Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1222105-120150 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1222105-120150
論文名稱
Title
轉換型領導、團隊異質性及團隊衝突與團隊學習關係之探討:團隊行為整合之中介角色
Transformational Leadership, Diversity, Conflicts and Learning in Teams: The Mediating Role of Team Behavioral Integration
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
77
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-10-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-12-22
關鍵字
Keywords
團隊學習、團隊衝突、團隊異質性、轉換型領導、行為整合
Team Learning, Team diversity, Behavioral Integration, Transformational Leadership
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5641 次,被下載 2934
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5641 times, has been downloaded 2934 times.
中文摘要
本研究整合自Hambrick(1994)提出行為整合的觀點以來,有關於團隊行為整合的相關研究,並採取Hambrick(1994)的觀點,真正的團隊不在於團隊式的組織設計,而在於成員間的互動過程,行為整合正是一個形容此關鍵過程的整合型構念。因此,本研究參考過去學者的研究,針對任務互依(task interdependence)以及情感互依(social emotional interdependence)的工作部門為研究的對象,以轉換型領導、團隊異質性及人口統計變項為自變數,團隊衝突與團隊學習為依變數,並將行為整合視為重要的中介角色,利用結構方程式(structural equation method, SEM)做整體模式的檢定。研究結果發現行為整合的確有助於降低團隊衝突以及提昇團隊學習的程度,此結果與過去的研究一致,並再次證明行為整合的確能夠幫助團隊的表現。本研究首次以一般工作單位為研究對象,並首次以結構方程式檢定有關於行為整合的整體性架構,針對研究發現的理論、實務以及方法上的意涵,以及未來研究方向,本研究均有深入之討論。
Abstract
Extending Hambrick’s(1994) concept of behavioral integration, a real “team” doesn’t focus on its team-orientation design, but on the interaction among its members. The concept of behavioral integration describes the key process of interaction among team members. Owing to the characteristics of task and social emotional interdependence, some work units need to work as teams to complete their task. The article concludes related surveys, and constructs a theoretical framework. Using survey data from 100 basic work units, the researcher tests the structural model by applying structural equation method (SEM). Although not every hypothesis has been supported by sample, transformational leadership is positively related to team behavioral integration. Besides, the relation between behavioral integration, team conflicts and learning is found.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論...........................................1
第一節 研究背景..............................................1
第二節 研究動機..............................................2
第三節 研究目的..............................................3
第二章 文獻探討 ......................................4
第一節 行為整合.............................................4
第二節 團隊特徵變項對團隊行為整合的影響......................8
第三節 轉換型領導對團隊行為整合的影響.......................14
第四節 團隊行為整合對團隊衝突的影響.........................16
第五節 團隊行為整合對團隊學習的影響.........................19
第六節 行為整合的中介效果...................................22
第三章 研究方法 .....................................24
第一節 研究架構.............................................24
第二節 研究樣本.............................................25
第三節 研究假設.............................................29
第四節 研究變項與衡量工具...................................30
第五節 統計研究方法.........................................41
第四章 研究發現 .....................................43
第一節 資料加總的正當性評估.................................43
第二節 測量模式.............................................44
第三節 結構模式.............................................49
第五章 討論與結論 ..................................53
第一節 分析結果討論.........................................53
第二節 研究意涵.............................................55
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向...............................57
參考文獻 .............................................59
附錄 問卷內容 ........................................68
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
林豪傑,2005,CEO權力支配性、高階人力資源管理系統、高階經營團隊社會
凝合與競爭之關係。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
林冠宏,2003,轉換型領導、組織認同、組織溝通對領導效能影響之研究—以台
南縣政府組織變革為例。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林鴻均,2004,領導風格對團隊學習之影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士
論文。
林能白、丘宏昌,1999,服務品質之研究—服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用,
管理學報,第16卷第2期,頁175-200。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯,Robbins S. P.著,1994,組織行為學,台北:華泰
書局。
沈聰益,2003,人格五因素模式預測保險業務員銷售績效的效度—NEO-PI-R量
表之跨文化檢驗與人際特質架構之實證探討。國立交通大學經營管理研究所博
士論文。
涂嘉峪,2003,團隊情感對團隊歷程的影響。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士
論文。
張翊祥,2004,團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究—以團隊互動過程
為中介變項。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳慧芳,2005,台灣派遣勞工對要派機構的認知、派遣機構的認知、人格特質與
工作滿意及離職傾向之相關研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩
士論文。
陳順宇,1998,多變量分析,台北市:華泰書局。
黃嘉雄,2004,組織政治知覺對工作價值觀與組織承諾影響之研究—以醫療機構
人員為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
黃芳銘,2004,結構方程式模式理論與應用(修訂版),台北:五南書局。
蘇文郁,2005,人格特質、印象管理與組織公民行為關係之探討。國立中山大學
人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。


二、英文部分
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 103(3): 411.
