Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1121109-112243 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1121109-112243
論文名稱
Title
旋梯螺和芋螺超科之分子親緣關係探討
Molecular phylogeny of Thatcheria mirabilis and the Superfamily of Conoidea
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
75
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-10-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-11-21
關鍵字
Keywords
捲管螺科、筍螺科、芋螺科、芋螺超科、旋梯螺
Thatcheria mirabilis, 16S rDNA, Turridae, Terebridae, Conidae, Conoidea
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5684 次,被下載 2526
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5684 times, has been downloaded 2526 times.
中文摘要
旋梯螺在芋螺超科的分類地位不明,曾被歸在旋梯螺科、捲管螺科及芋螺科內,但芋螺超科大而多元,全世界的物種數可能超過一萬種,傳統上以殼形及齒舌形態為分類依據,分為芋螺科、筍螺科、捲管螺科,之後,以前腸的解剖構造、殼形及齒舌形態將三科修訂至七科。本研究以粒線體的16S rDNA片段探討芋螺超科的分類及旋梯螺在超科內的分類位階,結果顯示芋螺超科分為三大系群,推測此三系群分別為芋螺科、筍螺科及捲管螺科;各系群內的平均遺傳距離分別為0.12、0.10及0.10,系群間則在0.14~0.17間;筍螺科及捲管螺科可能為姊妹群或二者在同一類群下,且筍螺科與捲管螺科的親緣關係比芋螺科近。此外,旋梯螺和Bathytoma luhdorfi 雖具有捲管螺的螺旋殼形,其親緣關係卻與芋螺科系群的Conus屬較接近,其他原歸於捲管螺科的三個物種(如Oenopota sagamiana、Phymorhynchus buccinoides 和Raphitoma linearis)亦歸於芋螺科系群。此分類結果不支持Powell (1966) 和 Kohn (1998) 以殼形特徵為依據的傳統芋螺超科分類,而與Taylor等人 (1993)、Rosenberg (1998) 及Bouchet和Rocroi (2005) 以前腸解剖特徵所做的支序親緣結果類似,而芋螺超科中空魚叉狀齒舌及毒腺構造可能由各科獨立演化而產生。
Abstract
The taxonomic status of the Japanese Wonder Shell, Thatcheria mirabilis is questionable, because it has been classified in the family of Thatcheriidae, Turridae or Conidae (Superfamily: Conoidea). Conoidea is a large and diverse superfamily with more than 10,000 species. Based on shell and radula characters, it is classified into three families, i.e. Conidae, Terebridae and Turridae. However, seven families have been proposed based on foregut structure, shell and radula morphology. In the present study, the molecular phylogeny of Conoidea and the taxonomic status of Thatcheria mirabilis were determined by mitochondria DNA 16S rDNA. The results show that Conoidea includes three clades, presuming Conidae, Terebridae and Turridae. The mean genetic distances within clades were 0.12, 0.10 and 0.10, respectively. And, the distances between clades were 0.14~0.17. Phylogenetic trees reveal that Terebridae and Turridae were within the same group or sister group, Terebridae was closer to Turridae than to Conidae. Although Thatcheria mirabilis and Bathytoma luhdorfi have turrid-form shells, their phylogenetic relationship was close to Conus which was in Conidae`s clade. Some other species, i.e. Oenopota sagamiana、Phymorhynchus buccinoides and Raphitoma linearis were also in Conidae`s clade which had been placed in Turridae. In general, the results are consistent with the cladistic classification by Taylor et al (1993), Rosenberg (1998) and Bouchet & Rocroi (2005), but differenrt from the classification by Powell (1966) and Kohn (1998) based on shell characters. Additionally, the hollow, harpoon-like teeth and venom apparatus in Conoidea might independently evolve in each family.
目次 Table of Contents
謝辭.............................................................I
中文摘要....................................................II
英文摘要...................................................III
目錄...........................................................IV
表目錄........................................................V
圖目錄.......................................................VI
附錄目錄..................................................VII
前言............................................................1
材料與方法................................................7
結果..........................................................11
討論..........................................................16
參考文獻..................................................21
表..............................................................26
圖..............................................................35
附錄..........................................................52
參考文獻 References
賴景陽。2001年。貝類。第二版。渡假出版社。台北市。
鍾柏生。2005年。台灣捲管螺淺談(一)。貝友。31:3-13。
邵廣昭,彭鏡毅和吳文哲。2008年。2008台灣物種多樣性 II.物種名錄。行政院農業委員會林務局。台北市。
Allen, G. R., and S. A. McKenna. 2001. A marine rapid assessment of the Togean and Banggai islands, Sulawesi, Indonesia. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 20.
