Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0905105-121503 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0905105-121503
論文名稱
Title
組織公平、信任與顧客公民行為之研究
The Relationships among Organizational Justice,Trust, and Customer Citizenship Behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-07-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-09-05
關鍵字
Keywords
顧客公民行為、組織公正、組織信任
Trust, Organizational Justice, Customer Citizenship Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5678 次,被下載 6031
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5678 times, has been downloaded 6031 times.
中文摘要
組織公民行為(Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983)強調組織成員的主動協助行為,而且不會因為組織的直接獎賞而受益。過去研究已經辨識組織公正與組織信任等因素對此一員工行為的影響效果(Motowidlo & Van Scotter, 1994; Organ & Konovsky, 1989),但是幾乎所有研究均侷限於組織內部成員的範疇(Orr, Sackett, & Mercer, 1989; Podsakoff, Aheame, & Mackenzie 1997),忽略顧客的價值。基於顧客關係管理時代的來臨,顧客價值理當得到應有重視,本研究根據組織公民行為的概念發展出「顧客公民行為」,主要目的為檢驗組織公平與組織信任與顧客公民行為之間的關係,討論組織信任作為組織公平與顧客公民行為之間的中介效果,同時以台灣運籌相關產業為研究對象,提出組織公平與組織信任與顧客公民行為之間的假設,應用問卷調查方法,蒐集資料予以驗證,研究結果與應用對實務將有所幫助。實証分析如下:
1. 當顧客覺得組織愈公平時,愈容易產生顧客公民行為。
2. 當顧客覺得組織愈公平時,愈容易對組織產生信任。
3. 當顧客覺得組織愈值得信任時,愈容易產生顧客公民行為。
4. 組織信任對組織公平與顧客公民行為之關係有顯著中介影響效果。
5. 顧客不同個人屬性對顧客公民行為有顯著差異
Abstract
Organizational citizenship behavior(Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983)refers to discretionary behaviors that benefit the organization but are not formally rewarded or appraised. Previous research has traditionally identified employee perceptions of justice or equity, and trust with the organization as determinants(Motowidlo & Van Scotter, 1994; Organ & Konovsky, 1989), but this conceptualization has been focused on employee’s behaviors(Orr, Sackett, & Mercer, 1989; Podsakoff, Aheame, & Mackenzie 1997). This study develops a new concept as an important variable, customer citizenship behavior(CCB), underlying logistics industry in Taiwan, to further the understanding of citizenship behaviors. It is important to study because it affects organizational performance. And, with the growing importance of Customer Relationship Management(CRM), the relationship between the business context and CCB has not been addressed. The business context is defined to include: organizational justice, trust in business teams, and satisfaction with the other customer service relationships. Hypotheses are developed linking these aspects of the business context to CCB.The main purpose of this research is to investigate the relationships between organizational justice, trust and CCB and indirect effects as the mediated variable”trust”between organizational justice and CCB.Those relationships could be examined through questionnaire survey method. The main findings of the empirical study are as follows:
1. Organizational justice holds the positive relationship toward CCB
2. Organizational justice holds the positive relationship toward Trust
3. Trust holds the positive relationship toward CCB
4. Trust holds the significant indirect effects between organizational justice and CCB
5. Personal attributes holds the significant influence toward CCB
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 組織公平之理論與研究 5
第二節 信任之理論與研究 12
第三節 顧客公民行為之理論與研究 19
第四節 組織公平、信任與顧客公民行為之關係 23
