Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0910109-173244 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0910109-173244
論文名稱
Title
高雄縣市產業園區永續發展策略與決策之跨域分析-PAM架構觀點
The Cross-Domain Analysis of the Strategies and Decisions of the Industrial Park Sustainable Development of the Kaohsiung Region — the Perspective of the Public Affairs Management Integrated Reference Framework (PAM)
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
257
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-07-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-09-10
關鍵字
Keywords
產業園區、跨域分析、永續發展、高雄縣市
Kaohsiung Region, Industrial Park, Sustainable Development, the Cross-Domain Analysis
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5738 次,被下載 19
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5738 times, has been downloaded 19 times.
中文摘要
本研究係運用公共事務管理整合架構(PAM)之跨域分析方法,就高雄市產業園區永續發展之策略與決策進行研究,本研究係結合質性研究、初級與次級資料之分析、並運用認知續線理論得到受測者之權重與區分不同決策模式。並運用互動管理方法,得到10項產業園區永續發展之策略與增強因果關係圖。
經本研究驗證,認為公共事務管理整合架構(PAM)之跨域分析方法為一種可以解決多元意見與複雜問題的方法,經過十個步驟的進行,可以協助決策者澄清問題並擬定具體策略。
本研究並獲得以下具體結論:(1)獲得影響高雄縣市產業園區永續發展的八項具體問題;(2)南北落差的消弭與兩岸交流強化,以增加海空雙港的效能,應是強化高雄縣市產業體質的關鍵;(3)檢討閒置產業園區,強化招商引資功能,推動產業轉型,以創造就業機會;(4)運用認知續線理論,認為引進新產業是最重要的策略,政策行銷以直覺式較能產生效果;(5)運用互動管理結果,得到以下十大推動產業園區永續發展的策略;(6)建構因果關係層級圖,建立跨域行政管理機制是最重要的優先策略,以啟動中央與地方聯合招商機制。
Abstract
Based on the Cross-Domain Analysis method of the “Public Affairs Management Integrated Reference Framework,” this study analyzed the the strategies and decisions of the sustainable development of the industrial park of the Kaohsiung Region. It combine the primary data , secondary data and the qualitative research,and compare with the results of the Cognitive Continuum Theory(CCT) and the Interactive Management,(IM), in order to understand the whole picture from some dimensions.
At the end of the research, it can be agreed that the Cross-Domain Analysis method of the “Public Affairs Management Integrated Reference Framework” and solve the multiple opinions of diversified communities, through the ten stages of the method, we can clarified the questions and concluded the strategies.
There are the conclusions of the study as the follows: (1) the study concluded the eight questions of the Sustainable Development of the Industrial Park of the Kaohsiung Region; (2) they are the key performance factors to reduce the gap of Kaohsiong and Taipei, and to enhance the relationship with the main-land China, they could promote the effiencies of the Kaohsiong Port and Kaohsiung Airport. (3) to examine the land-use of the industrial parts of Kaohsiong, and to upgrate the industrial typies could create more job opportunities;(4) to import new industries is the most important strategy; and the policy-maketing should add more the elements of the intuition; (5) it can concluded the ten strategies based on the Interactive Management(IM); (6) the first priority strategy is to establish the managerial mechanism of the cross-territories, in order to consolidate the efforts of the Central government and the Local government.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章、緒論15
第一節、研究背景與動機15
第二節、研究目的23
第三節、研究範圍25
第四節、研究限制27
第五節、研究流程29
第貳章、文獻探討31
第一節、高雄縣市產業發展歷程、現況與相關研究31
第二節、產業園區永續發展的理論與策略53
第三節、決策與判斷理論81
第四節、公共事務理整合參考架構之跨域分析107
第五節、互動管理131
