近來組織行為的研究學者，不斷致力於組織政治知覺等相關議題的各項研究，希望藉此來增進組織信任，並進而達到組織競爭之優勢。因此，本研究是以Ferris et al.（2002）提出的組織政治知覺修訂模型為架構基礎，探討組織政治知覺與組織信任之關係，並以SPSS 17.0及結構方程式模型為驗證方法。
利用何金銘教授帶領之組織政治知覺研究團隊於2008年的研究資料，透過重新研究分析發現如下:
一、組織政治知覺中「一般政治行為」構面對組織信任中「信任主管」構面有負向影響。
二、組織政治知覺中「一般政治行為」構面對組織信任中「信任組織」構面有負向影響。
三、組織政治知覺中「一般政治行為」構面對組織信任中「信任同事」構面有負向影響。
四、組織政治知覺中「保持沈默，靜待好處」及「政策與實務差距」構面對組織信任各構面有顯著的正向影響，與研究假設方向不一致。

Recently, researchers in the organizational behavior have continued their research on the related issues in the perception of organizational politics in the hope to promote organizational trust, and thus achieve the competitive advantages of the organization. Therefore, this study is based on the revised model of the perception of organizational politics, proposed by Ferris et al. (2002), to explore the relation between the perception of organizational politics and organizational trust, and to use SPSS 17.0 and the structural equation model as verification.
To re-analyze the research information provided by the research team led by Professor Chin-Ming Ho in the perception of organizational politics, there are discoveries as follows:
1. the dimension of "general political behavior" in the perception of organizational politics has a negative impact to the dimension of "trust manager" in the organizational trust.
2. the dimension of "general political behavior" in the perception of organizational politics has a negative impact to the dimension of "trust organization" in the organizational trust.
3. the dimension of "general political behavior" in the perception of organizational politics has a negative impact to the dimension of "trust colleagues" in the organizational trust.
4. the dimensions of "remain silent, waiting for the benefits" and "difference between policies and practices" in the perception of organizational politics has significantly positive impact to each dimension in the perception of organizational trust.

論文審定書 Ⅰ
中文摘要 Ⅱ
英文摘要 Ⅲ
目錄 Ⅳ
圖次 Ⅴ
表次 Ⅵ
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 2
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 組織政治知覺 5
第二節 組織信任 29
第三節 各研究變項之關係 38
第三章 研究方法 39
第一節 研究架構 39
第二節 研究假設 40
第三節 研究變項操作性定義與衡量工具 41
第四節 資料收集過程 45
第五節 資料分析方法 47
第四章 實證分析 54
第一節 樣本描述性統計分析 54
第二節 量表信效度分析 57
第三節 結構方程式模型分析 67
第四節 研究假設檢定結果 71
第五章 結論與建議 74
第一節 研究結論 74
第二節 管理實務意涵 77
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 78
參考文獻 80
附錄 組織政治知覺團隊(2008)之調查問卷 91

中文部分
1.王淑霞 (2004)。組織政治知覺、組織氣候、角色壓力，組織承諾與工作績效關連性之研究-以嘉義縣稅捐稽征處為例，國立東華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
2.朱建平 (2002)。組織成員的政治知覺對離職傾向之影響：工作滿足得中介效果，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
3.何金銘 (2003)。組織政治知覺研究現況之缺撼。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所授課講義。
4.何金銘 (2003)。組織政治知覺的類型及其前因與後果模型之再建。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。
5.何金銘 (2006)。統計分析方法-SPSS軟體的輔助分析。台南：台灣復文興業股份有限公司。
6.江亭儒 (2003)。組織犬儒主義之前因與後果。國立台灣大學心理學研究所論文。
7.牟鍾福 (2002)。國中體育教師組織正義與組織信任對組織承諾影響之研究，國立台灣師範大學體育學系博士論文。
8.吳明隆（2008）。結構方程模式-SIMPLIS的應用。台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
9.吳孝慈（2000）。組織政治知覺及其對組織承諾之影響－某大學的實證分析。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
10.李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬合譯（2006）。組織行為學（Organizational Behavior ），台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司出版。
11.李安民 (2002)。組織政治知覺對員工工作態度之影響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
12.李粵強（2002）。團隊績效管理導向對組織信任及組織團隊績效影響之研究。私立朝陽科技大學企業管理碩士論文，彰化。
13.林鉦棽 (1996)。組織公正、信任、組織公平行為之研究：社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報，第十三卷，第三期 PP391-415。
14.林鉦棽、彭台光，（2006）。多層次管理研究：分析層次的概念、理論和方法，管理學報，23（6），649-675。
