Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0909110-115037 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0909110-115037
論文名稱
Title
企業與2009年高雄地區「表演藝術行銷平台」共同行銷聯盟模式之研究
A Study on Co-marketing Alliances Model of Business Companies and 2009 "Marketing Platform of Performing Arts" in Kaohsiung
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
143
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-07-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-09-09
關鍵字
Keywords
共同行銷聯盟、表演藝術、表演藝術行銷平台
Co-marketing Alliance, performing arts, Performing Arts Marketing Platform
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5674 次,被下載 15
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5674 times, has been downloaded 15 times.
中文摘要
國內表演藝術環境的變動,導致部分表演藝術團隊積極與企業進行「跨界」合作,分享彼此行銷通路資源的方式共同對抗環境挑戰;而國藝會於2006年開始推動的「表演藝術行銷平台專案」,讓擁有多元表演藝術產品的「平台」以「共同行銷」的方式與企業合作,可從中獲得更多效益。但是,合作的模式或是方法在目前尚未發展成熟,因此,本研究目的在於:一、探究共同行銷聯盟的理論基礎與模式;二、行銷平台之「藝術中介」特性於共同行銷聯盟合作過程中的影響;三、比較不同個案的共同行銷聯盟模式;四、修正共同行銷聯盟之模式,並對於如何促進企業與行銷平台之互動提出建言。

本研究採用個案研究的方式,選擇2009年高雄地區「表演藝術行銷平台」專案與威秀影城、金鑛咖啡、台灣味之素與中華衛星大車隊等企業合作之案例,並透過觀察與深度訪談等方法來收集資料以探究共同行銷聯盟之模式,並印證表演藝術行銷平台「共同行銷聯盟模式」之完整性與可行性。研究結果發現:目前企業與行銷平台聯盟動機主要為「拓展客源」與「品牌形象提昇」等因素,商業利業考量外,「社會責任」也會促使企業與表演藝術單位聯盟;從聯盟模式影響層面來看,聯盟動機影響著企業聯盟模式中的夥伴選擇、聯盟管理與效益評估考量因素,「社會責任」因素使合作夥伴願意給予表演藝術單位較多信任與協商空間;聯盟夥伴選擇因素中,行銷平台的「互補性能力」與「聯盟倡導者」較一般表演藝術團隊擁有更多優勢;聯盟效益則因消費者認知態度改變的衡量不易,企業僅能掌握消費人次、廣告曝光量、總體營業額或活動問卷等資料,輔以「主管的主觀評估」方式調查與衡量。

本研究對於企業的建議為「熟悉表演藝術的多樣性」和「多元化與差異化的合作」等兩項;而表演藝術行銷平台在提案與合作的過程中,必須考量自身、企業與團隊三方的立場,才能進一步地建立穩定的合作關係,因此建議行銷平台需熟悉自身的優勢、強調互利互惠、團隊資源的連結和提升執行者的專業能力等。
Abstract
As Taiwanese performing arts environment changes, some performing arts groups begin to co-operate with business companies and share marketing resources aggressively. On the other hand, since National Culture and Arts Foundation has launched Performing Arts Marketing Platform project in 2006, which has promoted several platforms to co-market with business companies and to gain benefits. However, this business model has not been developed throughly. The purposes of this study are to explore the theories of co-marketing alliances; to understand the influence of the marketing platforms during co-marketing alliances as arts intermediaries; to compare four cases of co-marketing alliances; to modify the co-marketing alliances models and to conclude some suggestions for business companies and Performing Arts Marketing Platforms to improve their cooperation.

This study is based on four co-marketing alliances case studies, with observation and in-deep interviews to collect research data. The study concludes that except marketing concern and brand awareness, social responsibility, which helps performing arts organizations to gain more trusts from business companies, becomes another important motivation to form alliances. These motivations affect business companies for choosing their partners, managing the alliances, and evaluating the results. Furthermore, “complementary possibilities” and “alliance promoters” are two advantages for Performing Arts Marketing Platforms to built relationships with business companies. Since customers’ cognitions and attitude are not easy to be evaluated, business companies can only measure the outcomes of the alliances through number of consumers, advertisement impression, overall revenue and return questionnaires, which are also difficult to distinguish from normal situations. Therefore, most of the business companies prefer to evaluate the alliance by managers’ subjective judgments.

