Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0908105-014422 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0908105-014422
論文名稱
Title
人造濕地健康評估指標架構之研究-以高雄市洲仔濕地公園為例
A Study on Health Assessment Indicators of Artificial Wetlands: Zo-Zai Wetland Park in Kaohsiung, Taiwan as the Case
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
140
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-07-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-09-08
關鍵字
Keywords
德爾菲法、健康評估指標、洲仔濕地公園、人造濕地
Health Assessment Indicators, Delphi Method, Zo-Zai Wetland Park, Artificial Wetlands
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5686 次,被下載 2580
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5686 times, has been downloaded 2580 times.
中文摘要
台灣濕地的消失反映了各類生物的流離失所,許多濕地已經受到破壞,面對
所剩不多的濕地,更須加以珍惜,給予保護。目前有許多濕地保護的行動正如火
如荼的進行,需投入更多的研究監測,對於濕地健康狀態應加以調查建檔,以期
在保護的過程中,能夠更有效地利用有限的資源。本研究期望針對台灣濕地的特
性,建構出一套台灣濕地健康評估的指標系統。
一個健康的濕地代表其生態功能的健全,意謂其具有植生穩定、生物的多樣
性、良好的水質以及能夠涵養水源的特性。本研究於參考國內外相關指標系統
後,擬定初步的濕地健康評估指標系統,經由德爾菲(Delphi)法專家問卷調查,
彙整不同背景之專家學者對濕地健康評估指標的認知與意見,建立適合台灣濕地
之健康評估指標,指標系統分為「環境實質面」及「規劃管理面」兩大方向,並
分為生物、水體、土壤、環境、管理及社會經濟等六大指標群,共18 個指標項
目。並以高雄市左營區之洲仔濕地公園為對象,利用此指標系統來檢視其健康程
度及指標成效,健康評估結果為「健康稍佳」(71 分),而導致濕地不健康的項
目有「復育物種成長度」、「外來強勢物種的分布情形」、「水質情況」、「水文情況」
及「濕地之維護經費」。整體而言,洲仔濕地尚屬健康之濕地,但影響濕地健康
之因子仍需持續監測,以維護濕地健康品質。
本研究希望能夠藉由濕地健康評估指標系統,配合定期完整濕地監測,來診
斷濕地之健康狀態,進而擬定濕地後續規劃管理對策,使濕地所面臨問題能於早
期加以改善,以營造健康濕地為最終目標。
Abstract
The disappearance of the wetlands of Taiwan have reflected all kinds of
biological drifting about aimlessly. We have to take action for protecting the wetlands,
due to there are less than before. In the face of the wetlands that there are not much
left, we must treasure and offer protection. The action that a lot of wetlands protection
at present is going on. We need to invest more research and monitoring, and should
investigate the state of wetland health that file, expect that can utilize limited
resources more effectively during the process of protecting. This research expects to
build the index system constructing out a set of Taiwan wetlands and assessing to the
characteristic of the wetland of Taiwan.
After consulting the domestic and international relevant index system, this
research drafts preliminary wetland health assessment system. Through Delphi
method, gathering opinions and suggestions from experts and scholars this research
could set up the health assessment indicators of Taiwan artificial wetlands.
Index system is divided into environment and management two general parts,
and is categorized into six major indexes groups, including organism, water, soil,
environment, management and social economy, amounts to 18 indexes.
In the case of Zo-Zai Wetland Park, in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, we applied this
index system to inspect the health degree of Zo-Zai Wetland Park and its index results.
Assessing the result for being 'good' in health, and cause the unhealthy projects of
wetland include restoration species grow up degree, the distribution of the invasive
species, the water quality situation, the hydrology situation and the maintenance funds
of the wetland .
The whole but the speech, the continent Zo-Zai Wetland Park still belongs the
health, but influence the wetland healthy factors still need to monitor continuously in
order to maintain wetland health quality.
