Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0907112-141254 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0907112-141254
論文名稱
Title
如何強化新進人員的留任與表現?探討新進人員個人工作適配、個人組織適配對其工作績效與離職行為的影響:師徒制度與新進人員人格特質的干擾效果
How to enhance newcomers' retention and performance? Exploring the moderating effects of mentoring and newcomers' personality on the relationships between newcomers' Person-Job fit/Person-Organization fit and task performance/turnover intentions
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
62
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-09-03
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-09-07
關鍵字
Keywords
個人-組織適配、離職傾向、人格特質、個人-工作適配、新進人員、師徒制、工作績效
Personality, P-J fit, Job performance, P-O fit, Mentor, Turnover intentions, Newcomer
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5819 次,被下載 2164
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5819 times, has been downloaded 2164 times.
中文摘要
人才是企業最重要的資產,企業透過招募與甄選的過程,其目的能夠找到工作能力相符合的優秀人才 (即:個人-工作適配; person-job fit),或是與組織有共同理念的員工 (即:個人-組織適配; person-organization fit);然而,自認為具有高個人-工作適配與高個人-組織適配的新進人員,是否能在到職後有好的工作表現或是願意長期留任呢?本研究將針對此議題進行深入探討,以釐清制度面的師徒關係、與個人特質中的盡責性和情緒穩定性是否干擾新進人員的個人-組織適配與個人-工作適配與其工作績效、離職傾向的關係,以及新進人員本身適配程度交互作用的影響。
本研究採取問卷調查法搜集資料,而樣本選擇以通過試用考核的新進人員為施測對象,主要鎖定在年資一年內之新進員工為主,且不限於產業。本研究共回收198份有效樣本,總計來自於20家公司。本研究結果發現:(1) 新進人員若已具高個人-工作適配,在減少師徒制的干擾下,則將呈現良好的工作績效;(2) 而在人格特質的干擾效果的探討結果呈現:高盡責性、情緒穩定性的新進人員,會強化其個人-組織適配與離職傾向之間的負向關係;(3) 新進人員個人-工作適配與個人-組織適配之交互作用下,對於工作績效的關係有顯著正向關係。
本研究綜合實證結果,提出以下幾點之管理實務意涵,以供實務界參考:(1)重視新進人員適配組合,加速新進人員的社會化;(2) 甄選高盡責性或是高情緒穩定性的新進人員,進而加強個人與組織適配的程度對日後留任的效果;(3) 針對不同經驗的新進人員實施不同社會化機制,讓員工更能適才適所。
Abstract
In order to enhance newcomers' retention and performance, the present study explored the moderating roles of mentoring and newcomers' personality (conscientiousness and emotional stability) on the relationships between newcomers' perceived person-job fit, (P-J fit) person-organization fit (P-O fit) and their task performance and turnover intentions. The data was collected from newcomers who have passed probation with their organizational tenure less than one year. In total, 198 usable questionnaires were collected from 20 firms in Taiwan. The present study applied the hierarchical regression analysis to test our hypotheses. The results showed that: (1) when mentoring relationship is low, the positive relationship between newcomer P-J fit and task performance is strengthened; (2) when conscientiousness and emotional stability are high, the negative relationship between newcomers P-O fit and turnover intentions is strengthened; (3) the interaction between newcomer P-J fit and P-O fit is positively related to task performance.