In order to establish a steady alliance, a business company has to familiar with the diversity of performing arts and alternative alliance models beforehand. A Performing Arts Marketing Platform has to consider the needs of business companies, performing arts organizations and itself. The study also suggests a Performing Arts Marketing Platform should increase its advantages and emphasize equal partnerships. It can connect the resource from all the performing arts organizations it helps, and enhance alliance promoter’s professional ability.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………………4
第三節 研究限制………………………………………………………………5
第四節 章節概要………………………………………………………………5
第貳章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………7
第一節 表演藝術市場行銷特性………………………………………………7
第二節 表演藝術行銷平台執行模式探討………………………………… 17
第三節 共同行銷聯盟的定義……………………………………………… 25
第四節 形成共同行銷聯盟的動機………………………………………… 29
第五節 共同行銷聯盟的夥伴選擇與聯盟管理…………………………… 34
第六節 共同行銷聯盟之績效評估………………………………………… 39
第七節 共同行銷聯盟之模式……………………………………………… 41
第參章 研究方法………………………………………………………………… 43
第一節 研究設計與方法…………………………………………………… 43
第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………… 45
第三節 資料收集與分析…………………………………………………… 49
第肆章 個案探討………………………………………………………………… 53
第一節 威秀影城股份有限公司…………………………………………… 53
第二節 金鑛連鎖企業股份有限公司……………………………………… 61
第三節 台灣味之素股份有限公司………………………………………… 69
第四節 中華衛星大車隊…………………………………………………… 79
第五節 交叉分析及聯盟模式之修正……………………………………… 84
第伍章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………… 92
第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………………… 92
第二節 研究建議與後續研究方向………………………………………… 94
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………… 97
附錄一 訪談綱要…………………………………………………………………106
附錄二 訪談紀錄…………………………………………………………………108
參考文獻 References
一、英文部分
Aaker, D.A.& Keller, K.L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 27-41.
Aaker, D.A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38 (3), 102-120.
Achrol, R.S., Scheer, L.K. & Stern, L.W. (1990). Designing successful transorganizational marketing alliances. Report No. 90-118 (Sep). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Alder, L. (1966). Symbiotic marketing. Harvard Business Review, 44 (Nov-Dec), 59-71.
Allen, D.S., Rajendra, K.S.& Robert, W.R. (1994). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 149-158.
Anderson, E. & Weitz, B.A. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8 (4), 310-323.
Anderson, J. & Narus, A.J. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54 (Jan.), 42-58.
Anderson, E. (1990). Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance. Sloan Management Review, 31 (2),19-30.
Aulakh, PS., Kotabe, M. & Sahay, A. (1996). Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5), 1005-1032.
Barny, J.B. & Hesterly, W.S. (2008). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (2end ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Beamish, P.W. (1984). Joint venture performance in developing countries. University of Western Ontario, London: Doctorsl Disseration.
Borys, B.& Jemison, D.B. (1989). Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14 (2), 234-249.
Bronder, C. & Pritzl, R. (1992). Developing strategic alliances: A conceptual framework for successful co-operation. European Management Journal, 10 (4), December, 412-421.
Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E., & Wilkinson, T.J. (1995). Strategic alliance: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28 (3), 18-25.
Bucklin, L.P. & Sengupta, S. (1993). Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. Journal of Marketing, 57 (2), 32-46.
Chakravarthy, B.S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (3), 437-458.
Chung, S., Singh, H. & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (1), 1-22.
Cook, K.S. (1977). Exchange and power in networks of international relationships. Sociological Quarterly, 18 (Winter), 62-99.
Coase, R.H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16), 386-405.
Cullen, J.B., Johnson, J.L. & Sakano, T. (1995). Japanese and local partner commitment to IJVs: psychological consequences of outcomes and investments in the IJV relationship. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (1), 91-115.
