論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available
論文名稱 Title |
追尋正義的旅程:極端年代學者范乃思對當代中國的
想像 A Journey to the Just World: Peter Van Ness’ China as Scholarship of Radical Years |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
142 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2010-07-22 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2010-12-23 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
帝國主義、美國中國觀、極端年代學者、CCAS、正義、美國中國學、范乃思 Imperialism, CCAS, Justice, Peter Van Ness, American Sinology, American Images of China, Scholarship of Radical Years |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5688 次,被下載 3 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5688 times, has been downloaded 3 times. |
中文摘要 |
不論身處於哪一個時期,人們總是依照自身的需求去建構「中國」的形象。 而美國人總是懷抱著「自由中國夢想」看待中國,自以為扮演保護者和楷模的角 色。然而從越戰開始,極端年代學者認為美國是不折不扣的帝國主義侵略者。不 同於其他主張圍堵中國的學派,極端年代學者曾對中國懷抱著極高的理想性,中 國對他們而言是一個「理想化的他者」,為一正義的救世主。本文以CCAS (Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars)學者范乃思(Peter Van Ness)為主要的研究對象,輔以研究極端年代學者中部份CCAS 學者,以文本分析法和訪談 法為研究方法,「外在研究法」為主要的分析途徑,檢視其思想變遷的時代背景 以及其思想,探究其「中國觀」、「美國觀」、「正義觀」,包括其中的相互建構關 係和時代因素。研究結果發現,范乃思等一干極端年代學者於1960 年代和1970 年代,在中國對外資訊不足的情況下,受到強烈正義感和一些現實誘因的驅使, 為了批判美國而不自覺地建構出一個理想的中國形象,但這個形象與真實的中國 有著極大的落差。後來受到「中國對革命的背叛」、文革真相和天安門事件的影 響,摧毀了這個形象,也成為這群學者思想的重大轉折點,從此他們開始扮演監 督中國人權的角色。 |
Abstract |
none |
目次 Table of Contents |
第一章 緒論 1 壹、問題意識 1 貳、研究背景 2 參、文獻回顧 5 肆、章節安排 10 伍、研究方法 11 陸、研究範圍及限制 12 第二章 美國中國觀的開展、CCAS 學者與越戰 15 第一節 美國的中國觀和中國研究知識社群的起源探究:從畢治文到麥卡 錫 15 一、美國中國觀和中國研究的發展:1789 年到1911 年 15 二、費正清、美國的中國印象和當代中國學的建立:1911 年到中共崛 起 18 三、麥卡錫主義對美國學界和中國觀的影響 24 四、美國當代中國學的建立 25 第二節 青年范乃思:經歷和思想 27 第三節 越戰、學運、和CCAS 32 第三章 從帝國主義到霸權 42 第一節 范乃思反美帝前的思想脈絡 42 第二節 范乃思和CCAS 學者的正義觀和美國觀 46 一、范乃思和CCAS 學者的帝國主義觀 47 二、范乃思的美國霸權觀 52 三、范乃思如何看待美國的世界觀 59 第四章 中國革命角色的背叛 62 第一節 范乃思的中國觀:從越戰到文化大革命 62 一、范乃思如何看待中華民國(台灣) 63 二、范乃思如何看待文化大革命 67 三、范乃思的第三世界觀 70 第二節 中共對革命的背叛如何影響范乃思的中國觀 76 一、中國對革命角色的第一次背叛──尼克森與毛澤東和談 76 二、中國對革命角色的第二次背叛──改革開放 79 三、范乃思的中國觀:1984-1989 83 第三節 CCAS 學者的中國觀 85 一、CCAS 學者如何看待中國:1960 年代到1970 年代 86 二、CCAS 學者Edward Friedman 對於革命的失望和轉向 89 第五章 六四事件後,范乃思的正義觀、中國觀和美國觀 99 第一節 六四天安門事件和范乃思的人權觀點 99 第二節 范乃思的正義觀之演進 110 第三節 小結 114 第六章 結論 120 參考文獻 126 |
參考文獻 References |
壹、參考專書 【外文專書】 Axelrod, R. M. 2006. The evolution of cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Booth, K., & N. J. Wheeler. 2008. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Carnoy, Martin. 1984. The State and Political Theory, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Chatfield, Charles. 1990. An American Ordeal: the Antiwar Movement of the Vietnam Era, New York: Syracuse University Press. Chang Chun-shu, James Crump, and Rhoads Murphey (ed.), 1968. The Cultural Revolution 1967 in Review, Michigan: Center for Chinese Studies of the University of Michigan. Robert Alan Dahl, Ian Shapiro, Jose Antonio Cheibub (ed.), 2003. The Democracy Sourcebook, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Dittmer, Lowell & Samuel S. Kim eds. 1993. China's quest for national identity, New York: Cornell University Press. Fairbank, John K., 1983. Chinabound: A fifty-year Memoir, New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Foucault, Michael. 1977. Discipline and punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage. Kim, Samuel S. ed., 1998. China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium, Boulder: Westview. Li, Hongshan & Zhoahui Hong. 1998. Image, Perception and the making of U.S. –China Relations, New York: University Press of America. Ling, L.H.M. 2002. Postcolonial International Relation: Conquest and Desire Between Asia and the West, New York: Palgrave. Lutz, Jessie Gregory, 2008. Opening China: Karl F. A. Gutzlaff and Sino-Western Relations, 1827-1852, Michigan: Eerdmans Publication Company. Mackerras, Colin. 