Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0901110-232013 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0901110-232013
論文名稱
Title
置入方式與廣告位置對於雜誌置入效果之影響
Do Placement Characteristics and Advertising Position Matter in Magazine Product Placement?
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
116
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-09-01
關鍵字
Keywords
產品置入、置入方式、廣告位置
placement characteristics, advertising position, product placement
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5749 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5749 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
厭倦了收看傳統廣告,近年來「產品置入」在全國際及台灣蔚為風潮,不管各類型的企業都希望可以將自己的產品融入在某部電影或是戲劇當中,期望能夠為品牌創造好效益,但若只是一昧使用產品置入而沒有考慮情境的搭配則未必可以對品牌帶來面效用。
本文透過雜誌來了解產品置入在雜誌中之應用與結果,透過實驗來檢視置入方式和廣告位置來了解產品置入之廣告效果的影響,而實驗的置入文章為一篇介紹canon相機的相關文章。實驗為2×4二因子設計,分別為置入方式(明顯的置入方式vs.暗隱的置入方式)和廣告位置(搭配於置入文章前、搭配於置入文章旁、搭配於置入文章後、沒有搭配廣告),透過虛擬的產品置入廣告建立起八種不同的實驗情境,觀察消費者在不同情境下對產品置入廣告展現的購買意圖與品牌態度。
結果顯示暗隱的置入方式較明顯的置入方式來得有較佳的廣告效果,而且置入方式與廣告位置之間確實存在交互作用,在產品置入當中使用明顯置入時若將品牌廣告搭配在置入文章旁邊相較其他廣告搭配位置會獲得較負面的效果。同時依據此結果,在使用產品置入的行銷廣告方案時,可先考量要採取明顯的或暗隱的置入方式,再將其商業廣告搭配在一個最適位置。
Abstract
Due to ineffectiveness of traditional advertising, the notion of "product placement" quickly reinforced to be a new forming trend in recent years. Companies incorporate their products into movie films or television media. Those placements attempt to generate positive attitudes of target audiences for the brand. Unfortunately, this strategic intent does not always work.
Using the magazine as the medium, this research investigates how to optimize the effects of placement characteristics and advertising position. Product placement is presented in a fictitious article about the introduction to new Canon digital camera. An experiment of 2 (placement characteristics: prominent placement vs. subtle placement) × 4 (advertising position:before the article vs. next to the article vs. after the article vs. no advertisement) factorial design is conducted. Eight different scenarios are established through fictitious a product placement, and eight experimental conditions are developed. The advertising effectiveness is measured by purchase intention and attitudes toward the brand.
The results suggest that a subtle placement is more effective than a prominent placement. More importantly, an interaction of placement characteristics and advertising position is observed. The results indicate that product placement is most likely to backfire when a brand advertisement is shown next to the placement article. According to these findings, marketers should consider the “placement characteristics” of their brands before choosing an appropriate advertisement position appearing in the product placement.
目次 Table of Contents
中文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------- 1
英文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------- 2

第一章 緒論 ---------------------------------------------------- 8
第一節 前言 -------------------------------------------------- 8
第二節 研究背景與動機 ---------------------------------------- 8
第三節 研究目的與問題 ---------------------------------------- 10
第四節 論文架構與研究流程 ------------------------------------ 11

第二章 文獻回顧 ------------------------------------------------ 12
第一節 前言 -------------------------------------------------- 12
第二節 產品置入之概述 ---------------------------------------- 12
一、 產品置入之介紹----------------------------------------- 12
二、 產品置入之相關理論------------------------------------- 14
三、 產品置入之廣告效果------------------------------------- 15
四、 產品置入之呈現方式------------------------------------- 16
第三節 廣告位置之概述----------------------------------------- 19
第五節 小結 -------------------------------------------------- 21

第三章 研究設計與方法 ----------------------------------------- 22
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------------- 22
第二節 研究架構與假設 --------------------------------------- 22
一、 置入方式類型對產品置入之廣告效果的影響--------------- 22
二、 不同廣告位置對產品置入之廣告效果的影響--------------- 24
三、 置入方式類型與不同廣告位置的交互作用對產品置入
之廣告效果的影響-------------------------------------- 25
第三節 研究設計---------------------------------------------- 26
一、 實驗設計概要 ----------------------------------------- 26
二、 受訪者與選擇產品和主題-------------------------------- 27
三、 研究變數 --------------------------------------------- 27
四、 研究操弄情境------------------------------------------ 30
五、 問卷題項設計------------------------------------------ 33
六、 實驗執行過程------------------------------------------ 34
第四節 小結 ------------------------------------------------- 34

