E. 1985. Test for individual perceptions of job equity: some preliminary findings. Perceptual And Motor Skills, 61, p.1055-1064.
Huseman, R., Hatfield, J., & Miles, E. 1987. Anew perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitiveity construct. Academy Of Management Review, 12, p.222-234.
Jaffe, D. T., & Scott, C. D. 1998. Rekindling work commitment and effectiveness through a new work contract. In The New Organizational Reality: Downsiziing, Restructuring, And Revitalization. Eds. Gowing, M. K., Kraft, J. D., & Quick, J. C. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, p.185-205.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The Social Psychology Of Organizations, 2nd ed., New York: wiley.
Keith, D., & Newstrom, J. W. 1989. Human Behavior At Work: Organizational Behavior, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill.
Keith, D., Newstrom, J. W. 1997. Organiaztional behavior: Human Behavior At Work. New York, wiley.
Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. 2001. Broken promises:Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal Of Business And Psychology, Vol.16, 2, ABI/INFORM Global.
King, W., & Miles, E. 1994. The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal Of Occupayionsl And Organizational Psychology, 67, p.133-142.
King, W., Miles, E., & Day, D. 1993. A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal Of Oganizational Behavior, 14, p.301-317.
Kissler, G. D. 1994. The new employment contract. Human Resource Management, 33, p.335-352.
Korman, A. 1977. Organization Behavior. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kotter, J. P. 1973. The psychological contract: Managing the Joining-up process. California Management Review, 15, p.91-99.
Langsner, A. Z. 1961. Wage and salary administration. South- Western, p.315-316.
Lester, S. W., Claire, E., & Kickul, J. 2001. Psychological contracts in the 21st century:What Employees value most and how well organizations are responding to these expectations. Humman resource planning,Vol.24 ,No.1, p.10-21.
Lester, S. W., Turnley, W. H., Bloodgood, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. 2002. Not seeing eye to eye: Differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 23, p.39-56.
Levinson, H. 1962. Men, Management And Mental Health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Levinson, H. 1965. Reciprocation: The relationship between man and Organization. Administrative Scuence Quarterly.Vol.9, No.4, pp.370-390
Levinson, H., Price, C., Munder, K., Mandl, H., & Solley, C. 1962. Men, Management And Mental Herlth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis-McClear, K., & Taylor, M. S. 1997. Not seeing eye-to-ete:implications of discrepant psychological contracts and contract violation for the employment relationship. Academy Of Management Proceedings, p.335-340.
Macneil, I. R. 1985. Relational contract: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 483-525.
McFarlane, S. L., & Tetrick, L. E. 1994. The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. Tredns In Organizational Behavior, Vol., p.91-109.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. 1991. A three-componet conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, p.61-98.
Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R. W. 1998. Organizational Behavior. New York, 5th., p.89.
Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal Of Applied Psychology, 76, p.845-855.
Morrison, D. 1994. Psychological contracts and change. Human Resource Management, 33, P.353-372.
Morrison, E.W., & Robinson, S. L. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Acdemy Of Management Review, 22, p.226-256.
Motowidle, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal Of Applie Psychology, 79, p.475-780.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 14, p.224-247.
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1994. A management challenge. Organizational Behavior., The Dryden Press, p.400.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. 1985.A conceptual model of service quality and it implication for future research. Journal Of Marketing , Vol.49, p.41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. 1988. Communication and control Processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal Of Marketing , Vol.52(April), p.35-48.
Parks, J., & Kidder, D. A. 1994. Till death us do part...;Changing work relationships in the 199s. Trends In Organizational Behavior, 1, p.111-136.
Pfeffer, J. 1998. The Human Equation: Building Profits By Putting People First. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, L., Steers, R., & Lawler. 1968. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and trunover among psychiatric technicians. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, p.603-609.
Rearcon, K. K., & Enis, B. 1990.establishing a companywide customer orientation througy persuasive internal marketing. Management Communication Quarterly, Vol.3,(February), p.376-387.
Robbins, S.P. 1993. Organizational behavior,6th ed. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. 1995. Organizational citizenship behavior : A psychological contract perspective. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 16 , p.289-298.
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Violating the psychological contract : Not the exception but the norm. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 15, p.245-259.
Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Changing obligation and the psychological contract : A longitudinal study. Academy Of Management Journal, 37, p.137-152.
Robinson, S.L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contracts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, p.574-599.
Rotter, J. B. 1954. Social Learning And Clinical Ppsychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Rotter, J. B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, Vol.80, P.1-28.
Rousseau, D. M. 1989. Psychological and implied contracts in organization. Employee Responsibilities And Rights Journal, 2(2), p.121-139.
Rousseau, D. M. 1995. Psychological Contracts In Organizations: Understanding Written And Unwritter Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rousseau, D. M. 2000. Psychological contracts inventory technical report. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. 1998. Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measure. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, Vol.19, No. 7, p.679-695.
Rousseau, D. M.,& Parks, J. M. 1993. The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research In Organizational Behavior, Vol.15, p.1- 43.
Rousseau, D.M. 1990. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 11, p.389-400
Rousseau, D.M. 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations, p.33.
Schein, E. H. 1980. Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice - Hall.
Schein, E. W. 1965. Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Schermerhorm, J. R. 1989. Management For Productivity, 3rd. Edition New York, John Wiley and Sons.
Shalk, R., & Freese, C. 1997. New facets of commitment in response to organizational change : Research Trends And The Dutch Experience, Vol.4, p.115.
Shore, L.M., & Barksdale, K. 1998. Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange approach. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 19, p.731-744.
Singh, R. 1998. Redefining psychological contracts within the U.S. Work force: A critical task for strategic human resource management planners in the 1990s. Human Resource Management, 37, p.61-69.
Skarlicke, D. P., & Folger, R. 1997. Retaliationin the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justic. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 82, p.434-443.
Stell, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. 2d. 1984. A revies and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol.69, 4, p.673-686.
Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. 1978. Assessing personal, role and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy Of Management Journal, 21, p.380-396.
Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T. V. 1973. Conleict, Power And Games. Chicago: Aldine.
Turnley, W. H. 1996. Reconceptualizing the nature and consequences of psychological contract violations. Doctral dissertation, University of South Carolina.
Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. 2000. Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 21, p.25-42.
Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. 1998. Psychological contract violations during organizational restructuring. Human Resource Management, 37, p.71-83.
Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D.C. 1999. A discrepancy model of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9, p.367-386.
Turnley, W. H., & Feleman, D. C., 1984. Psychological contract violations during organizational restructuring. Human Resource Management, 37, p.71-83.
Turnley, W. H.. & Feldman, D. C. 1999. The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations, 52, p.895-922.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. 1984. Negative affectivity : The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 98, p.219-235.
Whyte, W. H., Jr. 1956. The Organization Man. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Whyte, W.H. 1956. The Organization Man. New York, NY:Simon & Schuster.
Wolfle, L. M., & Robertshaw, D. 1982. Effects of college attendance on locus of control. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 43, p.802-810.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code