Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1225102-164341 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1225102-164341
論文名稱
Title
建構人權:歷史脈絡,意義分殊,權力競逐
Constructing Human Rights:Historical Contexts,Diverse Meanings,Competing Powers
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
145
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2002-12-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2002-12-25
關鍵字
Keywords
詮釋、世代、對話、人權、亞洲價值
Asian Values, Interpretation, Generations, Human Rights, Dialogue
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5732 次,被下載 5214
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5732 times, has been downloaded 5214 times.
中文摘要
摘要

本文主要寫作動機是期望以一個歷史脈絡與意義流變的角度來理解有關於人權概念的種種爭議,而之所以選擇歷史面向來作為解析的依據,主要是因為所謂的人權概念並非是一套有如自然現象般的事物,而是一種人為的產品。換句話說,人權概念本質上便是一組可以操作的論述機制、知識體系以及詮釋系統;質言之,人權的語彙是由人所編寫的,人權的內容是由人所賦予的,而人權的體制更是由人所創建的。如此一來,人權概念的流變便不會是有如自然現象般的無可控制,而人權概念的定義也不會有什麼所謂的歷史的必然。據此,本文希望達到四個目的:第一、整理人權概念在時間脈絡中的意義流變,以試圖提出一個主張,亦即:人權概念並非是如同自然天成般的東西,而是在不同的時空脈絡之下,會有其不同的詮釋內容;第二、處理人權概念之中的幾個辯論議題,諸如「證成人權概念之範圍及可信度的基礎何在」、「普遍主義」與「相對主義」之爭、「個人人權」與「集體人權」之爭以及「人權」與「主權」之間的辯證關係,以便為人權概念的辯論提供一個立足點;第三、立基於人權概念釐清的基礎之上,進一步探討「亞洲價值」的內容與意涵,並指陳「亞洲價值」在理論上的矛盾與不足;最後,筆者將以「對話」概念為依據,探索消解人權議題在概念爭議上的可能出路。


Abstract
Abstract

This essay elaborates in a historical perspective on some controversies concerning the human rights conception. The reason why I take a historical perspective as my analytic standpoint lies in the essence of the human rights conception which is recognized as a human-made thing, rather than a natural phenomenon. In other words, the human rights conception is a kind of interpretation, knowledge and narrative. In this essay, I will firstly examine the main changes of philosophical and social conditions influencing the development and evolution of human rights conceptions. After a brief introduction of human rights conception, the following work of this essay is premised on the questions of what might be broadly termed “universalism vs. relativism”, “individual rights vs. collective rights” and “sovereignty vs. human rights”. Accordingly, it is concerned with focusing scholarly attention on the place of diverse values and cultures in contemporary international society. Besides, I will take “Asian value” as an object to embody those controversies mentioned above. Briefly speaking, there are four premises on which the “Asian value” is founded, namely “priority of the socio-economic rights over the politico-civil rights”, “priority of the cultural particularity over the universality of human rights”, “priority of individual rights over collective rights”, and “priority of sovereignty over human rights”. Finally, I will examine the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. It is argued that the notion of the “fusion of horizons”, which Gadamer derives from the linguistic and nature and historicity of human existence, provides fruitful responses to those competing opinions outlined above. I suggest that an application of Gadamer’s inspiring ideas opens the way to a more convergent and inclusive human rights conception.


目次 Table of Contents
第一章 導論∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙1
第一節 研究動機與目的∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙2
第二節 研究方法與章節架構∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙10

第二章 人權概念的世代演變∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙13
第一節 第一代的公民政治權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙14
第二節 第二代的經濟社會權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙26
第三節 第三代的集體與發展權利∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙36

第三章 人權概念的核心論述與後設基礎∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙49
第一節 什麼是權利?∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙49
第二節 普遍主義與相對主義∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙57
第一項 普遍主義的人權觀-人性尊嚴與國際共識∙∙∙∙∙∙∙59
第二項 相對主義的人權觀-文化脈絡與特定評價∙∙∙∙∙∙65
第三節 個人人權與集體人權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙73
第一項 個人人權-自我完成與多元價值∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙74
第二項 集體人權-社群價值與集體發展∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙80
第四節 主權與人權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙86
第一項 以人權為目的∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙87
第二項 以主權為手段∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙89
第三項 小結∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙91

