Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0905111-185902 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0905111-185902
論文名稱
Title
併購後人力資源部門的角色與功能
The role and function of human resource practice after M&A process
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
159
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-07-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-09-05
關鍵字
Keywords
薪酬結構、績效評估系統、溝通系統、教育訓練系統、工作輪調、併購
compensation structure, job rotation program, training system and communication system, performance appraisal systems, mergers and acquisitions (M&A)
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5753 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5753 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
財富、華爾街期刊或哈佛商業評論中的許多報告指出,許多的併購案最後都以失敗收場,而這個議題不得不使得我們去正視它的重要性。事實上,將近70%以上的併購案無法達到當初預期的財務目標,而這個統計數目著實讓許多的高階管理者感到震撼。然而,諷刺的是,許多的數據顯示併購案的失敗常歸咎於“關於人”的議題。此外,併購後的不確定性更導致人力資源管理之議題無法正確的被落實。

人力資源議題在併購案當中,可被劃分為併購前和併購後兩個階段,而許多的文獻都可清楚的指出人力資源部門在這兩階段有著不同的策略,然而,本研究將重點著重在併購後期階段。的確,併購後期,人力資源部門將把評估的目標著重在組織文化、組織結構差異性、領導者的角色與管理風格等面向上。另外,高離職率、士氣與工作動機降低都是導致併購案失敗的主因。再者,人力資源政策之改變、組織精簡、員工壓力與系統結構之差異都是併購後值得被正視的議題。因此,人力資源管理議題在併購的議題當中佔領著相當大的重要性,所以,本研究將把重點聚焦在人力資源規劃、績效評估、員工發展與勞資關係等面向上。

此外,併購案也會導致員工的職涯路徑、發展之改變,部分的員工必須面臨職位重新編制與工作輪調計畫。因此,人力資源部門必須發展出一套完善的教育訓練機制與溝通系統重建員工的自信心,而這些計畫將有助於員工適應併購後的職涯適應,並且有效發揮其員工的潛能。

最後,併購後,雙方的薪資福利面臨了無可避免的差異性,有些組織的薪資結構依照績效作為評估標準,然而,有些組織則規劃較高的底薪系統,因此,人力資源部門必須重新評估薪資福利與獎酬系統,讓員工內心可以感到公平。此外,人力資源部門需和工會定期保持會議,並且維持合諧穩定的關係,因此,本研究將著重人力資源部門如何與工會保持其正向關係以協助員工保證其工作之權益。總而言之,一旦人力資源管理議題能確實落實,其將有助於倂購案之成功。
Abstract
Whether it is Forbes, The Globe & Mail, The Wall Street Journal or Harvard Business Review, one can’t help but notice that most accounts of business mergers are about what went wrong! In fact, over 70% of all mergers and acquisitions fail to achieve original financial expectations. That is a traumatic statistic. Additionally, although the merging entities give a great deal of importance to financial matters and the outcomes, HR issues are the most ignored ones. To be ironical, many studies have shown that most of the mergers fail to bring out the desired outcomes due to “people-related” issue. The uncertainty brought out by poorly managed HR issues in mergers and acquisitions have been the major reason for these failures.

The human resource issues in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can be classified in two phases the pre-merger phase and the post merger phase. Some literature provides ample evidence of difference in between the human resource activities in the two stages: the pre-acquisition and post acquisition period. However, we will focus on post acquisition period. The post acquisition period involves an assessment of the cultural and organizational differences, which will include the organizational cultures, role of leaders in the organization, and the management styles. The usual impacts, such as high turnover rate, decrease in the morale, motivation, and even lead to M&A failures. The other issues in the M&A activity are the changes in the HR policies, downsizing, layoffs, stress on the workers, and information system issues. As a result, human resource system issues in M&A activity are occupying a crucial position, indeed, human resource planning, compensation designs, performance appraisal system, employee development and employee relations should be given in the priority.