Cullen, J.B., Johnson, J.L. & Sakano, T. (2000) Success through commitment and trust: The soft side of strategic alliance management. Journal of World Business, 35 (3), 223-240.
Doz, Y.L. (1988). Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: some critical issues. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17 (4), 31-57.
Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 11-27.
Elmuti, D. & Kathawala, Y. (2001). An overview of strategic alliances. Management Decision, London, 39 (3), 205-237.
Frazier, G.L. (1983). Interorganizational exchange behavior in marketing channels: A broadened perspective. American Marketing Association, 47 (Autumn), 68-78.
Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 1-19.
Geringer, J.M. (1991). Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (1), 41-62.
Geringer, J.M. & Hebert, L. (1991). Measuring performance in international joint venture. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (2), 249-263.
Gray, B. & Wood, D.J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27 (1), 3-22.
Guiltinan, J.P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 74-85.
Hall, R.H., Clark, J.P., Giordano, P.C., Johnson, P.V., & Martha, V.R. (1977). Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (3), 457-474.
Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Sum), 83-103.
Harbison, J.R. & Pekar, P. (1997). Cross-border alliances in the age of collaboration. Virginia: Booz Allen & Hamilton.
Harrigan, K.R. (1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. F.J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business. 205-226. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Hesterly, W.S., Liebeskind, J.P. & Zenger, T.R. (1990). Organizational economics: An impending revolution in organization theory? Academy of Management Review, 15 (3), 402-420.
Hill, C.W.L. & Jones, T.M. (1992). Stakeholder - agency theory. The Journal of management studies, 29 (2),131-154.
Hoffmann, W.H.& Schaper-Rinkel, W. (2001). Acquire or ally? A strategy framework for deciding between acquisitions and cooperation. Management International Review, 41 (2), 131-159.
James, B. (1985). Alliances: The new strategic focus. Long Range Planning, 18 (3), 76-81.
Kalb, C.C. (1988). Joint marketing or co-marketing: Co-operations or competition. Medical Marketing & Media, 23 (14), 112-11
Konsynski, B.R. & McFarlan, F.W. (1990). Information partnership-shared data, shared scale. Harvard Business Review, Sep/Oct, 114-120.
Kolter, P. (1975). Marketing management: Analysis, planning and control (3rd ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lauterborn, R.F., Schultz, D.E., & Tannenbaum, S.I. (1993).Integrated marketing communications. Lincolnwood: NTC Business Books.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1 (3), 248-266.
Lewis, J.D. (1990). Partnerships for profit: Structuring and managing strategic alliances. New York: Free Press.
Magrath, A.J. (1991). Collaborative marketing comes of age-again. Sales and Marketing Management, Sep., 61-64.
McCarthy, E. J. (1981).Basic marketing: A managerial approach (7th ed). Homewood: R.D. Irwin.
McCarthy, E.J. & Perreault, W.D. (2004). Basic marketing: A global-managerial approach (15th ed). Boston: Irwin.
Merriam, S.B.(1988). Case Study Research in Education. A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Mohr, J. & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. & Deshpande, R. (1992). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 81-101.
Morgan, R.M.& Hunt, S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20-38.
Park C.W., Jun S.Y. & Shocker, A.D. (1996).Composite branding alliances: An investigation of extension and feedback effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (4), 453-467.
Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organization learning and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter, 579-601.
Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (4), 794-829.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
Porter, M.E., & Fuller, M.B. (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Rao, A.R., Qu, L. & Ruekert, R.W. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 258-268.
Rao, A.R. & Ruekert, R.W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, 36 (1), 87-97.
Rich, M.K. (2003). Requirements for successful marketing alliances. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18 (4/5), 447-456.
Ruekert, R.W. & Walker, O.C., Jr. (1987). Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 51 (1), 1-19.
Shocker, A.D., Sricastava, R.K. & Rudkert, R.W. (1994). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to the special issues. Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (May), 149-158.
Shamdasani, P.N. & Sheth, J.N. (1995). An experimental approach to investigating satisfaction and continuity in marketing alliances. European Journal of Marketing, 29 (4), 6-23.
