Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1112105-014440 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1112105-014440
論文名稱
Title
員工分紅入股影響因素之研究
Study on the Determinants of Employee Profit-Sharing Ownership Plans
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
109
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-06-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-11-12
關鍵字
Keywords
分紅入股、股票選擇權、限制股票、誘因強度、相對比例
employee profit-sharing ownership plan, stock options, incentive-intensity, mix, restricted stock
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5671 次,被下載 2722
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5671 times, has been downloaded 2722 times.
中文摘要
本國主要股票基礎的報酬(分紅入股)容易對企業的評價造成失真,故本研究利用誘因強度與相對比例等兩個指標來評估企業與股票基礎報酬的關連性。結果顯示在2002到2004年間,534家上市(櫃)公司股東權益的市場價值(總市值)每變動$ 1,000下,員工分紅入股的金額為$ 17.1834;且股票基礎與現金基礎報酬的比例為0.6594。企業發放分紅入股做為獎酬的數量越多,往往與企業的績效(盈餘)呈現正相關,尤其在電子產業更明顯。上市樣本的員工其股票基礎的報酬佔整個工作報酬的比重,會高於上櫃樣本的員工。
Abstract
It is easy to evaluate unfairly on performance of companies with stock-based rewards in Taiwan, so we use Incentive-Intensity and Mix to evaluate relationship between companies and stock-based rewards. Results documents that employees of 534 companies issuing on TSE and OTC can get NT$ 17.1834 per NT$ 1,000 change in market value of equity over 2002-04 period, and the average ratio of profit sharing and stock ownership rewards to cash compensation is 0.6594. We suggest that the more stocks companies grant, the better performance companies have, especially for electronics industry. The ratio of stock-based rewards to total compensation of employees of companies issuing on TSE is higher than employees of companies issuing on OTC.
目次 Table of Contents
論文提要 ........................................I
謝詞 ........................................II
摘要 ........................................III
第一章 緒論.....................................1
第一節 研究動機與背景...........................1
第二節 研究目的.................................3
第三節 研究大綱.................................5
第二章 文獻探討.................................8
第一節 股票基礎之報償的代理焦點.................8
第二節 股票基礎的CEO報酬模式....................15
第三節 股票基礎之報酬間制度比較.................21
第三章 研究設計.................................37
第一節 研究假設之建立...........................37
第二節 變數定義與衡量...........................44
第三節 統計方法與樣本收集及其敘述性統計.........50
第四章 實證結果分析.............................52
第一節 誘因強度與相對比例的表現.................52
第二節 電子類股誘因強度與相對比例的表現.........64
第三節 影響誘因強度與相對比例的相關變數.........78
第五章 結論與建議...............................93
第一節 結論.....................................93
第二節 建議.....................................97
參考文獻.........................................99
參考文獻 References
中文部分

王仁暉,2003,分紅配股與公司、員工間激勵效果之關聯性研究, 國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
李雅婷,2003,員工分紅入股制度之闡析及其與生產力之關聯研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
林冥芬,2003,台灣證券業分紅入股制度對員工生產力之影響探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
趙曉玲,2002,員工分紅入股制度對組織績效的影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

西文部分

Baber, William R., Surya N. Janakiraman and Sok-Hyon Kang, 1996, Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation, Journal of Accounting and economics 21, 297-318.
Banker, Rajiv W. and Srikant M. Datar, 1989, Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research 27, 21-39.
Berle, Adolf A. and Gardiner C. Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, MacMillan, New York.
Black, Fisher and Myron Sholes, 1973, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-654.
Bizjak, John M., James A. Brickley and Jeffrey L. Coles, 1993, Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior, Journal of Accounting Research 16, 349-372.
Bryan, Stephen, LeeSeok Hwang and Steven Lilien, 2000, CEO stock-based compensation: An empirical analysis of Incentive-Intensity, relative Mix, and economic determinants, The Journal of Business 73, 661-693.
Bushman, Robert M., Raffi J. Indjejikian and Abbie Smith, 1996, CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 161-193.
Chigos, Peter T., 1997, Paying for Performance, New York: Wiley.
Dechow, Patricia M., Amy P. Hutton and Richard G. Sloan, 1996, Economic consequences of accounting for stock-based compensation, Journal of Accounting Research 34, 1-20.
Eaton, Jonathan and Harvey S. Rosen, 1983, Agency, delayed compensation, and the structure of executive remuneration, Journal of Finance 38, 1489-1505.
Gaver, Jennifer J. and Kenneth M. Gaver, 1993, Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 125-160.
Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Jensen, Michael C. and Kevin J. Murphy, 1990, Performance pay and top-management incentives, Journal of Political Economy 98, 225-264.
John, Teresa A. and Kose John, 1993, Top-management compensation and capital structure, Journal of Finance 48, 949-974.
Kole, S. R., 1997, The complexity of compensation contracts, Journal of Financial Economics 43, 79-104.
Kruse, L. Douglas, 1992, Profit sharing and productivity: microeconomic evidence from the United States, Economic Journal 102, 24-36.
Lamber, Richard A. and David F. Larcker, 1987, An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts, Journal of Accounting Research 25, 85-129.
Lewellen, Wilbur G., Claudio Loderer and Kenneth Martin, 1987, Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: An empirical evidence, Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 287-310.
Matsunaga, Steven R., 1995, The effects of financial reporting costs on the use of employee stock options, The Accounting Review 70, 1-26.
Matsunaga, Steven R., Terry Shevlin and D. Shores, 1992, Disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options: Tax benefits versus financial reporting cost, Journal of Accounting Research 30, 37-68.
Mehran, Hamid, 1995, Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance, Journal of Financial Economics 38, 163-184.
Murphy, Kevin J., 1985, Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 11-42.
Murphy, Kevin J., 1998, Executive compensation, In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Murphy, Kevin J. and Jerold L. Zimmerman, 1993, Financial performance surrounding CEO turnover, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 273-315.
Ofek, Eli and David Yermack, 1997, Taking stock: Dose equity-based compensation increase managers’ ownership? Working paper, New York, New York University.
Smith, Clifford W. and Ross L. Watts, 1992, The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 263-292.
Watts, Ross L. and Jerold L. Zimmerman, 1986, Positive Accounting Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Yermack, David, 1995, Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39, 237-269.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code