1989. Western Images of China, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Madsen, Richard. 1995. China and the American Dream, California: University of California Press. Meisner, Maurice. 1979. Mao’s China: A History of the People’s Republic, New York: The Free Press. Nathan, Andrew J. 1990. China’s Crisis: Dilemmas of Reform and Prospects for Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press. Oksenberg, Michel and Robert Oxnam ed. 1978. Dragon and Eagle: United States China Relations, Past and Future, New York: Basic Books. Park, Jae-Kyu and Melvin Gurtov eds. 1977. Southeast Asia in Transition, Seoul: Kyung Nam University Press, Institute for Far Eastern Studies. Reus-Smit, Christian ed., 2002. War With Iraq?, Canberra: Australian National University. Shambaugh, David, 1993. American Studies of Contemporary China, Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Solinger, Dorothy J. ed., 1984. Three Visions of Chinese Socialism, Boulder: Westview Press. Suez Crisis. 2009. Encyclopadia Britannica. Encyclopadia Britannica 2009 Student and Home Edition. Chicago: Encyclopadia Britannica. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists ed., 1970. China After the Cultural Revolution, New York: Vintage Books. The Pentagon Papers, 1965. The U.S. Department of Defense. Van Ness, Peter &Mel Gurtov ed. 2005. Confronting the Bush Doctrine, New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Van Ness, Peter ed. 1999. Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays from United States and Asia, New York: Routledge. ------------------. 1996. Human Rights and Democracy in China: Four Theories on Why the World Should Care, Canberra: Peace Research Centre, Australian National University. -----------------------.ed.1989.Market Reforms in Socialist Societies, Colorado: Boulder. -------------------. 1970. Revolution and Chinese Foreign Policy: Peking's Support for Wars of National Liberation, Berkeley: University of California Press. Werner, Jayne S. & Luu Doan Huynh. ed., 1993. The Vietnam War, (New York: M.E.Sharpe. Wilson, Dick ed. 1977. Mao-Tse-Tung in the Scales of History, London : Cambridge University Press. 【中文專書】 (譯著) Arendt, Hannah 著,蔡英文譯,1982。《帝國主義》,台北:聯經出版社。 Cohen, Paul A.著,林同奇譯,1991。《在中國發現歷史》,台北:稻鄉出版社。 Gleitman, Henry 著,洪蘭譯,1997。《心理學》,台北:遠流。 Isaacs, Harold R.著,于殿利、陸日宇譯,2006。《美國的中國形象》,北京:中華 書局。 --------------------著,于殿利、陸日宇譯,2005。《美國的中國形象》,新竹:花神 出版社。 McGiffert, Carola 編, 2003。《美國政治印象中的中國》,台北:國防部史政編譯 室。 Prestowitz, Clyde 著,杜默譯,2004。《美國遊戲》,台北:大塊文化。 (非譯著) 石之瑜,1999。《政治心理學》,台北:五南。 --------,1998。《宋美齡與中國》,台北:商智文化。 李歐梵,2005。《我的哈佛歲月》, 台北:二魚文化。 --------,1996。《徘徊在現代和後現代之間》,台北:正中書局。 忻劍飛,1991。《世界的中國觀》,香港:三聯書店。 金耀基等,1989。《神州悲劇的省思》,台北:正中書局。 唐賢龍,1947。《台灣事變內幕記》,南京:中國新聞出版部。 唐德剛,1998。《晚清七十年》,台北:遠流。 韋政通,2009。《毛澤東與文化大革命》,台北:立緒文化。 張世雄編,2004。《社會正義與全球化:福利與自由主義的反思》,台北:桂冠 出版公司。 洪鎌德,2000。《人的解放:21 世紀馬克思學說新探》,台北:楊智文化。 席宣、金春明,1992。《文化大革命簡史》,北京:中共黨史出版社。 陳永忠,2009。《儲安平生平與思想研究──國共不容的知識份子》,台北:秀威 資訊。 廖高賢,石之瑜,2009。《似曾相敵 : 天安門事件後在美國與台灣的中國印象》, 台北 : 國立臺灣大學政治學系中國大陸暨兩岸關係教學與研究中心。 戴國煇、葉芸芸,1992。《愛憎二二八》,台北:遠流出版社。 貳、參考論文 【外文論文】 “Asia Scholars to End the War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), 1970, pp.2, 109. Baldwin, Frank. 