Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0909108-010124 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0909108-010124
論文名稱
Title
員工分紅制度、分紅公平、工作投入與工作績效關係之研究
Research on the relationship of profit sharing system, sharing fairness, job involvement and working performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
123
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-07-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-09-09
關鍵字
Keywords
分紅公平、分紅滿意度、員工分紅制度、工作績效、工作投入
sharing fairness, profit sharing system, working performance, sharing satisfaction, job involvement
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5679 次,被下載 1829
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5679 times, has been downloaded 1829 times.
中文摘要
本研究針對台灣企業,透過實證研究來探討「員工分紅制度」、「分紅公平」、「工作投入」及「工作績效」之間的關係。藉以提供企業在因應分紅費用化時,可針對員工分紅制度與分紅公平上,設計更具激勵誘因方式之參考。
以新竹以北有施行員工分紅制度之公司為研究母體,採問卷調查的方式,總計發出問卷500份,回收之有效樣本共174份。經實證分析,其研究結果如下:
1. 員工分紅制度與分紅公平各變項均呈現正相關。員工對分紅制度越滿意,則認為分紅之分配公平及程序公平認知也越高。
2. 員工分紅制度對工作投入與工作績效沒有顯著影響。員工分紅制度可能會隨著時間的增加而降低其激勵效果,因此,對工作投入與工作績效的影響較不顯著。
3. 分紅公平與工作投入沒有顯著影響,但對工作績效之目標達成與合作滿意度有顯著影響。如果員工對分紅制度分配資訊不了解的話,易造成其對分紅產生不公平的感覺,這將可能影響員工對工作的投入,但若加強分紅在程序上的公平,則可以增加員工在工作目標上的達成率及促進彼此間的合作滿意度。
4. 員工分紅制度不會透過分紅公平的中介效果而影響工作投入與工作績效。由於分紅制度施行已久,逐漸成為薪資的一部分,對員工的吸引力降低,再加上員工對分紅公平產生懷疑,進而造成其對工作投入與工作績效沒有顯著影響。
Abstract
This study is to investigate the relationship among profit sharing, sharing fairness, job involvement and working performance by the empirical research. The goal of this study is to suggest the company how to design more incentive system from the profit sharing and sharing fairness when the profit sharing will become the operation expense in Taiwan.
500 questionnaires were sent to the company which is based on the north of Hsin-Chu County. The valid questionnaires are 174 copies in total after the return. Upon the empirical analysis, the important findings are as the following:
1.Profit sharing system and sharing fairness are positive correlated. The more the employees are satisfied with the profit sharing system and feel the importance of the profit sharing system, the higher their awareness is on the fairness of the profit distribution and execution procedure.
2.Profit sharing system is not significant to job involvement and working performance. When the time goes by, the incentive effect from the profit sharing system will decrease. Therefore, the effect of profit sharing system is not significt to job involvement and working performance.
3.Sharing fairness is not significant to job involvement, but significant to the goal achievement of working performance and collaboration’s satisfaction. If the employee doesn’t understand the profit sharing system, it easily causes the unfair feeling and it might impact on the job involvement. But if the company can emphasize the fairness of the execution procedure, it can increase the possibility of the goal achievement and enhance the collaboration’s satisfaction.
4.Profit sharing system can’t affect the working performance and job involvement by the intermediate effect of sharing fairness. Since the profit sharing system has been implemented for a while and became part of salary, it can’t draw more attraction as the beginning. In addition, if the employee starts to suspect the fairness of the profit sharing, it will result in the less influence on job involvement and working performance.