Avise, J., J. Arnold, R. Ball, E. Bermingham, T. Lamb, J. Neigel, C. Reeb, and N. Saunders. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:489-522.
Bandyopadhyay, P. K., B. J. Stevenson, J. P. Ownby, M. T. Cady, M. Watkins, and B. M. Olivera. 2008. The mitochondrial genome of Conus textile, coxI–coxII intergenic sequences and conoidean evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 46:215-223.
Bouchet, P. 1990. Turrid genera and mode of development: The use and abuse of protoconch morphology. Malacologia 32:69-77.
Bouchet, P., and J. Rocroi. 2005. Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families. Institute of Malacology Haddonfield, USA .
Brown, W. M. 1985. The mitochondrial genome of animals. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics: Monographs in Evolutionary Biology :95.
Calvo, M., J. Templado, M. Oliverio, and A. Machordom. 2009. Hidden mediterranean biodiversity: Molecular evidence for a cryptic species complex within the reef building vermetid gastropod Dendropoma petraeum (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96:898-912.
Chang, C. K., and W. Thorsson. Part 6 classification of Daphnellinae and Philbertinae.
Charig, A. J. 1963. The gastropod genus Thatcheria and its relationships. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 7:257-297.
Eales, N. 1938. On the affinities of Thatcheria mirabilis Angas. Journal of Molluscan Studies 23:15-17.
Espiritu, D. J. D., M. Watkins, V. Dia-Monje, G. E. Cartier, L. J. Cruz, and B. M. Olivera. 2001. Venomous cone snails: Molecular phylogeny and the generation of toxin diversity. Toxicon 39:1899-1916.
Franklin, J. B., S. A. Fernando, B. A. Chalke, and K. S. Krishnan. 2007. Radular morphology of Conus (gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Conidae) from India. Molluscan Research 27:111-122.
Greene, J. L., and A. Kohn. 1989. Functional morphology of the Conus proboscis (mollusca: Gastropoda). Journal of Zoology 219:487-493.
Heralde, F. M., J. Imperial, P. K. Bandyopadhyay, B. M. Olivera, G. P. Concepcion, and A. D. Santos. 2008. A rapidly diverging superfamily of peptide toxins in venomous Gemmula species. Toxicon 50:890-897.
Holford, M., N. Puillandre, Y. Terryn, C. Cruaud, B. Olivera, and P. Bouchet. 2008. Evolution of the toxoglossa venom apparatus as inferred by molecular phylogeny of the Terebridae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26:15-25 .
Imperial, J. S., M. Watkins, P. Chen, D. R. Hillyard, L. J. Cruz, and B. M. Olivera. 2003. The augertoxins: Biochemical characterization of venom components from the toxoglossate gastropod Terebra subulata. Toxicon 42:391-398.
Imperial, J. S., Y. Kantor, M. Watkins, F. M. Heralde 3rd, B. Stevenson, P. Chen, K. Hansson, J. Stenflo, J. P. Ownby, P. Bouchet, and B. M. Olivera. 2007. Venomous auger snail Hastula (Impages) hectica (linnaeus, 1758): Molecular phylogeny, foregut anatomy and comparative toxinology. Journal of Experimental Zoology.Part B.Molecular and Developmental Evolution 308:744-756.
Kantor, Y. I. 1990. Anatomical basis for the origin and evolution of the toxoglossan mode of feeding. Malacologia 32:3-18.
Kochzius, M., R. Söller, M. A. Khalaf, and D. Blohm. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of the lionfish genera Dendrochirus and Pterois (Scorpaenidae, Pteroinae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28:396-403.
Kohn, A. 1990. Tempo and mode of evolution in Conidae. Malacologia 32:55–67.
Koufopanou, V., D. G. Reid, S. A. Ridgway, and R. H. Thomas. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the Patellid limpets (Gastropoda: Patellidae) and its implications for the origins of their antitropical distribution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11:138-156.
Kumar, S., M. Nei, J. Dudley, and K. Tamura. 2008. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics .
Kuroda, T., and T. Habe. 1954. Notes on three remarkable species of Japanese gastropods. Venus, Kyoto 18:79-84.
Lieberman, B. S., W. D. Allmon, and N. Eldredge. 1993. Levels of selection and macroevolutionary patterns in the turritellid gastropods. Paleobiology :205-215.
Lydeard, C., W. E. Holznagel, J. Garner, P. Hartfield, and J. M. Pierson. 1997. A molecular phylogeny of Mobile River drainage basin pleurocerid snails (caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7:117-128.