第參章、研究方法與研究設計137
第一節、公共事務管理整合參考架構跨域分析之應用137
第肆章、以PAM跨域分析探討高雄縣市產業園區永續發展策略139
第一節、問題系統界定139
第二節、多元當事人界定171
第三節、問題(標的)與方案(標的物)界定175
第四節、目標界定與屬性界定185
第五節、檢視問題的結構化程度191
第六節、區分事實與價值,分別進行判斷195
第七節、判斷角色分工199
第八節、判斷合成201
第九節、進行人際判斷—運用互動管理203
第十節、確認本問題進行跨域分析之成功等級 207
第伍章、結論與建議209
第一節、結論209
第二節、後續研究建議213
參考文獻215
附錄:認知續線(CCT)問卷實驗問卷 225
參考文獻 References
(一)網站
美國大學研究園區協會(AURP):http://www.aurrp.org/
國際科學園區協會(IASP):http://www.iaspworld.org/
新竹科學園區:http://www.sipa.gov.tw/1/in7/index-in7-1.htm
台南科學園區:http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/
英國科學園區協會(UK Science Park Association):http://www.ukspa.org.uk/
行政院主計處網站:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/
內政部資訊服務網:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
交通部統計處:http://www.motc.gov.tw
高雄市政府統計資訊服務網:http://kcgdg.kcg.gov.tw/
高雄縣政府http://www.kscg.gov.tw/tw/home/index.aspx
經濟部工業局全球資訊網:http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/

(二)中文文獻
王水杉(2001)。柴山開發保育公眾參與決策中專業角色與觀點之研究。國立中山大學,高雄市。
王文誠、施鴻志(2002)。全球化趨勢。於施鴻志編著,地區發展與管理。新竹:建都文化事業股份有限公司。
王文誠、劉麗娟(2006)。民間團體協助推動高高屏地區永續發展認知提昇與策略研擬之研究(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSC95-2621-8-003-003)。
初國華(2008)。全球化與兩岸關係新願景,中國大陸研究,第51 卷4 期(2008 年12 月),頁89-114。
汪銘生、黃國良(1991)。高雄市製造業勞動條件之研究─社會判斷理論之應用。管理評論,10,1-22。
汪銘生(1992)。環境決策與管理。高雄:復文書局。
汪銘生、洪東煒(1993)。都市公共財評量模式CVM與SJT之比較─以高雄市水上巴士為例。管理評論,22,2,131-148。
汪銘生(1994)。高雄都會區發展策略及行動方案之研究。高雄市政府研考會研究報告。
汪銘生、邱忠民(1999)。地方發展下公共事務管理教育角色之研究。海峽兩岸首屆公共事務與跨世紀發展研討會,大連理工學院。
汪銘生、黃宗誠(2003)。公共事務管理整合參考架構與兩岸大學MPA課程之結構分析。公共事務評論,1,1-68。
汪銘生、陳碧珍(2003)。風險資訊整合模式與風險知覺之研究–以石化業為例。管理學報,20(2),251-287。
汪銘生、胡以祥、戴雅明(2004)。高雄對兩岸直航之預應─經濟發展、社會參與及政府職能。亞太經濟管理評論,7,35-50。
汪銘生、戴雅明、胡以祥(2004)。多元社會下高雄市招商策略認知與判斷之研究:以高雄市為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSCN-93-2416-H-110-008)。
汪銘生(2005)。公共事務管理研究方法。台北市:五南書局。
汪銘生、林錦郎(2005)。高高屏地區永續發展策略與行動計畫之研究:多元社會之觀點(I)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSC94-2621-Z-110-002)。
汪銘生、江明修、陳建寧、馬群傑(2006)。高雄市地方發展與公民文化之研究。公共行政學報,19,127-168。
汪銘生、江明修、陳建寧、馬群傑(2006),高雄市地方發展與公民文化之研究,公共行政學報,第19 期,頁127-168。
汪銘生、馬群傑(2007)。地區行銷理論與實證,台北市:巨流圖書公司。
李樑堅等(2009),高雄地區產業再生策略規劃,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究報告。
李淑聰()。PAM之跨域分析-兩岸直航對澎湖政府面的影響,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
吳濟華、林新沛、邱文彥、王文誠、鄭博文、柯志昌等(2004)。高高屏三縣市地方永續發展策略計畫報告書,高雄市政府研究發展考核委員會。
李永展(2000)。都市指標系統對衡量台北市永續發展之適用性及評估手冊研擬,台北:國立政治大學地政系永續發展工作室,台北市政府都市發展局委託研究。
李永展(2000)。以都市指標系統談台北市之永續性趨勢,都市計畫,第29卷,第四期,頁551-574。
李監明、謝碧鳳、王俊凱(2001)。因應永續發展我國環境與生活綜合指標建立與量化之研究,臺灣土地金融季刊,第38卷第四期(No.150)。
李國鼎、陳木在(1987)。我國經濟發展策略總論,台北市,聯經出版社。
林南著,林祐聖等譯(2005)。社會資本,台北市:弘智出版社。
林錦郎(2005)。多元社會之衝突管理─判斷分析之觀點。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
洪東煒(2003)。綠色財政改革與管理之研究─以高雄市為例。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
胡國強(1992)。高雄都會區知覺環境品質指標之建立,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
涂明贊(2001)。從高雄港改制探討中央與地方之決策衝突。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
陳忠仁與黃金成(2003)。科學園區產業引進多重準則評估之研究—以台南科學園區為例, 管理研究學報,第三卷,第一期, pp.123-144。
陳碧珍(2001)。集體決策中的社會決策基模及社會平均定理,公共事務評論,第
2 卷第1 期,頁183-207。
紀子文、朱美琴(2000)。環境指標之設計、監測與管理,台北:朝陽科技大學環境管理學系,行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。(NSC -89-2621-Z -324-001)。
洪朝輝(2008)。全球化:跨世紀的顯學,問題與研究,第39 卷第8 期,頁74。
高一中譯,Donella.Meadows,Jorgen.Randers,Dennis.Meadows 著(2007)。成長的極限,台北市:臉譜出版社。
高子梅等譯,Linda Lear著(1997)。「自然的證人—瑞秋卡森傳」,台中市,晨星出版社。