15.林隆儀 (2002)。不同聯盟型態之下經濟誘因與信任之重要性研究-以台灣清涼飲料產業為例。國立台北大學企業管理系博士論文。
16.邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式。台北：雙葉書廊。
17.黃怡姿 (1999)。員工之組織信任的形成與影響，國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
18.張文華 (2000/9)。組織信任之初探。人力發展月刊。
19.梁素君 (2002)。組織犬儒主義及其影響因素之研究-以助人工作者為例。長榮學報 6(2)，145-158。
20.許道然 (2001)。組織信任之研究：一個整合性觀點。空大行政學報，11，253-296。
21.許道然 (2002)。公部門組織信任與組織公平行為關係之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
22.楊世瑩（2008）。SPSS統計分析實務。台北：旗標出版股份有限公司。
23.劉玉琰 (1986 )。組織行為。華泰圖書文物公司出版。
24.謝金青（1992）。國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意之研究，國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
25.謝哲豪 (2006)。組織政治知覺、信任與知識分享關係的研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
26. 鄭錫鍇（1999）。政府再造的省思：社會資本主義的觀點。世新大學行政管理編，民主行政與政府再造研討會論文集。台北市：世新大學行政管系。
27.潘正文（2009）。組織政治知覺對組織公平與組織信任之影響-以瞭解與知覺控制為干擾變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
28.陳方裕（2010）。組織政治知覺對組織信任之影響:組織犬儒主義的中介效果分析。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
29. 陳儀樺（2010）。組織政治知覺對組織承諾之影響：工作滿足與組織犬儒主義的中介效果分析。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
1.Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: bases and consequences. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 126(3), 269-292.
2.Allen R.W., Madison D.L., Porter L.W., Renwick P.A., & Mayes B.T.（1979）. Organizational Politics: Tactics and Characteristics of Its Actors. California Management Review, 22, 77-83.
3.Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes., Annual Review of Psychology(Vol. 52, pp. 27): Annual Reviews Inc.
4.Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using A Contract Violation Framework. Human Relations, 49, pp.1395-1418.
5.Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in The Workplace: SomeCauses and Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, pp.449-460.
6.Andrews, M.C., Witt, L.A., & Kacmar, K.M.（2003）. The Interactive Effects of Organizational Politics and Exchange Ideology on Manager Ratings of Retention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 357-369.
7.Angle, H. L. & Perry, J. L. (1981). "An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness," Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 26, pp.1-14.
8.Argyris, C. 1964. On organizations of the future. Beverly Hills , CA：stage.
9.Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee “Citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26, pp.587-595.
10.Bateman, T. S., Sakano, T., & Fujita, M. (1992). Roger, Me, and My Attitude: Film Propaganda and Cynicism Toward Corporate Leadership. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 77(5), .pp.768-771.
11.Borman,W.C.,＆Motowidlo,S.J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to include Elements of Contextual Performance,In Schmitt,N.and Borman,W.C.(Eds). Personnel Selection in Organizations,San Francisco：Jossey-Bass,71-98
12.Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Deam, J. W. (1999). Does rganizational Cynicism Matter? Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Ooutcomes. Outstanding Empirical Paper Award, Eastern Academy of Management.
13.Brandes-Duncan, P. (1995). An Exploration of Organizational Cynicism. WorkingPaper, University of Cincinnati.
14.Bradshaw-Camball, P., & Murray, V.V.（1991）. Illusions and Other Games: A Trifocal View of Organizational Politics. Organization Science, 2（4）, 379-398.
15.Breckler, S. J.(1984). Empirical Validation of Affect, Behavior, and Cognition asDistinct Components of Attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp.307-311.