第四章 亞洲價值的內涵與反省∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙94
第一節 亞洲價值的內涵∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙95
第一項 「亞洲價值」的興起背景與社會脈絡∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙96
第二項 「亞洲價值」的主張∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙98
第二節 亞洲價值的反省∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙107
第一項 經濟社會權利必須與公民政治權利齊頭並進∙∙∙∙∙108
第二項 文化相對主義的不足與謬誤∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙110
第三項 社群與個人的調和共存∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙113
第四項 對於主權概念的濫用∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙115

第五章 理解、交談與融合:不斷演進與擴大的人權概念∙∙∙∙∙118
第一節 哲學詮釋學的內容∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙120
第二節 哲學詮釋學對於人權概念建構的可能啟發∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙128

第六章 結論∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙132

參考文獻∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙135
參考文獻 References
參考文獻 中文部分
石之瑜,1995,人性與中國主權。台北:世界書局。初版
朱鋒,2000,人權與國際關係。北京:北京大學出版社。初版
江宜樺,2001,自由民主的理路。台北:聯經。初版
杜鋼建與宋鋼,1997,「人權與中國文化之關聯-論語的四條蹊徑與新仁學的四項原則」。收於戴大為(Michael Davis) 編,鄧文正 譯,1997,從法律、哲學和政治觀點看人權與中國價值。牛津大學出版社。頁39-57。
林火旺,1995,「自由主義可否建立一個政治社群?」,收於陳秀容、江宜樺 主編,政治社群。台北:中央研究院,頁249-270。
林天河,1998,「道德衝突與政治共識」,收於蕭高彥、蘇文流 主編,多元主義。台北:中央研究院,頁79-99。
李詠怡,1997,「人權與非西方價值」,收於戴大為(Michael Davis) 編,鄧文正 譯,從法律、哲學和政治觀點看人權與中國價值。牛津大學出版社,頁77-98。
李澤厚,1996,批判哲學的批判-康德評述。台北:三民書局
高宣揚,1998,當代社會理論(上)(下)。台北:五南。初版
許國賢,1995,「民主與個人自主性」,收於張福建、蘇文流 編,民主理論:古典與現代。台北:中央研究院,頁277-299。
張鼎國,1998,「理解,詮釋與對話:從哲學詮釋學的實踐觀點論多元主義」,收於蕭高彥、蘇文流 編,多元主義。台北:中央研究院,頁307-335。
張福建,1995,「寬容的意義及其限度」,收於張福建、蘇文流 編,民主理論:古典與現代。台北:中央研究院,頁249-275。
張福建,蘇文流 主編,1995,民主理論:古典與現代。台北:中央研究院。
張佛泉,1993,自由與人權。台北:台灣商務印書館。初版
張灝,1992,幽暗意識與民主傳統。台北:聯經。修訂二版
陳思賢,1995,「激進輝格與保守輝格的民主理念:潘恩與柏克的對比」,收於張福建、蘇文流 主編,民主理論:古典與現代。台北:中央研究院,頁21-49。
陳思賢,1998,西洋政治思想史:近代英國篇。台北:五南。初版
陳秀容、江宜樺 主編,1995,政治社群。台北:中央研究院。
陳秀容,1995a,「第三世界人權觀念的探討:1986年聯合國『發展權宣言』的初步分析」,收於張福建、蘇文流 主編,民主理論:古典與現代。台北:中央研究院,頁249-275。
陳秀容,1995b,「社群的互動與人權:關於社群權利的一種思考」,收於陳秀容、江宜樺 主編,政治社群。台北:中央研究院,頁315-344。
陳秀容,1997,「近代人權觀念的轉變:一個社會生態觀點的分析」。人文及社會科學集刊,第九卷:第二期,頁101-132。
蕭高彥、蘇文流 主編,1998,多元主義。台北:中央研究院。
戴大為(Michael Davis) 編,鄧文正 譯,1997,從法律、哲學和政治觀點看人權與中國價值。牛津大學出版社。
Aristotle,顏一 編,1999,亞理士多德選集:政治學篇。北京:中國人民大學出版社
D’Entrèves, A. P.,李日章 譯,1984,自然法:法律哲學導論。台北:聯經
Fukuyama, Francis,李永幟 譯,1993,歷史之終結與最後一人。台北:聯經。初版
Palmer, Richard,嚴平 譯,1992,詮釋學。台北:桂冠。初版
Roberts, Clayton and David Roberts,賈士蘅 譯,1986,英國史(上,下冊)。台北:五南。
Taylor, Charles,程東 譯,2001,現代性之隱憂。北京:中央編譯出版社。初版
參考文獻 英文部分
Adler, Emanuel and Beverly Crawford (eds.) 1994 Progress in Post-Cold War International Relations. New York:Columbia University Press.
Adler, Emanuel. Beverly Crawford and Jack Donnelly 1994 “Defining and Conceptualizing Progress in International Relations,” in Adler and Crawford (eds.) Progress in Post-Cold War International Relations. New York:Columbia University Press.
American Anthropological Association 1947 “Statement on Human Rights,” American Anthropologist No.47, pp. 539-543.
Amin, Samir 1991 “The State and Development,” in Held (ed.) 1991 Political Theory Today. London:Polity Press. pp. 305-329.
Anderson, Benedict 1991 Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York:Verso.
An-Na’im, Allad 1992 Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives:A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
Arblaster, A. 1984 The Rise and Decline of Western Liberalism. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
Ashley, Richard K. and R. B. J. Walker 1990 “Speaking the Language of Exile:Dissident Thought in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 259-268.
Avineri, Shlomo and De-Shalt, Avner (eds.) 1992 Communitarianism and Individualism. New York:Oxford University Press.
Barkin, Samuel 1998 “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms,” Millennium:Journal of International Studies Vol.27, No.2, pp.229-252.
Bauer, Joanne R. and Daniel A. Bell (eds.), 1999 The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Baylis, John and Steve Smith (eds.) 1999 The Globalization of World Politics. New York:Oxford University Press.
Beitz, Charles 1991 “Sovereignty and Morality in International Affairs,” in Held (ed.) 1991 Political Theory Today. London:Polity Press. pp. 236-254.