This research hopes to diagnose the health state of the wetlands, through health
assessment indicators system and regular wetland monitoring, Then designing the
wetland follow-up planning and management strategies to result the wetlands’
problems earlier. Finally, it hopes to help restoring the wetlands in Taiwan.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機················································································ 1-1
第二節 研究目的················································································ 1-3
第三節 研究方法與流程···································································· 1-4
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 濕地特性················································································ 2-1
第二節 濕地健康評估指標意涵························································ 2-8
第三節 國內外健康評估指標·························································· 2-13
第四節 小結······················································································ 2-23
第三章 健康評估指標之研擬
第一節 研究架構設計········································································ 3-1
第二節 指標之初步建構···································································· 3-7
第三節 德爾菲法問卷調查過程······················································ 3-10
第四節 健康評估指標之架構·························································· 3-20
第五節 小結······················································································ 3-25
第四章 濕地健康評估指標應用
第一節 左營洲仔濕地公園之現況···················································· 4-1
第二節 濕地健康評估指標之套用·················································· 4-14
第三節 指標成效之分析·································································· 4-33
第四節 小結······················································································ 4-35
第五章 結語與建議
第一節 研究結論················································································ 5-1
第二節 後續研究建議········································································ 5-4
參考文獻······················································································ R-1
附錄
附錄一 加拿大亞伯達(Alberta)濕地健康評估指標···················· A-1
附錄二 市民量化棲地評價指數(CQHEI)·····································B-1
附錄三 溪流生態工法定性評價表····················································C-1
附錄四 濕地生態功能成效評估表··················································· D-1
附錄五 第一回合德爾菲法專家問卷·················································E-1
附錄六 第二回合德爾菲法專家問卷·················································F-1
附錄七 洲仔濕地公園鳥類名錄······················································· G-1
附錄八 洲仔濕地公園蛙類名錄······················································· H-1
附錄九 洲仔濕地公園昆蟲名錄·························································I-1
附錄十 洲仔濕地公園植物名錄·························································J-1
參考文獻 References
Costanza, R. (1992). Toward an operational definition of health, In: R. Costanza, B.
Norton & B. Haskell eds. Ecosystem Health:New Goal for Environmental
Management, Island Press, pp.239-256.
Fennessy, M.S., A.D. Jacobs, and M.E. Kentula (2004). Review of Rapid Methods for
Assessing Wetland Condition, EPA/620/R-04/009, US EPA, Washington, D.C.
Fitch, L. and N. Ambrose (2003). Riparian Areas: A User’s Guide to Health,
Lethbridge, Alberta: Cows and Fish Program. ISBN No. 0-7785-2305-5.
Fitch, L., B. Adams and K. O’Shaughnessy (2003). Caring for the Green Zone:
Riparian Areas and Grazing Management - Third Edition. Lethbridge, Alberta:
Cows and Fish Program. ISBN No. 0-9688541-2-5
Grayson, J.E., M.G. Chapman and A.J. Underwood (1999). The assessment of
restoration of habitat in urban wetlands, Landscape and Urban Planning, 43(4):
pp.227-236.
Mitsch, W. J., X. Wu, R.W. Nairn, P.E. Weihe, N. Wang, R. Deal, C.E. Boucher
(1998). Creating and restoring wetlands. BioScience , 48(12):pp.1019-1030.
Mitsch, W. J. and J.G.. Gosselink (2000). Wetlands, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons,
INC., NJ.
Mitsch, W. J and S.E. Jorgensen (2003). Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem
Restoration, John Wiley & Sons, INC. , NJ.
Neckles, H.A. and M. Dionne, Editors (2000). Regional standards to identify and
evaluate tidal wetland restoration in the Gulf of Maine. Wells National Estuarine
Research Reserve Technical Report, Wells, ME. 21 p. plus appendices.
