Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1128117-013153 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1128117-013153
論文名稱
Title
「型」有所「感」? 探討食品外型、食品類型與飲食控制對於消費行為的影響
Feeling from the Shape! Influences of Food Shape, Food Perception, Food Type and Restraint Dieting on Consumption Behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
154
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-10-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-12-29
關鍵字
Keywords
產品評價、飲食控制、食品類型、食品食用量、跨型態對應、食品感知、食品外型
food consumption, product evaluation, dietary restraint, food type, crossmodal-correspound, food perception, food shape
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5811 次,被下載 142
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5811 times, has been downloaded 142 times.
中文摘要
本研究探討不同的食品外型(圓vs.方),是否會使消費者產生不同的食品感知,基於跨型態對應理論,提出食品類型及飲食控制會對食品外型具有干擾作用,並且影響到產品評價及食品食用量。
本研究共進行三個實驗,使用產品分別為,蘋果飲料、水果及餅乾。實驗一透過操弄飲料食品外型的不同(方 vs. 圓),來觀察外型影響食品感知的背後機制,實驗二則加入干擾變數食品類型,探討2(食品外型:方 vs. 圓)與2(食品類型:健康型 vs. 不健康型)雙因子組間設計,共四種情境。實驗三分成3a、3b,探討2(食品外型:方 vs. 圓)與2(食品類型:健康型 vs. 不健康型)及2(飲食控制:飲食控制者 vs. 非飲食控制者)的2x2x2三因子組間設計。
研究結果顯示,視覺堅硬度為食品外型產生不同食品感知的背後機制,方形會讓人產生健康的食品感知,圓形則讓人產生美味的食品感知。當食品類型為健康型時,搭配上方形食品外型,會相較圓形食品外型,讓消費者有較佳的產品評價及食品食用量,若食品類型為不健康型時,搭配上圓形的食品外型會相較於方形食品外型,讓消費者有較佳的產品評價及食品食用量。再者,當消費者本身為飲食控制者時,搭配上方形食品外型相較於圓形食品外型,會讓消費者有較高的食品食用量;當消費者為非飲食控制者時,搭配上圓形食品外型相較於方形食品外型,會讓消費者有較高的食品食用量。
Abstract
This research examines how the different food shapes (circle vs. square) influence consumer perception and product evaluation and food consumption. Drawing from crossmodal-correspound theoty, food type and dietary restraint are proposed to moderate the effects of food shape.
Three experiments use apple beverage, fruit and cookies as test products. In Study 1, the effects of food shape (circle vs. square) on food perception is examined. Meanwhile, visual potency as the underlying mechanism behind the effects of food shape is also tested. In Study 2, a 2 (food shape: circle vs. square) x 2 (food type: vice vs. virtue) between-subject design is employed. In Studies 3a and 3b, a 2 (food shape: circle vs. square) x 2 (food type: vice vs. virtue) x 2 (dietary restraint: restraint vs. unrestraint) between-subjects design is conduced.