高克孝(2006)。從PAM架構探討高雄市警務機關在職教育訓練變革之研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
游建華(2003)。永續土地利用管理決策支援系統之發展,台灣大學環境工程研究所博士論文。
梁定澎(2005)。決策支援管理系統與企業智慧,台北市:智勝出版社。
張沛文(2008)。高雄地區遊艇製造業之全球生產網絡研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
張璠與張吉宏(1997)。設置「科學園區」與「科技工業區」之競合問題探討,經濟情勢暨評論第三卷第三期,pp.87-94。
楊日昌、李玲玲(2002)。聯合國永續發展指標系統與台灣永續發展指標系統之比較,永續發展台灣簡訊,第4卷,第三期,頁9-25。
楊曙聰(2002)。「探討永續發展與能源指標發展」,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第25卷第3期(No.29)。
葉俊榮計畫主持人,協同駱尚廉、李玲玲、王俊秀、劉錦添、孫志鴻等(1999)。永續台灣評量系統,台北:台大法律系,88年度國科會永續發展研究計畫成果報告。
蔡美戀(2003)。鄉鎮層級都市永續發展指標體系架構之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
劉弘雁(1997)。高雄都會區水資源之系統動力學研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
劉炯廷(1996)。以系統思考探討建立國土綜合規劃政策分析系統,成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
劉麗娟(2007)。PAM之操作步驟與跨域分析--以非營利組織促進高雄區域發展與兩岸開放為例,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
鄭翔徽(2006)。外國專業人員移民我國策略選擇之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
蕭乃沂(2002)。衝突分析的先導研究--結合判斷分析與系統動力學的方法,中國行政評論,11:2,77-114。
蕭新煌(2002)。各縣市永續發展藍圖,國科會計畫,(NSC91-2621-Z-001-002)。
謝政勳(2002)。都市永續發展指標適用性評估:以高雄縣為例,國立中山大學公共事務研究所碩士論文。




(三)英文文獻

Akkermans, H. and Kim van Oorschot, 2002, Developing a Balanced Scorecard with System Dynamics, full paper on CD-ROM Proceeding of 2002 International System Dynamics Conference, Palermo, Italy.
Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York:Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H.(1991), Contribution to Information Integration Theory volumeⅠ:Cognition, US..
Anderson, N.H. (1991). Contributions of Information Integration Theory, VolumeⅡ: Social. New Jersey.
Anderson, N.H. (2004). Unified Theory. In J.T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. A.Prenticc (eds). Perspectivism in Social Psychology.
Atkisson, A., (1996). “Development Indicators of Sustainable Community: Lesson from Sustainable Seattle”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review,16:337-350.
Bagheri A., Hjorth P.(2007),”Planning for Sustainable Development: a Paradigm Shift Toward a Process-Based Approach”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 83-96.
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann.(1991),”The Social Construction of Reality (知識社會學/社會實體的建構)”,鄒理民譯。台北:巨流。
Bithas K.P., Christofakis.M.(2006),”Environmentally Sustainable Cities. Critical Review and Operational Conditions”, Sustainable Development , Dev. 14., PP. 177-189.
Blakely, E. J. (1994). Planning local economic development – Theory and practice.
SEGA Publications.
Bossink B.A.G..,(2007),”Leadership for Sustainable Development”. International Journal of Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol.6, No.2, PP. 135-149.
Bozzo, U. (1998), Technology Park: an Enterprise Model, Progress in Planning, 49(3/4), pp.215-225.
Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st
century. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Brugmqnn J. (1997): “Is there a method in our measurement? The use of indicators in local sustainable development planning” Local Environment 2 (1), 59-72.
Bui, T., & Loebbecke, C., “ Supporting Cognitive Feedback Using System
Dynamics: A Demand Model of the Global System of Mobile Telecommunication, ”Decision Support Systems, Vol 17, (May 1996), PP. 83-98.