Beside, the M&A activity also causes changes in their well defined career paths and future opportunities in the organization. Some employees also have to be relocated or assigned new jobs. Accordingly, HR will place employees in a completely different situation with new job profiles and work teams or design the job rotation programs. This may pose a tremendous impact on the performance of the employees. Therefore, HR may also need to develop a variety of training system and communication system to rebuild self-esteem of each employee. Those programs will enhance employees to obtain ability and create their potentials.

Finally, the compensation structure among the organizations may also have a unavoidable difference, for example, one of firms may have performance based pay while other may have higher component of fixed pay; Hence the differences in compensation structure and performance appraisal systems also need to be re-evaluated so as to bring equity in the human resource systems and to treat employees at the equal level. Simultaneously, the employee relations issues will gain more importance in the acquisitions of Taiwan’s industries. The power equation between management and unions is bound to change with the acquisition. The acquiring management also needs to keep track of number of unions in the workplace and equations between HR department and unions. Hence, developing a harmony relationship should be put in the first place. To sum up, this will require study of management-union equation, employee contracts, political linkages of the unions, compensation related clauses, number of union and dynamics between the unions. To sun up, once company accomplish those conditions, it will elevate the successful rate of M&A.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 -------------------------------------------------- i
誌謝 -------------------------------------------------- ii
中文摘要 -------------------------------------------------- iii
英文摘要 -------------------------------------------------- v
目錄 -------------------------------------------------- viii
圖次 -------------------------------------------------- ix
表次 --------------------------------------------------- x
第一章 緒論 ------------------------------------------ 1
第一節 研究背景 --------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究動機 --------------------------------- 2
第三節 研究目的 --------------------------------- 7
第四節 研究流程 --------------------------------- 10
第二章 文獻探討 ------------------------------------ 12
第一節 併購的理論與意涵 --------------------- 12
第二節 併購學派之理論基礎 ------------------ 19
第三節 併購後的管理整合與人力資源功能 -- 26
第四節 組織文化對併購的影響 -------------- 38
第五節 員工權益保障 -------------------------- 48
第三章 研究方法 ----------------------------------- 58
第一節 個案研究法 ----------------------------- 58
第二節 研究流程與內容 ----------------------- 59
第四章 個案公司訪談與分析 -------------------- 61
第五章 結論與建議 -------------------------------- 133
第一節 研究結論 -------------------------------- 133
第二節 研究建議 -------------------------------- 136
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 ----------- 138
參考文獻 -------------------------------------------------- 141
附錄 -------------------------------------------------- 148
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
伍忠賢(2000),企業購併理論與實務:跨世紀全球投資觀點,台北:新陸書局。
伍忠賢(2002),企業併購聖經,台北:遠流出版社。
朱若柔(1998),社會變遷中的勞工問題,台北:揚智文化。
李田樹譯(2000),合併與收購:哈佛商業評論,台北:天下遠見出版社。
李書齊、張文耀(2006),明基一場350億元的併購教訓,李焜耀認錯,今週刊,第511期,頁49-58。
吳芳銘(2006),併購成長:面對中國高速經濟成長的策略,台北:時英出版社。
吳修辰、胡釗維(2006),太習慣「成功」,李焜耀誤吞苦藥,商業週刊,第985期,頁44-46。
徐宗國(譯)(1997),A. Strauss & J. Corbin著,質性研究概論,台北:巨流。
馬舉魁(2009),併購企業人力資源整合的風險及內容構建,理論探討,第6期,頁90-94。
張殿文(2005),新聯想的三個險惡山頭,數位時代,第109期,頁144-146。
許明哲(2009),民營企業併購國有企業後的人力資源整合分析,經濟綜橫,第 10期,頁99-101。
黃英忠、蔡正飛(2005),企業人力精簡時員工的因應策略:企業利害關係人理 論觀點,人力資源管理學報,第5卷第1期,頁111-134。
劉世敏(2006),質性研究資料分析與文獻格式之運用:以QSR N6與EndNote 8為例,台北:心理出版社。
戴國良(2007),國際企業管理實務個案分析,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