目次 Table of Contents
誌謝 II
摘要 IV
ABSTRACT V
目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 員工分紅制度 5
第二節 分紅公平認知 14
第三節 工作投入 20
第四節 工作績效 25
第五節 各變相間關係之推導 29
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究假設 35
第三節 變項之定義與衡量方法 37
第四節 問卷設計 40
第五節 抽樣方法與樣本 46
第六節 資料分析方法與流程 49
第四章 研究結果分析與討論 52
第一節 信度與效度分析 52
第二節 各研究構面間之複迴歸分析 67
第三節 不同個人特性在各構面間差異性分析 76
第四節 研究假設檢定結果 84
第五章 結論與建議 86
第一節 研究結論 86
第二節 研究限制 90
第三節 建議 91
參考文獻 93
附錄─本研究問卷 108
參考文獻 References
中文部分
1.王世榕(1991),公、民營事業單位實施勞工分紅入股與年終獎金制度之研究,台灣省政府研究考核委員會。
2.江福興(2004),以社會資本觀點探討國內製造業員工之人格特質與工作價值觀對其工作績效之影響,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.余國謀(1996),員工入股計劃對員工工作態度影響之研究-以高科技產業為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
4.吳家聲(1988),員工分紅入股制度之探討,勞工行政,第16期。
5.李正鋼、黃金印(2001),人力資源管理—新世紀觀點,前程企業管理有限公司。
6.李德玲(1992),企業員工對薪酬制度反應之研究,中國文化大學企業管理所碩士論文。
7.林杰兒(2008),因應員工分紅費用化 聯發科加薪25~30%。資料來自:http://pro.udnjob.com/mag2/it/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=95&f_SUB_ID=689&f_ART_ID=39191
8.林淑姬(1992),薪酬公平、程序公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為之關係研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
9.林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉與司徒達賢(1994),薪資公平、程序公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,管理評論,第十三卷第二期,頁87-108。
10.林蓂芬(2003),台灣證券業分紅入股制度對員工生產力之影響探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
11.邵秀玲(2005),以社會資本觀點探討中階主管之事業生涯成功與工作績效,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
12.施能傑(1994),我國行政機關俸給政策的公平性,政大學報,第69期,頁27-55。
13.柯函秀(2004),員工分紅入股制度對工作績效影響之研究─以新竹科學園區高科技廠商為例,大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
14.胡孝忠(2001),半導體業分紅入股制度與員工行為關係的研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
15.馬啟人(2006),員工分紅費用化研討,台灣工銀證券投顧。
16.張火燦(1996),策略人力資源管理,台北:揚智。
17.張峰銘(2002),薪資制度、組織承諾與工作績效關係之研究-以鍋爐製造業為例,國立中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文
18.張清滄(1996),薪酬管理實務,高雄:前程出版社。
19.張錫惠(1997),績效管理,非營利組織經營管理研修精要,台北:洪建全基金會。
20.曹正芬(2008),蔡明介:維持競爭力 管理很重要。資料來自:http://pro.udnjob.com/mag2/it/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=39773
21.曹國雄(1994),工作價值對員工態度的影響,人力資源學報,第4期,頁1-19。
22.曹國雄(1997),員工績效考核及勞動生產力規劃,台北:中華民國企業人力資源發展學會。
23.許韶芹(2007),員工分紅費用化 所得最重減半。資料來自:http://pro.udnjob.com/mag2/it/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=95&f_SUB_ID=689&f_ART_ID=36612
24.陳旭耀(2006),管理者自我導向學習傾向、管理才能、工作績效之相關研究─以知覺組織支持者為干擾變項,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
25.陳金福(1982),我國企業員工分紅入股制度,台北:中國文化大學出版部。
26.陳盈成(2000),分紅入股滿意度、工作投入、工作滿意度、工作壓力與離職傾向之相關研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
27.陳淑嬌(1989),國民中學校長領導形式、教師工作投入與組織效能關係之研究,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
28.辜文賢(2003),薪酬結構、分配公平與百貨公司專櫃銷售人員工作表現關係之研究─工作經驗、銷售能力與成長需求強度的干擾效應,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
29.黃英忠(1997),人力資源管理,台北:三民。
30.溫金豐、錢書華(2002),報酬結構、認知公平與研發人員績效關係之研究:以某高科技研究機構為例,人力資源管理學報,第2卷第1期,頁19-35。
31.趙曉玲(2001),員工分紅入股對組織績效的影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
32.蔡玲玉(1979),薪酬管理與勞資氣氛之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
33.鄧家駒,多變量分析(初版),台北市:華泰文化事業公司,2004。
34.鍾聘華(2006),人力資源管理措施知覺對員工工作績效之影響─工作投入及組織承諾之中介效果分析,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
35.魏美蓉(2008),因應員工分紅費用化後的秘訣。資料來自:http://www.heissmann.at/asia-pacific/taiwan/pubs/articles/2008/2008_01_03.asp
36.羅順華(2000),高科技廠商薪資策略研究-以新竹科學工業園區為例,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
37.蘇義祥(1999),中華電信專戶服務部門領導型態與工作績效關係之研究:服務人員特質及成熟度的調節作用,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

英文部分
1.Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In H. L. Tosi, R. J. House & M. D. Dunnette (Eds.), Managerial Motivation and Compensation: Board of Trustees of Michigan State University.