Aram, J. D., Morgan, C. P., & Esbeck, E. S. 1971. Relation of collabrative interpersonal Relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. 16(3): 289-297.
Arnold, K. A., Barling, J., & Kelloway E. K. 2001. Transformational leadership ot the iron cage:which predict trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 22(7/8): 315-320
Avery, D. R.. 2003. Personality as a predictor of the value of voice. The Journal of Psychology. 137(5): 435-446.
Bales, R. F. 1950. Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small group. MA: Addision-Wesley.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. 2003. Negtive self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(1): 87-99.
Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(3): 377-391.
Barry, B., & Steward, G. L. 1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-management groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology.82(1): 62-78.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadersip. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(2): 207-218.
Beal, D. J., & Cohen, R. R. 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(6): 989-1004.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & Mclendon, C. L. 2003. Cohesion and performance in Groups:A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(6): 989-1004.
Beckman, C. M., & Hauschild, P. R. 2002. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisition. Administrative Science Quarterly. 47(1): 92-124.
Bernthal, P. R., & Insko, C. A.. 1993. Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group & Organization Management. 18(1): 66-87.
Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variable. New York: Wiley.
Bradly, J. H., & Hebert, F. J. 1997. The effect of personality type on team performance. The Journal of Management Development. 16(5): 337.
Brown, H. G., Poole, S. M., & Rodgers, T. L. 2004. Interpersonal traits, tomplementarity, and trust in virtual collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems. 20(4): 115-137.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M.. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(3): 552-560.
Chattopadhyay, P. 1999. Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 42(3): 273-287.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes team work: Group effectives research for the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management. 23(3): 239-290.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory and new Five-Factor inventory: Professional Manual. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas E. 2004. Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly. 15: 857-880.
Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., & Ramsey, R. P. 2002. Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education. 24(2): 114-125.
Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., & Atwater, L. E. 2004. Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 17(2): 177-193.
Ding, L., Velicer, W. F. W., & Harlow, L. L. 1995. Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2: 119-143
Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychology safety and leaning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44(2): 350-383.
Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H.. 2003. Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5): 821-835.
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C. L. 2003. Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance:A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review. 13(2): 329.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand M. J., & Magley, V. J. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(4): 578-589.
Goldberg, L. R. 1992. The development of makers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychology Assessment. 4: 26-42.
Goldman, S., & Kahnweiler, W. M. 2000. A collaborator profile for executive of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. 10(4): 435-451.
Golen, S. P., Catanach Jr., A. H., Moeckel C. 1997. The frequency and seriousness of communication barriers in the auditor-client relationship. Business Communication Quarterly. 60(3).
Guthrie, J. P., Ash, R. A., & Steven, C. D. 2003. Are women “better” than men? Personality differences and expatriate selection. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 18(3): 229.
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. 2005. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review. 30(2): 269-287.
Hackman, J. R. 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh(Ed.). Handbook of Organiztional Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management group:A conceptual integration and consideration of the “team” label. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummins(eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (16: 171-213). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. 1998. Corporate coherence and the top management team. In D. C. Hambrick, D. A. Nadler, & M. L. Tushaman(eds.), Navigating Change:How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation (pp. 123-140). MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hambrick, D. C. 1995. Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top Management teams. California Management Review. 37(3):110-127.
Harland, L., Harrison, W., Jones, J. R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. 2005. Leadership behaviors and Subordinate Resiliense. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 11(2): 2-14.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. 1998. Beyond relational demography : Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal. 41(1): 96-107.
Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. 2005. Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 90(3): 509-522.
James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology. 67(2): 219-229.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. 69: 85-98.
Janis, I. L. 1982. Victims of groupthink(2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. 2001. The role of senior management and team leaders in building collaborative new product teams. Engineering Management Journal. 13(2): 33-39.
Jehn, K. A., & Chatman, J. A. 2000. The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management. 11(1): 56-73.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict : A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal. 44(2): 238-251.
Jehn, K. A. 1995. Mutimethod examination of detriment of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40: 256-282.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. 1993. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review. 71(2): 111-121.
Kight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., & Flood, P. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal. 20(5): 445-465.
Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., & Mehra, A. 2000. The management-team diversity and firm performance:Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science. 11(1): 21-34.
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. 2004. The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader-team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness. Group & Organization Management. 29(3): 334-368.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. 1992. A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling Issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology. 77(2): 298-309.
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan J. K. 2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal. 48(4): 645-659.
Lawrence, B. S.. 1997. The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science. 8(1): 1-22.