Novitzki, R.P., R. Daniel Smith, Judy D. Fretwell (1997). Restoration, Creation, and
Recovery of Wetlands, Wetland Functions, Values and Assessment, U.S.
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425.
Tiner, R. W. (1999). Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation,
classification, and mapping, CRC Press LLC.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1980). Habitat evaluation procedures, Ecological
Services Manual 102, Washington, DC.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1982). Habitat suitability index models and instream
flow suitability curves: American shad, Biological Report82 (10.88), Washington,
DC.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1981). Standard for the development of habitat
suitability index models, Ecological Services Manual 103, Washington, DC.
于立平(1997),「濕地公園規劃策略之研究-以高雄縣鳥松濕地公園為例」,中
山大學海洋環境研究所碩士論文。
中華民國野鳥學會(1993),「台灣沿海濕地資源」,行政院農委會委託研究計畫。
王俊秀、邱文彥、紀駿傑、梁明煌、陳章波(1997),「濕地白皮書」,台北市野
鳥學會。
行政院公共工程委員會(2004),「2004 生態工法案例編選集」,行政院公共工程
委員會:台北市。
李國忠、高振源、賴建興(1998),「台北市郊區都市林管理問題之研究」,中華
林學季刊,31(2):頁387-404。
林享能(2003),「國際自然保育發展之趨勢」,國家政策論壇,冬季號,十月。
林昆海(2004),「水雉返鄉-洲仔濕地復育計畫的背後」,大自然,(82):頁
72-75。
邱文彥(2000),「海岸管理:理論與實務」,五南圖書出版公司。
邱文彥(2001),「關懷消失中的台灣濕地-濕地公園的規劃與課題」,科學月刊
32(7):頁571-577。
邱文彥(2002),「生態保育相關案例介紹」,台灣濕地,(35):頁7-11。
邱文彥(2003),「歐洲濕地保育考察報告」,台灣濕地,(39):頁4-8。
邱皓政(2002),「量化研究與統計分析:SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」,
五南書局,台北。
邱錦和(2003),「生態水池工法應用」,台灣濕地,(44):頁16-19。
周正明(2002),「河川生態工法評估程序建立-溪流狀況指數為例」,台灣大學
土木工程學研究所碩士論文。
周芳華(2004),「洲仔濕地水生植物與陸生植物紀錄」,台灣濕地,(48):頁
21-28。
施鴻志編著(2001),「環境規劃」,建都文化:新竹。
洪慶宜(2003),「河川溪流污染與志工水環境監測」,台灣濕地,(39):頁16-21。
洪慶宜(2004),「人工濕地棲地品質指標與推動策略評析」,台灣濕地,(50):
頁4-14。
高明瑞(1994),「自然資源保育與管理」,淑馨出版社,台北市。
翁榮炫(2001),「埤塘濕地生態系中的水雉」,社團法人中華民國濕地保護聯盟:
台南市。
翁義聰、王建平(2001),「黑翅遊俠-兼記台灣鹽田的生物多樣性」,社團法人
中華民國濕地保護聯盟:台南市。
翁義聰、王建平、侯平君(2002),「四草濕地-野生動物的庇護所」,社團法人
中華民國濕地保護聯盟:台南市。
陳宜清(2003),「濕地之恢復、創造及重建」,台灣濕地,(41):頁27-33。
陳宜清、何宗翰(2003),「探討以健康河川及棲地評價概念應用於野溪治理生態
工法之評估」,國科會專題研究(NSC92-2313-B-212-009)。
陳珍瑩(2004),「都會型濕地公園營造之規劃與管理-以高雄左營洲仔濕地公園
為例」,中山大學海洋環境及工程學系碩士論文。
陳振華(2000),「河川綜合環境品質評估模式之建立與應用-以高屏溪為例」,
東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳章波(1998),「台灣濕地白皮書簡介」,第四屆海岸濕地生態及保育研討會論