Beitz, Charles 2001 “Human Rights as a Common Concern,” American Political Science Review Vol.95, No.2, pp.269-282.
Bell, Daniel 1996 “The East Asian Challenge to Human Rights:Reflections on an East West dialogue,” Human Rights Quarterly Vol.18, No.3, pp.641-667.
Bell, Daniel 1998 “The Limits of Liberal Justice,” Political Theory Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 557-582.
Bell, Daniel 2000 East Meets West:Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah 1969 Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, Richard 1983 Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Oxford:Basil Blackwell
Bernstein, Richard 2001 “To Butt In or Not in Human Rights: The Gap Narrows,” New York Times 4 August.
Booth, Ken and Steve Smith (eds.) 1995 International Relations Theory Today, University Park:The Pennsylvania University Press.
Booth, Ken 1995 “Dare not to Know: International Relations Theory versus the Future,” in Booth and Smith (eds.) International Relations Theory Today, University Park:The Pennsylvania University, Pp.328-50.
Booth, Ken 1995a “Human Wrongs and International Relations,” International Affairs Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 103-126.
Booth, Ken 1996 “75 years on: rewriting the subject’s past- reinventing its future,” in Smith, Booth and Zalewski (eds.) 1996 International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Chris 1999 “Human Rights,” in Baylis and Smith (eds.) The Globalization of World Politics, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 469-482.
Buergenthal, Thomas 1988 International Human Rights in a Nutshell. Minnesota:West Publishing
Bull, Hedley 1974 The Anarchical Society:A Study in World Politics. New York:Columbia University Press.
Burnham, James 1941 The Managerial Revolution:What Is Happening in the World. New York:John Day Company.
Burton, Sandra 1993 “Society vs. The Individual,” Interview with Lee Kuan Yew, Time, June 14. Pp. 20-21.
Canavan, Francis 1987 “Thomas Paine,” in Strauss and Cropsey (eds.) History of Political Philosophy. Chicago:Chicago University Press. Pp. 680-686.
Chang, Joseph 1999 “A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China,” in Bauer and Bell, (eds.) 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. pp. 212-237.
Charvet, Jofn 1998 “The Possibility of a Cosmopolitan Ethical Order Based on the Idea of Universal Human Rights,” Millennium:Journal of International Studies Vol.27, No.3, pp.523-541.
Crawford, James (ed.) 1992 The Rights of Peoples. Oxford:Clarendon Press.
Crick, Bernard 1987 Socialism. Buckingham:Open University Press.
Crittenden, Jack 1992 Beyond Individualism:Reconstituting the Liberal Self. New York:Oxford University Press.
de Bary, Theodore 1998 Asian Values and Human Rights – A Confucian Communitarian Perspective. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Donnelly, Jack 1984 “The ‘Right to Development’:How not to Link Human Rights and Development,” in C. E. Welch and R. I. Meltzer (eds.) Human Rights and Development in Africa. Albany:State University of New York Press.
Donnelly, Jack 1984 “Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly No. 6, pp. 400-419.
Donnelly, Jack 1983 “The Human Rights Priorities of the UN:A Rejoinder to Alston,” International Organization Vol.37, No.3, pp.547-550.
Donnelly, Jack 1989 Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. New York:Cornell University Press.
Donnelly, Jack 1999 “Human Rights and Asian Values:A defense of ‘Western’ Universalism,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.) The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald 1977 Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Evans, Graham and Jeffrey Newnham (eds.) 1998 Dictionary of International Relations. London:Penguin Books.
Falk, Richard 1995 On Human Governance:Toward a New Global Politics. Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Fay, Brian 1975 Social Theory and Political Practice. London:Unwin Hyman.
Flathman, Richard 1976 The Practice of Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Freeden, Michael 1991 Rights. Buckingham:Open University Press.
Frey, R. G. (ed.) 1984, Utility and Rights. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall 2000 Truth and Method. New York:Continuum