第四章 研究結果分析 ------------------------------------------- 36
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------------- 36
第二節 樣本背景資料 ----------------------------------------- 36
第三節 信度分析 --------------------------------------------- 37
第四節 研究設計之檢驗 --------------------------------------- 38
一、操弄確認 ---------------------------------------------- 38
二、 潛在共變數檢定---------------------------------------- 39
第五節 研究假設之檢驗 --------------------------------------- 40
一、 以購買意圖為依變數進行研究假設驗證 ----------------- 42
二、 以對品牌的態度為依變數進行研究假設驗證 ----------- 45
第六節 小結 ------------------------------------------------- 47

第五章 結論與建議 --------------------------------------------- 48
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------------- 48
第二節 研究結果討論 ----------------------------------------- 48
第三節 研究貢獻 --------------------------------------------- 51
一、 理論貢獻 --------------------------------------------- 51
二、 實務貢獻 --------------------------------------------- 52
第四節 研究限制 --------------------------------------------- 52
一、 以大學生為樣本的便利抽樣 ----------------------------- 52
二、 實驗設計法 ------------------------------------------- 53
三、 單一產品類別 ----------------------------------------- 53
第五節 未來研究建議 ----------------------------------------- 53
一、以不同的產品類別加以探討對品牌的影響-----------------53
二、以不同的產品置入方式加以探討對品牌的影響---------- 54
三、置入「虛擬品牌」或「新品牌」的產品,來進行實驗--------- 54
第六節 小結 ------------------------------------------------- 54

參考文獻 ------------------------------------------------------ 56

附錄一:明顯置入方式與廣告搭配於前--------------------------- 65
附錄二:暗隱置入方式與廣告搭配於前--------------------------- 71
附錄三:明顯置入方式與廣告搭配於旁----------------------------77
附錄四:暗隱置入方式與廣告搭配於旁--------------------------- 83
附錄五:明顯置入方式與廣告搭配於後----------------------------89
附錄六:暗隱置入方式與廣告搭配於後----------------------------95
附錄七:明顯置入方式沒有搭配廣告-----------------------------101
附錄八:暗隱置入方式沒有搭配廣告------------------------------107
附錄九 正式問卷(明顯的置入方式)--------------------------------113
參考文獻 References
林建煌(2002),消費者行為,智勝。

徐振興、黃甄玉(2005)。產品訊息疑似置入電視偶像劇之研究。中華傳播學刊, 8。
李亭慧(2007) 產品置入與電視廣告對消費行為之影響。銘傳大學研究管理所。

Lindstrom, (2009)。買我!-從大腦科學看花錢購物的真相與假象,遠流。

Aaker, David S. and Donald E. Bruzzone (1985),“Causes of Irritation in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 47-57.

Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wesley Hutchinson (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411-454.

Andreoli, Virginia, and Stephen Worchel (1978), “Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Position on Attitude Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(1), 59-70.

Appel V. (2000), “EDITORIAL ENVIRONMENT AND ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESS,” Journal of Advertising Research, 89-94

Avery,Roesmary J. and Rosellian, Ferraro (2000),“Verisimilitude or Advertising? Brand Appearances on Prime-Time Television,”Journal of consumer Affairs, 34(2), 217-244

Auty, Susan, and Lewis, C. (2004), “Exploring Children's Choice: The Reminder Effect of Product Placement,” Psychology and Marketing, 21, 697-713.

Axelrod, Joel N. (1963), “Induced Moods and Attitudes Toward Products,” Journal of Advertising Research, 3(June), 19-24.

Babin, L. A., and Carder, S. T. (1996), “Viewers' Recognition of Brands Placed Within a Film, ”International Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 140-151.

Balasubramanian, Siva K. (1994), “Beyond Advertising and Publicity: Hybrid Messages and Public Policy Issues,” Journal of Advertising, 4, 29-46.

Belch, George E.(1982),“The Effects of Television Commercial Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), 56-65.

Belk, and Russell, W. (1982),“ Effects of Gift-Giving Involvement on Gift Selection Strategies,” Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 408-412.

