多年來，許多組織政治的研究對組織政治的定義莫衷一是。對組織政治行為的界定亦眾說紛紜，在企業經營中，一方面雇主要求員工要有良好的工作態度，但另一方面，員工在組織中卻處處伴隨著政治行為的產生，究竟是何種環境情況下，會造成人們對所謂的「事實的知覺」採取行動，而非「事實的真相」，畢竟那又會造成何等影響，是個值得深思的問題。
　　筆者服務金融界，由於適逢金控法立法通過，金融界之間的購併，整合日益劇烈，對於金融機構的組織文化和從業人員心態的調整，都產生莫大衝擊，值得一探究竟。
　　本研究以國內二家大型金融機構為驗證對象，採用分層比例抽樣法，共發出問卷286份，有效回收問卷251份，經由差異、相關、複迴歸等統計分析後，經由驗證結果，獲致以下論點。
一、經探索性研究，歸併組織政治知覺構面為三個構面：
(一)上司與同事行為政治知覺
(二)薪資升遷政策行為政治知覺
(三)保持沈默靜待好處行為政治知覺
二、個人變項對組織政治知覺的差異性
(一)年齡、年資、主管職務，對組織政治知覺有顯著差異。
(二)其中主管職級分別對組織政治知覺的三個構面均有顯著差異。
(三)年齡變項僅對組織政治知覺三個構面中的上司與同事行為之政治知覺有顯著差異。
(四)年資則不對組織政治知覺的三個構面分別有顯著差異。
三、影響性假設驗證結果
經採複迴歸分析，得到：
個人變項（馬基維力主義、A型人格、主管職級）
組織結構（專業化）
工作特性（互動關係、升遷機會、完整性）
上列七變項對組織政治知覺可達41.2％的變異量解釋度。

During decades, the definitions of organizational politics are different by many researches of organizational politics. And also, the limitations of behave of organizational politics are in confusion or divisive. In an enterprise’s business, the employer may demand his（her）staff to work well, however, his or her staff may work in accordance with politic behave within organization. The problems are that what kind of environment shall make the staff to act relative response to it so-called “Consciousness of fact” but not for “Reality of fact”, and what concerns shall be involved about? These issues are worthily to study.

I, the author currently serving in finance industry, I’ve felt that there are great shocks generated or gave directly to the organizational tradition culture or employee’s mental adjustment of finance organization since the stipulation of “Finance Control Law” for which has forced the existing financial organizations to adopt combination or consolidation measures.

This study has proposed two domestic and large-scale of private finance organizations for verification. The sampling of separated levels ratio is applied, 286 questionnaires were issued and 251 questionnaires were availably replied. Before final verification, these questionnaires were statistically analyzed by difference, relativity and multi-recovery etc, and following points were concluded.

1. After explorative research, the organizational politics consciousness is mainly divided as three aspects.
（1）The behave of political consciousness for high rank and colleague.
（2）The behave of political consciousness for qualification promotion policy
（3）The behave of political consciousness for silence with personal benefit.

2. The difference of individual variety to organizational politics consciousness.
（1）Age, qualification and leadership are totally have obvious difference to organizational politics consciousness.
（2）Leadership has obvious difference to the three aspects of organizational politics consciousness respectively.
（3）Age only has obvious difference to the aspect of high rank and colleague, of organizational politics consciousness.
（4）Qualification hasn’t obvious different to the three aspects of organizational politics consciousness.

3. The outcome of influential assumed verification
Follows were found after multi-recovery analysis：
Individual variety（Markivillism, A type human characteristic, leadership）
Organization’s construction（Specialization）
Working feature（Interactive relation, promotion opportunity, integration）

Upon explanation, the seven varieties above have 41.2% variety volume relatively to the organizational politics consciousness.

第一章　緒　論 1
第一節　研究動機 1
第二節　研究目的 2
第二章　文獻探討 3
第一節　知　覺 3
第二節　組織政治知覺相關理論與研究 5
第三章　研究方法 21
第一節　研究架構 21
第二節　研究假設 22
第三節　研究變項之操作性定義與衡量工具 23
第四節　資料蒐集與研究樣本分析 27
第五節　資料分析方法 33
第四章　研究結果分析 35
第一節　各研究變項之描述性統計分析 35
第二節　個人變項與各研究變項之關係 36
第三節　各研究變項之相關分析 41
第四節 各研究變項之迴歸分析 44
第五章　結論與建議 53
第一節　研究結論 53
第二節　研究建議 57
參考文獻 60
附錄：研究問卷 63

1. Cropanzano R., Howes J. C., Grandey A. A., 1997, The Relationship of Organizational Politics and Support Work Behaviors, Attitudes, and Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18, 159-180.
2. Drory A., 1993, Perceived Political Climate and Job Attitudes, Organization Studies, 14, 1, 59-71.
3. Drory A., Romm T., 1988, Polities in Organization and its Perception within the organization, Organization Studies, 9/2, 165-179.
4. Ferris G. R., Dedor D. B., King T. R., 1994, A Political Conceptualization of Managerial Behavior, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 4, Nol, 1-34.
5. Ferris G. R., 1994, Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 13, 1204-1220.
6. Ferris G. R., Kacmar K. M., 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, Nol, 93-116.
7. Ferris G. R., King T. R., 1991, Politics in Human Resources Decisions: A Walk on Dark Side, Organization Dynamics, 20, 59-71.
8. Gilmore D. C., Ferris G. R., 1996, Organizational Politics and Employee Attendance, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, 481-494.
9. Hochwarter W. A., Witt L. A., Kacmar K. M., 2000, Perceptions of Organization Politics as a Moderator of Relationship Between Conscientiousness and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, No. 3, 472-478.
10. Kacmar K. M., Baron R. A., 1999, Organizational Politics: The State of Field, Links to Related Processes, and an Agenda for Future Research, Research in Personnel and IIuman Resources management, Vol. 17, 1-39.
11. Parker C. P., Dipboye Robert I., 1995, Perceptions of Organizational Polities: An Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, 891-912.