Simonin, B.L. & Ruth, J.A. (1995). Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumer’s reservation prices for the bundle, the new product and its tie-in. Journal of Business Research, 33 (3), 219-227.
Simonin, B.L. & Ruth, J.A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (1), 30-42.
Smith, J.B. & Barclay, D.W. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 3-22.
Spekman, R.E. & Sawhney, K. (1990).Toward a conceptual understanding of the antecedents of strategic alliances. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Van de Ven, A.H. & Ferry, D.L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Varadarajan, P.R. (1986a). Symbiotic marketing revisited. Journal of Marketing, 50 (1), 7-17.
Varadarajan, P.R. (1986b). Horizontal cooperative sales promotion: A framework for classification and additional perspectives. The Journal of Marketing, 50 (2), 61-73.
Varadarajan, P.R. & Cunningham, M.H. (1996). Strategic alliances: A synthesis of conceptual foundations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 282-296.
Venkatesh, R. & Mahajan, V. (1997). Products with branded components: An approach for premium pricing and partner selection. Marketing Science, 16 (2), 146-165.
Venkatesh, R., Mahajan, V. & Muller, E. (2000). Dynamic co-marketing alliances: When and why do they succeed or fail? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17 (Nov), 3-31.
Webster, F.E., Jr. (1992). The changing role of marketing in the corporation. Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 1-17.
Werner, O. & Schoepfle, G.M. (1987). Systematic fieldwork: Ethnographic analysis and data management. Newbury Park: SAGE.
Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
Wernerfelt, B.A. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
Williamson, O.E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3), 548-577.
Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269-296.



二、中文部份
2009臺北藝術節。2009年12月10日,取自:http://www.taipeifestival.org/Content/Content.aspx?id=5301&subid=5317。
2009國際藝術節。2009年12月10日,取自:http://www.ntch.edu.tw/front/showArticleDetail/40408e951ef8c43f011efdd5b4730071。
2010國際藝術節。2009年12月10日,取自:http://tif.ntch.edu.tw/preferential.php。
Hill, L., O’Sullivan, C. & O’Sullivan, T.(2004)。如何開發藝術市場。(林潔盈譯)。臺北市:五觀藝術管理。
Kotler, P. & Scheff, J.(1998)。票房行銷—飛利浦•柯特勒談表演藝術行銷策略(高登第譯)。臺北市:遠流。
大開劇團(2009年10月29日)。Coldstone冰淇淋升級時間只到11/30。臺中市:大開劇團。2009年12月10日,取自:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/opentheater/5550313。
方敏(2002)。以行銷聯盟經營品牌對品牌權益的影響。國立交通大學管理科學學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
王文科(2002)。教育研究法(7版)。臺北市:五南。
成喬明(2003)。談藝術中介的管理。東南文化,7(171),86-88。
成喬明(2004)。藝術中介管理的幾個理論問題。藝術百家,2(76),129-132。
行政院文化建設委員會(2007)。表演藝術產業調查研究。臺北市:文化建設委員會。
江義平(1999)。臺灣中小企業策略聯盟決策模式建構與分析之研究。中興大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺中市。
吳青松(1990)。本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效之評估。產業科技發展管理研討會論文集,經濟部科技顧問室。