2.Allport, G. W. (1947). The psychology of participation. Psychological Review(52), 117-132.
3.Anthony , P. W., Perrewe, L. P., & Kacmar, K. M. (1993). Strategic Human Resource Management Orlando: Dryden Press.
4.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
5.Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779-801.
6.Bergman, T. J., Scarpello, V. G., & Hills, F. S. (1998). Compensation Decision Marking (3rd ed.): Harcourt Brace College.
7.Blau, G. J., & Boal, K. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. Academy of Management Review, 12, 288-300.
8.Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
9.Blood, M. R., & Hulin, C. L. (1967). Alienation Environmental Characteristics of Workers Responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 284-290.
10.Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Associates, Personnel Selection in Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-223.
12.Byars, L., & Rue, L. W. (1994). Human Resource and Personnel Management: Homewood.
13.Campell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and organizational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
14.Carvell, M. R., & Kuzmits, F. E. (1982). Personnel: Management of Human Resource: Ball & Howell.
15.Cropanzanzo, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Process in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Roberson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 317-372). New York: Wiley.
16.Dubin, R. (1956). Industrial Work's Worlds: A Study of the Central Life Interests of Industrial Workers. Social Problem, 3, 131-142.
17.Ellerman, D. P. (1984). What is a Worker Cooperative? Somerville, MA: Industrial Cooperative Association.
18.Farris, G. F. (1971). A Predictive Study of Turnover. Personnel Psychology, 24, 311-328.
19.Ferris, K. R., & Aranya, N. (1983). A Comparison of Two Organizational Commitment Scales. Personnel Psychology, 36, 87-98.
20.Floger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowl & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183).
21.Florkowski, G. W. (1987). The organizational impact of profit sharing. Academy of management Review, 12(4), 622-636.
22.Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedure justice: an interpretative analysis of personnel system. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 3, 141-183.
23.Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(March), 115-130.
25.French, J. L. (1987). Employee perspectives on stock ownership: Finacial Investment or Mechanism of Control? Academy of management Review, 12(3), 427-435.
26.George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin(112), 310-329.
27.Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
28.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading (4th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Prentice. Hall.
29.Hattrup, K., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Learning about individual dif-ferences by taking situations seriously. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations (pp. 507-547). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.Ivancevich, J. M. (1998). Human Resource Management (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Co., Inc.
31.Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
32.Kane, V. E. (1976). Process Capability Indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41-52.
33.Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
34.Klein, K. J. (1987). Employee Stock Ownership and Employee Attitudes: A Test of Three Models. . Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 319-332.
35.Klein, K. J., & Hall, R. J. (1987). Employee Stock Ownership and Employee Attitudes: A Test of Three Models. Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 319-332.
36.Klein, K. J., & Hall, R. J. (1988). Correlates of Employee Satisfaction with Stock Ownership: Who Like an ESOP Most? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 630-638.