LeBrasseur, R., Whissell, R., & Ojha, A. 2002. Organizational learning, transformational leadership and implementation of continuous quality improvement in Canadian hospital. Australian Journal of Management. 27(2): 141-162.
Lepine, J. A. 2003. Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(1): 27-39
Li, H. & Zhang, Y. 2003. Founnding team comprehension and behavioral integration:evidence from new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Proceedings. p.B1.
Liao, H., Joshi, A. & Chuang, A. 2004. Sticking out like a sore thumb:employee dissimilarity and deviance at work. Personnel Psychology.57(4): 969-1000.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. 1997. Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 32(2): 193-210.
Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. 2001. Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal. 29(2): 115-134.
McCain, B. E., O’Reilly C., & Pfeffer J. 1983. The effects of department demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal. 26(4): 626-641.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Yik, M. S. M. 1996. Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure, on Bond, M. H. (Ed.). The Hand book of Chinese Psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 1984. Designing strategic human resources systems. Oranizational Dynamics. 13(1): 36-52.
Mohammed S., & Angell L. C. 2004. Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroup: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 25(8): 1015-1039.
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr.. 1995. Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P. 2001. Getting it together temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal. 44(6): 1251-1262.
Mooney, A. C. & Sonnenfeld J. 2001. Exploring antecedents to top management team conflct:the importance of behavioral integration. Academy of Management Proceedings. p.L1.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. 1998. Five reasons why the “Big Five” article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology. 51(4): 849-857.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. 1999. The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management. 24(1): 28-46.
Pearson, A. W., Ensley, M. D., & Amason, A. C. 2002. An assessment and refinement of Jehn’s intragroup conflict scale. The International Journal of Conflict Management. 13(2): 110-126.
Pelled, L. H., Xin, K. R., & Weiss, A. M. 2001. No es como mi: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 74: 63-84.
Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. 2003. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5): 795-802.
Piedmont, R. L., & Weinstein, H. P. 1993. A psychology evolution of the new NEO-PIR facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality Assessment. 60(2): 302-318.
Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Moon H. 2003. Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(3): 391-403.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satistfication, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly. 1: 107-142.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empipical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management. 26(3): 513-563.
Rogelberg, S. G., Conway, J. M., Sederburg, M. E., Spitzmϋller, C., Aziz, S., & Knight, W. E. 2003. Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(6): 1104-1114.
Saucier, G. 1994. Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment. 63(3): 506-516.
Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. 1995. Team-member exchange under tem and traditional management. Group & Organizational Management. 20(1): 18
Shaw, J. B., & Power, B. E. 1998. The effect of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations. 51(10): 1307-1325.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2005. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal. 48(1): 69-84.
Smith, K. G. S., Smith K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims Jr., H. P., O’Bannon D. P., & Scully, J. A. 1994. Top management team demography and process.: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly. 39(3): 412-438.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. 2000. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal. 43(2): 135-148.
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. 2003. A personality trait-based integrationist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(3): 500-517.
Tett, R. P., & Murphy, P. J. 2002. Personality and situations in co-worker preference: similarity and complementarity in worker compatibility. Journal of Business and Psychology. 17(2): 223-243.
Thatcher S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. 2003. Cracks in Diversity Research:The effects of diversity faultiness on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation. 12: 217-241.
Tompkins, T. C. 1995. Role of diffusion in collective learning. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 3(1): 69-85.
Trimmer, K. J., Domino, M. A., & Blanton, J. E. 2002. The impact of personality diversity on conflict in ISD teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 42(4): 7-15.
Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1989. Beyond simple demography effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal. 32(2): 402-432.
Vegt, Gs. V. D., Emans, B. J. M., & Vliert, E. V. D. 2001. Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology. 54(1): 51-69.
Vianen A. E. M., & Dreu C. K. W. D. 2001. Personality in teams:Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 10(2): 97-120
Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1984. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Administrative Science Quarterly. 29(1): 74-93.
Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. 2004. The role of collective in relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Ovvupational and Organizational Psychology. 77: 515-530.
Webber, M. 1964. He urban place and the nonplace urban realm? Explorations into Urban Structure. Ed Melvin Webber et al. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P: 79-153.
Wei, L., Wang, Z. & Young, M. 2003. A test of upper echelons theory in Chinese shareholding enterprises. Academy of Management Proceedings. p.J1-J6.
Werner, J. M., & Lester, S. W. 2001. Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 12(4): 385-402.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly III, C. A.. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior. 20: 77-141.
Zaccaro, S. J. 1991. Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology. 131(3): 387-399.
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. 1989. Organiztional demography: The differential effects of ages and tenure distribution on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal. 32: 353-376
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code