Galbraith, John K. 1977 The Age of Uncertainty. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
Geertz, Clifford 1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. New York:Basic Books.
Geertz, Clifford 1993 Local Knowledge. New York:Basic Books.
Geertz, Clifford 1984 “Distinguished Lecture:Anti Anuti-Relativism,” American Anthropologist Vol.86, pp.263-278.
Giddens, Anthony 1998 The Third Way:The Renewal of Social Democracy. London:Polity Press.
Gilpin, Robert 1987 The Political Economy of International Relations. New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Gladney, Dru C. 1994 “Representing Nationality in China: Refiguring Majority/ Minority Identities,” The Journal of Asian Studies 53: 1, pp.92-123.
Goldwin, Robert A. 1987 “John Locke,” in Strauss and Cropsey (eds.) History of Political Philosophy. Chicago:Chicago University Press. Pp.476-512.
Gourevitch, Peter A. 1986 Politics in Hard Times:Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
Gutman, Amy (ed.) 2001 Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen 1970 Toward a Rational Society:Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Translated by Jeremy Shapiro. Boston:Beacon Press
Harris, Marvin 1971 Cultures, Man, and Nature:An Introduction to General Anthropology. New York:Crowell.
Hassner, Pierre 1987 “Immanuel Kant,” in Strauss and Cropsey (eds.) History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Pp.581-621.
Held, David 1987 Models of Democracy. California:Stanford University Press.
Held, David (ed.) 1991 Political Theory Today. London:Polity Press.
Heller, Agnes 1991 “The Concept of the political Revisited,” in Held (ed.) Political Theory Today. Oxford: Blackwell
Henkin, Louis 1978 The Rights of Man Today. Colorado:Westerview Press.
Henkin, Louis 1981 “International Human Rights as Rights,” in Pennock and Chapman (eds.) Human Rights, New York:New York University Press.
Huang, Mab 1999 “Debating Asian Values:Saying Too Little or Saying Too Much?,” 東吳政治學報 No. 10, pp. 1-30.
Humphrey, J. 1979 “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights:Its History, Impact and Juridical Character,” in B. G. Ramcharan (ed.) Human Rights:Thirty Years After the Universal Declaration. Hague:Martinus.
Huntington, Samuel J. 1993 “The Clash of Civilization?,” Foreign Affairs Vol.72, No.3, pp.22-49.
Ignatieff, Michael 2002 “Is the Human Rights Era Ending?,” New York Times 5 February.
Ignatieff, Michael 2001 “The Attacks on Human Rights,” Foreign Affairs Vol.8, No.6, pp.102-116.
Ignatieff, Michael 2001 “Human Rights as Idolatry,” in Gutman (ed.) 2001, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Jones, Peter 1994 Rights. London:MacMillan.
Kamenka, Eugene 1992 “Human Rights, Peoples’ Rights,” in Crawford (ed.) The Rights of Peoples. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Pp. 127-140.
Kim, Samuel 1979 China, the United Nations, and World Order. New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Kofman, Eleonore and Gillian Youngs (eds.) 1996 Globalization:Theory and Practice. New York:Pinter Press.
La queur, Walter and Barry Rubbin (eds.) 1990 The Human Rights Reader. New York:Meridian Book.
Lawson, Edward (ed.) 1991 The Encyclopedia of Human Rights. New York:Taylor & Francis.
Lichtheim, , George 1980 A Short History of Socialism. England:Fontana.
Locke, John 1960 Two Treaties of Government, Peter Laslett (ed.) Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1984 After Virtue. Second Edition Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press.
Macpherson, C. B. 1972 The Real World of Democracy. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Makinson, David 1992 “Rights of Peoples:A Logician’s Point of View,” in Crawford (ed.) The Rights of Peoples. New York:Oxford University Press. pp. 69-92.
McClellend, J. S. 1996 A History of Western Political Thought. New York:Routledge.
Mill, John S. John Gray (ed.) 1991 On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Mulhall, Stephen and Swift, Adam 1992 Liberals and Communitarians. Oxfords: Blackwell Publishers.
Nickel, James 1987 Making Sense of Human Rights:Philosophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. California:University of California Press.