二、英文部分
Appelbaum, S. H., Gandell, J., Yortis, H., Proper, S., & Jobin, F. (2000). Anatonmy of a merger: Behavior of organizational factors and processes throughout pre-during-post-stages, Management Decision, 38(9): 649-661.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20-39.
Ashkenas, R. N., DeMonaco, L. J., & Francis, S. C. (1998). Making the deal real: How GE Capital integrates acquisitions, Harvard Business Review, 76(1): 165-178.
Aviation Daily (2001). United flight attendants file against illegal merger, Aviation Daily, 345(19): 3.
Buono, A. (1989). The human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collisions between people, cultures, and organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2001). On managing cultural integration and cultural change Processes in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(2/3/4): 192–207.
Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Hakanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation, Journal of Management Studies, 37(3): 395–425.
Bryson, J. (2003). Managing HRM risk in a merger, Employee Relations, 25(1): 14-30
Buono, A. F., & Bowditch, J. L. (1989). Managing collisions: Between people, cultures and organizations, London: Jossey-Bass.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Managing mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances: Integrating people and cultures, Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1993). The role of culture compatibility in successful organisational marriage, Academy of Management Executive, 7(2): 57-70.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). Managing mergers acquisitions and strategic alliances: Integrating people and cultures, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.
Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms, Strategic Management Journal, 7(2): 119-139.
Chatterjee, S., Lubatkin, M. H., Schweiger, D. M., & Weber, Y. (1992). Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: Linking equity and human capital, Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 319–334.
Cobb, A. T., Wooten, K., & Folger, R. (1995). The role justice plays in organizational change, Public Administration Quarterly, 19(2): 135-151.
Datta, D. K. (1991). Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration, Strategic Management Journal, 12(4): 281-297.
Donald, DePamphilis, M.. (2008). Mergers, acquisition and other restructuring activities: An integrated approach to process, tools, case, and solutions (4th ed.), Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.
Eccles, R. G. Lanes, K. L., & Wilson, T. C. (1999). Are you paying too much for that acquisition, Harvard Business Review, 77(4)136-146.
Forstmann, S. (1998). Managing cultural differences in cross-cultural mergers and acquisitions. In M. C. Gertsen, A-M. Soderberg, & J. E. Torp (Eds.), Cultural Dimensions of International Mergers and Acquisitions (pp.39-56). Berlin.
Ficery, K., Herd, T., & Pursche, B. (2007). Where has all the synergy gone: The M&A puzzle. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(6)29-35.
Guba, E. G., & Licoln, Y. S. (1991). Effective evaluation, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Galpin, T. J., & Robinson, D. E. (1997). Merger integration: The ultimate change management challenge, Mergers and Acquisitions, 31(24)24-28.
Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal, New York: Free Press.
Hirsch, P., & Andrews, J. A. (1983). Ambushes, shootouts, and knights of the roundtable: The language of corporate takeovers, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hunt, J. W. (1990). Changing pattern of acquisition behavior in takeovers and the consequences for acquisition processes. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1): 69-77.
Jeffery, A. S. (2001). Making mergers work: The strategic importance of people. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resourcec Management.
Kang, N., & Johansson, S. (2000). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Their role in industrial globalization, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, OECD, Working paper.
Kramer, R. M. (1991). Inter-group relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes, Research in organizational behavior, 13: 191-228.
Krefting, L. A., & Frost, P. J. (1985). Untangling webs, surface waves, and wildcatting, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Krishnan, H. A., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. (1997). Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5): 361-74.
Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization, Organization Science, 10(1): 1-26.
Lewicki, R. J., & Buncker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in working relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Marks, M. L. (1982). Merging human resources: A review of current research, Mergers and Acquisitions, 17(2): 38-44.
Marks, M. L., & Mirvis P. H. (1997). Revisiting the merger syndrome: Dealing with stress, Mergers and Acquisitions, 31(6):21-27.
Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1998). Joining forces: Making one plus one equal three in mergers, acquisitions and alliances, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McManus, M. L., & Herert, M. L. (1988). Surviving merger and acquisition, Landon: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Nahavandi, A., & Malekzadeh, A. (1998). Acculturation in mergers and acquisition, Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 79-90.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
Olie, R. (1990). Culture and integration problems in international mergers and acquisitions, European Management Journal, 8(2): 206-215.
Shrivastava, P. (1986). Postmerger integration, Journal of Business Strategy, 7(1): 65-76.
Schraeder, M., & Self, D. R. (2003). Enhancing the success of mergers and acquisitions, Management Decision, 41(5): 511-522.
Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (2001). HR issues and activities in mergers and acquisitions, European Management Journal, 19(3): 239-253.
Shanley, M. T., & Correa, M. E. (1992). Agreement between top management teams and expectations for post acquisition performance, Strategic Management Journal, 13(4): 245-266.
Trice, H. M ., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Terry, D. J., & O’Brien, A. T. (2001). Status, legitimacy, and in-group bias in the context of an organizational merger, Group Processes & Inter-group Relations, 4(3): 271-289.
The New York Times (2000). Strikes protest plan to merge 2 Korean banks, The New York Times, 23 December, p.C2.
Walsh, J. P. (1988). Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions, Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 173–183.
Weber, Y. (1996). Corporate cultural fit and performance in mergers and acquisitions, Human Relations, 49(9): 1181-1202.
Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2009). Human resource practices and performance of mergers and acquisitions in Israel, Human Resource Management Review, 20(3): 1-9.