The results indicate that visual potency is the underlying mechanism that the square food shape is perceived as more healthy while the circle food shape is perceived as more tasty. When the food is percrvied as virtue, square food shape leads to more favorable product evaluation and more food consumption (compared with circle food shape). Opposite results are found when the food is considered as vice. Furthermore, the effects of square food shape are more effective to people with dietary restraint on their food consumption. On the other hand, the effects of circle food shape are more effective to people without dietary restraint on their consumption.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 前言 1
第二節 研究背景 1
第三節 研究動機 3
第四節 研究目的與問題 5
第五節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 前言 8
第二節 線條、形狀產生的消費者感知背景理論 8
一、線條感知的相關研究 8
二、方圓形狀影響感知的相關研究 10
三、線、形於消費者行為領域的研究 12
第三節 跨型態對應 13
一、跨型態對應於感官對應研究 14
二、跨型態對應於形狀與味道的應用研究 16
三、跨型態對應於形狀與口腔體感的研究 18
第四節 食品類型 19
一、健康和非健康食品的分類 19
二、健康型與不健康食品類型於行銷領域的應用 22
第四節 飲食控制者 26
一、飲食控制者的定義 26
二、飲食控制者在消費者行為研究的表現 27
第五節 小節 27
第參章 研究設計與方法 28
第一節 前言. 28
第二節 研究假說與架構 28
一、食品外型與食品感知的關係 28
二、食品類型對於方圓食品外型干擾效果 30
三、飲食控制者對於方圓食品外型干擾效果 32
第三節 四個實驗的建立 33
第四節 前測 34
一、前測目的 34
二、前測問卷發放與設計 34
三、前測問卷分析 37
第五節 小結 39
第肆章 實驗一設計與結果分析 40
第一節 前言 40
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 40
一、自變數操弄及操弄檢定 40
二、依變數:食品感知 41
三、中介變數:視覺堅硬度 42
四、欲排除之中介變數 42
五、人口統計變數 43
第三節 研究設計 43
一、問卷題項設計 43
二、抽樣方法 44
第四節 實驗一結果分析 44
一、樣本背景資料敘述統計 44
二、實驗一信度分析 45
三、實驗一食品外型操弄檢定 45
四、實驗假說之檢驗 45
五、排除其他可能的中介變數 47
第五節 小結 48
第伍章 實驗二設計與結果分析 49
第一節 前言 49
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 49
一、自變數操弄及操弄檢定 49
二、依變數 52
三、個人差異變數 53
第三節 研究設計 55
一、問卷題項設計 55
二、抽樣方法 56
第四節 實驗二結果分析 56
一、樣本背景資料敘述統計 56
二、信度分析 57
三、研究設計操弄確認 57
四、潛在共變數確認 58
五、研究假說之檢驗 59
第五節 小節 67
第陸章 實驗三a設計與結果分析 68
第一節 前言 68
第二節 研究變數操作型定義及衡量 68
一、自變數操弄及操弄檢定 68
二、依變數 69
三、個人差異變數 70
第三節 研究設計 71
一、問卷題項設計 71
二、抽樣方式 72
第四節 實驗3a結果分析 72
一、樣本背景資料敘述統計 72
二、信度分析 73
三、研究設計操弄確認 73
四、潛在共變數確認 73
五、研究假說之檢驗 74
第六節 小節 77
第柒章 實驗三b設計與結果分析 78
第一節 前言 78
第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 78
一、自變數操弄及操弄檢定 78
二、依變數 80
三、個人差異變數 80
第三節 研究設計 82
一、問卷題項設計 82
二、實驗流程 82
三、抽樣方法 83
第四節 實驗三b結果分析 84
一、樣本背景資料敘述統計 84
二、實驗三信度分析 84
三、實驗三操弄檢定 84
四、潛在共變數確認 85
五、研究假說之檢驗 85
第七節 小結 89
第捌章 結論與建議 90
第一節 前言 90
第二節 研究結果討論 90
一、食品外型影響食品感知的背後機制為視覺堅硬度。 90
二、食品外型使用方形,搭配健康型食品類型時,會有較好的產品評價;當消費者為飲食控制者時,食品外型使用方形會有較多的食品食用量。 91
三、食品外型使用圓形,搭配不健康型食品類型時,會有較好的產品評價;當消費者為非飲食控制者時,食品外型使用圓形會有較多的食品食用量。 91
第三節 研究貢獻 92
一、理論貢獻 92
二、實務貢獻 93
第四節 研究限制 95
一、樣本限制 95
二、實驗設計法 95
三、食品外型 95
四、食品感知衡量 96
第五節 未來研究建議 96
一、形狀特色應用於非食物品類 96
二、探討不同視覺元素 96
三、探討不同的個人差異變數 98
第六節 總結 98
參考文獻 99
附錄一 前測問卷 107
附錄二 實驗一問卷 109
附錄三 實驗二問卷 113
附錄四 實驗三a問卷 125
附錄五 實驗三b問卷 131
參考文獻 References
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.CA: Sage.
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye: University of California Press.
Aronoff, J., Barclay, A. M., & Stevenson, L. A. (1988). The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 647-655.