Based on our findings, we proposed several practical implications as below: (1) organizations should pay attention to newcomers’ P-J, P-O fit, and their socialization processes; (2) using selection tools to hire newcomers with high conscientiousness and emotional stability; (3) organizations should apply different socialization practice for newcomers with different attributes.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
摘 要 i
Abstract ii
圖 次 v
表 次 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
新進人員的工作績效與離職傾向:個人-組織及個人-工作適配的角色 5
師徒制對新進人員的適配與工作績效/離職傾向關係的干擾效果 8
人格特質對新進人員的適配與其工作績效/離職傾向關係的干擾效果 10
新進人員的個人-工作適配、個人-組織適配交互作用對其工作績效/離職傾向關係的影響 14
第三章 研究方法 16
一、研究架構 16
二、研究樣本與施測程序 17
三、研究工具 18
四、資料分析方式 21
第四章 研究結果 23
一、敘述性統計與相關分析 23
二、驗證性因素分析 24
三、假設檢定結果 25
第五章 結論與建議 32
一、研究結果 32
二、管理實務意涵 35
三、研究限制與未來研究建議 36
參考文獻 39
一、中文部份 39
二、英文部份 40
附錄 新進人員工作狀況之適應研究問卷 49
圖 次
圖 3 1研究架構 16
圖 4 1師徒制對D-A fit與工作績效關係之干擾效果 27
圖 4 2盡責性對個人-組織適配與離職傾向關係之干擾效果 29
圖 4 3神經質 (情緒穩定性)對個人-組織適配與離職傾向關係之干擾效果 29
圖 4 4 個人-組織適配對要求-能力適配與工作績效關係之干擾效果 30
表 次
表3 1 考核成績標準化說明 20
表4 1 各主要變數之相關係數矩陣 24
表4 2 師徒制、人格特質與新進人員要求-能力適配與工作績效關係的干擾效果 26
表4 3 師徒制、人格特質對新進人員個人-組織適配與離職傾向關係的干擾效果 28
表4 4 研究假設之結果摘要整理 30
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
行政院主計處(2010)。99年受僱員工動向調查統計結果綜合分析。行政院主計處全球資訊網。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/112616133671.pdf
李瑋譯 (2005年5月)。主管如何幫新人求生?。遠見雜誌,227。取自http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lis.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/gv/
吳美連 (2007)。商管碩士生與指導教授師徒關係的研究-與學習滿意、情感承諾及職涯承諾之關係。管理評論,26 (1),1-21。
凃博崧 (2010)。師徒制度功能對徒弟職涯成效影響之整合分析。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
房美玉 (2002)。 儲備幹部人格特質甄選量表之建立與應用 - 以某高科技公司為例。人力資源管理學報 , 2 (1 ),1-18 。
周欣儀 (2004)。員工五大人格特質、組織正義、印象管理策略對工作績效影響。員工五大人格特質組織正義之研究。國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林晏鈴、張婉菁 (2010)。師徒功能與工作壓力之關係:以組織社會化為中介變項。人力資源管理學報,10 (3),75-96。
紀乃文、陳皓怡、楊美玉、鄭妃君與蔡維奇 (2008)。個人-工作適配量表發展:多元構面觀點。管理學報,25 (5),577-598。
郭奇靈 (2009)。新進人員調適策略對工作團隊整合、工作滿意與組織承諾之影響-組織社會化戰術觀點。國立臺北大學企業管理所碩士論文。
陳建豪 (2005年12月)。半數科技業無傳承機制。遠見雜誌,234。取自http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lis.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/gv/
莊璦嘉、林惠彥 (2005)。個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響。臺灣管理學刊,5 (1),123-148。
莊璦嘉、蘇弘文 (2005)。主觀適配的特質環境前因與工作態度後果之探討。人力資源管理學報,5 (1),1-27。
張春興 (1991)。現代心理學。台北:東華書局。
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華書局。
張火燦、紀乃文、劉嘉雯、林夢倫 (2009)。積極人格、社會價值傾向與顧客正義知覺對個人社會資本的影響。臺大管理論叢,20 (1),99-130。
彭台光、高月慈與林鉦棽 (2006)。管理研究中共同方法變異::問題本質、影響、測試與補救。管理學報,23 (1),77-98。
曾琡雅 (2004)。影響個人與組織適配及個人與工作適配長期變化因素之研究。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃至賢(2004)。客服人員的人格特質對其工作績效之影響。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
郭建志、鄭伯壎、王建忠 (2001)。文化價值契合、工作性格與員工效能:遞增效度的分析。中華心理學刊,43 (2),175-187。
蔡維奇、紀乃文 (2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節、及個人層次後果變項之研究。組織與管理,1 (1),1-37。
謝云嘉 (2005)。個人與組織適配及個人與工作適配對工作行為之交互作用影響。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M., (1997). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1), 149-178.
Autry, C. W., & Daugherty, D. J. (2003). Warehouse operations employees: Linking person-organization fit job satisfaction and coping responses. Journal of Business Logistics, 24, 171-197.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi,Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterty, 36, 421-458.
Baltes, B. B., Bauer, C. C., Bajdo, L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2002). The use of multitrait-multimethod data for detecting nonlinear relationships: The cause of psychological climate and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 3-17.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44 (1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Antecedents of involuntary turnover due to a reduction in force. Personnel Psychology, 47, 515-535.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.
Barrick, M. R., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2009). Hiring for retention and performance. Human Resource Management, 48 (2), 183-206.
Bliese, P. D., & Halverson. R. R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and icc values. Journal of Management. 24 (2), 157-172.
Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (5), 1357-1367.
Boyer, D. (2006). The power of mentorship: Developing the leader within (1st Ed), Whittier, CA: Real Life Teaching.