16.Burns, T.（1961）. Micropolitics: Mechanisms of Institutional Change. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
17.Carnevale, D. G.(1995). Trust worthy government : leadership and management strategies for building trust and high performance,California: Jossey-Bas.
18.Carnevale, D. G. & Wechsler, B. ( 1992). Trust in the Public Sector : Individual and Organizational Determinamts, Administraton & Society, Vol. 23, No. 4, February, pp.471-494.
19.Carnevale, D. G. (1998). " Organizational Trust," in Tay M. Shafritz (ed.),The International Encyclopedia of Public and Addministration. Westview Press.
20.Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed Hostility and Pharisaic-VirtueScales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, pp.414-418.
21.Cook, J. & Wall, T. D. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of occupational psychology , Vol. 53, pp. 39-52.
22.Costign, R. D., S. S. Itler, & J. J. Berman, (1998). A multi-dimension of trust in organization. Journal of Managerial Issue, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 303-317.
23.Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Konovsky, M.A.（1993）. Dispositional Affectivity as a Predictor of Work Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 595-606.
24.Cropanzano, R.S., Kacmar, K.M., & Bozeman, D.P.（1995）. Organizational politics, justice, and support: Their differences and similarities. In R.S. Cropanzano & K.M. Kacmar（Eds.）, Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace（pp 2-18）. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
25.Cropanzano, R., Howes, J.C., Grandey, A.A., & Toth, P.（1997）. The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
26.Daft, R. L. (1989).Organization Theory and Design, West, St, Paul.
27.Dean Jr, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dhwardkar, R. (1998). Organizational Cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.341-352.
28.Doney, P. D., J. P. Cannon, & M. R. Mullen, 1997, Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 601-620.
29.Driscoll, J.W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 44-56.
30.Drory, A. (1993). Perceived Political Climate and Job Attitudes.Organization Studies, 14(1), pp.59-71.
31.Drory, A., & Romm, T. (1990). The Definition of Organizational Politics: AReview. Human Relations, 43, pp.1133-1154.
32.Farrell, D., & Petersen, J.C.（1982）. Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7, 403-412.
33.Ferris,G. R.,D. D.Frink.,M.C. Galang,Jing Zhou., Kacmar, K.M.,＆Jack L.Joward. (1996).Perceptions of Organization Politics：Prediction, Stress-Ralated Implications,and Outcomes,Human Relations,Vol.49(2)：233-266.
34.Ferris, G. R., Frink D. D., Bhawuk D. P.S., Zhou, J., and Gilmor, D. C. (1996). Reactions of diverse groups to politics in the workplace, Journal of Management, Vol.22(1)：23-44.
35.Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M.（1989）. Politics in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfield（Eds.）, Impression management in the organization（pp 143-170）. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.Ferris, G.R., & Kacmar, K.M.（1989）. Perceptions of organizational politics. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Academy of Management Meeting, Washington, D.C.
37.Ferris, Fedor, Chachere & Pondy, 1989, “Myths & politics in organization context”, Group & Organizational Studies, Vol.14, 88-103.
38.Ferris, G.R., & Kacmar, K.M.（1992）. Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management, 18, 93-116.
39.Ferris, G.R., Mitchell, T.R., Canavan, P.J., Frink, D.D., & Hopper, H.（1995）. Accountability in Human Resource Systems. In G. R. Ferris, S.D. Rosen, & D.T. Barnum（Eds.）, Handbook of human resource management（pp.175-196）. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
40.Ferris, G.R., Frink, D.D., Beehr, T. A., & Gilmore, D. C.（1995）. Political fairness and fair politics: The conceptual integration of divergent constructs. In R.S. Cropanzano & K.M.Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational Politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace（pp.21-36）. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
41.Ferris, G.R., Dulebohn, J.H., Frink, D.D., George-Falvy, J., Mitchell, T.R., & Matthews, L.M.（1997）. Job and Organizational Characteristics, Accountability, and Employee Influence. Journal of Managerial, 9, 162-175.
42.Ferris, G.R., Harrell-Cook, G., & Dulebohn, J.（2000）. Organizational politics: The nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 89–130.
43.Ferris, G.R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R.W., Hochwarter, W.A., & Ammeter, A.P.（2002）. Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau（Eds.）, Research in multi-level issues, Volume 1: The many faces of multi-level issues（pp 179–254）. Oxford: JAI Press/Elsevier Science.