Burkhart, R. E., & M. S. Lewis-Beck. (1994). Comparative Democracy: The Economic
Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1996). Managing sustainable urban
environments. In Camagni, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies (pp. 124-140).
Sage. R. Paddison. London.
Cartwright, L.(2000),”Selecting Local Sustainbale Development Indicators: Does Consensus Exist in their Choice and Purpose?. Planning Practice & Research.15(1/2),65-78.
Chorda, I. M. (1996).Towards the maturity stage: an insight into the performance of French technopoles. technovation, 16(3), 143-152.
Cummings, S. (1995). Graduate programs in urban and public affairs: The missing
component of the urban mission. Metropolitan University, Spring: 13-26.
Davidson G., Hyland P.(2006), " Continous Innovation in a Complex abd Dynamic Environment: the Case of the Australian Health Service ". International Journal of Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol.5,No.1, PP. 41-59.
Davidson P.I., Bjurklo M., & Wikstrom H.(1993), " Introducing System Dynamics in Schools-The Nordic Experience, " System Dynamics Review, Vol 9, PP.165-181.
D. H., Kravchuk R. S.(2002),”Public administration understanding management politics, and law in the public sector. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 21-22.
Dobson A.(2007),”Environment Citizenship: Towards Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. I5 , PP. 276-285.
Dunn, William N.(1994),”Public policy analysis-an introduction”,(Second Edition),New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Emst & Young(1995). The Emst & Young Guide to Perfomance Measurement For Financial Institutions, Richard D.Irwin ,Inc.
Epstein, Marc J., and J. F. Manzoni. "Implementing Corporate Strategy: From Tableaux de Bord to Balanced Scorecard." European Management Journal (1998). P190-203.
Eweje G.(2007),”Strategic Partnerships Between MNEs And Civil Society: the Post-WSSD Perspectives”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 15-27.
Faucheux,Sylvie ed.,Valuation for Sustainable Development:Methods and Policy Indicators,Cheltenham,Glos,UK:Northampton,MA, 1998.
Ford, A.,(1999). “Modeling the Environment-An Introduction to System Dynamics Models of Environmental Systems”, ISLAND PRESS.
Geng Y., Haight M.,Zhu Q.(2007),”Empirical Analysis of Eco-Industrial Development in China”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 121-133.
Graham, A. K., " Introduction to The System Dynamics National Model Structure,
" Working paper D-3573, (1984) System Dynamics Group, M.I.T.
Hall M.,, Purchase D.,(2006),”Vuilding or Bodging? Attitudes to Sustainable in UK Public Sector Housing Construction Development”, Sustainable Development (March 2006), PP. 206-218.
Hammond, K.R., McAlellanf, G.H.&Mumpover, J.(1980), Human Judgment and Decision Making Theories, methods and procedures, New York: Praeger Publication.
Hammond, K.R.&Adelman, L.(1986),“Science, Value and Human Judgment,” In H. R. Arkes and K. R. Hammond(Eds.), Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardi, P. and Zdan, T. (ed.) (1997) Assessing Sustainable Development, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Ite U. E.(2007),”Changing Times and Strategies: Shell’s Contribution to Sustainable Development Community Development in the Niger Delta, Nigeria”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. I5 , PP. 1-14.
Islam S.M.N.,Clarke M.H.(2005),”The Welfare Economics of Measuring Sustainability: a New Approach Based on Social Choice Theory and Systems Analysis”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 13 , PP. 282-296.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post modernization: Culture, economic, and
political change in 43 societies.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton New Jersey:
Princeton University Press
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A.(1972), “Subjectives probability:A judgment of representativeness, ” Cognitive Psychology, Vol.3.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A.(1973),“On the psychology of prediction,” Psychological Review, Vol.80.
Kaplan, Robert S., and Norton, David P. 1996a. The Balanced Scorecard:Translating Strategic Into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kaplan, Robert S., and Norton, David P. 2000. The Strategy Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kaplan, Robert S., and Norton, David P. 2003. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kotler, P., & Andreasen, A. R. (1994). Strategic marketing for non-profit organizations (Fouth ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P., Haider, D. H., & Rein, I. (1993). Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nation. New York: The Free, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
Lee, C. M. (2004). Changes and challenges for moral education in Taiwan. Journal of
Moral Education, 33(4): 575-595.
Lewis-Beck, M. (1986). Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany and
Italy. American Journal of Political Science, 30: 315-346.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of structure and action. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, N.Y.:
Doubleday.
