Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0912106-211907 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0912106-211907
論文名稱
Title
野生與圈養台灣獼猴敵對行為與和好之比較
A Comparison of Agonistic Behavior and Reconciliation in Free-ranging and Captive Formosan Macaques (Macaca cyclopis)
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
100
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2006-07-03
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2006-09-12
關鍵字
Keywords
衝突、位序、友好行為、對立攻擊、臣服行為、攻擊行為、和好、敵對行為、台北市立動物園、壽山地區、台灣獼猴
macaca cyclopis, Formosan macaques, rank, post-conflict, affiliation, Taipei zoo, agonistic behavior, reconciliation, submission, aggression, counter aggression, conciliatory tendency
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5729 次,被下載 42
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5729 times, has been downloaded 42 times.
中文摘要
本研究之目的在探討圈養與野生台灣獼猴的敵對與和好行為,比較其在圈養與野外環境中的差異,並與馬來猴系中的馬來猴、恆河猴與日本猴相比較,以推論台灣獼猴的優勢模式。觀察方法為社群的掃瞄取樣、成年台灣獼猴攻擊行為的隨機取樣,及對成年台灣獼猴的焦點取樣及衝突後與配對對照之焦點取樣。
圈養台灣獼猴表現敵對行為的頻度是野生台灣獼猴的2.5倍,尤其在敵意與臣服行為有顯著差異(P < 0.05)。威嚇是圈養與野生台灣獼猴最常見的攻擊方式,占攻擊行為的52%(圈養)至72%(野外)。圈養之成年雌猴的位序愈高,威嚇與敵意頻度愈高,臣服頻度則愈低。野生台灣獼猴表現臣服行為在性別間有顯著差異(P = 0.02)。圈養與野生台灣獼猴被攻擊者表現立即臣服之比例相當高(82.1% - 89.0%),但表現對立攻擊之比例則低(9.1% - 15.9%)。
成年台灣獼猴野外的和好傾度平均為14.3%(n = 25),而圈養則為19.6%(n = 16)。在成年雄猴攻擊成年雌猴與成年雌猴間的攻擊中,被攻擊者在衝突後發生友好的比例受圈養或野外的影響。圈養與野生成年台灣獼猴在衝突後表現友好的比例皆受餵食的影響(P < 0.05)。成猴在衝突後的第1分鐘內發生第一次友好行為的比例為最高。圈養與野生台灣獼猴在衝突後與配對對照期間主要以理毛方式和好,且偏好在衝突後期間和好的比例遠高於在配對對照期間。此外,圈養與野生台灣獼猴吸引配對的比例皆高於分散配對的比例,至於和好傾度則不受親屬關係的影響。最後,本研究結果顯示台灣獼猴與馬來猴系獼猴相近,支持系統發生假說,判斷台灣獼猴屬於專制優勢模式。
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the agonistic behaviors and reconciliation in captive and free-ranging Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis). The dominance style of Formosan macaques was compared with long-tailed, rhesus and Japanese macaques. I have used scan, focal sampling and ad libitum on aggressions of adult macaques. I have recorded post-conflict (PC) focal samplings on victims and compared those with matched control (MC) focal samplings.
Agonistic behaviors had significantly higher frequency in captive than in free-ranging Formosan macaques. The frequencies of hostile and submission were significantly higher in captive than in free-ranging Formosan macaques. The captive adult females of higher rank had higher frequency of threat and hostile, and lower frequency of submission. Threat was the most frequent aggression (52-72%) expressed by both the captive and free-ranging adult monkeys. The victims in captive and free-ranging Formosan macaques usually submitted immediately after aggression (82-89%). The proportion of counter aggression in captive and free-ranging Formosan macaques were relative low (9-16%).
The aqerage conciliatory tendency for adult Formosan macaques was 14.3% to 19.6%. The affiliative contacts in PC and MC in captive and free-ranging Formosan macaques were striking that both preferred grooming. The Formosan macaques significantly reconciled more during PC than MC period both in captive and free-ranging conditions. In addition, both had significantly more attracted than dispersed PC-MC pairs. The conciliatory tendencies in captive and free-ranging Formosan macaques were similar regardless of kin and non-kin partners. This study indicated that Formosan macaques were close to the macaques of Fascicularis group. Therefore, Formosan macaques had a despotic dominance style as suggested by Phylogenetic hypotheses.