Aronoff, J., Woike, B. A., & Hyman, L. M. (1992). Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1050-1066.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17(8), 645-648.
Becker, L., van Rompay, T. J., Schifferstein, H. N., & Galetzka, M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 17-23.
Bertamini, M., Palumbo, L., Gheorghes, T. N., & Galatsidas, M. (2016). Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? British Journal of Psychology, 107(1), 154-178.
Birch, L. L. (1999). Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition, 19(1), 41-62.
Biswas, D., Szocs, C., Krishna, A., & Lehmann, D. R. (2014). Something to chew on: The effects of oral haptics on mastication, orosensory perception, and calorie estimation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 261-273.
Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing,59(3), 16-29.
Bohrer, B. K., Forbush, K. T., & Hunt, T. K. (2015). Are common measures of dietary restraint and disinhibited eating reliable and valid in obese persons? Appetite, 87(1), 344-351.
Bond, B., & Stevens, S. S. (1969). Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(6), 337-339.
Booth, D. A. (1987). Cognitive experimental psychology of appetite. In R. A. Boakes, D. A. Popplewell, & M. J. Burton (Eds.). Eating Habit: Food, Physiology and Learned behavior (pp. 175-209). New York: Wiley.
Bronner, K., Frieler, K., Bruhn, H., Hirt, R., & Piper, D. (2012). What is the sound of citrus? Research on the correspondences between the perception of sound and flavour. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition, pp. 142-148.
Bublitz, M. G., Peracchio, L. A., & Block, L. G. (2010). Why did I eat that? Perspectives on food decision making and dietary restraint. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 239-258.
Bui, M. M., Tangari, A. H., & Haws, K. L. (2017). Can health “halos” extend to food packaging? An investigation into food healthfulness perceptions and serving sizes on consumption decisions. Journal of Business Research, 75(c), 221-228.
Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 292-304.
Cardello, A. V. (1994). Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In H. J. H. MacFie & D. M. H. Thomson (Eds.), Measurement of Food Preferences (pp. 253–297). London: Blackwell.
Carels, R. A., Harper, J., & Konrad, K. (2006). Qualitative perceptions and caloric estimations of healthy and unhealthy foods by behavioral weight loss participants. Appetite, 46(2), 199-206.
Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80-94.
Chernev, A. (2011). Semantic anchoring in sequential evaluations of vices and virtues. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 761-774.
Chernev, A., & Gal, D. (2010). Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 738-747.
Cheskin, L. (1957). How to predict what people will buy. New York: Liveright.
Cheskin, L. (1981) Research design and analysis in the testing of symbols. In: W. Stern (Ed.) Handbook of Package Design Research. New York: Wiley Interscience, pp. 211–220.
Creusen, M. E., & Schoormans, J. P. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81.
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design studies, 25(6), 547-577.
Crisinel, A.-S. (2010). As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetes between tastes/flavors and musical notes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1994-2002.
Deroy, O., & Valentin, D. (2011). Tasting liquid shapes: Investigating the sensory basis of cross-modal correspondences. Chemosensory Perception, 4(3), 80-90.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2009). The effects of advertising copy on sensory thoughts and perceived taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 748-756.
Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Binser, M. J., Friedman, R., & Pekrun, R. (2009). The effect of red on avoidance behavior in achievement contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 365-375.
Fang, X., & Mowen, J. C. (2005). Exploring factors influencing logo effectiveness: An experimental inquiry, In G. Menon & A. R. Rao. (Eds.) Advances in Consumer Research, 32, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, 161.
Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: The interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 698-711.
Fox, C. W. (1935). An experimental study of naming. American Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 545-579.
Gal, D., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2007) Cross-modal influences on gustatory perception. unpublished manuscript. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030197.
Garg, N., Wansink, B., & Inman, J. J. (2007). The influence of incidental affect on consumers' food intake. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 194-206.
Heatherton, T. F., Herman, C. P., Polivy, J., King, G. A., & McGree, S. T. (1988). The (mis) measurement of restraint: An analysis of conceptual and psychometric issues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 19-28.