Bello, Daniel C, Robert E. Pitts and Michael J. Etzel (1983), “The Communication Effects of Controversial Sexual Content in Television Programs and Commercials,” Journal of Advertising, 12(3), 32-42.

Bhatnagar, Namita, Lerzan A., and Malkoc, S. A. (2004),“ The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficacy,”

Bowen, L., and S, H. C. (1974), “Product Involvement and Pertinent Advertising Appeals,” Journalism Quarterly, 51, 613-621.

Brennan I. (2008),“ Brand placement in novels. A test of the generation effect,”International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 495–509

Brennan ,Ian, Dubas K., and Babin L.A. (1999),“The Influence of Product Plcement Type and Exposure Time on Product Placement Recogniton,” International Journal of Advertising, 18, 323-337.

Bryant, Jennings and Paul W. Comisky (1978), “The Effects of Positioning a Message Within Differentially Cognitively Involving Portions of a Television Segment on Recall of the Message,” Human Communication Research, 5(1), 63-75.

Burke, Marian and Julie E. (1986),“Ad Reaction over Time:capturing Changes in the Real World,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 114-118.

Cauberghe V. and Pelsmacker P. D. (2010),“The Impact of Brand Prominence and Game Repetition on Brand Responses,”Journal of Advertising, 1(Spring),.5–18.

Chaiken, Shelly, and Alice H. Eagly ](1976), “Communication Modality as a Determinant of Message Persuasiveness and Message Comprehensibility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 605–614

Chaiken, Shelly, and Alice H. Eagly (1983), “Communication Modality as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of Communicator Salience,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241–256.

Chaiken, Shelly (1980),“Heuristic verses Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source verses Message Cues in Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(Nov), 752-766.

Chaiken, Shelly and Charles Stangor (1987), “Attitudes and Attitude Change,” Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.

Chaney,I.M., Ku-Ho Lin, and Chaney,J. (2004),“The Effect of Billboards within the Gaming Environment,”Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(1), 5-26.

Clancy, Kevin J. and David M. Kweskin (1971), “TV Commercial Recall Correlates,” Journal of Advertising Research, 11(April), 18-20.

Considine, P. (2008),“ Does product placement really work,” Campaign, 10, 24

Cooper, Joel and Robert T. Croyle (1984), “Attitudes and Attitude Change,”Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 395-426.

Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., and Moore, M. (2005), “Enhancing or Disrupting Guilt the Role of Ad Credibility and Perceived Manipulative Intent,” Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 361-368.

Cowley, E., and Barron, C. (2008), “When Product Placement Goes Wrong: The Effects of Program Liking and Placement Prominence,”Journal of Advertising 37(1), 89-98.

Dahlén, Rosengren, Törn, and Öhman, (2008),“Could Placing ADS Wrong be Right?: Advertising Effects of Thematic Incongruence,” Journal of Advertising, 3(Fall), 57-67

d'Astous, Alain, and Chartier, F. (2000), “A Study of Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations an Memory of Product Placements in Movies,”Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22(2), p31-40.

d'Astous, Alain; Séguin, Nathalie (1999), “Consumer Reactions to Product Placement Strategies in Television Sponsorship,” European Journal of Marketing,. 9/10, 896-910.

DeLorme, D. E., L. N. Reid, and M. R. Zimmer (1994), “Brands in Films: Young Moviegoers’ Experiences and Interpretations,” paper presented to the 1994 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising.

Finn, Adam (1988), “Print Ad Recognition Scores: An Information Processing Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 168–177.

Friestad, M., and Wright, P. (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts, ”The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.

Galician and Bourdeau (2004), “The Evolution of Product Placements in Hollywood Cinema, ” Journal of Promotion Management, 10(May), 15 – 36

Goldberg, Marvin E. and Gerald J. Gom (1987), “Happy and Sad TV Programs: How They Affect Reactions to Commercifds,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 387-403.

Gould, S. J., Gupta, P. B., and Grabner-Krauter, S. (2000), “Product Placements in Movies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Austrian, French and AmericanConsumers’ Attitudes Toward This Energin, Internaitonal PromotionalMedium,” Journal of Advertising, 29(winter), 41-58.

Greenwald, A. G. (1968),“ Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change,” Psychology Foundations of Attitudes, 147-170.