目次 Table of Contents
誌謝---i
摘要---iii
Abstract---iv
目錄---vi
前言---1
材料與方法---4
一、研究地點與對象 ---4
(一)台北市立動物園---4
(二)高雄壽山地區 ---4
二、記錄方法---5
三、行為定義---6
四、資料分析---8
(一)行為頻度---8
(二)位序關係(Hierarchical linearity)---10
(三)和好傾度(Conciliatory tendency, CCT)---10
(四)統計分析---11
結果---13
一、台北市立動物園---13
(一)台灣獼猴活動性---13
(二)敵對頻度---15
(三)被攻擊者的反應---17
(四)和好---20
二、高雄壽山地區---22
(一)台灣獼猴活動性---22
(二)敵對頻度---23
(三)被攻擊者的反應---25
(四)和好---27
三、台北動物園與高雄壽山成年台灣獼猴之比較---29
(一)敵對頻度---29
(二)被攻擊者的反應---30
(三)和好---31
討論---32
參考文獻---36
表---43
圖---61
附錄---88
參考文獻 References
尤仲妮,2000。恆春熱帶植物園區台灣獼猴活動模式與食性,國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。
王敬平,2005。壽山地區台灣獼猴的活動性與食性研究,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
呂建興,2003。台灣獼猴警戒聲與其功能之分析,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
何信瑩,1994。利用動物園做臺灣獼猴行為觀察,市師科學教育季刊,21(9):26-49。
林品涵,2000。壽山地區台灣獼猴分群與社會變化,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
林樹宜,2004。壽山地區台灣獼猴的親子行為,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
紀純真,1989。台北市木柵動物園台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)敵對行為之研究,國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。
紀純真、李玲玲,1990。動物園台灣獼猴敵對行為與位序結構,動物園學報 2。
高千晴,2004。壽山地區人猴互動及遊客對棲地之衝擊,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
高千晴、徐芝敏,2003。壽山地區遊客對遊憩資源之利用及與台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)之互動初探,2003年環境教育學術研討會,pp:54-58。
高雄市政府建設局,1995。高雄市壽山自然生態保育及觀光休憩設施整體規劃定案報告書。
莊志文,2004。台灣獼猴敵對聲音之研究,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
陳立明,2001。台灣獼猴聲音類型之研究,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
陳淑梅,2000。柴山地區台灣獼猴交配季中兩性間的行為互動,國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。
陳淑梅,2003。吃的健康又有趣--臺灣獼猴餵食豐富化,動物園雜誌,23(4):11-15。
陳憶民,1988,猴國春秋,動物園雜誌,8(3):10-16。
鹿野忠雄,1929。台灣哺乳類分布及習性,動物學雜誌,41︰332-340。
黃志堅,2003。台灣地區台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)之生殖行為,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
黃國明、楊翕雯,2000。餵什麼?為什麼?臺灣獼猴展示場遊客餵食行為觀察,動物園雜誌,20(4):36-43。
賈山民,2002。壽山地區台灣獼猴食土行為之研究,國立中山大學生物科學系碩士論文。
楊子欣,2003。恆春地區台灣獼猴活動範圍使用之研究,國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳添財、廖俊奎、楊遠波,2003。壽山自然公園生態系列叢書圖鑑下冊:植物篇。
葉曉穎、詹淑惠,2000。柴山地區台灣獼猴嬰猴行為研究,國立屏東科技大學野生動物保育系實務專題論文。
鄭任南,1989。台北市木柵動物園台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)之生殖行為與親子行為研究,國立台灣大學動物研究所碩士論文。
儲瑞華,1998。柴山臺灣獼猴成年雌猴的親源、階級與社會行為,國立臺灣大學動物學系碩士論文。
Abegg C, Thierry B, Kaumanns W. 1996. Reconciliation in three groups of lion tailed macaques. Int J Primatol 17:803-816.
Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227-265.
Appleby M. 1983. The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim Behav 31:600-608.
Aureli F. 1992. Post-conflict behaviour among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:329-337.
Aureli F, Das M, Veenema HC. 1997. Differential kinship effect on reconciliation in three species of macaques (Macaca fascicularis, M. fuscata, and M. sylvanus). J Comp Psychol 111:91-99.
Bernstein IS, Ehardt CL. 1985. Age-sex differences in the expression of agonistic behavior in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) groups. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 99:115-132.
Bernstein Is, Gordon TP, Rose RM. 1983. The interaction of hormones, behavior, and social context in nonhuman primates. Hormones and aggressive behavior. B. B. Svare, Editors. New York: Plenum Press pp. 535-561.
Bernstein IS, Willians L, Ramsay M. 1985.The expression of aggression in old world monkeys. Int J Primatol 4:113-125.
Birky WA. 2001. Mating season effects on male-female relationships in wild Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis). Am J Physical Anthropol 32:40.