Herman, C. P., & Mack, D. (1975). Restrained and unrestrained eating. Journal of Personality, 43(4), 647-660.
Hertenstein, J. H., Platt, M. B., & Veryzer, R. W. (2005). The impact of industrial design effectiveness on corporate financial performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 3-21.
Hevner, K. (1935). Experimental studies of the affective value of colors and lines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(4), 385-398.
Irmak, C., Vallen, B., & Robinson, S. R. (2011). The impact of product name on dieters’ and nondieters’ food evaluations and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 390-405.
Janiszewski, C., & Chandon, E. (2007). Transfer-appropriate processing, response fluency, and the mere measurement effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 309-323.
Jayanti, R. K., & Burns, A. C. (1998). The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 6-15.
Jiang, Y., Gorn, G. J., Galli, M., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2016). Does your company have the right logo? how and why circular- and angular-logo shapes influence brand attribute judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 709-726.
Johnson, W. G., Corrigan, S. A., Schlundt, D. G., & Dubbert, P. M. (1990). Dietary restraint and eating behavior in the natural environment. Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 285-290.
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
Karnal, N., Machiels, C. J., Orth, U. R., & Mai, R. (2016). Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 106-119.
Kastl, A. J., & Child, I. L. (1968). Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(6), 440-446.
Koenigstorfer, J., & Baumgartner, H. (2016). The effect of fitness branding on restrained eaters’ food consumption and postconsumption physical activity. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 124-138.
Laessle, R. G., Tuschl, R. J., Kotthaus, B. C., & Pirke, K. M. (1989). Behavioral and biological correlates of dietary restraint in normal life. Appetite, 12(2), 83-94.
Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., & Stearns, J. J. (2007). The shape of threat: Simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. Emotion, 7(3), 526-534.
Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 603-618.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165.
Liu, C. H. (1997). Symbols: Circles and spheres represent the same referents. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(2), 135-147.
Liu, C. H., & Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Symbolic forms and cognition. Psyke & Logos, 14(2), 441-456.
Liu, P. J., Haws, K. L., Lamberton, C., Campbell, T. H., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2015). Vice-virtue bundles. Management Science, 61(1), 204-228.
Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., & Mummery, K. (2002). Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(1), 23-40.
Lundholm, H. (1921). The affective tone of lines: Experimental researches. Psychological Review, 28(1), 43-60.
Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2012). Taste lovers versus nutrition fact seekers: How health consciousness and self‐efficacy determine the way consumers choose food products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 316-328.
Marks, L. E. (1987). On cross-modal similarity: Auditory–visual interactions in speeded discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(3), 384-394.
Martin, B. A., Gnoth, J., & Strong, C. (2009). Temporal construal in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 5-20.
Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (1999). Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: Tests of the semantic coding hypothesis. Perception, 28(7), 903-923.
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2011). The Influence of price discount versus bonus pack on the preference for virtue and vice foods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 196-206.
Moreau, C. P., Markman, A. B., & Lehmann, D. R. (2001). “What is it?” Categorization flexibility and consumers' responses to really new products. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 489-498.
Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “intenders” actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
Nenkov, G. Y., & Scott, M. L. (2014). “So cute I could eat it up”: Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 326-341.
Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 53-75.
Ngo, M. K., & Spence, C. (2011). Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that consumers associate with different kinds of chocolate. Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(6), 421-428.
Ngo, M. K., Velasco, C., Salgado, A., Boehm, E., O’Neill, D., & Spence, C. (2013). Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 361-369.
Oakes, M. E. (2005). Beauty or beast: Does stereotypical thinking about foods contribute to overeating? Food Quality and Preference, 16(5), 447-454.
Oakes, M. E., & Slotterback, C. S. (2001a). Judgements of food healthfulness: Food name stereotypes in adults over age 25. Appetite, 37(1), 1-8.
Oakes, M. E., & Slotterback, C. S. (2001b). What's in a name? A comparison of men's and women's judgements about food names and their nutrient contents. Appetite, 36(1), 29-40.