44.Gandz, J., & Murray, V.V.（1980）. The Experience of Workplace Politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 237-251.
45.Gilmore D.C.＆Ferris G.R.（1996）. Organizational Politics and employee attendance,Group＆Organization Management,Vol.21(4)：481-494.
46.Golembiewski, R. T, & McConkie M（1975）. The centrality of interpersonaltrust in group processes. In C.L.Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes（pp.131-185）.New York：Wilcy.
47.Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R.（1980）.Work redesign,MA：Addison-Wesley.
48.Hage, J., and M. Aiken . （1967）.Relationship of centralization to other structural properties, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.12(1)：72-92.
49.Hall, A.Royle, M., Brymer, R., Perrewe′, P., Ferris, G., & Hochwarter, W.（2006）. Relationships between Felt Accountability as a Stressor and Strain Reactions: The Neutralizing Role of Autonomy across Two Studies. Journal of Occupational, Health Psychology, 11, 87-99.
50.Hochwarter, W.A., Perrewe, P.L., Ferris, G.R., & Guercio, R.（1999）. Commitment as an Antidote to the Tension and Turnover Consequences of Organizational Politics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 277-297.
51.Hochwarter, W.A., Kacmar, C.J., & Ferris, G.R.（2003）. Accountability at work: An examination of antecedents and consequences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
52.Hochwarter, W. A., James, M., Johnson, D., & Ferris, G. R. (2004). TheInteractive Effects of Politics Perceptions and Trait Cynicism on Work Outcomes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10(4), pp.44-58.
53.Hochwarter, W., Ferris, G., Gavin, M., Perrewé, P., Hall, A., & Frink, D.（2007）. Political Skill as a Moderator of the Felt Accountability - Job Performance Relationship: Longitudinal Convergence of Mediated Moderation Results. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 226-239.
54.Johnson, J. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The Effects of Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Cynicism: Not All Social Exchange Violations are Created Equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, pp.627-647.
55.Kacmar, K.M., &Ferris, G.R.（1991）. Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale（Pops）: Development and Construct Validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 193-205.
56.Kacmar, K.M. & Carlson, D.S.（1997）. Further Validation of the Perception of Politics Scale（Pops）: A Multiple Sample Investigation. Journal of Management, 23, 627-658.
57.Kacmar, K.M., & Baron, R.A.（1999）.
Organizational politics: The state of the field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris（Eds.）, Research in personnel and human resources management（Vol. 10, pp. 1–39）. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
58.Kacmar, K.M., Bozeman, D.P., Carlson, D.S., & Anthony, W.P.（1999）. A Partial Test of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model. Human Relations, 52, 383-416.
59.Kanter, D. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: living and working inan age of discontent and disillusion (1st ed.): San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
60.Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S., & Wilkinson, I.（1980）. Intra-Organizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
61.Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). "Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange,"Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.656-669.
62.Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (eds.),(1996). Trust in Organizations ：Forntiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications.
63.Kumar, P., & Ghadially, R.（1989）. Organizational politics and its effects on members of organizations. Human Relations, 42, 305–314.
64.Lewin, K.,（1936）. The Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
65.Lewin, K.,（1951）. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
66.Lewis, J. D. & Weigert, A. (1985). Social atomism , holism , and trust. The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 455-471.
67.Lewicki, R.J. & Bunker, B.B. (1996). Development and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler(Eds.), Trust in Organizations Frontiers of Theory and Research, ( pp.114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.Lodahl, T. M. & Kejner, M. (1965).The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement ,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.49(1)：24-33.
69.Madison, D.L., Allen, R.W., Porter, L.W., Renwick, P.A. & Mayes, B.T.（1980）. Organization Politics: An Exploration of Managers’ Perceptions. Human Relations, 33: 79-100.
70.Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M.,（1990）. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.108 (2): 171-194.
71.Mayes, B.T., & Allen, R.W.（1977）. Toward a Definition of Organizational Politics. Academy of Management Review, 2, 672-678.
72.McCauley, D. P. & K.W. Kuhnert, (1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Aministration Quarterly, 16:265-283.