Castles DL, Aureli F, de Waal FBM. 1996. Variation in conciliatory tendency and relationship quality across groups of pigtail macaques. Anim Behav 52:389–403.
Castles DL, Whiten A. 1998. Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. Ⅰ. Reconciliation, redirection and consolation. Ethology 104:126-147.
Chu JH, Wu HY, Yang YJ, Takenaka O, Lin YS. 1999. Polymorphic microsatellite loci and low-invasive DNA sampling in Macaca cyclopis. Primates 40:573-580.
Chaffin CL, de Waal FBM. 1995. Dominance style of Japanese macaques compared with Rhesus and Stumptail macaques. Am J Primatol 35:103-116.
Cooper MA, Bernstein IS. 2002. Counter aggression and reconciliation in Assamese macaques ( Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology 56:215–230.
Demaria C, Thierry B. 2001. A comparative study of reconciliation in rhesus and tonkean macaques. Behaviour 138:397-410.
de Waal FBM, Luttrell LM. 1989. Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys. Am J Primatol 19:83–109.
de Waal FBM, Ren RM. 1988. Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptail and rhesus macaques. Ethology 78:129–142.
de Waal FBM, Ren R. 1988. Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptail and rhesus macaques. Ethology 78:129–142.
de Waal FBM, Hoof JARAM Van, Netto WJ. 1976. An ethological analysis of types of agonistic interaction in a captive group of Java-monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Primates 17(3):257-290.
de Waal FBM, Yoshihara D. 1983. Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour 85:224–241.
Eaton G, Modahl KB, Johnson DF. 1981. Aggression behavior in a confined troop of Japanese macaques: Effects of density, season, and gender. Aggre Behav 7:145-164.
Fooden J. 1976. Provisional classification and key to living species of macaques. Folia Primatol 25:225-236.
Hinde DA, Atkinson S. 1970. Assessing the role of social partners in maintaining mutual proximity, as exemplified by mother-infant relations in rhesus monkey. Animal Behavior 18:221-234.
Hsu MJ, Agoramoorthy G, Lin JF. 2001. Birth seasonality and interbirth intervals in free-ranging Formosan macaques, Macaca cyclopis, at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Primates 42:15-25.
Hsu MJ, Chen LM, Agoramoorthy G. 2005. The vocal repertoire of Formosan macaques: Acoustic structure and behavioral context. Zoological Studies 44: 286-305.
Hsu MJ, Lin JF, Agoramoorthy G. 2000. Occurrence of twins in wild Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis), at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Folia Primatol 71:154-156.
Hsu MJ, Lin JF. 2001. Troop size and structure in free-ranging Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis) at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Zoological Studies 40:49-60.
Hsu MJ, Lin JF, Agoramoorthy G. 2006. Effects of group size on birth rate, infant mortality and social interactions in Formosan macaques at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 18:3-17.
Huntingford F, Turner A. 1987. Animal conflict. Chapman and Hall Ltd., New York.
Irwin SB, Cooper MA. 1999. Dominance in Assamese Macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology 48:283-289.
Judge PG, de Waal FBM. 1997. Rhesus monkey behaviour under diverse population densities: coping with long-term crowding. Anim Behav 54:643-662.
Kawamura S, Norikoshi N, Azuma N. 1991. Observation of Formosan monkeys (Macaca cyclopis) in Taipingshan, Taiwan. In al Ehara et al eds. Primatology Today. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 97-100.
Krebs JR, Davies NB. 1993. An introduction to behavioral ecology. Blackwell Scientific Pub. London. pp. 265-290.
Leca JB, Fornasieri I, Petit O. 2002. Aggression and reconciliation in Cebus capucinus. Int J Primatol 23:979-998.
Lehmann EL. 1975. Nonparametric Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Manson JH, Perry S, Stahl D. 2005. Reconciliation in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Am J Primatol 65:205-219.
Maruhashi T, Takasaki H. 1996. Socio-ecological dynamics of Japanese macaque troop range. In J. E. Fa and D. G. Lindburg eds. Evolution and ecology of the macaque societies. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 146-159.
Maruhashi T, Saito C, Agetsuma N. 1998. Home range structure and inter-group competition for land of Japanese macaques in evergreen and deciduous forests. Primates 39:291-301.
Masayuki N, Yasuo K, Naosuke I, Shinji I, Shoji M. 1995. Interactions among adult males and females before and after the death of the alpha male in a free-rang troop of Japanses macaques. Primates 36:385-396.
Masayuki N, Naosuke I, Shinji I, Shoji M. 1995. Dominance relations among adult females in a free-ranging group of Japanese monkeys at Katsuyama. American Journal of Primatology 37:241-251.