Liu W.H.,Ou C. H.(2007),”A Comoarative Analysis of Sustainable Fishery Development Indicator system in Australia and Canada”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 28-40.
Mass, Nathaniel J(1975)., Economics Cycles: An Analysis of Underlying Causes, M.I.T. Press.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A. & Taylor, J.E.(1993). Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431-751.
Meadows, Dennis L(1970)., Dynamics of Commodity Production Cycles, Wright Allen Press Inc.,Mass: Cambridge, U.S.A.
Meadows, Donella (1998) Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development, The Sustainability Institute.
Medd W.,Marvin S.(2007),”strategic Intermediation: Between Regional Strategy and Local Practice”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. I5 , PP. 318-327.
Moon J.(2007),”The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 296-306.
Moore, M. H. (1997). Creating public value. Replica Books October, Hardcover,
Harvard University Press.
Newman L.(2007),”The Virtuous Cycle: Incremental Changes and a Process-Base Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 267-274.
Ostrom, T. M., Werner, C., & J.Sake, M. (1978). An Integration Theory Analysis of Jurors: Presumptions of Guilt or Innocence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 436-450.
Ostrom, E.(1988).“An Agenda for the Study of Institutions,” Public Choice 48:P3-25.
Pezzey, J. (1992), “Analysis of unilateral CO2 control in the Europeaan Community and OECD”, The Energy Journal, 13(2), pp.159-171.
Porter, M. E. (1995). The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, May - June, pp.55-71.
Purdue, D. (2007). Introduction: Deminsions of Civil Society. In D. Purdue (Ed.), Civil Societies and Social Movement: Potentials and Problems. New York Routledge.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Survinal of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Sauders,Peter.(1981),”Social Theory and the Urban Question”,New York:Holmes & Meier Publishers,Inc.
Schudson, M. (1984). Advertising, The Uneasy Persuasion:Its Dubious Impact on American Society. New York: Basic Books.
Sharp, E. B. (1990). Urban politics and administration. New York: Longman. New
York: Longman
Shils, E. (1997). The Virtue of Civility. In S. Grosby (Ed.), The Virtue of Civility:Selected Essays on Liberalism Tradition, and Civil society (pp. 320~355). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Smith, D. H. (2001). The Impact of the Voluntary Sector on Society. In J. S. Ott (Ed.), The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector (pp. 79~87). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Smith, S. R., & Gronbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relation. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (Second ed., pp. 221~242). New Haven & London: Yale University.
Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1978). Reconstructuring the Past: Some Cognitive Consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 941-950.
Steinberg, R., & Powell, W. W. (2006a). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (Second ed., pp. 1~10). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Steinberg, R. (2006b). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization. In W. W. Powell & R. Stenberg (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (Second ed., pp. 117~135). New Haven & Lodon: Yale University & London.
Sterman, J(2000), Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw Hill.
Stough, R. R. (1990). Potentially irreversible global trends and changes:
Sustainable Seattle (1993). The Sustainable Seattle 1993 Indicators of Sustainable Community: A Report to Citizens on Long -Trends in Our Community. U.S.A.: Sustainable.
Taplin D.M.R.,Spedding T.A.,Khoo H.H.(2006),”Use of Simulation and Modelling to Develop a Sustainable Production System”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 14 , PP. 149-161.
Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & D.O.Sears. (1997). Social Psychology: Prentice Hill Inc.
Til, J. V. (2000). Growing Civil Society: from Nonprofit Sector to Third Space. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
United Nations (1997), “Indicators of Sustainable Development -- From Theory to Practice: Indicators of Sustainable Development,” Online Document, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/indi6.htm
Wang, M. S. & J. S. Yang (1998). A multi-criteria experimental comparison of three multiple attributes weight measurement methods, Journal of multiple-criteria decision analysis, 7, 340-350, Wiley.
Williams K.,Dair G..(2007),”A Framework of Sustainable Behavious that can be Enables through the Design of Neighbourhood-Scale Development ”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 15 , PP. 160-173.
Wolstenholme, E., 1990, System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wolstenholme, E., 1998, Balanced Strategies for Balanced Scorecards: The Role of System Dynamics in Supporting Balanced Scorecard and Value Based Management, full paper on CD-ROM Proceeding of 1998 International System Dynamics Conference, Quebec, Canada.
Zavadskas E.K., Antucheviciene J.(2006),”Development of an indicator Model and Ranking of Sustainable Revitalization Alternatives of Derelict Property: A Lithianian Case Study”, Sustainable Development ,Dev. 14 , PP. 287-299.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.22.248.208
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.22.248.208
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code