73.Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
74.Mintzberg, H. (1985). The Organization as Political Arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22, 133-154.
75.Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
76.Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.Niederhoffer, A. (1967). Behind the Shield: The Police in Urban Society. GardenCity, New York: Doubleday & Company.
78.Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, Opportunism, and Governance：A Process and Control Model, Organization Studies , 17, pp.985-1010.
79.Nyhan, R. C. The interrelationship organizational commitment, trust, and participatory decision making: practices in public organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton: Florida.
80.Nyhan, R. C. (2000). Changing the Paradigm: Trust and Its Role in Public Sector organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30(1):87-109.
81.O’connor, W. E., & Morrision, T. G. (2001). A Comparison of Situational and Dispositional Predictors of Perceptions of Organizational Politics. The Journal of Psychology, 135(3), 301-312.
82.Parker, P. Christopher & Robert, I. Dipboye. (1995).Perceptions of Organizational Politics : An Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Management, Vol.21 (5): 891-912.
83.Pettigrew, A.M.（1973）. The Politics of Organizational Decision Making. London: Tavistock.
84.Pfeffer, J.（1981）. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw（Eds.）, Research in organizational behavior: 1-52. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
85.Pfeffer, J.（1992）. “Managing with power, Boston Politics: A Confirmatory Analysis”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.25 (19): 1747-1764.
86.Porter, L.W.（1976）. Organizations as political animals. Presidential Address, Division of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, 84th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
87.Porter. Allen. & Angle,（1981）. The poltics of upward influence in organization. Administrative Science Quarterly.
88.Quinn, J.B.（1980）. Strategy for Change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
89.Randall, M.L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C.A., & Birjulin, A.（1999）. Organizational Politics and Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159-174.
90.Reichers, A. E.,Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managingcynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 48-59.
91.Rosen, C.C., Levy, P.E., & Hall, R.J.（2006）. Placing Perceptions of Politics in the Context of the Feedback Environment, Employee Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 211-220.
92.Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of trust. Journal of Personality, Vol. 35, pp. 651-665.
93.Rotter, J. B. 1980. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, Vol. 3591, pp. 1-7.
94.Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C.（1998）. Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3):393-404.
95.Schein, V.E.（1977）. Individual Power and Political Behaviors in Organizations: An Inadequately Explorer. Academy of Management Review, 2, 64-72.
96.Shepperd, J.A. & Arkin, R.M. (1991). Behavioral other-enhancement: Strategically obscuring the link between performance and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 79-88.
97.Tushman, M. L.（1977）. A Political Approach to Organizations: A Review and Rationale. Academy of Management Review, April: 206-216.
98.Tyler, T. R. & R. M. Kramer.（1996）. Whither trust? In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(eds.), Trust in organization pp. 288-301. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
99.Valle, M., & Perrewe, P.L.（2000）. Do Politics Perceptions Relate to Political Behaviors? Tests of an Implicit Assumption and Expanded Model. Human Relations, 53, 359-386.
100.Vance, R. J., Brooks, S. M., & Tesluck, P. E. (1995, May). Organizational cynicism, cynical cultures, and organizational change efforts. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Orlando, FL.
101.Vredenburgh, D.J., & Maurer, J.G.（1984）. A Process Framework of Organizational Politics. Human Relations, 37, 47-66.
102.Vigoda＆Fran.（2000）.”Internal Politics in Public Administration Systems”,Public Personnel Management,Vol.29(2)：185-210.
103.Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizationalchange: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & OrganizationManagement, 25, 132-153.
104.Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R.（1996）. Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes, and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
105.Wortman C. B. & Linsenmeier J. A.（1977）. Interpersonal attraction and techniques of ingratiation in organizational settings. In Staw B.M. & Salancik G.R.（Eds.）, New directions in organizational behavior, 133-178, Chicago: St. Clair Press.
106.Wilson , Patricia. A. (1995). “The Effects of Politics and Power on The Organization Commitment of Federal Executives”, Journal of Management, Vol.21(1)：101-118.
107.Zhou, J. & Ferris, G.R.（1995）. The Dimensions and Consequences of Organizational Politics Perceptions: A Confirmatory Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1747-1764.