三、網站資料
王淑芬(2007),一堂350億元的課 — “BenQ-Siemens?虼祫坁滲}局。取自http://web.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/~minfei/eduorgchangeanddevelopment-1/case(95-1-9).pdf.
仇佩芬(2004),聯想併購IBM個人電腦業務,聯合報, 2004/12/09,擷取時間:2010/09/17。取自http://ms1.renfoss.com.tw/new/cool_news/news_20041209-1.htm.
沈勤譽(2005),CEO專訪-明基集團董事長李焜耀,西門子灌頂明基打通手機、品牌任督二脈,DigiTimes科技電子報,2006/12/20,擷取時間:2010/08/02。取自http://www.digitimes.com.tw/ext/ext.asp?BigExtID=476.
明叔亮(2006),明?盓L敗西門子,互聯網週刊,2006/12/25,擷取時間:2010/08/12。取自http://big5.huaxia.com/zt/sw/06-078/584831.html.
高斯(2004),《華盛頓觀察》週刊(Washington Observer weekly),第45期,2004/12/15,擷取時間:2010/08/03。取自http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/HIAW/730371.htm.
陳元保(2006),從明基在德國併購失利談國際併購的風險,台商電子報,2006/12/19,擷取時間:2010/08/01。取自http://news.cier.edu.tw/tmail/about_3.asp?sno=525.
陳慧玲(2010),勞基法新修正草案─事業併購可以裁員嗎,博仲新聞,2010/03/04,擷取時間:2010/09/15。取自http://www.winklerpartners.com/?p=1429&lang=zh-hant.
凱文(2010),聯想CIO談併購IBM,PC:五大要點促整合,擷取時間:2010/08/20。取自http://finance.sina.com/bg/tech/sinacn/20100521/230061787.html.
聯合報(2004),脫胎換骨-聯想在IBM併購案中獲得新生,聯合報,2004/12/09,擷取時間:2010/08/01 。取自http://klhsieh.wordpress.com/2006/03/02/.
Adolph, G., Buchanan, I., Hornery, J., Jackson, B., Jones, J., Kihlstedt, T., Neilson, G., & Quarls, H. (2001), Merger integration: Delivering on the promise. Retrieved: 2010/09/11. http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/76776.pdf.
Kerler, P. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: Opportunities in the crisis. Retrived: 2010/10/23. http://www.kpmg.ch/Topics/15922.htm.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.128.199.88
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.128.199.88
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code