Grigorovici, Dan M. and Constantin, Corina D. (2004), “Experiencing Interactive Advertising beyond Rich Media: Impacts of Ad Type and Presence on Brand Effectiveness in 3D Gaming Immersive Virtual Environments,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(Fall), 22-36.

Gupta, P. B. and Gould, S. J. (1997), “Consumers’ Perceptions of the Ethics andAcceptability of Product Placements in Movies: Product Category and IndividualDifferences,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 14(spring), 37-50.
Gupta, Pola B. and Kenneth R. Lord (1998),“ Product placement in movies: the effect of prominence and mode on audience recall,” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47-59

Han, C. Min, (1989),“Country Image: Halo Or Summary Construct,” Journal ofMarketing Research, 2, 222.

Hansen, R. W., T. E. Barry, H. H. Reed and M. E. McGill (1976), “Marketing Applications of Transactional Analysis: Some Empirical Support for Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 5(1), 16-21, 24.

Hernandez, M. D. and Minor, M. S. (2003), “A Decision Tool for the Assessment of Advergaming Suitability,” Paper presented at the 2003 American Marketing Association Summer Educators Conference (August).

Homer P. (2009), “The Impact of Placement Type and Repetition on Attitude, ”Journal of Advertising, 3, 21–31.

Horn, Martin L and William J. McEwan (1977), “The Effects of Program Context on Commercial Performance,” Journal of Advertising. 11(1), 23-27.

Hovland, Carl I., Irving L. Janis and Harold H. Kelley (1953),“ Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change,” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hudson, S., Hudson, D. and Peloza, J. (2007), “Meet the Parents: A Parents' Perspective on Product Placement in Children's Films, ”Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 289-304.

Hutchinson, J. Wesley and Joseph W. Alba (1991),“Dimensions of consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer research, 13(March), 411-454

Johnson, Robert W. (1981), “An Application of Helson's Adaptation- Level Theory to the Problem of Context in Television Advertising” Dissertation Abstracts International. 42(2), 439a.



Kamins, Michael A., Lawrence J. Marks and Deborah Skinner (1991), “Television Commercial Evaluation in the Context of Program Induced Mood: Congruency Versus Consistency Effects,”Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 1-14.

Karrh, James (1998),“Brand placement:A Review,” Journal of Current Issuesand Research in Advertising, 20(fall), 31-49.

Karrh, J. A., Mckee, K. B., and Pardun, C. J. (2003),“ Practitioners' Evolving Views on Product Placement Effectiveness,”Journal of Advertising Research., 43(June), 138-49.

Keller, Kevin Lane, (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, January, 1-22.

Kennedy, John R. (1971), “How Program Environment Affects TV Commercials,” Journal of Advertising Research. 11(February), 33-38.

Krugman, Herbert E. (1983), “Television Progrsim Interest and Commercial Interruption: Are Commercials on Interesting Programs Less Effective,” Journal of Advertising Research. 23(February), 21-23.

Kiesler, Charles A., Barry E. Collins and Norman Miller (1969), “ Attitude Change: A Critical Analysis of Theoretical Approaches”. New York: Wiley.

Kisielius, Jolita, and Brian Sternthal (1984), “Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21(February), 54–64.

Kisielius, and Sternthal (1986), “Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(March), 418–431.

Lambert, Daniel R. (1980), “Transactional Analysis as a Congruity Paradigm for Advertising Recall,” Journal of Advertising. 9(2), 37-41, 44-45.

Laroche, M., Kim C., and L. Zhou, (1996),“ Brand Familiarity and Confidence as Determinants of Purchase Intention: An Empirical Test in a Multiple Brand Context,” Journal of Business Research, 37(2),115-120.
Lastovicka, J. L. (1979), “ Questioning the Concept of Involvement Defined Product Classes,” In Advances in consumer Research, 6, 174-179.

Lastovicka, J. L., and Garder, D. M. (1979),“ Components of Involvement, in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, ”John Maloney and Bernard Silverman, eds., Chicago. American Marketing, 53-73

Law, Sharmistha, Braun, and Kathryn A. (2000), “I’ll Have What She’s Having: Grauging the Impact of Product Placements on Viewers,” Psychology & Marketing, 1059-1075.

Leach, David C. (1981), “Should Ads be Tested,” Advertising Age, 13(July), 47-48.