Burke,R., McKenna, C. L., & McKeen, C. (1991). How do mentorships differ from typical supervisory relationships? Psychological Reports, 68, 459-466.
Burke, R., McKenna, C. L., & McKeen, C. (1993). Correlates of mentoring in organizations: The mentor’s perspective. Psychological report, 72, 883-896.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person organization fit, job choice decision, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.
Caligiuri, P. M. (2000). Selecting expatriates for personality characteristics: A moderating effect of personality on the relationship between host national contact and cross-cultural adjustment. Management International Review, 40 (1), 61-81.
Cawyer, C. S., & Friedrich, G. W. (1998). Organization socialization: Processes for new communication faculty. Communication Education, 47, 234-245.
Chang, H. T., Chi, N. W., & Chuang A. (2010). Exploring the moderating roles of perceived person-job and person-organization fit on the relationship between training investment and knowledge workers’ turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (4), 566-593.
Chao, G. T., O Leary-kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P.D. (1994). Organizational Socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (5), 930-943.
Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations : Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences. Second
Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Costa, P.T. Jr., McCrae, R.R., & Dye, D.A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: Are vision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality And Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI R) and NEO five factor inventory ( NEO-FFI). Professional Manuel. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant
qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 500-509.
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 283-357). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T.N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive
personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58,
859–891.
Evans, N. J. (1985). Needs assessment methodology: A comparison of results. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(2), 107-114.
Garcia, M. F., Posthuma, R. A., & Colella, A. (2008). Fit perceptions in the employment interview: The role of similarity, liking, and expectations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 81, 173-189.
Gatewood, D. R., & Field, S. H. (1998). Human Resource Selection 5th ed., Forth Earth, TX: The Dryden Press.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth public domain personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several seven five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.
Gooley, T. B. (2001). How to keep good people. Logistics Management and Distribution Report, 40, 55-60.
Greenberger, D. B., Straser, S., Cummings L. L., & Dunham R. B. (1989). The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 29-51.
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
Harris E. G., & Fleming, D. E. (2005). Assessing the human element in service formation: Personality congruency and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Service Marketing, 19 (4), 187-198.
Higgins, C.A., & Judge, T.A. (2004). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (4), 622-632.
Hogan, J. and Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and Integrity at Work. Handbook of Personality Psychology, 849-870.
House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, Mass: Addison wiley.
Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 193–212.
Jӧreskog, K. G., & Sӧrbom, D. (1999). LISREL: Structural equation modeling with the
SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359-394.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phase of mentor, relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 608-625.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work. IL:Scott, Foresman & Co.
Kowtha N, Rao (2008). Engineering the engineers: Socialization tactics and new engineer adjustment in organizations. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 55 (1), 67-81.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 643-671.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Jansen, K. J., & Colbert, A. E. (2002). A policy-capturing study of the simultaneous effects of fit with jobs, groups, and organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 985–993.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’fit at work: A meta-Analysis of person-Job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58 (2), 281-342.
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof, A. L. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59,454-470.
Major, D. A., Kozowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., & Gardner, P. D. (1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effect of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (3), 418-431.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the myers-briggs type indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17-40.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., SaT.W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 1102-1121.
O’ Reilly, CAIII. Chatman, J. A., & Caldwell, D. E. (1991). People of organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11 (2), 245.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4), 531-544.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S .M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-293.
Ragings, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relations, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177-1194.
Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B., & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person-organization fit and workrelated attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and
conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1446-1455. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1446
Rhodes, J. E., Contreras, J. M., & Mangelsdorf, S. C. (1994). Natural mentor relationships among Latina adolescent mothers: Psychological adjustment, moderating processes, and the role of early parental acceptance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 445-461.
Rollag, K. (2004). The impact of relative tenure on newcomer socialization dynamics. Journal of Organization Behavior, 25 (7), 853-872.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395-426.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 646-654.
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The 5-factor model of personality and job-performance in the European-community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Suls, J., Green, P., & Hillis, S. (1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletim, 24, 127-136.
Thomas, C. H., & Lankau, M. J. (2009). Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Academy of Management Proceedings, 48 (3), 417-432.
Wang, M., Zhan, Y., McCune, E., & Truxillo, D. (2011). Understanding newcomers’ adaptability and work-related outcomes: Testing the mediating roles of perceived P-E fit variables. Personnel Psychology, 64, 163-189.
Wanous, J. P., & Colella, A. (1989). Organizational entry research: Current status and future directions. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management. (pp. 59 – 120). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wickman. (1997). Mentoring. New York: Irwin Professional Group.
Zey, M. G. (1993). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL:Irwin.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code