1972. “Patrolling the Empire: Reflections on the USS Pueblo,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 4(2), pp. 54-74. Bastid Marianne,1970. “A Triptych in Honour of the Cultural Revolution,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp.83-88. Bix, Herbert. 1968. “A Critical Review of some Anti-Communist Perspectives in American Policy Towards Asia,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(2), 1968, 2. Branfman, Fred. 1970. “Laos: No place to Hide,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(4), pp.15-46. Clubb, O. Edmund. 1969. “McCarthyism and Our Asian Policy,” “McCarthyism and our Asian Policy,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(4), pp.23-26. Craig, Campbell. 2004. “American Realism Versus American Imperialism, ”World Politics, 57(1), 143-171. Cumings, Bruce. 2000. “Eulogy for John S. Service,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 32(3), pp. 41-46. -------------------. “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies During and After Cold War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29(1), 1997, pp.2-26. Decornoy, Jacques. 1970. “Laos: The Forgotten War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp.21-33. Fairbank, John K. & James Peck, 1970. “An Exchange,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), 1970, pp. 51-70. Fairbank, John K., 1968. “Government Personnel Can Help Us and We Can Help Them,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(2), 7-12. Frederick, Cynthia. 1970. “Cambodia: ‘Operation Total Victory No.43’,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp.3-18. Friedman, Edward.1981.“Learning about China after the Revolution……for the first time!,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 13(2), pp.41-43. -----------------------.1981. “The Original Chinese Revolution Remains in Power,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 13(3), pp.42-48. -----------------------. 1979. “On Maoist Conceptualizations of the Capitalist World System,” The China Quarterly, 80, pp.806-837. -----------------------.1978. “Simon Leys Hates China; America Loves Simon Leys,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 10(3), pp.19-27. -----------------------. 1974. “Chinese Foreign Policy and American Social Science,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholar, 6(2), pp.7-12. -----------------------. 1972. “China, Pakistan, Bangladesh,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 4(1), pp.99-108. -----------------------. 1970. “Why America Fights in Asia,” Pacific Affairs, 43(2), pp. 258-267. -----------------------. 1968. “War with China and Enlightened American Newspapers,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(2), pp.3. -----------------------. 1966. “Fifteen Years of Communist China,” The China Quarterly, 25, Jan-Mar., pp. 225-227. Gunn, Anne. 1989. “‘Tell the World About Us’: The Student Movement in Shenyang, 1989,” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 24, pp. 243-258. Gurley, John G. 1970. “Capitalist and Maoist Economic Development,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp. 34-50. Harding, Harry. 1982. “From China, With Disdain: New Trends in the Study of China," Asian Survey, 22(10), 934-958. Kagan, Leigh. 1968. “A Statement of Directions,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(1), pp.1. Kagan, Richard. 1969.“McCarran’s Legacy: The Association for Asian Studies,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(4), pp. 18-22. Kaplan, Robert. 