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究架構 26
第二節 研究變項之操作性定義 27
第三節 研究假設 29
第四節 研究工具及測量方法 31
第五節 資料蒐集 35
第六節 資料分析方法 37
第七節 研究限制 39
第四章 資料分析結果 40
第一節 各研究變項之特性分析 40
第二節 組織公平與顧客公民行為之影響 46
第三節 組織公平、信任對顧客公民行為之影響 48
第五章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 建議 54
參考文獻 55
附錄 研究問卷 59
表目錄
表2-1-1 組織公平兩構面分類架構 6
表2-2-1 信任的重要性 12
表2-2-2 信任的定義 13
表2-2-3 信任之特性 15
表3-4-1 量表來源與信度 31
表3-4-2 工作績效量表構面 32
表3-4-3 組織公平量表構面 33
表3-4-4 信任量表構面 33
表3-4-5 研究變項內部一致性信度值彙總表 34
表3-5-1 問卷之發放與回收情形 35
表3-5-2 樣本描述 36
表4-1-1 各研究變項之描述性統計表 40
表4-1-2 性別與各變項間之t檢定 41
表4-1-3 年齡與各變項間之ANOVA檢定表 42
表4-1-4 婚姻狀況與各變項間之ANOVA檢定表 43
表4-1-5 教育程度與各變項間之ANOVA檢定表 44
表4-1-6 研究變項相關分析摘要表 45
表4-2-1 組織公平對顧客公民行為之複迴歸分析表 46
表4-2-2 組織公平對信任之複迴歸分析表 47
表4-2-3 信任對顧客公民行為之複迴歸分析表 47
表4-3-1 組織公平、信任對利他行為的層級迴歸分析表 48
表4-3-2 組織公平、信任對本份行為的層級迴歸分析表 49
表4-3-3 組織公平、信任對雞婆行為的層級迴歸分析表 50
表4-3-4 組織公平、信任對公民道德的層級迴歸分析表 50
表5-1-1 假設驗證結果彙總表 53
圖目錄
圖1-3-1 本研究流程 4
圖3-1-1 研究架構圖 26
參考文獻 References
王又鵬、陳怡如、曾雍欽(2003),信任量表發展之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫, NSC91-2416-H-158-001。
余德成(1996),品質管理人性面系統因素對工作績效之影響,高雄:國立中山大學企業管理學系博士學位論文。
余德成、溫金豐、陳泰哲(2001),組織公平與組織公民行為之關係:以半導體封裝業為例,科技管理學刊,第六卷第一期,頁131-150。
余德成、連淑君(2004),薪資制度、責任感與工作績效之研究,人力資源管理學報,第四卷第二期,頁47-59。
林鉦棽(1999),組織承諾、工作滿足與組織公民行為之研究:各種不同理論模式之比較,中山管理評論,第七卷第四期,頁1049-1073。
林鉦棽(1996),組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點,管理科學學報,第十三卷第三期,頁391-415。
林鉦棽(2004),休閒旅館從業人員的組織公正、組織信任與組織公民行為關係:社會交換理論觀點的分析,中華管理學報,第五卷第一期,頁91-112。
林淑姬( 1992),薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1984),薪酬公平,程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,管理評論,第十三卷第二期,頁87-108。
林澄貴(2001),知識管理、工程專業人員核心能力與工作績效關係之研究─以中鋼公司為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
馬樹榮(2001),組織公平與組織承諾關係之研究─檢驗薪資制度知覺的調節效果,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
洪振順(1998),組織公正對組織公民行為影響之研究─ 信任關係之觀點,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃小娉(2002),組織公平、信任與組織公民行為之研究─以財政部高雄市國稅局為對象,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃素貞(2002),員工組織政法知覺與工作投號人及工作績效關係之研究,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃彩霖(2003),醫院行政人員的人格特質、工作壓力、工作投入、專業承諾及工作績效之相關性研究,南華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
張峰銘(2002),薪資制度、組織承諾、工作績效關係之研究—以鍋爐製造業為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳正強(1998),組織公正、信任對工作投入與組織公民行為影響關係之研究,國防管理院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
溫金豐、錢思華(2002),報酬公平、認知公平與研發人員績效關係之研究:以某高科技研究機構為例,人力資源管理學報,第二卷第一期,頁19-35。
潘富仁(2003),督導行為、角色壓力及任務績效之研究—以高屏地區醫院為例,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
王郁惠,1997,服務業類別、關係行銷與顧客忠誠度關係之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陸儀勳,1996,員工認知因素與工作價值對組織公民行為影響之研究:以高雄地區金融業櫃檯從業人員為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
劉一賜,2000,拋開Portal Site 的門戶之見,網路通訊雜誌,第88期,頁67-73。

Adams, J. S., 1963. Wage inequities, productivity, and work quality. Industrial Relations, 3, pp.9-16.
Armistead R. & Clark, N. 1992. Customer service and support, Guidford and King’ Lynn, U.K.
Bateman, T. S. & Organ,D.W l983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26: pp.587-595.
Berry L.L.& Parasuraman,A. 1991. Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality, New York: The Free Press, pp.136-142.
Blau P., l964. Exchange and power in social life, New York: Wiley.