Olshavsky, R. W., & Lee, D. H. (1993). Self-gifts: A metacognition perspective. In L. Mcalister & M. L. Rothschild, (Eds.) Advance in Consumer Research, 20, Provo, UT : Associatation for Consumer Reseach, 547-552.
Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64-81.
Ozcakir, A., Dogan, F. O., Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2014). Health locus of control, health related behaviors and demographic factors: A Study in a Turkish Population. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research, 4(21), 3856-3869.
Poffenberger, A. T., & Barrows, B. (1924). The feeling value of lines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(2), 187-205.
Provencher, V., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2009). Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more! Appetite, 52(2), 340-344.
Psouni, S., Chasandra, M., & Theodorakis, Y. (2016). Patterns of eating and physical activity attitudes and behaviors in relation to body mass index. Psychology, 7(2), 180-192.
Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The unhealthy= tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170-184.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
Romero, M., & Biswas, D. (2016). Healthy-left, unhealthy-right: can displaying healthy items to the left (versus right) of unhealthy items nudge healthier choices? Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 103-112.
Rozin, P., Ashmore, M., & Markwith, M. (1996). Lay American conceptions of nutrition: Dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. Health Psychology, 15(6), 438-447.
Salgado-Montejo, A., Alvarado, J. A., Velasco, C., Salgado, C. J., Hasse, K., & Spence, C. (2015). The sweetest thing: The influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1382. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01382.
Salgado‐Montejo, A., Tapia Leon, I., Elliot, A. J., Salgado, C. J., & Spence, C. (2015). Smiles over frowns: When curved lines influence product preference. Psychology & Marketing, 32(7), 771-781.
Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225-239.
Scott, M. L., Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & Morales, A. C. (2008). The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 391-405.
Seo, H.-S., Arshamian, A., Schemmer, K., Scheer, I., Sander, T., Ritter, G., & Hummel, T. (2010). Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols. Neuroscience Letters, 478(3), 175-178.
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278-292.
Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 25-42.
Smets, G., Overbeeke, K., & Gaver. W. (1994). Form-giving: Expressing the nonobvious. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI on Human Factors in Computing Systetns (pp. 79-84). ACM.
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971-995.
Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 37-54.
Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2011). Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality and Preference, 22(3), 290-295.
Spence, C., Smith, B., & Auvray, M. (2015). Confusing tastes and flavours. Perception and its Modalities, 247-274.
Steiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo, M. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001). Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci Biobehav Review, 25(1), 53-74.
Stock, R. M., Oliveira, P., & Hippel, E. (2015). Impacts of hedonic and utilitarian user motives on the innovativeness of user‐developed solutions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 389-403.
Takahashi, S. (1995). Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. Psychological Review, 102(4), 671-683.
Van Rompay, T. J., & Pruyn, A. T. (2011). When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape‐typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 599-610.
Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E., Bergers, G., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295-315.
Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Spence, C. (2014). Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference, 34, 88-95.
Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Deroy, O., & Spence, C. (2015). Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 151-158.
Wallston, K. A., Strudler Wallston, B., & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs, 6(1), 160-170.
Wan, X., Woods, A. T., Bosch, J., McKenzie, K. J., Velasco, C., & Spence, C. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between tastes and visual features. Frontiers Psychology, 5, 1365. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2014.01365.
Wang, Q. J., Carvalho, F. R., Persoone, D., & Spence, C. (2017). Assessing the effect of shape on the evaluation of expected and actual chocolate flavour. Flavour, 6(1), 1-2.
Wang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Affective priming by simple geometric shapes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00917.
Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 605-617.
Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213-228.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
Wertheimer, M. (1958). The relation between the sound of a word and its meaning. American Journal of Psychology, 71(2), 412-415.
Westerman, S. J., Gardner, P. H., Sutherland, E. J., White, T., Jordan, K., Watts, D., & Wells, S. (2012). Product design: Preference for rounded versus angular design elements. Psychology and Marketing, 29(8), 595-605.
Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Price, L. J. (2006). The impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 794-805.
Zhu, R., & Argo, J. J. (2013). Exploring the impact of various shaped seating arrangements on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 336-349.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code