吳思華(2000)。策略九說,臺北:臉譜出版社。
南方朔(2008)。2007表演藝術年鑑-二ΟΟ七年是警惕的開始。臺北市:國立中正文化中心。
周新富(2007)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
周倩漪(2008)。物價連三漲,票房倒!倒?倒…。表演藝術雜誌,187,32-37。
邱瓊平(2009年11月15日)。藝文團體喊話 盼盛治仁協助。聯合晚報。2009年12月10日,取自:http://www.udn.com/2009/11/15/NEWS/READING/REA8/5252221.shtml。
個案研究(尚榮安譯)(2001)。臺北:弘智文化。(原作者:Yin, R. K原著出版年:2000)
高孔廉、鍾東仁(2004)。大陸臺商策略聯盟管理作為與其績效之關聯性研究。中原學報,32(2),121-139。
高啟震(1995)。品牌聯盟的品質訊號傳遞效果之研究。大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
高雄表演藝術行銷平台(2010)。表演藝術行銷平台專案計畫成果報告書。財團法人國家文化藝術基金會專案成果報告,未出版。
高雄表演藝術行銷平台(2010)。與觀眾做朋友—共同行銷及志工經驗分享。財團法人國家文化藝術基金會【藝”網”打盡 行銷零距離】表演藝術行銷座談會,2010年2月3日。
財團法人國家文化藝術基金會(2009a)。專案成果-【表演藝術行銷平台專案】補助計畫。2009年10月14日,取自:http://www.ncafroc.org.tw/Content/plan-content.asp?Act_id=74
財團法人國家文化藝術基金會(2009b)。2008年國家文化藝術基金會年報。臺北市:國家文化藝術基金會。
梁琬琪(2003)。認同卡策略行銷聯盟之效益分析。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
統一星巴克(無日期)。會員專區—藝文活動,2010年3月10日,取自:https://www.starbucks.com.tw/member/art/member_art.jspx
雲門舞集(無日期)。星巴克免費講座-行草三部曲 - 雲門的肢體藝術。2009年12月10日,取自:http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=116083097022&index=1。
郭明仁(2004)。品牌聯盟營運模式的探討:以智慧型手機供應商與電信營運商為例。國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
郭崑謨、張五岳(1995)。臺商與大陸鄉鎮企業關係之發展—策略聯盟之需求與意向探討。行政院大陸委員會之委託研究報告。
張芳誠(1995)。行銷聯盟動機與企業核心資源對聯盟績效影響之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
陳正男、李勝祥(1997)。聯盟夥伴認知與動機對績效與未來承諾之影響。臺大管理學叢,8(2),125-164。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
陳亞萍(1999)。北市表演藝術觀眾之生活型態與行銷研究。國立中央大學藝術學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
陳啟昕(2007)。臺灣表演藝術產業通路策略研究-以音樂類表演藝術為例。國立成功大學藝術研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
陳麗娟(2007)。縣市文化中心演藝廳之功能與角色探討。陳錦城(主持人),兩廳院二十週年論壇臺灣劇場經營研討會,文化大學推廣部。
陳錦誠(2008)。2007表演藝術年鑑-年度表演藝術預算之探討。臺北市:國立中正文化中心。
黃玉芳(2008年9月16日)。加演16場 一票難求 太陽劇團明售票。聯合晚報。2009年12月10日,取自:http://ishow.udn.com/events/alegria/news_080916.html。
黃俊英(1999)。企業研究法。臺北:東華。
黃琡珺(2006)。策略聯盟伙伴之關係(Guanxi)、信任、聯盟績效及未來繼續合作意願。國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
教育研究法-研究設計與實務(楊孟麗、謝水南譯)(2005)。臺北市:心理出版社(四版)。(原作者:J. R. Fraenkel & N. E. Wallen;原著出版年:2000)
楊雯芩(1999)。國內行銷策略聯盟模式之探討。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
馮意倩(2007)。表演藝術行銷平台專案研究-以臺中市為例。國立中山大學藝術管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
溫慧玟(2005)(計劃主持人)。表演藝術生態系統初探。臺北市:行政院文化建設委員會。
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光(1993)。策略聯盟的發展策略-交易成本的觀點。管理評論,12(1),99-118。
葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。
趙莉(2002)。藝術中介存在必要性的經濟分析。東南大學學報,4(5),99-101。
蔣永寵(2002)。表演藝術聯合行銷及消費者行為。臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
蔡孟君(2010)。行銷真情指數百分百—與數字面對面。財團法人國家文化藝術基金會【藝”網”打盡 行銷零距離】表演藝術行銷座談會,2010年2月3日。
賴炳森(2009)。印刷業跨產業行銷聯盟模式之研究─以員林地區為例。大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 13.59.218.147
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 13.59.218.147
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code