Brown,S.A., 2000. From Customer Loyalty to Customer Dependency: a case for strategic customer care, S.A.(ed) Brown, in Customer Relationship Management- A Strategic Imperative in the World of E-Business, John Wiley & Sons, Canada, pp.69-86.
Cook, J. & Wall,T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: pp.39-52.
Deluga, R. J., l994. Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67: pp.315-326.
Falque, E. 2000.Using the Tools:Database Marketing,Data Warehousing and Data Mining, in Customer Relationship Management- A Strategic Imperative in the World of E-Business, John Wiley & Sons, Canada,pp.227-240.
Giffin, K., 1967. The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process, Psychological Bulletin, 68, pp.104-120.
Gordon S. L., 1999. CRM: aka, the intelligent enterprise, intelligent enterprise, November 16, pp.8-13.
Gouldner, A. W., l960. The norm of reciprocity, American Sociological Review, 25, pp.165-167.
Greenberg J., l990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Journal of Management, 16, pp.399-432.
Griffin, J., 1995. Customer Loyalty: How to Keep It, Simmon and Schuster inc. 王秀華譯,忠誠顧客-如何培養,如何保持,朝陽堂文化,台北,1996。
Griffin J., 1995. Customer Loyalty: How to Earn it, How to Keep It, New York:Lexington Books.
Heskett, J. L., W. Earl Sasser, Jr. & C.W. Hart, 1989. Service Breakthrough, New York: The Free Press.
Holmes, J. G. 1981. The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and Macromotives. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.). The justice motive in social behavior, pp.261-248. N. Y.: Plenum.
Kim W. C. & Mauborgne, R. 1997. Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy, Harvard Business Review, JUL-AUG.
Konovsky M. A. & Pugh,S.D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.656-669.
Kotler P., 1997. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control (9th ed.), New Jersey: David Borkowsky.
Kotler P., 2000. Marketing Management 10th ed., Prentice Hall.
MacNeil I. R., 1985. Relational contracts: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, pp.483-535.
Moorman R. H., 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: pp.845-855.
Moorman R. H., Niehoff, B. P. & Organ,D.W. 1992. Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting our the effects of job satisfaction. organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
Motowidlo S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R., 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: pp.475-480.
Newell, Frederick 2000.Loyalty.Com, McGraw Hill.
Niehoff B. P. & Moorman,R.H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp.527-556.
Organ D., 1988. Organizational cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 157-164.
Organ D. W. & Konovsky.M. 1989. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 157-164.
Organ D. W. 1988 Organizational citizenship behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ D. W. & Konovsky,M. 1989. Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, pp.157-164.
Orr J. M., P. R. Sackett, & Mercer,M. 1989. The role of prescribed and nonprescribed behaviors in estimating the dollar value of performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, pp.34-40.
Papers D. & Rogers,M. 1999. Is Your Company Ready for One-to-One Marketing, Harvard Business Review, pp3-12.
Podsakoff P. M., Todor,W.D.,Grover, R.A.& Huber,V.L. 1984. Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behavior: Fact or Fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, pp. 21-36.
Podsakoff P. M., Ahearne M. & Mackenzie,S.B. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2): pp.262-270.
Podsakoff P. M.,Mackenzie, S.B, Moorman,R.H. & Fetter,R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects of followers trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors, Leadership Quarterly, l: pp.107-142.
Puffer S. M., 1987. Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, pp.615-621.
Reichheld F. F. & Earl Sasser,W. Jr., 1990. Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services, Harvard Business Review, 68 (5), pp.105-111
Rotter J. B., 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust, Journal of Personality, 35: pp.651-665.
Rousseau D. M. & Parks,J.M. l993. The contracts of individuals and organizational behavior, 15: pp.1-43. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
Schnake M., 1991. Organizational citizenship: A review, proposed model and research agenda. Human Relations, 44: pp.735-759.
Scholl R. W., Cooper,R A & Mckenna,J.F. 1987. Referent selection in determining equity perceptions: Differential effects on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 40: pp.113-124.
Seybold P. B., 2001. The Customer Revolution: How to thrive when customers are in control. Crown Pub.
Smith C. A., Organ,D.W. & Near,J.P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: pp.653-663.
Swift R., 2001. Accelerating Customer Relationships, Prentice Hall.
Tiwanan A., 2001. The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Yukl G. A., 1989. Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Yearly Review of Management, 15, pp.251-289.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code