文集,頁387-395。
莊孟憲(2004),「洲仔濕地蛙類初探」,台灣濕地,(48):頁18-20。
彭國棟(1998),「物種瀕危等級與保育優先次序之評估」,自然保育季刊,(21):
頁6-15。
楊文瑜(1999),「台灣地區濕地規劃管理決策之研究-以關渡和無尾港為例」,
中山大學海洋環境及工程學系碩士論文。
經濟部水利署(2003),「河川近自然與生態工法」,經濟部水利署:台北市。
蔡美戀(2003),「鄉鎮層級都市永續發展指標系統架構之研究」,中山大學公共
事務管理研究所碩士論文。
劉靜靜(1995),「台灣海岸濕地保護策略與法制之研究」,中山大學海洋環境研
究所碩士論文。
濕盟高雄分會(2003),「水雉返鄉計畫將由民間團體認養公園推動」,台灣濕地,
(40):頁7-8。
濕盟高雄分會(2003),「左公一水雉返鄉計畫認養規劃」,台灣濕地,(40):頁
11-14。
濕盟高雄分會(2003),「水雉復育的第二個十年計晝」,台灣濕地,(40):頁15-19。
謝政勳(2002),「都市永續發展指標適用性評估-以高雄市為例」,國立中山大
學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
謝蕙蓮、陳章波(2002),「台灣西海岸濕地生態保育軸經營管理之規劃」,行政
院農委會(農委會90 保育基金-3.5)。
謝蕙蓮、陳章波(2002),「台灣西海岸濕地生態保育軸經營管理之推動研究」,
行政院農委會(農委會91 保育基金-3.5)。
謝蕙蓮(2004),「整合分散各地的濕地 建構台灣濕地保育軸」,台灣環境資訊
協會,網址:http://e-info.org.tw/special/wetland/2004/we04020401.htm。
韓乃鎮、邱勤庭(1998),「台灣沿海濕地調查」,民生報。
薛美莉(2004),「西南沿海棲地環境與生物的互動」,鳥語,(263):頁37-41。
魏銀南、林昆海、呂學樺(2004),「鳥松濕地公園之經營管理」,鳥語,(263):
頁20-25。
網頁資料:
Alberta: Cows and Fish Program, Lakes and Wetland.
http://www.cowsandfish.org/pdfs/lakes_wetlands.pdf。
Alberta: Cows and Fish Program, Biodiversity and Riparian Areas.
http://www.cowsandfish.org/pdfs/biodiversity.pdf。
Alberta: Cows and Fish Program, Water Quality and Riparian Areas.
http://www.cowsandfish.org/pdfs/water_quality.pdf。
Alberta: Cows and Fish Program, Value of Wetlands.
http://www.cowsandfish.org/pdfs/value_of_wetlands.pdf。
Alberta: Cows and Fish Program, Riparian Health Training.
http://www.cowsandfish.org/pdfs/riparian_health_training.pdf。
Alberta Riparian Habitat Management Society – Cows and fish.
http://www.cowsandfish.org。
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. http://www.ramsar.org。
中華民國野鳥學會。http://bird.org.tw/Default.htm。
台灣的濕地樂園。國立海洋生物博物館。http://wetland.nmmba.gov.tw/bb.asp。
台灣的濕地。農委會林務局自然資源與生態資料庫。
http://ngis.zo.ntu.edu.tw/wetland/list.asp。
台灣大學動物博物館。http://archive.zo.ntu.edu.tw/index1.htm。
台灣沿海濕地調查。http://udn.com/SPECIAL_ISSUE/domestic/wetland/index.htm。
特有生物研究中心。http://www.tesri.gov.tw/species.asp。
經濟部中央地質調查所地質資訊系統。http://210.69.81.69/geo/begin_internet.cfm。
高雄左營洲仔清水宮暨蓮池潭觀光全國資訊網。
http://www.taconet.com.tw/taiwanshow/。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code