Oldfield, Adrian 1990 Citizenship and Community:Civic Republicanism and the Modern World. London:Routledge.
O’Neill, Onora 1991 “Transnational Justice,” in Held (ed.) 1991. Political Theory Today, London:Polity Press. pp. 276-304
Paine, Thomas 1989 Political Writing, Bruce Kuklick (ed.) Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Pennock, Ronald and John Chapman (eds.) 1981 Human Rights, New York:New York University Press.
Rawls, John 2000 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Renteln, Alison Dundes 1990 International Human Rights:Universalism Versus Relativism. California:Sage Publication
Rich, Roland 1992 “The Right to Development:A Right of Peoples?,” in Crawford (ed.) The Rights of Peoples. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Pp. 39-54.
Sandel, Michael 1982 Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya 1999 “Human Rights and Economical Achievements,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.) 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Pp. 88-99.
Shapcott, Richard 1994 “Conversation and Coexistence:Gadamer and the Interpretation of International Society,” Millennium:Journal of International Studies Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 57-83.
Smith, Steve. Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.) 1996 International Theory:Positivism and Beyond. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Leo 1965 Natural Right and History. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Strauss, Leo and Joseph Cropsey (eds.) 1987 History of Political Thought. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Strayer, Joseph and Hans W. Gatzke 1979 The Mainstream of Civilization. New York:Harcourt Brace.
Sumner, L. W. 1984 “Rights Denaturalized,” in Frey (ed.) Utility and Rights. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press. Pp.20-41.
Tatsuo, Inoue 1999 “Liberal Democracy and Asian Orientalism,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.) 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Pp. 27-59.
Taylor, Charles 1999 “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus of Human Rights,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.) 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Pp. 124-144.
Tickner, Ann 1995 “Re-visioning Security,” in Booth and Smith (eds.) International Relations Theory Today (University Park: The Pennsylvania University). Pp.175-97.
Tilley, John J. 1998 “Cultural Relativism, Universalism, and the Burden of Proff,” Millennium:Journal of International Studies Vol.27, No.2, pp.275-297.
Tönnies, Ferdinand 1955 Community and Association (Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft). Translated and Supplemented by Charles P. Loomis. London:Routledge & Paul.
Vincent, John 1986 Human Rights and International Relations. New York:Cambridgge University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy 1993 Liberal Rights:Collected Papers, 1981-1991. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Welch, C. E. and R. I. Meltzer (eds.) 1984 Human Rights and Development in Africa. Albany:State University of New York Press.
Welch, C. E. 1984 “Human Rights as a Problem in Contemporary Africa,” in Welch and Meltzer (eds.) Human Rights and Development in Africa. Albany:State University of New York Press.
Williams, Marc. 1996. “Rethinking Sovereignty,” in Eleonore Kofman and Gillian Youngs, eds., 1996, Globalization:Theory and Practice. New York:Pinter. Pp.109-122.
Wilson, Richard A. (ed.) 1997 Human Rights, Culture and Context-Anthropological Perspective. London:Pluto Press.
Wilson, Richard A. 1997 “Human Rights, Culture and Context:An Introduction,” in Wilson (ed.) 1997, Human Rights Culture and Context-Anthropological Perspective. London:Pluto Press.
Yasuaki, Onuma 1999 “Toward an Intercivilizational Approach to Human Rughts,” in Bauer and Bell (eds.) 1999, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. pp. 103-123.
Zakaria, Fareed 1994 “Culture is Destiny:A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew,” Foreign Affairs Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 109-126.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code