37.Kruse, D. (1993). Profit sharing: Does it make a difference: The productivity and stability effects of employee profit-sharing plan. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
38.Lawler, E. E., & Jenkins, G. D. (1981). Impact of Employee Participation in Pay Plan Development. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 111-128.
39.Lawler, I., E.E. (1971). Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.Lawler, I., E. E. (1972). Secrecy and the need to know. In M. Dunnette, R. House & H. Tosi (Eds.), Reading in Managerial Motivation and Compensation: East Leasing: Michigan State University Press.
41.Lawler, I., E. E. (1981). Pay and Organization Development. MA: Addison-Wesley.
42.Lawler, I., E.E., & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 305-312.
43.Lee, Y. D., Lain, J. W., & Chen, C. Y. (1999). A study on the measurement of productivity for white-collar employees-A Case of electronic in Taiwan. The Chinese Military Academy Journal, 14, 345-361.
44.Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in Social Relationships. In J. W. Thibult, J. T. Spence & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topic in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
45.Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K.Gergen, M. Greenberg & R. Willis (Eds.), Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
46.Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
47.Long, R. J. (2000). Employee profit sharing: consequence and moderations. Industrial Relations, 55(3), 477-504.
48.Luthans, F., & Kreitner, R. (1975). Organizational Behaviour Modification and Beyond. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.Mahoney, T. A. (1989). Multiple pay contingencies: Strategic design of compensation. Human Resourse Management, 28, 337-347.
50.Martocchio, J. J. (2000). Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc.
51.Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers Pub.
52.Milkovich , G. T., & Anderson, P. H. (1972). Management compensation and secrecy. Personnel Psychology, 25, 293-302.
53.Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (1999). Compensation (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology(76), 845-855.
55.Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal:Social, organizational , and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.O'Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: agents of headquarters or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal(21), 525-548.
57.Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivation basis of organizational citizen bahavior. Research in Organizational Behavior(12), 43-72.
58.Ouchi, W. C. (1980). Market, bureaucracies, and clan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.
59.Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone- Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct Validation of Two Instruments Designed To Measure Job Involvement and Work Centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(224-228).
60.Pyun, S. H. (1997). Organizational Justice Orientation and Workforce Performance Effectiveness in South Korea. University of Southern California.
61.Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
62.Saleh, S. D., & J., H. (1976). Job involvement: Concepts and measurements. Academy of Management Journal, 19(213).
63.Schermerhorn, J. R. (1989). Management for Productivity (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons., Inc.
64.Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (1994). Managing Organizational Behavior (5th ed.): John Wiley & Sons., Inc.
65.Schuler, R. A., & Rogersky, N. (1998). Understanding compensation practice Variation Across Firms: The Impact of National Culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 159-177.
66.Schuler, R. S. (1988). Human resource management choices and organizational strategy. In R. S. Schuler, S. A. Youngblood & V. L. Huber (Eds.), Personnel and Human Resource Management (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
67.Schuler, R. S. (1995). Human Resource Management (5th ed.). New York: West Publishing Company.
68.Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton. (1992). Organizational justice: The search for fairness in the workplace. New York: Macmillan.
69.Sibson, R. E. (1975). The outlook for executive pay. Nation's Business, 63(12).
70.Spencer, D. G. (1986). Employee voice and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal(49), 488-502.
71.Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. Sam Advance Management Journal, Summer, 25-31.
72.Vroom, V. H. (1962). Ego Involvement, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance. Personnel Psychology, 15, 159-177.
73.Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: John Wisley & Sons., Inc.
74.Wallace, J., M.J., & Fay, C. H. (1988). Compensation Theory and Practice (2rd ed.). Boston Massachusetts: Pws-Kent.
75.Wallace, J., M.J., & Fay, C. H. (1998). Compensation Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Pws-Kent.
76.Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
77.Werner, J. M. (2000). Implication of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Human Resourse Management Review, 10(1), 3-24.
78.Wilson, T. B. (1995). Innovative Reward Systems for the Changing Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code