2010. “The Geography of Chinese Power,” Foreign Affairs, 22. Retrieved from MAS Ultra - School Edition database, 2010/05/23. Koen, Ross. 1969. “Two Postscripts to the McCarran Hearings,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(4), pp.27-31. Lippit, Victor. 1972. “Economic Development and Welfare in China,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 4(2), pp. 76-85. Masland, John W., 1941. “Missionary Influence upon American Far Eastern Policy,” The Pacific Historical Review, pp. 279-296. McDonald, Angus. 1970. “The Historian’s Quest: Joseph R. Levenson,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp. 71-82. Noumoff, S. J., 1970. “Asia Scholars to End the War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp.2, 109。 Paterson, Thomas G. 1986. “The Origins of Cold War”, Magazine of History, 2(1), 5-9. Peck, James. 1969. “The Roots of Rhetoric: The Professional Ideology of America's China Watchers”, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(1), 59-67. ---------------. 1969. “Reflections on the Implications of the Vietnam Caucus”, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1(1), 1968, pp.2-4. Pfeffer, Richard M. 1970. “Revolution and Rule: Where Do We Go From Here?,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(3), pp. 88-96. “Restoration of China’s Lawful Rights in the United Nations,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(1), 1969, pp. 32-33. Riskin, Carl. 1970. “China’s Economic Growth: Leap or Creep?,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 2(2), pp. 19-24. Van Ness, Peter. et al. 1989. “Who We Are in 1989: East Asia,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 21(2), pp. 192-195. Van Ness, Peter. 2009.“The Problem with George: US Hegemony in Disarray,” Global Asia, 4(1), pp.52-53. -------------------. 2008. “Designing a Mechanism for Multilateral Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia,” Asian Perspective, 32(4), pp. 107-126. -------------------. 2007. “Reconciliation Between China and Japan: the Key Link to Security Cooperation in East Asia,” Asian Perspective, 31(1), pp.7-13 -------------------. 2005. “Why the Six Party Talks Should Succeed,” Asian Perspective, 29(2), pp. 231-246. -------------------. 2004. “China’s Response to the Bush Doctrine,” World Policy Journal, winter, pp.38-47. -------------------. 2003. “The Bush Doctrine in Asia: A Brief Introduction,” Asian Perspective, 27(4), pp.5-7. -------------------. 2002. “Hegemony, not Anarchy: Why China and Japan are not Balancing US Unipolar Power,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2, pp. 131-150. -------------------. 1998. “Alternative US Strategies with respect to China and the Implications for Vietnam,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 20(2), pp. 154-170. -------------------. 1996.“Addressing the Human Rights Issue in Sino-American Relations,” Journal of International Affairs, pp.309-331. -------------------. 1996. “Competing Hegemons,” The China Journal, 36, pp. 125-128. -------------------. 1995. “Introduction: Values, History, and Power,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 27(4), pp. 3-5. -------------------. 1994. “Australia, Asia, and Human Rights Diplomacy,” Current Affairs Bulletin, 70(7), Dec-Jan, pp. 27-29. -------------------. “Whatever Happened to Bill Clinton’s Human Rights Policy?” Current Affairs Bulletin, 71(1), 1994, pp. 39-41. -------------------. 1992. “Human Rights and International Relations in East Asia,” Asian Studies Review, 16(1), pp.43-52. -------------------. 