Matsumura S. 1999. The evolution of “egalitarian” and “despotic” social systems among macaques. Primates 40:23-31.
Menard N, Vallet D. 1997. Behavioral responses of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) to variations in environmental conditions in Algeria. American Journal of Primatology. 43:285-304.
O’Leary H, Fa JE. 1993. Effects of tourist on Barbary macaques at Gibraltar. Folia Primatol 61:77-91.
Palagi F, Paoli T, Tarli SB. 2004. Reconciliation and consolation in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). American Journal of Primatology 62:15-30.
Paul A, Kuester J, Arnemann J. 1996. The sociobiology of male-infant interactions in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim behave 51:155-170.
Peng MT, Lai YL, Yang CS, Chiang HS. 1973. Formosan monkey (M. cyclopis): present situation in Taiwan and its reproductive biology. Exp Anim 22:447-451.
Petit O, Abegg C, Thierry B. 1997. A comparative study of aggression and conciliation in three cercopithecine monkeys (M. fuscata, M. nigra, Papio papio). Behav 134:415-432.
Pryor W, Chang CP, Raulston C. 1969. Urolithiasis in a Taiwan monkey (M. cyclopis): A literature review and case report. Lab Anim Care 19:862-865.
SAS Institue Inc. 2000. SAS/ETS Software: changes and enhancements, Release 8.1. Cary, NC.
Scott JP. 1958. Aggression. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Soltis J, Mitsunaga F, Shimizu K, Yanagihara Y, Nozaki M. 1999. Female mating strategy in an enclosed group of Japan macaques. American Journal of Primatology 47:263-278.
Sterck EHM, Watts CP, van Schaik CP. 1997. The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:291-309.
Su HH, Lee LL. 2001. Food habits of Formosan rock macques (Macaca cyplopis) in Jentse, northeastern Taiwan, assessed by fecal analysis abd behavioral observation. Int J Primatol 22:359-377.
Sugiura H, Sato C, Agetsuma N, Takahashi H, Tanaka T, Furuichi T, Takahata Y. 2000. Variation in intergroup encounters in two population of Japanese macaques. Int J Primatol 21:519-535.
Suzuki S, Hill DA, Sprague DS. 1998. Intertroop transfer and dominance rank structure of nonnatal male Japanese macaques in Yakushima, Japan. Int J Primatol 19:703-722.
Swinhoe R. 1862. On the mammals of Taiwan. Proc Zool Soc London 1862:347-365.
Thierry B. 1985. Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggressive Behavior 11:223-233.
Thierry B. 2000a. Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. In: Aureli F, de Waal FBM, editors. Natural conflict resolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 17-19.
Thierry B. 2000. Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. Natural Conflict Resolution. Aureli F, de Weaal FBM, editors. Berkeley: Univ California Press. pp. 106-128.
Thierry B, Demaria C, Preuschoft S, Desportes C. 1989. Structural convergence between silent bared-teeth display and relaxed open-mouth display in the Tonkean macaque (Macaca tonkeana). Int Folia Primatol 52:178-184.
van Schaik CP. 1989. The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In: Standen V, Foley R, editors. Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals. Boston: Blackwell. p 195–218.
Veenema HC, Das M, Aureli F. 1994. Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation. Behav Process 31:29–38.
Vehrencamp S. 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31:667-682.
Wahaj SA, Guse KR, Holekamp KE. 2001. Reconciliation in the Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107:1057-1074.
Walters JR, Seyfarth RM. 1987. Conflict and cooperation. in B. B. Smuts, et al., (editors), Primate Societies pp. 306-317.
Westlund K, Ljungerg T, Borefelt U, Abrahamsson C. 2000. Post-conflict affiliation in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus). American Journal of Primatology 52:31-46.
Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1:80-83.
Wu HY, Lin YS. 1992. Life history variables of wild troop of Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis) in Kenting, Taiwan. Primates 33:85-97.
Wu HY, Lin YS. 1993. Seasonal-variation of the activity and range use patterns of a wild troop of Formosan macaque in Kenting, Taiwan. Bull Inst Zool, Academia sinica 32:242-252.
Zhao QK, Deng Z. 1992. Dramatic consequences of food handouts to Macaca thibetata at Mount Emei, China. Folia Primatol 58:24-31.
Zhao QK. 1999. Responses to seasonal changes in nutrient quality and patchiness of food in a multigroup community of Tibetan macaques at Mt. Emei. Int J Primatol 20:511-524.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.12.41.106
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.12.41.106
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code