Menneer, Peter (1987), “Audience Appreciation: A Different Story From Audience Numbers,” Admap. (June), 36-40.

Monroe, Kent B., Dhruv Grewal and Larry D. Compeau, (1991), “The Concept of Reference Prices: Theoretical Justifications and Research Issues, presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference,” Chicago.

Morton, Cynthia R. and Meredith, Friedman (2002), “I saw it in the movies’ Exploring the Link Between Product Placement Beliefs and Reported Usage Behavior”, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 24(2), 33-40

Murphy, John H., Isabella C. M. Cunningham and Gary B. Wilox (1978), “The Impact of Program Environment on Recall of Humorous Television Commercials,” Journal of Advertising. 8(2), 17-21.

Nebenzahl, Isrel D. and Eugene Secunda (1993), “Consumers’ Attitude toward Product Placement in Movies,” International Journal of Advertising, 1, 1-11

Norris, C. E., and Colman, A. M. (1992), “Context effects on recall and recognition of magazine advertisements,” Journal of Advertising, 21(3), 37-46.

Rathans, Arno J. , John L. Swasy , and Lawrence Marks (1986), “Effects of Television Commercial Repetition. Receiver Knowledge,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23(February), 50-61

Robertson (1976), “Low-commitment consumer behavior,” Journal of Advertising Research, 16, 19-24.

Roehm, M. L., Roehm Jr, H. A., and Boone, D. S. (2004), “Plugs versus Placements: A Comparison of Alternatives for Within-Program Brand Exposure,” Psychology and Marketing, 21(1), 17-28.

Russell, Cristel A. (1998), “Toward a Framework of Product Placement: TheoreticalPropositions,” Advances in Consumer Research, 357-362.

Russell, A. C. (2002), “Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placement in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Polt Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 306-318.

Russell, Cristel A. and Belch, M (2005), “ A managerial investigation into the product placement industry,” Journal of advertising Research,1(March), 73-92.

Russell ,Cristel A. and Stern, Barbara B. (2006), “CONSUMERS, CHARACTERS, AND PRODUCTS: A Balance Model of Sitcom Product Placement Effects, ” Journal of Advertising, 1(Spring), 7-12

Sabherwal, S., J. Pokrywczynski, and R. Griffin (1994), “Brand recall for product placement in motion pictures: a memory-based perspective,” Working Paper Presented to AEJMC 1994 Ad Division-Research Track, Atlanta, GA.

Schiffman, L. G., and Kanuk, L. L. (2000), Consumer Behavior. Prentice Hall, 7.

Schiller, Gail. (2006), Adweek, 17, 20-22

Schwerin, Horace A. (1958), “Do Today's Programs Provide the Wrong Commercial Climate,” Television Magazine. 15(8), 44-47,90-91.

Schwerin and Henry A. Newell (1981), Persuasion in Marketing. New York: Wiley.

Siebert, Donald E. (1978), “The Effect of Program Context on Commercial Recall,” Paper Presented at a Meeting of the Association of National Advertisers Television Workshop, New York City, March.

Singh, Surendra N., GilbertA. Churchill Eind Jacqueline C. Hitchon (1987), “The Intensifying Effects of Exciting Television Programs on the Reception of Subsequent Commercials,” Working Paper, Department of Marketing, University of Kansas.

Soldow, Gary F. and Victor Principe (1981), “Response to Commercials as a Function of Program Context,” Journal of Advertising Research. 21(April), 59-65.

Steortz, E.(1987), “The Cost Efficiency and Communication Effects associated with Brand Name Exposure Within Motion Pictures,” Unpublished Master’s Thesis,West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.

Television Audience Assessment Inc. (1984), “Television Audience Assessment's Qualitative Ratings and the Daytime Viewing Environment,” Executive Siunmary.

Thorson, Esther, Byron Reeves and Joan Schleuder (1985), “Message Complexity and Attention to Television,” Communication Research. 12(August), 427-454.

Tyebjee, T. T. (1979), “Refinement of the Involvement Concept: An Advertising Planning Point of View,” Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, 94-111.

Weaver, Glenn B. and Voss, Zannie Giraud (2000), “Television programs and dvertising: measuring the effectiveness of product placement within Seinfeld,” Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division at the 50th annual conference of International Communication Association (ICA), Acapulco, Mexico

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.144.48.135
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.144.48.135
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code