McClain, C., and M. Rex. 2001. The relationship between dissolved oxygen concentration and maximum size in deep-sea turrid gastropods: An application of quantile regression. Marine Biology 139:681-685.
McLean, J. 1971. A revised classification of the family Turridae, with the proposal of new subfamilies, genera, and subgenera from the eastern Pacific. The Veliger 14:114-130.
Medina, M., and P. J. Walsh. 2000. Molecular systematics of the order Anaspidea based on mitochondrial DNA sequence (12S, 16S, and COI). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15:41-58.
Miller, B. 1970. Studies on the Biology of Indo-Pacific Terebridae .
Miller, J. A. 1989. The toxoglossan proboscis: structure and funtion. Journal of Molluscan Studies 55:167-181.
Moritz, C., T. Dowling, and W. Brown. 1987. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: Relevance for population biology and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:269-292.
Olivera, B. M. 2006. Conus peptides: Biodiversity-based discovery and exogenomics. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:31173-31177.
Palumbi, S. 1996. Nucleic acids II: The polymerase chain reaction. Molecular Systematics 2:205-247.
Powell, A. W. B. 1942. The New Zealand recent and fossil mollusca of the family Turridae, with general notes on turrid nomenclature and systematics. The Unity press limited, printers.
Powell, A. W. B. 1966. The molluscan families Speightiidae and Turridae: An evaluation of the valid taxa, both recent and fossil, with lists of characteristic species. Auckland Institute and Museum.
Puillandre, N., S. Samadi, M. Boisselier, A. Sysoev, Y. Kantor, C. Cruaud, A. Couloux, and P. Bouchet. 2008. Starting to unravel the toxoglossan knot: Molecular phylogeny of the" turrids"(Neogastropoda: Conoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47:1122-1134.
Ralser, M., R. Querfurth, H. J. Warnatz, H. Lehrach, M. L. Yaspo, and S. Krobitsch. 2006. An efficient and economic enhancer mix for PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 347:747-751.
Reid, D., E. Rumbak, and R. Thomas. 1996. DNA, morphology and fossils: Phylogeny and evolutionary rates of the gastropod genus Littorina. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences :877-895.
Remigio, E. A., and D. Blair. 1997. Molecular systematics of the freshwater snail family Lymnaeidae (Pulmonata: Basommatophora) utilising mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Journal of Molluscan Studies 63:173-185.
Rockel, D., W. Korn, and A. Kohn. 1995. Manual of the living Conidae, vol. 1, Indo-Pacific region.
Rosenberg, G. 1998. Reproducibility of results in phylogenetic analysis of mollusks: A reanalysis of the Taylor, Kantor, and Sysoev (1993) data set for Conoidean gastropods. American Malacological Bulletin 14:219-228.
Roy, K. 2002. Bathymetry and body size in marine gastropods: A shallow water perspective. Marine Ecology Progress Series 237:143-149.
Schander, C., K. M. Halanych, T. Dahlgren, and P. Sundberg. 2003. Test of the monophyly of Odostomiinae and Turbonilliinae (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia, Pyramidellidae) based on 16S mtDNA sequences. Zoologica Scripta 32:243-254.
Schneider, J. A., and D. Ó. Foighil. 1999. Phylogeny of giant clams (Cardiidae: Tridacninae) based on partial mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13:59-66.
Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87:651-701.
Smith, B., P. Beesley, G. Ross, and A. Wells. 1998. Mollusca: The southern synthesis. fauna of Australia.
Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei, and S. Kumar. 2007. MEGA 4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1596.
Taylor, J., Y. Kantor, and A. Sysoev. 1993. Foregut anatomy, feeding mechanisms, relationships and classification of the Conoidea(= toxoglossa)(gastropoda). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum.Zoology Series 59:125-170.
Thollesson, M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of Euthyneura (Gastropoda) by means of the 16S rRNA gene: Use of a ‘fast’ gene for ‘higher-level’ phylogenies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:75-83.
Watkins, M., D. R. Hillyard, and B. M. Olivera. 2006. Genes expressed in a turrid venom duct: Divergence and similarity to conotoxins. Journal of Molecular Evolution 62:247-256.
Weisburg, W., S. Barns, D. Pelletier, and D. Lane. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology 173:697-703.
Wenz, W. 1938. Gastropoda. Teil 1:1–240.
Fischer, P. H. 1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique: Ou, histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossiles. F. Savy .
Thiele, J. 1929. 1931 handbuch der systematischen weichtierkunde, vol. 1. Jena: Verlag Von Gustav Fischer.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code