1986. “New Zealand: What is the Problem?,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 18 (2), pp. 88-89. -------------------. 1984.“The Mosher Affair,” The Wilson Quarterly, 8(1), pp160-172. -------------------. 1974. “China and the Third World,” Current History, Sept, pp.106-109, 133. ------------------------. 1971. “Mao Tse-tung and ‘Revolutionary Self-Reliance,” Problems of Communism, 20, January/April, pp. 68-74. -------------------. 1966. “Quarterly Chronicles: Sino-Soviet Relations,” The China Quarterly, 26, 174-176. Walt, Stephen M. 1998. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories,” Foreign Policy, 110. 【外文研討會論文】 Black, Amy E. 2004 September. “With God on Our Side: Religion in George W. Bush’s Foreign Policy Speeches,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association: Chicago, Illinois. 【中文期刊,論文】 石之瑜,1996。〈歐美中國觀緣起探略〉,《美歐月刊》,11(11),頁106-120。 李明,2007。〈韓戰期間的美國對華政策〉,《國際關係學報》,23,頁57-90。 李哲賢,1999。〈美國漢學研究的概況〉,《文理通識學術論壇》,1,頁2-4。 艾萍,2008。〈衛三畏與美國早期中國學研究〉,《淮北煤炭師範學院學報(哲 學社會科學版)》,29(4),頁54-58。 韋磊,2007。〈費正清抗戰期間來華對其中國研究的影響〉,《新視野》,1, 頁103-104。 高湧泉,2010。〈改變歷史的人〉,《科學人》,101,頁32。 張朋園,2007。〈黎安友〈中國研究四十載〉讀後〉,《思想》,5,頁53-62 。 陳芳明,〈中共對二二八事件史觀的政策性轉變〉,《中國論壇》,31 卷5 期,頁37-44。 陳知青,1993。〈陳知青先生訪問記錄〉,《口述歷史》,4,頁99-111。 黃紀男,1993。〈黃紀男先生訪問記錄〉,《口述歷史》,4,頁75-90。 黃瑞霖、黃瑞峰,1993。〈黃瑞霖、黃瑞峰兄弟訪問記錄〉,《口述歷史》,4,頁 379-390。 楊靜林,2007。〈略論費正清對美國中國學研究的貢獻與影響〉,《四川教育學院 學報》,23(7),頁45-47。 黎安友,2007。〈中國研究四十載〉,《思想》,5,頁7-52。 【中文學位論文】 李圭之,2007。〈近代日本的東洋概念──以中國與歐美為經緯〉,碩士論文:中 山大學。 吳俊彥,2008。〈亨利魯斯(1898-1967):美國世紀理念與時代雜誌的中國意 象〉,碩士論文:成功大學。 洪雅筠,2010。〈來自德國的彝族企業家-王海(Thomas Heberer)與德國中國 研究的轉型〉,碩士論文:中山大學。 許韋婷,2010。〈悲劇或鬧劇?論Maurice Meisner 眼中的中國〉,碩士論文:台 灣大學。 肆、參考網站 “IES Remembers Ernst Bernard Haas,” Institute of European Studies, Retrieved from http://ies.berkeley.edu/enews/articles/old/haasmemorial.html, 2010/03/04。 Van Ness, Peter. 2009. “Peter Van Ness Interview”,台灣大學政治系中國大陸研究 中心網站訪談稿,http://politics.soc.ntu.edu.tw/RAEC/act02.php 將發表 ------------------. 2009. “Stick to the Six Party Talks on North Korea,” eastasiaforum.org, retrieve from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/06/23/stick-to-the-six-party-talks-on-north-korea/, 2009/11/14. ------------------. 2009. “Under Obama, Realism ain’t so Realistic Anymore,” eastasiaforum.org, retrieve from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/06/03/under-obama-realism-aint-so-realistic-any more/, 2009/11/14. ------------------. “Torture and American Leadership,” eastasiaforum.org, retrieve from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/05/13/torture-and-american-leadership/ , 2009/11/14。 〈人類安全〉,聯合國教科文組織網站,檢索日期2010/04/28 從 http://www.unesco.org/bpi/pdf/memobpi02_security_zh.pdf 〈各界聯名致函中國國家主席胡錦濤要求釋放劉曉波〉,Human Rights Watch 網 站,檢索日期2010/06/10,從http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2008/12/22-0 〈亞洲合作安全與和解策略國際工作坊會議〉,中興大學網站,檢索日期 2010/04/25,自http://gioip.nchu.edu.tw/app/news.php?Sn=207 朱浤源,〈二二八事件真相還原〉,《海峽評論》,206,檢索日期2010/5/16, 從http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/206-7118-二二八+二二八.html 陳建仲,〈偏頗的獨派二二八史觀埋下族群矛盾的種子〉,《海峽評論》,198, 檢索日期2010/5/16,從http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/198-1357-二二八 +二二八.html 陳毓鈞,〈美國.二二八與台獨〉,《海峽評論》,184,檢索日期2010/5/16,從 http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/SRM/184-1006-二二八+二二八.html |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.220.1.239 論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開 Your IP address is 18.220.1.239 This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |